• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:55
CEST 15:55
KST 22:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27
Community News
Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer2Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey. Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Which UAE App Developers Are Leading the Innovatio
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 33498 users

My Little Pony Mafia - Page 38

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 36 37 38 39 40 74 Next
Lucidity
Profile Joined July 2010
South Africa603 Posts
September 18 2011 19:30 GMT
#741
I hope to show you why wherebugsgo is scum. Please filter his posts as I'm not going to include everything here.

If you look at his filter you'll find that he spends little time on hunting scum. Instead there are a lot of policy and plan debating. This is in contrast to XLIV where he was actively hunting scum as his first priority.

He points out and reminds us of how scummy sinani is numerous times. But he never votes for him. He later says that we should not lynch sinani. Why spend time on pointing out how scummy he is then? Wouldn't it be best to draw attention away from someone you think is a townie? Why bring his bad townie play to Town's attention repeatedly? Well the answer is obvious. You wanted him lynched, while absolving yourself of any guilt.

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 14 2011 11:31 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 11:16 sinani206 wrote:
On September 14 2011 11:08 GreYMisT wrote:
On September 14 2011 10:49 chaos13 wrote:
On September 14 2011 10:27 GreYMisT wrote:
Sinani Hasn't been on the past two pages, are we talking about the same player?


Ctrl+F sinani on Page 15. You were even talking about him, so I don't know how you could have missed that lol


I just did a search for sinani on page 15 and he has not posted there, his name apears14 times on that page, and only in the messages of other people. His last post was (aside from the most recent one on this page where he votes dreamflower for suggesting to lynch lurkers on day1...) found on page 13 of this thread and it was the following

On September 13 2011 23:10 sinani206 wrote:
(it takes 7 to lynch not 8)


Hopefully that will end this senseless tangent.

Now Sinani, do you have a better reason for voting dreamflower other than the fact he/she voted for you? Dont say because he/she wants to lynch lurkers because thats something quite a few of us decided might be the best thing to do play a page back.


This is a pressure vote, to prompt an answer to my question, "Why lynch a lurker if we have a perfectly good other lynch candidate?"

I don't understand why other people can pressure vote me, but I can't pressure vote others.


I think it's generally cause your town play is so bad we can't tell the difference between it and real mafia.

I mean even right now I can't tell your alignment. I don't like the lynch lurker policy but really I can't fault them for voting you, you're not giving anyone any reason to keep you around.


On September 14 2011 11:55 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 11:49 Nisani201 wrote:
On September 14 2011 11:31 wherebugsgo wrote:
On September 14 2011 11:16 sinani206 wrote:
On September 14 2011 11:08 GreYMisT wrote:
On September 14 2011 10:49 chaos13 wrote:
On September 14 2011 10:27 GreYMisT wrote:
Sinani Hasn't been on the past two pages, are we talking about the same player?


Ctrl+F sinani on Page 15. You were even talking about him, so I don't know how you could have missed that lol


I just did a search for sinani on page 15 and he has not posted there, his name apears14 times on that page, and only in the messages of other people. His last post was (aside from the most recent one on this page where he votes dreamflower for suggesting to lynch lurkers on day1...) found on page 13 of this thread and it was the following

On September 13 2011 23:10 sinani206 wrote:
(it takes 7 to lynch not 8)


Hopefully that will end this senseless tangent.

Now Sinani, do you have a better reason for voting dreamflower other than the fact he/she voted for you? Dont say because he/she wants to lynch lurkers because thats something quite a few of us decided might be the best thing to do play a page back.


This is a pressure vote, to prompt an answer to my question, "Why lynch a lurker if we have a perfectly good other lynch candidate?"

I don't understand why other people can pressure vote me, but I can't pressure vote others.


I think it's generally cause your town play is so bad we can't tell the difference between it and real mafia.

I mean even right now I can't tell your alignment. I don't like the lynch lurker policy but really I can't fault them for voting you, you're not giving anyone any reason to keep you around.

I don't think you should be able to tell anyone's alignment this early in the game.


Good luck ever figuring out sinani's alignment. Won't find that out till he flips.


On September 14 2011 12:21 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 11:58 tnkted wrote:
Er, yeah, Curu, we can't lynch him because YOU SAY he will be bad for town atmosphere. I'm not really convinced you know what you're talking about.


You were so gungho about teaching Droneallday a "lesson" by getting him lynched day 1, so he would learn that he needs to contribute as town.

Sinani is arguably just as bad and yet you have a big problem with pushing for his lynch?

Are you scumbuddies?


Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 04:46 tnkted wrote:
Why would you give the noob some lattitude? This is how they learn: they get lynched d1 as town for lurking after they were pressured.


Sinani doesn't seem to have learned yet that we don't like his lurking/anti-town nill contribution style, yet you don't seem to care for policy lynching him.

So, Mr. Tnkted, why so flip-floppy?


On September 14 2011 12:35 wherebugsgo wrote:
an even better question would be to ask sinani what the fuck this is:


Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 10:30 sinani206 wrote:
##Vote: dreamflower for even bringing up the subject of lynching a lurker.





In my previous game with WBG he made trademark tl;dr over 9000 word cases on his scum candidates. He has not done that this game at all.

Things to look out for in the following post:
His use of name calling. That's not how he put his thoughts across in XLIV. There he was a blue and tried to convince us of his standpoints with reasoning and tunneling (yes you tunnel your scum candidates like mad).

He gives his reason for not wanting to vote sinani even though he looks scummy as fuck: "The bandwagon filled up too fast". It wasn't fast at all and we barely got enough votes to actually lynch sinani. i.e. bullshit reason.


