EPTSteamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46) - Page 100
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
MrZentor
United States1648 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
I think Nisani201 is Town. Day 1: Nisani201 (6): bumatlarge, wherebugsgo, Palmar, Drazerk, GreYMisT, sinani206 Day 2: Nisani201 (9): Drazerk, wherebugsgo, Day 3: (current votes) Nisani201 (8): wherebugsgo, RebirthOfLeGenD, Number of times a player has voted on Nisani201 bumatlarge (3) wherebugsgo (3) Palmar (2) Drazerk (2) GreYMisT (2) DCLXVI (2) Lemonwalrus (1) xsksc (1) RebirthOfLeGenD (1) MrZentor (1) Tyrran (1) Coagulation (1) sinani206 (1) Cyber_Cheese (2-1=1) Lanaia (1-0=1) | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
Including D3 votes when considering N2 kills might not make much sense, so below is the list for only D1 and D2. Day 1: Nisani201 (6): bumatlarge, wherebugsgo, Palmar, Drazerk, GreYMisT, sinani206 Day 2: Nisani201 (9): Drazerk, wherebugsgo, Number of times a player has voted on Nisani201 bumatlarge (2) wherebugsgo (2) Palmar (1) Drazerk (2) GreYMisT (2) DCLXVI (1) Lemonwalrus (1) xsksc (1) sinani206 (1) Cyber_Cheese (2-1=1) Lanaia (2-1=1) | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On November 25 2011 01:20 xsksc wrote: Doesn't nisani have 10 votes now forumite? You are right, I appear to have done a prplhz. I saw the votes in the thread, but forgot to update the zbot summary, and so didn´t know he had allready been lynched. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On November 24 2011 23:57 Lanaia wrote: I never OUTRIGHT claimed it. That was what I meant. I re-read your post about the claim and I must have misunderstood it earlier. My bad, sorry. I'm still curious that you're alive, have you been notified of any hits? | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
Lanaia, does your role do anything else except give you the option to negate another players vote on a target? Do you have any other powers? | ||
|
Tyrran
France777 Posts
On November 25 2011 01:15 Forumite wrote: Number of times a player has voted on Nisani201 bumatlarge (3) wherebugsgo (3) --> I have a town read on him, but i'm less convinced than for others. Palmar (2) Drazerk (2) GreYMisT (2) DCLXVI (2) Lemonwalrus (1) xsksc (1) RebirthOfLeGenD (1) MrZentor (1) Tyrran (1) Coagulation (1) sinani206 (1) Cyber_Cheese (2-1=1) Lanaia (1-0=1) Much better green distribution. Unless WBG is scum (unlikely ), most of the votes on him are from town. If he was town too, I would have expected some scum to vote for him more often. On November 25 2011 01:21 Forumite wrote: And no, voting for Nisani201 doesn´t make you scum, but if Scum wanted Town to lynch Nisani201 on their own, then those who voted several times, like WBG, would be poor targets for a Nightkill. I dont get your argument. If Nisani was scum, then wouldnt those who voted several time for him make very GOOD target for a nigthkill ? Including D3 votes when considering N2 kills might not make much sense, so below is the list for only D1 and D2. Day 1: Nisani201 (6): bumatlarge, wherebugsgo, Palmar, Drazerk, GreYMisT, sinani206 --> Palmar was hit Day 2: Nisani201 (9): Drazerk, wherebugsgo, So if anything , your analysis prove that Nisani201 was a good target for a lynch. It doesnt make me regret voting for him. | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
|
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On November 25 2011 01:52 Lemonwalrus wrote: Happy Thanksgiving! Probably won't post until tomorrow morning. Unfortunatly this for me as well. Some breif thoughts about the game state as it curently is though. I think our main focus for the rest of the day needs to be on if we want mr zentor dead or not. ever since he took over for chaoser I know I have been having a hard time deciding where to go. But recently I have noticed that a number of questions have been asked of him (chaoser's town claim, his thoughts) And he has either ignored them, or givin very vauge answers. His votes have also been very brief, and have the air of someone that wants to lay low. In addition to the case on chaoser, this is enough for me to vote for him ##Vote: MrZentor again, ill try to keep up with the thread the best that i can today. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
Forumite, that's some of the worst logic I have ever seen. | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
forumite i understand, zbot just recently updated the votes.. but palmar you voted for him and posted way behind the zbot update.. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
My bad. He's dead then. Nothing of value has been lost. | ||
|
Tyrran
France777 Posts
