|
On November 27 2011 05:10 Match wrote: Liking Kitaman's plan. Palmar was my first choice for mayor and since he's probably getting it I'm switching my vote to Kitaman to make him sheriff.
He doesn't have a plan that he is posted. What are you talking about?
|
srs Vote BC. hes obvious town this game lol
|
On November 27 2011 05:10 Match wrote: Liking Kitaman's plan. Palmar was my first choice for mayor and since he's probably getting it I'm switching my vote to Kitaman to make him sheriff.
What plan? You are mafia.
Annul is mafia and after his last-minute push failed his fellow mafia member kitaman decided to start his last minute push.
Vote sinani206 or BloodyC0bbler. All other candidates are mafia.
|
On November 27 2011 05:18 Serejai wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 05:10 Match wrote: Liking Kitaman's plan. Palmar was my first choice for mayor and since he's probably getting it I'm switching my vote to Kitaman to make him sheriff. What plan? You are mafia. Annul is mafia and after his last-minute push failed his fellow mafia member kitaman decided to start his last minute push. Vote sinani206 or BloodyC0bbler. All other candidates are mafia. Wait really? Vote Sinani206?
You have read his posts right? I would make a better Mayor and this is my first game....
|
On November 27 2011 05:20 Benjef wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 05:18 Serejai wrote:On November 27 2011 05:10 Match wrote: Liking Kitaman's plan. Palmar was my first choice for mayor and since he's probably getting it I'm switching my vote to Kitaman to make him sheriff. What plan? You are mafia. Annul is mafia and after his last-minute push failed his fellow mafia member kitaman decided to start his last minute push. Vote sinani206 or BloodyC0bbler. All other candidates are mafia. Wait really? Vote Sinani206? You have read his posts right? I would make a better Mayor and this is my first game.... Yes but you're not a Veteran
And I mean honestly, there's no real reason to post too much on day 1 except for the standard blending in. A lot of the trolling veterans will start playing seriously once the game thins out a bit. And the logic in his substantial posts check out.
|
On November 27 2011 05:20 Benjef wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 05:18 Serejai wrote:On November 27 2011 05:10 Match wrote: Liking Kitaman's plan. Palmar was my first choice for mayor and since he's probably getting it I'm switching my vote to Kitaman to make him sheriff. What plan? You are mafia. Annul is mafia and after his last-minute push failed his fellow mafia member kitaman decided to start his last minute push. Vote sinani206 or BloodyC0bbler. All other candidates are mafia. Wait really? Vote Sinani206? You have read his posts right? I would make a better Mayor and this is my first game....
You'd rather people vote for the mafia candidates? Aside from the two I mentioned, all other candidates look extremely scummy and all have support of people who are extremely scummy. Coincidentally, these scummy players all dislike sinani and cobbler also.
So, either sinani and cobbler are town and the rest are mafia... or sinani and cobbler are mafia and everyone else is town. Which seems more likely to you?
This is clearly a mafia-controlled election and whether or not sinani would make a good mayor is irrelevant if he's one of only two potential townies running in the race.
|
On November 27 2011 05:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 05:01 supersoft wrote: Why don't you post any scumreads you have, BC? because a scum read that is currently based on day 1 analysis is not solid enough. It instead is a list of players who seem off to you based on gut reads. The only one I will mention as I have been directly confronting is syllo. His play is spotty, but its day 1. Anyone who has directly proposed the town from trying to organize how to act I believe is suspect but most people have not given me enough reason to push their lynch at this point.
Lynch supersoft or kenpachi and you have my vote. I don't always agree with serejai, but when I do, it's that supersoft is scum.
On November 26 2011 20:37 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2011 20:32 intrigue wrote:On November 26 2011 19:32 supersoft wrote:On November 26 2011 19:28 tree.hugger wrote: Hey hey everyone, this is awkward timing, I'm in Sweden for Dreamhack (this is easily verifiable) and I'm having to run everywhere all day. I'll be back tomorrow probably, but I obviously need to explain my inactivity. vote yourself, dont get modkilled. We will take care of you tomorrow. ;-) who's "we"? and by "take care" do you mean you'll keep him safe? (if so why?) or is it a euphemism for killing him, because you're mafia? "we" are the more experienced players. taking care is something like this: Show nested quote +On November 26 2011 19:25 supersoft wrote:On November 26 2011 19:19 vaderseven wrote: hum a typical day.
no idea really how to play this cuz of the sheer size of this...