On September 15 2011 08:21 wherebugsgo wrote:
Alright, I'm back from class today and I see not really much has changed. Townies are still retarded and the mafia are slipping through undetected because of it. Our best lynch for today is tnkted, something I've been trying to get through to you numbskulls since yesterday, but instead all of you seem to be completely ignoring me.

Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 13:32 Curu wrote:
WBG you seem to agree with me on sinani (you were in that game too) but how come your vote never moved?


I agree that sinani is playing really poorly but I never agreed that he was the best lynch. I'm not gonna vote sinani cause I don't think we should lynch him today.

How god damn hard is it for you morons to understand this?

Instead, I think we should lynch tnkted. Just look at how fast the bandwagon on sinani piled up. You guys don't think that's strange? Unless scum is all out bussing him day 1 I think we ought to leave sinani be until we're more certain of his alignment.

Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 02:52 Nisani201 wrote:
I am going to Unvote: Curu. I feel like we were all just arguing while scum watched and laughed. IMO there would have been more people in the conversation if one of us were scum.

I will move my vote over to wherebugsgo, because he was perfectly active until we started arguing. He has posted no opinions on it because he doesn't feel the need to; he can afford for any of us to die. He simply comments on the same things that Curu has been bringing up, which is "Sinani played horribly in Ace's game, so we should lynch him."

##Vote: wherebugsgo


what in the hell is this?

There is only one thing I dislike more than wishy washiness, and that is lying. You sir, are a liar. I never said I wanted to lynch Sinani. I said I can understand why people would want to lynch him, but I never said we should lynch him.

If I thought we should lynch him I would've voted him. Ever get that through your dumb head, Nisani?

Honestly, until reading this post I thought you were just a dumb townie but now I smell that you could possibly have an agenda. Townies might grasp at straws but they certainly wouldn't fabricate things or put words in other people's mouths.






His "case" against Nisani. Not much effort or convincing at all. Even blatant misrepresentations.

+ Show Spoiler +
Other gems of Nisani's I've found:

On September 15 2011 00:57 Nisani201 wrote:
Also, I might not be as active during this portion of day becauSBe Minecraft 1.8 is out, and I will probably have a lot of homework.


You had a problem with me being inactive (BECAUSE I WAS SLEEPING) but you are planning on being less active during the most important part of the day? The day ends in like 3 hours. Also, you even said you wanted to hear from Forumite but you knew he is in another time zone and that's why you knew he wouldn't respond till later. So why did it never cross your mind that I could be sleeping as well?

Nice double standards, scum.

On September 15 2011 07:13 Nisani201 wrote:
Majority lynch is weird. I don't like it. However, GreYMisT is right, I shouldn't be voting for an outlier.

##Unvote

##Vote: Curu

If anyone else is interested in lynching wherebugsgo, just post it here, and maybe I can get some more votes on him.


"oh I seem to have been caught for my shitty reasoning.

Time to jump back on a bandwagon on a person I just said was town one post ago!"

On September 14 2011 13:24 Nisani201 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 13:02 Curu wrote:
On September 14 2011 12:40 Curu wrote:
Is there a reason why you're willing to accept lynch lurkers but not lynch sinani?


Still waiting for an answer Nisani.

And still waiting for chaos to explain his blanket chainsaw vote.

I already stated in the thread that I only intended to lynch lurkers if they ended up not posting. (however I will admit that this was poorly thought out, because he would be eligible for modkill anyways). I prefered voting for DroneAllDay rather than Sinani because Sinani has not done anything scummy. The case against Forumite is not good enough to warrant a vote. And then you come around, calling everyone scum, and make yourself the perfect target for my vote. EZ.


He admits that he did not think about his vote.

I repeat, Nisani201 DID NOT THINK ABOUT HIS VOTE. So Nisani, you're willing to arbitrarily throw around votes and cause havoc (like the shit town atmosphere we have right now) just on the basis of wanting to lynch lurkers for not posting?

That's a great way to blend in, isn't it? Lynch the guy who can't respond to you cause he's inactive. That way there's no backlash for your shitty reasoning. Yet, when you got called out on it you soft-defended sinani ("sinani has not done anything scummy") and the only other case is on Forumite. Who, I'm guessing is town, since you dismissed him so easily.

There's only two options for you:

1.) You rolled town, yet you have yet to use your brain and are just acting immensely thick.
2.) You're scum, trying to mislead others about what I said to try to fabricate a case on me, and are trying really hard to blend in.

I'm leaning toward #2 right now.




His case on tnkted. His best lynch candidate. Is 1 paragraph long. 1 paragraph. Discussing 1 post. The stuff after the first paragraph is just the ending of his long post, not the case on tnkted. He is CLEARLY not putting much effort into hunting scum. This is not how a WBG "Let's lynch this scum!" post looks like.

+ Show Spoiler +

With all of this, however, I have more things to point out. Our best lynch today, as I said earlier, is tnkted. I will explain further:

On September 14 2011 22:04 tnkted wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 13:32 Curu wrote:
tnkted and dreamflower, I'd like your thoughts on DroneAllDay and Lucidity.


...


tnkted has kept his vote on me because ON was a lurker. I'm obviously not lurking. Offer up some more thoughts, on me or whoever else because you don't have that excuse anymore.



Fair enough, You certainly haven't been lurking.

##Unvote

My thoughts on DroneAllDay: I don't think he's posted since the day started, which means he's probably going to get modkilled. Perhaps he hasn't checked his pms in awhile? Either way, I think he's going to get himself dead without anybody's help (@Dreamflower: This is one of the main reasons NOT to lynch lurkers; they tend to get themselves modkilled anyway and we waste a lynch).