On November 23 2011 01:32 Tyrran wrote: You just gave the worst possible excuse. Prplhz made a case against risk.nuke, who succefully defended himself and nothing happened. THAT WAS GOOD. That's how mafia is supposed to be played. Player put pressure on each other to make them slip. You played IRL mafia, how do you not know this ? You voted against prp because he played good. You dont lynch people because they made a case against someone else. you suspect them because of this, you build a case against them and if they fail to defend themself you lynch them. Quite frankly, this look like a scum, wondering "Can I safely bandwagon? Oh yeah he voted for a town so i'm safe". Oh and going trough your filter i find this : Lynching 6 people on day 2 ? Really ? You are obviously using the fact that Ken and Sinani played bad in order to lynch as much town as possible.( I take good not that 4 out of 6 are likely town, and 2 of them are blue. Thank god nobody listen to you). This has to be the most mafia oriented play yet. Yes you had to be drunk to post something like this. How did we not lynch you? Oh rigth, because you are lurking and not getting any attention. Typical mafia play again. Also, I'm not forgetting that this makes a lot of sense if you are mafia and you intent to lurk a lot. And last but not least : Saying obvious stuff without contributing a bit. Mafia play again. You have so many scummy play in so little post, I will definitely try to get you lynched on day 3. And if i dont survive nigth 2, I hope someone else will remind town to lynch you. What do you guys think ? He also promised a analysis that never came. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On November 25 2011 01:51 hyshes wrote: @forumite: care to explain your reasoning behind your statement about the votes on nisani? I can't really follow your logic in that. Which part of it? @Tyrran The point of listing only confirmed Town is because it hasn´t got to do with Scum voting Nisani, it has to do with Scum leaving alive those Townies who want to vote Nisani. I don´t throw suspicion on the players voting Nisani, but I think they survived the night because Scum would rather kill people like risk and Harbringer who couldn´t care either way about Nisani. It´s like the opposite of when Scum kill those suspecting them, now they killed those not caring about Nisani, thereby making it more likely that Nisani was lynched. I agree with those saying that we should lynch another player. My suggestion would be Zephirdd. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On November 25 2011 02:03 GreYMisT wrote: Unfortunatly this for me as well. Some breif thoughts about the game state as it curently is though. I think our main focus for the rest of the day needs to be on if we want mr zentor dead or not. ever since he took over for chaoser I know I have been having a hard time deciding where to go. But recently I have noticed that a number of questions have been asked of him (chaoser's town claim, his thoughts) And he has either ignored them, or givin very vauge answers. His votes have also been very brief, and have the air of someone that wants to lay low. In addition to the case on chaoser, this is enough for me to vote for him ##Vote: MrZentor again, ill try to keep up with the thread the best that i can today. I don´t like this, but only because MrZentor just went away, and will probably not be able to reply during the next 8 hours. | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
On November 25 2011 02:58 Forumite wrote: Which part of it? @Tyrran The point of listing only confirmed Town is because it hasn´t got to do with Scum voting Nisani, it has to do with Scum leaving alive those Townies who want to vote Nisani. I don´t throw suspicion on the players voting Nisani, but I think they survived the night because Scum would rather kill people like risk and Harbringer who couldn´t care either way about Nisani. It´s like the opposite of when Scum kill those suspecting them, now they killed those not caring about Nisani, thereby making it more likely that Nisani was lynched. I agree with those saying that we should lynch another player. My suggestion would be Zephirdd. It's nice that you ignored my defense/reasoning to your scum claims and now you are trying to lead town to lynch another town by blindly believing that you are right. again. ##Vote: Forumite o.m.g.u.s. | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 25 2011 02:58 Forumite wrote: Which part of it? @Tyrran The point of listing only confirmed Town is because it hasn´t got to do with Scum voting Nisani, it has to do with Scum leaving alive those Townies who want to vote Nisani. I don´t throw suspicion on the players voting Nisani, but I think they survived the night because Scum would rather kill people like risk and Harbringer who couldn´t care either way about Nisani. It´s like the opposite of when Scum kill those suspecting them, now they killed those not caring about Nisani, thereby making it more likely that Nisani was lynched. I agree with those saying that we should lynch another player. My suggestion would be Zephirdd. just the whole thing. What are you stating actually? | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On November 25 2011 03:24 hyshes wrote: just the whole thing. What are you stating actually? Scum wanted today to be spent lynching Nisani, so they killed a few players who didn´t care about lynching Nisani. After 2 failed attempts to kill Nisani to frustrate Town, and now with less people who think he is town/don´t care either way, the Nisani lynch was made much easier. Scum are manipulating the lynches, that shouldn´t be a surprise. When looking at it like that, it´s possible that Drazerk was killed by a Vigilante, in order to confirm hyshes. | ||
| ||