I don't like several posts but I can't actually say its beyond the fact that I really dislike some of the post styles I am seeing BUT ITS DAY 1 SO THINGS MIGHT LEVEL OUT.
I am not used to being forced into a vote (seems like a TL mafia thing over other places i've played) so I am going to have to vote for myself simply because I am stuck going 'but if' everytime I try to see if I could get behind someone.
I mainly dont buy into the the top two vote leaders for this mayor race and don't want to 'not vote' cuz that is against the rules.
okay, I understand, that you don't want to dig through all this. But I got a little job for you to do: Can you please filter prplhz, erandorr and Youngminii and tell us what you think about them? Would be great. Thanks.
Screams agenda.
Also let me analyze kenpachi.
On November 26 2011 08:13 Kenpachi wrote: NEVER lynch Sinani. Thats like lynching me. and town loses when i get lynched
All done!
|
On November 27 2011 05:09 syllogism wrote: Hi toad are you scum? 1. no 2. because I changed my vote? Because I'm unsure who to vote for? Because I think kita might be an option as well? Because I'm not voteing sandro although you want me to?
If you answer the 2nd one I'm happy to explain the reasoning behind it.
|
On November 27 2011 05:26 bumatlarge wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 05:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On November 27 2011 05:01 supersoft wrote: Why don't you post any scumreads you have, BC? because a scum read that is currently based on day 1 analysis is not solid enough. It instead is a list of players who seem off to you based on gut reads. The only one I will mention as I have been directly confronting is syllo. His play is spotty, but its day 1. Anyone who has directly proposed the town from trying to organize how to act I believe is suspect but most people have not given me enough reason to push their lynch at this point. Lynch supersoft or kenpachi and you have my vote. I don't always agree with serejai, but when I do, it's that supersoft is scum. Show nested quote +On November 26 2011 20:37 supersoft wrote:On November 26 2011 20:32 intrigue wrote:On November 26 2011 19:32 supersoft wrote:On November 26 2011 19:28 tree.hugger wrote: Hey hey everyone, this is awkward timing, I'm in Sweden for Dreamhack (this is easily verifiable) and I'm having to run everywhere all day. I'll be back tomorrow probably, but I obviously need to explain my inactivity. vote yourself, dont get modkilled. We will take care of you tomorrow. ;-) who's "we"? and by "take care" do you mean you'll keep him safe? (if so why?) or is it a euphemism for killing him, because you're mafia? "we" are the more experienced players. taking care is something like this: On November 26 2011 19:25 supersoft wrote:On November 26 2011 19:19 vaderseven wrote: hum a typical day.
no idea really how to play this cuz of the sheer size of this...
I don't like several posts but I can't actually say its beyond the fact that I really dislike some of the post styles I am seeing BUT ITS DAY 1 SO THINGS MIGHT LEVEL OUT.
I am not used to being forced into a vote (seems like a TL mafia thing over other places i've played) so I am going to have to vote for myself simply because I am stuck going 'but if' everytime I try to see if I could get behind someone.
I mainly dont buy into the the top two vote leaders for this mayor race and don't want to 'not vote' cuz that is against the rules.
okay, I understand, that you don't want to dig through all this. But I got a little job for you to do: Can you please filter prplhz, erandorr and Youngminii and tell us what you think about them? Would be great. Thanks. Screams agenda. Also let me analyze kenpachi. Show nested quote +On November 26 2011 08:13 Kenpachi wrote: NEVER lynch Sinani. Thats like lynching me. and town loses when i get lynched All done!