My thoughts on lucidity: his post analyzing dreamflower was extremely interesting because it was well done. I don't know if I agree with his conclusions, but his method was very effective: It paraphrased the important aspects of dreamflower's post, and interpreted them in order to understand what dreamflower was really talking about. THIS is a good way to find scum.

Now, why he chose dreamflower and nobody else is kind of interesting; Dreamflowers scumhunting abilities are so legendary (for me anyway) that I have a hard time believing she intended to come across as scummy as she did. I want to hear her response before I vote for her. Also interesting to note is that lucidity didn't actually vote her himself; he's also waiting for a response. For what it's worth, right now dreamflower is my #1 vote but I'll abstain until she shows up to defend herself.

Eh, what the hell. I can always change it later.

##Vote: Dreamflower

I have no self control.


Now, to deal with some mindless accusations:


Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 21:08 chaos13 wrote:
Just did a little re-reading myself. I have two main suspects. Forumite and tnkted. This post was the reason I backed off on Forumite

On September 13 2011 22:15 tnkted wrote:
Eh, I'm not buying the forumite lynch. His initial statements were pretty lame, but he's been acting like an unjustly accused town since then.

I want to shift town conversation back to Greymyst.


On September 13 2011 06:42 GreYMisT wrote:
Sadly I have to agree with Dream, and echo what she said. We pretty much haw a very long day 1 with no roles or anything but a very general plan to discuss. I have only played with a few of you, but from the games I have read we will do well if we can maintain a good atmosphere, as we have right now. Because we also don't know how many or what type of roles exist, we need to focus on logic and behavioral analysis, rather than hope for power roles to carry us. I think we should process forward assuming no blues exist.


Now I wanted to wait until after the nightpost to say this, but jackie beat me to it. This is a crazy scummy post. Its sheepy, and its a poor attempt to blend in with everyone, etc.

His response to the pressure everyone gave him was this:


On September 13 2011 09:06 GreYMisT wrote:
I prefer policy posts and "plans" to the spam and trolling it takes to get some games started on day 1. Would you rather I didn't post at all? I feel that at least gets everyone on the same page. Otherwise we don't know where anyone stands on the mechanics of the game, and judging from games I have read on here that seems to muck up later days.


Okay, lets look at the appeals he makes here. He doesn't try to defend his scummy post at all; instead he appeals to the emotional ("Would you rather I didn't post at all?") and then basically restates his first sentence. This is NOT how you react to pressure. A true townie would read their post and either say, "That wasn't scummy at all!" Or they'd defend themselves and explain what they meant. Greymyst did neither.


Oh, and then the rest of his posts are all about the d1 post and the clues it might contain, which successfully shields him from having to hunt for scum.


## Vote Greymyst


Namely the first line. I read that and went "Yeah, he kinda has", but after going over those posts again, he's probably scum. Take a look at tnkted's case here. I'd be willing to say he's a better town player than this. I don't have time to make a full analysis of him right now and I probably won't anyway since we need a majority to lynch.

So vote Forumite.

##unvote
##Vote Forumite


Frankly, this is a complete nonsense post. "Tnkted makes a good point about forumite not being scum, which convinced me, but later, i changed my mind and now I think he's scum too!" WHY did you change your mind when what I said made sense to you? Go find me evidence where he stopped acting like an annoyed townie and more like a frightened scum, and I'll consider switching to you.

Please post a case against me instead of just throwing out soft foses. You think people don't notice when you do this?


What?

What kind of reasoning is this?

Tnkted is voting dreamflower not because dreamflower made contradictions, not because dreamflower seems to be pushing an agenda, and not because dreamflower appears scummy to him but because dreamflower appears scummy to LUCIDITY.

This is the textbook definition of sheeping. Tnkted contributed absolutely nothing in this entire post except a massive sheep vote of Dreamflower by following Lucidity blindly.

You all need to seriously consider tnkted as a lynch today.



Finally, there are a few other players who I found made interesting remarks today, and who I think we should keep an eye on. Sinani and Curu for obvious reasons, but I have an inkling at least one of them is town. Chaos I never have a proper read on, he could be anything, but his reasoning as always has been fairly bad. For example, his forumite vote post in which he considers tnkted to be scum but doesn't actually say why. Let's keep him in mind. + Show Spoiler +
lol I still <3 you chaos


In summary:

Lynchlist: tnkted

Watchlist: Nisani201, sinani206, Curu, chaos13

worthy of a vig shot to the face: tnkted, nisani

Nisani is scummy to me, but as of right now there's no way to tell whether he's just a retarded townie or if he's mafia with an agenda. I lean mafia, but lynching him today is not the best option. Vigging him might be good, though.

Tnkted is our best lynch. Filter him and look at how he blends in, look at his sheeping of Lucidity, and look at his contradiction with respect to the lurker lynch policy and Droneallday. All of these things line up with a scum agenda IMO. None of these things make sense from a pro-town mindset.

I'll be around for the next 5-8 hours, so I hope to see people involved so that we can make a proper lynch.


He later follows up his case because dreamflower has to ask him what his case actually is. SOMEONE HAD TO ASK HIM TO CLARIFY HIS CASE. I can't emphasise enough how strange this is for a WBG case. Go look at XLIV. When he pushed for someone to be lynched he made sure all his thoughts were put into a 1 post thesis so that people knew what was going on. He's simply not caring enough to do it in this game. Because he's not invested in finding scum.

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 16 2011 09:36 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 16 2011 02:09 dreamflower wrote:
By the way, wherebugsgo, can you restate your case against tntked again, please? I went back over your posts, and it seemed like you were accusing him of wishy-washiness and sheeping Lucidity at one point. Is that about right? I just want to be clear on why you wanted to lynch him last night.


