TL Mafia L - Page 23
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
| ||
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
Elected roles gain detection immunity. This makes it worse for us if mafia get into one of these roles, as we have no way to DT check them. It also means that the GF probably won't run for office, or if he does, he'll drop out early. Between the mayor and the sheriff, the sheriff is the one who actually has power past day 1. So, one thing we can do, is vote in a player that we see as both a strong townie, and as being town in this game, into the mayor role solely for the purposes of protection. This applies to the sheriff too, but there's more responsibility on them as the game goes on due to the jailkeeper mechanic. Also something to note, is that we can't trust vig claims, due to the possibility of mafia jack's, who would be able to shoot and not affect what KP would show up that night coming from the mafia. We should also maybe talk about when to use our double lynches, but I don't think it's a huge deal until when the time comes that we might actually want to use them. We just need to be careful not to waste them. Vote me into office, please. | ||
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
![]() Cheese for mare! Campaign unofficially endorsed by flamewheel As you all know, my scum play is pretty bad, and I have the time to put into the game to discern the scum from the town. Giving me those extra votes is securing a safe town future. I'm going to lynch the scummiest mayorial candidate, and my vote will go to the person that seems to have the most time to (effectively) put into the game. | ||
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot. I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again. | ||
Foolishness
![]()
United States3044 Posts
![]() This is my official campaign post! It is all very simple! No, I am not running for office. My campaign is based around voting for the one and only Bill Murray! Let's face it, there are many people (L) who are going to run on the basis of lynching Bill Murray. Do we want to make such a rash decision this early in the game? Time has shown that such policy lynches are just a distraction from our true purpose of scum hunting. In order to save Bill Murray from such an easy day 1 lynch, I propose we save him by putting him in office. Now before you go on making propositions that I have just smoked a pound of weed, consider the situation our beloved Bill Murray is in. As his first game back, we know for sure he's going to be top notch. This is his chance to prove to the old members that he's changed and proved to the new members that he's a respectable player. Thus we can expect him to bust out his A+ game. He knows that if he nails a few mafia this game he'll have turned from village idiot into village hottie. Who would you rather have in office? Someone like Bill Murray who is probably spending 14 hours a day figuring out who is mafia or someone like kitaman27 or bumatlarge who will just put forth the same normal effort we'd expect from an elected official? Bill Murray is the real deal, and we know he'll be the real deal. Who knows how much effort Cyber_Cheese really wants to put in this game. Definitely not as much as Bill Murray will! A vote for Bill Murray is a vote for the town! Now what if our esteemed actor turns out to be mafia? Don't worry, as a proven scumhunter, I will dedicate enormous amounts of my time to making sure Bill Murray is indeed town. And he has a lot of games under his belt for comparison. Of course I will also be doing my usual scumhunting, so do not fret. But we can be sure that Bill Murray will be posting frequently (hopefully not too much) and will be active in his duties, especially given what I've said above. Is kitaman only going to make 2 posts a day if he gets elected in? Maybe. Will Bill Murray? No of course not. And we all know that the more someone posts the more likely their true colors show. If Bill Murray turns out to be mafia it shouldn't be long before it becomes obvious. If he's not, we got an easily confirmed innocent in office who at the very least will make the entire mafia team facepalm. And a mafia team with their palms on their faces will be unable to type. ![]() You can make the right choice! Vote Bill Murray! + Show Spoiler + Yes I'm 100% serious | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 13 2012 14:26 Ciryandor wrote: /confirm LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot. I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again. Well now we see you have no idea what you are talking about. I have seen kitaman play in alot of games as town and mafia, and going off one game means you have a biased opinion off limited samples. I can't read Wiggles for shit (he yet again starts the game with a post that seems strikingly similar to every other initial post he makes). I'd back cyber_cheese's idea of lynching a scummy candidate. It's not very original, but putting more risk to running is fine by me. | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
![]() | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
![]() risk.nuke for mayor I'm not the best townie here so you might be asking yourself why am I running for mayor, I came here to win and I think the best thing to do as a townie is to try and win the election. For those who have read my history you know I am passionate player. A few times in my last games I have found myself losing my mood. I can promise you that will not happen in this game. I don't like to be angry. I like to be helpfull, it makes me feel better and when I feel better I perform better. I will fight for a friendly town in order to keep the peace. So that logic and reason may reign the lynches, not tunneling, omgus and bandwagons or other scumtricks or anti-town shenanigans. I am reliable. I have the time to play, I wont disappear and I won't make excuses. I will be here so you can often have my thoughts on anything. I am persistant, I won't just sheep but I will stick to my beliefs and argue for them aslong as I have them. So If you want to elect a serious person, a person who you will always know where he is at, a person who will give this his best. Then vote for risk.nuke!! always townie, never not townie!! | ||
kitaman27
![]()
United States9244 Posts