I won't get mayor so I can't say I will day 1 lynch either of them. If supersoft continues playing as he is I can easily see myself pushing his lynch/vig shoot him however.
|
Voting for sinani is so unimaginably bad. No offense to him, but he is a bad player, his role is already known assuming he isn't lying and that role is awful for mayor/sheriff and scum knowing the role of the sheriff is bad as then they don't have to worry about roleblocking him and such.
|
Mafia are praying on the fact there are so many new players in the game who will simply bandwagon on to a candidate. You think half the people in this game are going to read 81 pages to make a decision? No. They all voted Palmar or sandro because they were vocal early on and likely won't be back to change their votes. This is also why Palmar has left the thread after securing all the newbie votes.
|
On November 27 2011 05:27 Toadesstern wrote:1. no 2. because I changed my vote? Because I'm unsure who to vote for? Because I think kita might be an option as well? Because I'm not voteing sandro although you want me to? If you answer the 2nd one I'm happy to explain the reasoning behind it. Yes, you should be voting for sandroba if you think I'm town. While BC is somewhat correct in that people should form their own opinions, a significant part of mafia is knowing who to support when you are unsure as to what to do.
|
On November 27 2011 05:29 syllogism wrote: Voting for sinani is so unimaginably bad. No offense to him, but he is a bad player, his role is already known assuming he isn't lying and that role is awful for mayor/sheriff and scum knowing the role of the sheriff is bad as then they don't have to worry about roleblocking him and such.
Stop calling other players bad. You aren't gods gift to mafia so stop attacking him. You have opted to be one of the most ill behaved players in this game. Cut it out. Veteran may or may not be the best role to run for mayor but experience in the game is key. You saying a veteran running for mayor is bad is like saying green townies should never do it.
Someones experience is more key. Also if everyone suddenly believed palmar and sandroba was red and and sinani was green having a green player who has expressed interest in the position is better than some random.
|
Not to suggest I'm correct all the time or even most of the time, but this time I can assure you I'm "correct" in the sense sandroba is more likely than not town based on his play and what I know about him. He could still be scum, but that applies to every single player in the game on day 1.
|
On November 27 2011 05:31 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 05:29 syllogism wrote: Voting for sinani is so unimaginably bad. No offense to him, but he is a bad player, his role is already known assuming he isn't lying and that role is awful for mayor/sheriff and scum knowing the role of the sheriff is bad as then they don't have to worry about roleblocking him and such. Stop calling other players bad. You aren't gods gift to mafia so stop attacking him. You have opted to be one of the most ill behaved players in this game. Cut it out. Veteran may or may not be the best role to run for mayor but experience in the game is key. You saying a veteran running for mayor is bad is like saying green townies should never do it. Someones experience is more key. Also if everyone suddenly believed palmar and sandroba was red and and sinani was green having a green player who has expressed interest in the position is better than some random. Whether I'm bad or not is irrelevant as I'm not running for mayor. Sinani is very young and probably would be first to admit that he isn't good at the game yet but is trying to improve. He should not be elected as of now.
|
On November 27 2011 05:30 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 05:27 Toadesstern wrote:On November 27 2011 05:09 syllogism wrote: Hi toad are you scum? 1. no 2. because I changed my vote? Because I'm unsure who to vote for? Because I think kita might be an option as well? Because I'm not voteing sandro although you want me to? If you answer the 2nd one I'm happy to explain the reasoning behind it. Yes, you should be voting for sandroba if you think I'm town. While BC is somewhat correct in that people should form their own opinions, a significant part of mafia is knowing who to support when you are unsure as to what to do.
Why would I vote for sandroba if I think you are town? That says nothing of sandrobas alignment just your belief. He should only vote for sandroba if he believes sandroba is town. You don't vote for someone because of that person's following you vote for them because you want them elected for your read on them -_-
|
And it's a necessary part of the election process to have your skills/experience evaluated. He chose to run for mayor and thus shouldn't object to me not considering him a player who has necessary skill and experience to hold that position. He would never get shot by mafia and one of the main advantages of the position would thus be completely wasted
|
On November 27 2011 05:33 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 05:31 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On November 27 2011 05:29 syllogism wrote: Voting for sinani is so unimaginably bad. No offense to him, but he is a bad player, his role is already known assuming he isn't lying and that role is awful for mayor/sheriff and scum knowing the role of the sheriff is bad as then they don't have to worry about roleblocking him and such. Stop calling other players bad. You aren't gods gift to mafia so stop attacking him. You have opted to be one of the most ill behaved players in this game. Cut it out. Veteran may or may not be the best role to run for mayor but experience in the game is key. You saying a veteran running for mayor is bad is like saying green townies should never do it. Someones experience is more key. Also if everyone suddenly believed palmar and sandroba was red and and sinani was green having a green player who has expressed interest in the position is better than some random. Whether I'm bad or not is irrelevant as I'm not running for mayor. Sinani is very young and probably would be first to admit that he isn't good at the game yet but is trying to improve. He should not be elected as of now.