Read these posts:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=263036&currentpage=15#284

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=263036&currentpage=15#292

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=263036&currentpage=15#297

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=263036&currentpage=17#339

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=263036&currentpage=23#447

Read and form thoughts for your own, people. I can't do much more than identify what I find to be contradictory and what I think deserves attention.

I also urge you all to read Lucidity's response to tntkted's "case" on him. As I said, tnkted case on Lucidity is really weak. Just yesterday he was sheeping Lucidity's vote for his suspicion on dreamflower, and then suddenly today he's against Lucidity for soft FoSes.




Then he doesn't understand the timing of Jackal's claim. Honestly, the only way he couldn't have considered that a Townie (especially someone like Jackal) could be afraid of dying to scum is if he's scum himself. Releasing info before the night ends makes perfect sense. How does WBG think it doesn't? In XLIV he even did the same thing!@#

On September 17 2011 11:01 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 05:38 tnkted wrote:
Just tell them jackal, the info is pro-town and if you're killed it confirms my alignment anyway which mafia does not want. Vice versa if you're killed.


Why don't you tell us?

This sudden claim stuff is hella shady to me. It came at a really strange time of day, and it's not making any sense yet other than Jackal "confirming" tnkted as town.

I find it weird that it's been put out there that tnkted is town but there's almost no explanation as for why or how. If you actually are town you'll get shot for sure (which is just dumb to me, idk why you would do that) and if you're not it makes sense as a gambit to get another mislynch today and get us closer to mylo.


The following post just set off alarm bells all over the place for me.

If we don't lynch tnkted/jackal today and they live he's going to look a lot harder at them? What? His PRIMARY candidate was tnkted. He should have looked hard at him to being with. WBG is a tunnelwhore extroardinaire. There's no way he decided tnkted is the best lynch candidate without looking hard at all his posts. Then he goes on to say that he's willing to drop tnkted for now if someone has a better target ..... But no one has presented anything yet ... WHAT? This is so different from townie WBG that I dont' know what to say. He is suspicious of his #1 target's claim, but willing to drop him. Uhuh.

On September 17 2011 11:19 wherebugsgo wrote:
Last thing I ought to mention is that there is no other alternative lynch today.

Neither of them have contributed one. I've contributed my list, but other than tnkted no one really grabbed anyone's attention yesterday.

We have to consolidate today or we're gonna be in deep shit. And certainly if we don't lynch mafia today, and we don't lynch tnkted/Jackal (and they're both alive), I'm going to be looking into them a lot harder. If someone has a better target I'm willing to drop tnkted for now, but no one has presented anything yet.


Then he votes Jackal?! He doesn't believe this claim stuff... So what does he do? Vote for his #1 scum candidate? NO! Let's vote Jackal. Who he has had a town read on all game. Yes!

On September 17 2011 14:19 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 14:13 Jackal58 wrote:
On September 17 2011 11:25 wherebugsgo wrote:
yeah, that's the last bit. They've "claimed" but it's not clear at all. If you're going to claim as town (and draw mafia attention) you might as well claim in full. Only they and the mafia right now know their alignment, and that's not really helping the rest of us.

Scum really hate when two townies know they are both townies don't you?
Scum really hate when townies have knowledge that is denied to scum don't you?

PM abilities in a non PM game are great. As I said before if you guys feel compelled to lynch me to verify my alignment I'm ok with that. But keep your dick beaters off of Twinkles.

Sorry Curu. I didn't realize you were running LOTR when I posted that.

My vote is going on Bugs. If you're town you can trust me or lynch me. But you damn sure aren't getting all the details.

##VOTE: wherebugsgo



This is the biggest bullshit vote I've ever seen.

I choose lynch.

##vote Jackal58


Followed by insta unvote:

On September 17 2011 16:19 wherebugsgo wrote:
I'm fine with lynching Nisani.

In hindsight I'm want to believe Jackal's claim because I had a town read on him all game. It doesn't add up to what I see in his behavior for him and tnkted to be scumbuddies. I just feel stupid because my entire case on tnkted is thrown out the window (for now, at least).

Nisani was my #2 choice, so I won't be complaining there.

##unvote Jackal
##vote Nisani201


Then the shit starts getting weird.

On September 18 2011 05:12 wherebugsgo wrote:
Jesus Christ you guys are fucking slow.


Show nested quote +
On September 17 2011 14:38 wherebugsgo wrote:
I don't have PM ability, but I think I understand what's going on.

Let's be...honest about it.


This is a breadcrumb. I have one of the pieces of honesty.

I thought you guys were getting pieces together so I wanted to help you out.

That's why I wanted to know more about what Jackal was doing. When I realized he was telling the truth and I reread his songpost, I figured he can't be mafia with tnkted.

Then, I voted nisani because he was my number 2 lynch target. I've been pushing tnkted and nisani all day, if I get a town read on tnkted of course I'm going to go back and push my second lynch after clarifying that the claim indeed is made from a pro town perspective.


His timing is all messed up. He realised Jackal was telling the truth. That's why he wanted more info about the claim. But HE VOTED tnkted AND Jackal in that period when he supposedly believed the claim. How does that make any sense?! I'll tell you how: He always knew they were both town. So there was never a point where he switched from doubting them to believing them. Thus, in his scummy mind, the timing got messed up.

But wait. There's more.

On September 18 2011 06:46 wherebugsgo wrote:
I got mine night 1.

Wait so sorry if this is a stupid question but why are we asking this?

On September 18 2011 16:26 wherebugsgo wrote:
I sent the PM to GMarshal to send the piece to tnkted.