On January 13 2012 14:04 EchelonTee wrote: Kita, what makes you a better Mayor than other potential candidates if you yourself say that you are not a very good town player? Most importantly, because I'm town, but I doubt that will convince you ![]() Mainly because I'm active and will be frequently reading the thread with promises to contribute the entire game. Plenty of past mayors get elected based on experience and then lose interest or become busy and don't live up to expectations. I have experience and prefer maintaining a strong thread presence the entire game. As for your comment, what I meant was there are probably 3-4 players that I consider better than me as town. I wouldn't say I'm a poor town player, which is clearly back up by the fact that I haven't lost in 11 months. Not a statistical anomaly at all! (Okay maybe it is.) On January 13 2012 14:26 Ciryandor wrote: /confirm LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot. I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again. I'm afraid you have me confused with someone else. I didn't play that game ![]() I'm somewhat surprised bum would vote for me minutes into the game without a real read, but I can't complain. Foolishness, I don't see how it is logical to campaign for another player, considering you know your own alignment. Lets not turn the first day into a discussion on whether or not BM's past incidents warrant risking him becoming the center of attention. The entire game is going to be about BM if he is elected, which is not ideal. You admit there are going to be numerous people that wish to policy lynch him based on his spammy playstyle, how does electing him solve that problem? | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
AND PLEASE MASON ME. I'll live with not being the mayor, but I love me some masons. Don't worry I'm not infected this game. Then I can share with you my knowledge. Also, I may or may not be batman this game, I feel a surge of confidence after winning the last game. | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
let's see who actually commits to their campaign in 24 hours | ||
Protactinium
Canada550 Posts
On January 13 2012 14:26 Ciryandor wrote: /confirm LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot. I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again. I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign. | ||
Foolishness
![]()
United States3044 Posts
On January 13 2012 14:48 kitaman27 wrote: Foolishness, I don't see how it is logical to campaign for another player, considering you know your own alignment. Lets not turn the first day into a discussion on whether or not BM's past incidents warrant risking him becoming the center of attention. The entire game is going to be about BM if he is elected, which is not ideal. You admit there are going to be numerous people that wish to policy lynch him based on his spammy playstyle, how does electing him solve that problem? What a selfish thing to say! I am only concerned about the interests of the town, this has nothing to do with me, and everything to do with... BILL MURRAY BILL MURRAY is proven to be active, and he'll be on his best behavior and bring out his best ability. That's what I want in a mayor. I read these other campaigns and see the dull tripe that is normally associated with campaigns "vote for me! I swear I'm good!" blah de blah. It's impossible to tell what these player's agenda's are. But with BILL MURRAY we know exactly what we are getting when we put him into office. | ||
Adam4167
Australia1426 Posts
So far I'm leaning towards voting for Cheese, as he is one of the few people in this game I have experience with. I am more likely to recognize his scum play if he is scum and, lets face it, he has a flaming pony as his campaign picture. So Cheese, since you opened the game with a vote on Wiggles, and he is now also running for mayor, will you be hanging him upon your election? | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 13 2012 15:08 Adam4167 wrote: Ill be waiting for Bill Murray to show up to the thread before I even consider him or his candidacy. So far I'm leaning towards voting for Cheese, as he is one of the few people in this game I have experience with. I am more likely to recognize his scum play if he is scum and, lets face it, he has a flaming pony as his campaign picture. So Cheese, since you opened the game with a vote on Wiggles, and he is now also running for mayor, will you be hanging him upon your election? I have successfully ruled this person out as mafia. I am good at this game. | ||
Erandorr
2283 Posts
| ||
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote: I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign. My campaign is to not make a campaign post, because they're all the same (except for foolishness' so far), and they're all useless. Generic Mayoral Campagin I think I am the best candidate to be voted into office, these are my credentials:
VOTE FOR ME!!!!! I think this adequately describes nearly every mayoral post we will see in this game. So, Foolishness, why do you think that Bill Murray is easier to read than any other player in the game? What games has he played, where he's shown his worth as a townie? I've only played with him twice, and they weren't exactly demonstrative of awesome play, but I don't think he was trying that hard. | ||
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + So don't worry, Foolishness! | ||
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote: I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign. LOL that's a good reason to get you voted in. Lynching someone for having an opinion. | ||
Foolishness
![]()
United States3044 Posts
On January 13 2012 15:11 Erandorr wrote: Foolishness, first of, what a beautiful campaign, you made more sense than anyone else until now. I am wondering, however, why you think that our focus should be to get the roles away from potentially strong mafia players instead of trying to protect potentially good town players in a massive game like this? The incarcerate ability seems like more of an asset to the mafia than the town (it's almost like a roleblocker). The extra votes will help mafia if it gets down near lylo. With 10 mafia I think it's safe to say we got some blue power on our side (exactly what or how is unknown, but it's there). I think it's better to halt the mafia from getting additional benefits then protecting a potentially good player. As you said a good town player is only "potentially" good. Even the best players have off games for whatever reasons. A mafia team won't "potentially" use those abilities correctly, they will. | ||
| ||