You are not running for mayor correct. You are however running another players campaign. Sinani is young, but that means dick fuck all. Being young does not make someone a bad leader. Is sinani the best candidate in the running? No. However if someone legitimately believes that sandroba is mafia and they don't trust me and opt to for for him because he seems town? then go for it. Sinani would learn and get better, and mafia denied an elected slot. If someone honestly believes that sinani is the only town choice left to vote for then they should vote for him. If they believe there is another town member running and is a better choice they should vote there.
|
On November 27 2011 05:36 syllogism wrote: And it's a necessary part of the election process to have your skills/experience evaluated. He chose to run for mayor and thus shouldn't object to me not considering him a player who has necessary skill and experience to hold that position. He would never get shot by mafia and one of the main advantages of the position would thus be completely wasted
Have them evaluated yes, do it constructively as you are now. Do not just outright call someone bad Especially when in this game you already have a track record for being negative and calling people out. Do I normally care if people attack me as you have others? No, but doing it to people who are not here to defend themselves is outright rude and insanely bad mannered.
|
On November 27 2011 05:26 bumatlarge wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2011 05:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On November 27 2011 05:01 supersoft wrote: Why don't you post any scumreads you have, BC? because a scum read that is currently based on day 1 analysis is not solid enough. It instead is a list of players who seem off to you based on gut reads. The only one I will mention as I have been directly confronting is syllo. His play is spotty, but its day 1. Anyone who has directly proposed the town from trying to organize how to act I believe is suspect but most people have not given me enough reason to push their lynch at this point. Lynch supersoft or kenpachi and you have my vote. I don't always agree with serejai, but when I do, it's that supersoft is scum. Show nested quote +On November 26 2011 20:37 supersoft wrote:On November 26 2011 20:32 intrigue wrote:On November 26 2011 19:32 supersoft wrote:On November 26 2011 19:28 tree.hugger wrote: Hey hey everyone, this is awkward timing, I'm in Sweden for Dreamhack (this is easily verifiable) and I'm having to run everywhere all day. I'll be back tomorrow probably, but I obviously need to explain my inactivity. vote yourself, dont get modkilled. We will take care of you tomorrow. ;-) who's "we"? and by "take care" do you mean you'll keep him safe? (if so why?) or is it a euphemism for killing him, because you're mafia? "we" are the more experienced players. taking care is something like this: On November 26 2011 19:25 supersoft wrote:On November 26 2011 19:19 vaderseven wrote: hum a typical day.
no idea really how to play this cuz of the sheer size of this...
I don't like several posts but I can't actually say its beyond the fact that I really dislike some of the post styles I am seeing BUT ITS DAY 1 SO THINGS MIGHT LEVEL OUT.
I am not used to being forced into a vote (seems like a TL mafia thing over other places i've played) so I am going to have to vote for myself simply because I am stuck going 'but if' everytime I try to see if I could get behind someone.
I mainly dont buy into the the top two vote leaders for this mayor race and don't want to 'not vote' cuz that is against the rules.
okay, I understand, that you don't want to dig through all this. But I got a little job for you to do: Can you please filter prplhz, erandorr and Youngminii and tell us what you think about them? Would be great. Thanks. Screams agenda. Also let me analyze kenpachi. Show nested quote +On November 26 2011 08:13 Kenpachi wrote: NEVER lynch Sinani. Thats like lynching me. and town loses when i get lynched All done! lol
|
|
|
|