Also, I made a mistake with respect to the timing of when I received my piece. I actually received my piece with the day 1 post, not the night 1 post (AKA September 13)

That's the time stamp on the PM. I had another PM from GMarshal that I mistakenly thought was the piece PM in my inbox so I wrongly assumed that was the one for the receptacle.

This is the most damning shit ever. How do you forget when you got the element? I proper LOL'd when I read this. You had to go look at the PMs? And you looked at the wrong one? HA HA HA ? All of you other guys who got your elements. How did you remember when you got yours? Did you have to go look at a PM? Or did you relate it to a point in the game? If I got it on Day 1 there's no way in hell I would have forgotten that I had that knowledge on Day 1......................... WBG is scum. What probably happened is that he got it from Chaos on Night 1 when he killed him.


2 random nuggets to further illustrate non WBG play:

+ Show Spoiler +
Points out scummy as fuck post. Forgets about it immediately. This isn't Town WBG play:

+ Show Spoiler +
On September 15 2011 11:10 wherebugsgo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 10:34 DroneAllDay wrote:
well damn I decided to read the thread more (I'll be honest, i skimmed cuz i was afraid the vote was coming soon and I figured that i needed to vote then) filtering Curu's posts and not looking at them at 6:30 A.M. well that vote was how you say really REALLY+ Show Spoiler +
STUPID CRAZY
dumb Sorry about that, thankfully my classes are gonna be lighter for now so I won't be doing this again. So with that, reading(NOTE: NOT SKIMMING) this time Nisani has too many posts with too little content (some of nothing useful and others of agreement)

On September 12 2011 10:39 Nisani201 wrote:
I don't have a favorite pony, because I love ALL of the ponies in Ponyville!


On September 13 2011 01:01 Nisani201 wrote:
god damnit you guys

talk about the GODDAMN MAFIA that's going to kill us all do horrible things to us!


On September 13 2011 08:28 Nisani201 wrote:
On September 13 2011 08:25 Jackal58 wrote:Did you guys know diphallia is a common disorder amongst the sub order Eunectes of constrictors?


nowai


On September 14 2011 12:36 Nisani201 wrote:
That, too.


On September 14 2011 14:37 Nisani201 wrote:
Me: I believe in pressuring lurkers, but not lynching them.

Curu: WTF man, you want to lynch lurkers, but you're not!!! OMG SCUM HERPADERP


and wherebugsgo found this which I find interesting
On September 15 2011 00:57 Nisani201 wrote:
Also, I might not be as active during this portion of day becauSBe Minecraft 1.8 is out, and I will probably have a lot of homework.


You had a problem with me being inactive (BECAUSE I WAS SLEEPING) but you are planning on being less active during the most important part of the day? The day ends in like 3 hours. Also, you even said you wanted to hear from Forumite but you knew he is in another time zone and that's why you knew he wouldn't respond till later. So why did it never cross your mind that I could be sleeping as well?

Nice double standards, scum.


and so with that



##UNVOTE
##Vote:Nisani201


lol wtf just noticed.

This is actually reallyy shady -_-


He feels he should have caused a no lynch? No lynch is 100% anti-town on Day 1.

On September 16 2011 00:49 wherebugsgo wrote:
I did it because people hate no-lynch.

I agree that, in hindsight I should've forced a no lynch. Then, instead of you attacking me for casting the hammer Forumite and Jackal would be attacking me for being responsible for a no lynch. I can't please everyone.


Let's lynch scum today.

Let's lynch wherebugsgo.
Valar Morghulis
Lucidity
Profile Joined July 2010
South Africa603 Posts
September 18 2011 19:35 GMT
#742
Oh I forgot to point out the aggressive nature in detail. Basically saying things like "Jesus Christ you guys are fucking slow." when he "breadcrumbs" in a general manner is bad (That "breadcrumb" could easily have referenced which pony he was (Applejack)). In fact, he breadcrumbs, but then points out 12 mins later what he breadcrumbed........................ WHY would he breadcrumb if he's going to reveal that info 12 minutes later? It makes no sense.

He is scum and has to push scummy agendas and he can't differentiate between scummy/town behaviour as he is scum himself. Therefore, he resorts to name calling and aggressive posts to get his point across. He is so obviously scum I can't even believe it.

Lynch WBG.
Valar Morghulis
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
September 18 2011 19:35 GMT
#743
tnkted (0)
1-Nisani201
2-wherebugsgo

wherebugsgo (2)
3-Jackal58
11-Nisani201
12-Forumite
14-Lucidity

Jackal58 (1)
4-wherebugsgo
7-Nisani201
8-Sevryn

Nisani201 (1)
5-Greymist
6-wherebugsgo

Forumite (2)
9-tnkted
10-Cyber_Cheese
13-Curu

Lucidity (2)
15-tnkted
16-Forumite

MODKILLS
dreamflower
GreYMisT
Jackal58
:3
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
September 18 2011 19:41 GMT
#744
Lucidity, why would WBG give up a piece of harmony if he´s scum?
:3
Lucidity
Profile Joined July 2010
South Africa603 Posts
September 18 2011 19:47 GMT
#745
He saw how much town cred tnkted and Jackal got? I really think he is the scummiest person in the game at this point. I can't see how he could possibly forget when he got his element. More likely he realised that we'd figure out that getting it on N1 instead of D1 with you meant he got it from Chaos' death and then tried to remedy the situation.

Seeing how useless the powers seem to be that the stones give I don't think scum would even care to give it away. Though I wouldn't know if they knew what combining it would do beforehand. I haven't received anything.

Can't believe it's only a name check :/ Proper derpy hooves man.

tnkted: Have you read my response to your case against me? What about it was unsatisfactory? Why do you think I'm scum?
Valar Morghulis
Lucidity
Profile Joined July 2010
South Africa603 Posts
September 18 2011 19:52 GMT
#746
On September 18 2011 22:50 Forumite wrote:
Lucidity, why did you readily believe Jackal and tnkted when they confirmed eachother, but believe one of either me or WBG is scum?

1. I don't believe all the pieces can be in townies' hands.

2. tnkted and Jackal were the first to claim and the circumstances surrounding the claim make me believe they're townies. tnkted giving his piece to Jackal IN PRIVATE when he feared for his life doesn't make sense as scum. Of course there is the possibility that he is playing us, but that is not my belief. I think it's unlikely. Jackal then revealed what tnkted did instead of simply killing him. Again, much more likely that he is Town for doing that. WBG on the other hand did everything in PUBLIC. Imo, much more likely that he's doing it for TOWN CRED. If you add the timing issues he had with believing tnkted/jackal's claim and when he actually got the stone, WBG is certainly scum.
Valar Morghulis
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
September 18 2011 19:56 GMT
#747
WBG didn´t know that the power was weak, because I didn´t know that the power would be that weak. I knew it was something, and expected Honesty to be a full rolecheck power for the rest of the game, but that was apparently too much to hope for.
:3
Jackal58
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4264 Posts
September 18 2011 19:56 GMT
#748
On September 19 2011 04:41 Forumite wrote:
Lucidity, why would WBG give up a piece of harmony if he´s scum?

Because we would have lynched him if he didn't. Same as we would have lynched you if you didn't.
Life can only kill you once.
Jackal58
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4264 Posts
September 18 2011 20:00 GMT
#749
Loyalty is a one off power as well. It allows the holder to protect 1 person 1 time.
However according to GMarshall the items become more powerful as they are combined even if they have expended their 1 use power.
Life can only kill you once.
GMarshal
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States22154 Posts
September 18 2011 20:00 GMT
#750
Now looking for one replacement.
Moderator
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
September 18 2011 20:00 GMT
#751
On September 19 2011 04:56 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2011 04:41 Forumite wrote:
Lucidity, why would WBG give up a piece of harmony if he´s scum?

Because we would have lynched him if he didn't. Same as we would have lynched you if you didn't.

Noone knew that I and WBG had a piece each. If he was scum, why did he reveal the existance of his piece at all?
:3
Lucidity
Profile Joined July 2010
South Africa603 Posts
September 18 2011 20:02 GMT
#752
On September 18 2011 23:45 Forumite wrote:
Okay, until those items arrive to you, I´ll keep my vote on WBG. I doubt he´s lying, but it´s so easy to make sure.

----

Leaving that for now, I have Lucidity in my sights, probably a bit UMGUS because of his early vote on me, but his play since doesn´t help in dispelling that first impression.

Not Scumtells: Pushing the first pony to look scummy (Me), not wanting to confirm Jackal+tnkted by lynching one of them.
Scumtells: Wanting to discuss ponies D0. Discrediting metaanalysis on self. Push DF with WIFOM. Soft FoS on Curu for no reason. Short posts except on DF and when defending himself. Wasting his vote by leaving it on me D1.

If WBG turns out to be town you're likely scum then. I can't imagine that both of you are town. So far you opened with a hella scummy play which I've pointed out already. You then disappeared. You came back and posted some absolute fluff. And then you discussed your stones a bit. All in all? No scum hunting. Except this post I quoted I guess... Which is the laziest case I've ever seen in my life.

Let's address my "scumtells" one by one.

Wanting to discuss ponies D0.

Because of my joke post? Which I followed up with stimulating discussion? Lol?

Discrediting metaanalysis on self.

That's just a weak reason and I already addressed it in my response to tnkted. I didn't discredit meta analysis on myself, I just pointed out that reading my past 3 games would be useless. PM games and 1 inactive game. Seriously, take a second to think about this...

Push DF with WIFOM.

I don't understand what you mean here. Could you please elaborate?

Soft FoS on Curu for no reason.

What do you mean for no reason? I shared my thoughts.

Short posts except on DF and when defending himself.

My posts today have been short for lack of time. Some of it was to try and bait you and WBG into going after me (eg my initial WBG accusation). I wanted to see if you'd latch on to an easy short post or two and then twist my earlier actions to look scummy. Apparently it has worked with you. If WBG flips town at some point please go after Forumite. He is not hunting scum. Filter him. HE IS NOT HUNTING SCUM.

Wasting his vote by leaving it on me D1

Again, I don't understand what you mean here. I voted sinani. Without my vote there would have been a no lynch.
Valar Morghulis
Jackal58
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4264 Posts
September 18 2011 20:12 GMT
#753
On September 19 2011 05:00 GMarshal wrote:
Now looking for one replacement.

For who may I ask?


On September 19 2011 05:00 Forumite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2011 04:56 Jackal58 wrote:
On September 19 2011 04:41 Forumite wrote:
Lucidity, why would WBG give up a piece of harmony if he´s scum?

Because we would have lynched him if he didn't. Same as we would have lynched you if you didn't.

Noone knew that I and WBG had a piece each. If he was scum, why did he reveal the existance of his piece at all?

Good point.
Life can only kill you once.
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
September 18 2011 20:15 GMT
#754
Missed the votechange D1, okay, ignore that.

Your FoS on dreamflower day 1: + Show Spoiler +
On September 14 2011 19:55 Lucidity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 00:18 dreamflower wrote:
At the moment, I am more in favor of lynching an inactive, because town lurkers still don't help the town if they're not sharing their thoughts or giving us information and Mafia lurkers are, well, Mafia. I am currently unconvinced by the cases so far, as they tend to be based on post-by-post analyses of posts made on Day 1, when most of us were unsure of what we should be discussing or trying to accomplish. Generally, I tend to be skeptical of post-by-post analysis, as they often are just nitpicking at small contradictions or confusing phrases in posts that perhaps the poster just didn't think through clearly and they seem to assume that Mafia will give themselves away a little in every post, which they usually don't. Right now, the cases made against Forumite and Greymist strike me as being more like townies accusing townies, so I'm hesitant to vote for a lynch based on those cases.

I did think it was a little odd that Forumite asked for a DT check on Jackal. But it seems like Jackal is a pretty well-known player, so I suppose it makes sense that he is subject to the scrutiny that well-known players tend to receive, like Ver or Ace. Jackal himself also seems quieter than I expected, though perhaps that is only because it is so early in the game.

So, I would much prefer lynching a lurker right now. The lurkers that stand out most to me are Sevryn and DroneAllDay. Of these two, the latter has specifically stated that he is very new and will be lurking a lot, which on one hand could be an honest statement of confusion but on the other hand could be a Mafia trying to look like a clueless newbie. The former, Sevryn, has made only a few game-related, non-pony-discussing posts, most regarding the Day post and how it'll give us more to talk about. Yet, he himself hasn't said anything substantial after the Day post except "Oh yay Day post. So, what are the Elements of Harmony?" I would very much like to hear from these two players sometime soon. I also wouldn't mind hearing about everyone's thoughts regarding the merits and flaws of lynching inactives versus lynching someone in particular.


Essentially this post served two purposes:

  • Introducing the idea of really attempting to lynch a lurker today. Getting a feel for our willingness to follow such a strategy with the last sentence.
  • Discrediting the cases brought forward so far.


Lynching lurkers should be a last resort. Going after lurkers (and by lurkers she actually means INACTIVES) allows scum to not offer any opinions and simply sheep onto an easy vote. This is not an ideal situation to say the least.

She discredits the cases against Forumite and Greymist, by simply saying that she doesn't like post by post analysis and that she thinks townies are accusing townies. Could you explain why you think townies are accusing townies dreamflower? You offer no reason to doubt the case based on actual discussion points. Simply "oh I'm unconvinced".

Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 00:25 dreamflower wrote:
Bah. And now that I posted, Sevryn has posted and even voted for Forumite. -_- I'm still a little cautious about the case on Forumite, as people seem to be basing it mostly on that one post and making him defend his ideas. I agree that his defense has also been inept, but I don't think it necessarily means he is Mafia.

For now, I guess I will just vote for DroneAllDay. And learn to refresh the page a lot better while I'm posting.

##vote DroneAllDay


Note the displeasure when she sees that someone else voted Forumite. So instead of waiting for other's opinions on the LaL strategy she proposed, she goes ahead with it to try and divert attention away from real scum hunting by voting for DroneAllDay.

Look at the reasoning in that post.

    She is visibly upset with another vote on Forumite.
    She thinks his defense is inept.
    But somehow he does not deserve any attention.
    Instead she "guesses" she'll vote for DroneAllDay.


Point? She's defending Forumite with no real reasoning. She puts her vote on an inactive, not a lurker.

Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 02:23 dreamflower wrote:
On September 14 2011 00:32 Jackal58 wrote:
Dreamflower lynching inactives is counter productive. Inactives are most likely going to be mod killed. Lurkers on the other hand are a different animal. There is a difference between the two. When you said inactives I'm pretty sure you were still referring to lurkers.


Ah, true. Yes, I was referring to lurkers when I said inactives. My apologies. A lot of my thinking still dates back to the olden days before inactivity modkills or the Ban List, so please excuse me if I phrase things oddly like that.

I also agree about OriginalName, whom I'm a little annoyed about not noticing myself. I also noticed that DroneAllDay's statement of Mafia newness came very soon after he signed up and long before roles were sent out, so that pretty much rules out his being a Mafia trying to masquerade as a newbie. My mistake there. OriginalName's one contribution to the thread after the Day post has been to call Forumite's post "a huge pile of fluff," but after that he hasn't said anything else at all. That does look more like lurking than outright inactivity.

To add my own opinion on the merits of lynching lurkers, I think it is a good idea early on, when we don't have much information to work with. I agree that lynching lurkers doesn't yield much information afterward, but I don't think going after "real" targets always does either. The people who argue for a townie to be lynched or vote for their lynch are not necessarily Mafia themselves. So, I don't think either approach can give us much in the way of useful information.


The part highlighted in red essentially explains why ON is where her vote should be. DroneAllDay is an inactive, which she doesn't want to go for. She wants lurkers, and ON is one. Yet her vote stays on DroneAllDay. She dedicates an entire paragraph to explaining why DAD is a bad vote, and then doesn't change it.

Then she goes on to try and push the LaL objective. We shouldn't be lynching for information. DEFINITELY not on Day 1. We should be hunting scum. Lynching lurkers (inactives) is not scum hunting. It doesn't give us any information, which you think is important? Yet you still advocate lynching lurkers. Going after "real" targets actually DOES offer us information ito voting patterns, defenses e t c . Not that, that is our first priority, but it blows your LaL policy out of the water.

tl;dr

Defends Forumite and greymist with no reasoning.
Pushes anti-town objective of lynching inactives instead of scum hunting.

(Note that she really means inactives when she says lurkers, even though she indicated otherwise. Her posts make that clear enough.)
The WIFOM I´m talking about is that your case against DF was heavily (50% if you trust the tl;dr.) about how she´s deflecting the vote from Me and Greymist, which would really only be scummy if we all are Scum, that´s the WIFOM.

Just checking, you are saying that with your vote on WBG and posting today, you purposefully act scummy, to draw out votes from us and Town? Seriously?
:3
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
September 18 2011 20:23 GMT
#755
Below is the reflexive FoS that Lucidity did on Curu. It and the FoS on DF came right after eachother.
On September 14 2011 20:03 Lucidity wrote:
I'll delve into that Curu/sinani/nisani shitstorm later.

Curu has scarred me with his brilliant Mafia play in XLIII(IV)? No matter how town he looks I'm always going to be doubting him now -_-
:3
Lucidity
Profile Joined July 2010
South Africa603 Posts
September 18 2011 20:33 GMT
#756
I'm referring to this.

On September 17 2011 21:03 Lucidity wrote:
Oh and WBG is scum.

2 ez.


On September 18 2011 07:04 Lucidity wrote:
Just read the new element of harmony claim. One of Forumite or WBG is definitely scum.

Though the latter was really because I didn't have time to post more. I could have left such a post out, but neither you nor WBG had attacked my previous post so I thought I'd post one more. I haven't been playing scummily on purpose except for that. I knew scum would try to latch on to that and town's short term memory and try to push for my lynch. Honestly, if you think that's worth a lynch or me pushing scum agenda I have no hope for Town. You are purposefully ignoring the rest of my play or misrepresenting it if you want to lynch me. I have since qualified my earlier statements regarding WBG being scum so those posts aren't even relevant anymore.

Has anyone read my case against WBG?

5.5 hours left. We need to start consolidating votes. Town is always way too slow near deadlines.
Valar Morghulis
Lucidity
Profile Joined July 2010
South Africa603 Posts
September 18 2011 20:37 GMT
#757
On September 19 2011 05:23 Forumite wrote:
Below is the reflexive FoS that Lucidity did on Curu. It and the FoS on DF came right after eachother.
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2011 20:03 Lucidity wrote:
I'll delve into that Curu/sinani/nisani shitstorm later.

Curu has scarred me with his brilliant Mafia play in XLIII(IV)? No matter how town he looks I'm always going to be doubting him now -_-

Maybe it came right after each other because that's when I was online posting? Lol. And that statement regarding Curu is true. Go read XLIV. He was considered the most pro-town player in Town and he was scum. That wasn't a FoS at all.

Here is my FoS on Curu:

On September 15 2011 08:01 Lucidity wrote:
I can't tell if Curu tried to cause chaos or if he's just being really aggressive... Policy lynching someone for actions in another game isn't something I think a good player would do. Curu hasn't advocated it in other games with Kenpachi/Kurumi as far as I'm aware, and he basically views them as unreadable too.


What do you think about my case on WBG Forumite?
Valar Morghulis
Lucidity
Profile Joined July 2010
South Africa603 Posts
September 18 2011 20:38 GMT
#758
Come on you North Americans !#$%@

WTB Input!
Valar Morghulis
Jackal58
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4264 Posts
September 18 2011 20:51 GMT
#759
Where has Curu been?
Life can only kill you once.
Forumite
Profile Joined February 2011
Sweden3280 Posts
September 18 2011 21:05 GMT
#760
You say it was a bait, I just see a FoS without any substance behind it, after getting WBG more or less confirmed, at least in my eyes. Scum would want to discredit any correct attempt to confirm Town, which makes pushing WBG at that time scummy. Of course I think you look scummy for it.

I´ve read your case on WBG, skimmed it at least.
Him forgetting when he got his piece, does it make him more scum? N1 makes less sense, as it must have come from Sinani, as Sinani wouldn´t have kept his piece when he was getting lynched and WBG didn´t look like the best one to send it to. The thing is, that when he got it doesn´t make him Scum, wether or not he lied about it might, if for example another Scum got it and that Scum told him the wrong day. Is that what you think?

What looks weird is him pushing for more info from Jackal, even though he allready knew what they were talking about. He should have accepted earlier. That´s the part of your case on him I can agree with, at least before he gave up his piece.
:3
Prev 1 36 37 38 39 40 74 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
$400 Monday #40
WardiTV1152
OGKoka 528
IndyStarCraft 236
Rex175
CranKy Ducklings135
IntoTheiNu 25
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 528
Lowko362
Harstem 308
IndyStarCraft 236
Hui .200
Rex 175
ProTech70
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 4632
Horang2 2508
EffOrt 1406
Mini 1112
Larva 749
Stork 497
Light 312
actioN 299
firebathero 297
Zeus 241
[ Show more ]
Snow 170
Mong 114
Pusan 83
JYJ82
Sharp 80
hero 72
sSak 70
Sea.KH 69
JulyZerg 61
Killer 48
PianO 47
Movie 39
Rush 30
soO 25
zelot 24
Backho 21
scan(afreeca) 20
Shine 15
GoRush 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
Terrorterran 14
Noble 12
sorry 9
yabsab 8
Sacsri 8
ivOry 5
Stormgate
RushiSC13
Dota 2
qojqva2586
XcaliburYe431
Fuzer 276
League of Legends
Dendi1930
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2733
allub199
Other Games
singsing2096
hiko1303
B2W.Neo1218
crisheroes327
Beastyqt319
ArmadaUGS180
elazer142
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream13903
Other Games
gamesdonequick609
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV233
League of Legends
• Nemesis13389
• Jankos3243
• TFBlade548
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
2h 5m
Replay Cast
10h 5m
Replay Cast
20h 5m
RSL Revival
20h 5m
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
PiGosaur Monday
1d 10h
RSL Revival
1d 20h
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
RSL Revival
3 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
SC Evo League
4 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-11
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.