EPTTL Mafia L - Page 130
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Yeah, because if I were scum, I'd be SO concerned about protecting supersoft from the analysis of someone who went AWAL for a whole cycle. I'll remember this page all right - I'll remember it as the very first time I became suspicious of p4NDemik. | ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:16 bumatlarge wrote: If a player is incinerated, and vigilante uses his shot on said person, does the bullet return? No. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:16 p4NDemik wrote: I want town to remember this page when supersoft flips scum. Remember the names of these fools who are mindlessly spamming. that's what I keep telling myself ALL THE TIME when someone talks about how sandroba is a green. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:18 p4NDemik wrote: Why are you more concerned about one theory more than another. Stop doing everything you can to spam this accusation under the rug and consider all possibilities for the sake of town. Also wtf are you talking about? flamewheel? Because Supersoft can't drive this herd of lemmings over a cliff and into the sea. BC, Proact, and Flamewheel can. | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
| ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:18 Jackal58 wrote: It's INCARCERATED Not incinerated. Not incarnated. I called my shot Bum. What do you have issues with? RPGs? no i thought you were very likely scum. Perhaps I need to review BC more closely. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:18 VisceraEyes wrote: :eyeroll: Yeah, because if I were scum, I'd be SO concerned about protecting supersoft from the analysis of someone who went AWAL for a whole cycle. I'll remember this page all right - I'll remember it as the very first time I became suspicious of p4NDemik. didn't you just say you wanted to stop with that wbg-style? You don't really have the same attitude. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:01 p4NDemik wrote: I've been incredibly lazy over the last few days (I've been reading the thread but the first couple of days left me pretty burnt out -___- Anyways I'm all for voting Bill Murray as his behavior yesterday was incredibly erratic. Which leads me to this post and my second vote: This post seems extremely odd for a number of reasons, first of all he has this proposition that we lynch macpo, but refuses in putting his vote in for him. I cannot understand why a townie would come in with a post explaining his vote and feel it necessary to express his distaste for another player he wasn't voting for but oddly still supports lynching. Feels like he doesn't want to vote Macpo but at the same time wants to get in this last sliver of distrust so his intentions aren't questioned at the time. Secondly, he just latches on to another case when explaining his vote (keep in mind even cybercheese didn't feel strongly enough to vote for Chaosquo), this feels like a lazy cop-out for having to post an explanation. Finally he has this bit about the case against BM being hard to understand. I have this as the weakest point because it is buttressed if BM flips red, but I thought all along the BM case was incredibly clear cut. He made some odd claims and had a lot of erratic behavior, which not surprisingly drew a lot of suspicion. Even if you don't agree with it I don't think it at any time has been difficult to grasp why people want him lynched. Couple that with this suspicious chain of posts following L's candidacy for Mayor and I feel strongly enough to make this my second vote today. "Maybe I'll vote for L" "BM most likely town!!" bs #mafiatalk ##Vote Bill Murray and ##Vote supersoft guys!! Ferrr liquidia! mhm. if you rip my posts out of the context and change the chronologic order i really am suspicious. i btw called out L. Only because i had so few time i didn't push for his lynch. + it wasn't necessary to vote macpop, because he already had a comfortable lead. also as long as caosque isnt town, there is no reason to suspect me. and even if he is, i just might have been wrong and that doesnt make me scum. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:20 p4NDemik wrote: Can someone please speak to the actual content of my accusation? You guys are acting like children on the playground. the problem I have with it is that we already have a bunch of people we're able happy to lynch today. I don't think we need more but yeah I am suspicious of supersoft for couple of reasons as well but I'm not sure about it + everyone else stomped on me the last time I posted a case. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:21 bumatlarge wrote: no i thought you were very likely scum. Perhaps I need to review BC more closely. Start here - Why did Proact want BM to incarcerate L? Read his filter but with Foolishness and Proacts. Not one of them I could call scummy individual. But they are all 3 legs of the same milk stool. | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:24 Jackal58 wrote: Start here - Why did Proact want BM to incarcerate L? Read his filter but with Foolishness and Proacts. Not one of them I could call scummy individual. But they are all 3 legs of the same milk stool. I don't think that is entirely true. Foolishness and protact I agree with, but BC feels like a much shorter leg then the other three. Why would you not call him a scummy individual? | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:16 Jackal58 wrote: I'm more concerned about the possibility of a scum triumvirate trying to gain control of town than what Supersoft may or may not be. BC, Proactinium, Flamewheel. Mutually supporting scumteam. That possibility scares me. They trust each other way to much. Hrm... Not really sure how I feel about this. How sure are you of this? How do you feel about BM, then, Jackal? Also I like BM lynch. Not sure KJ is the best second. | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
And VE I know we have a lot of candidates. The important thing is that we get the ones we feel the most strongly about. And I feel like this case is a home run. Clear cut. Lazy voting behavior. He even manages to bus his own team member while voting for someone else. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:31 Lanaia wrote: Hrm... Not really sure how I feel about this. How sure are you of this? How do you feel about BM, then, Jackal? Also I like BM lynch. Not sure KJ is the best second. I'm not sure. I'm not anywhere near sure. Until BM tells us who he caged up I'm going to presume he's town. On January 19 2012 13:29 bumatlarge wrote: I don't think that is entirely true. Foolishness and protact I agree with, but BC feels like a much shorter leg then the other three. Why would you not call him a scummy individual? I'm saying that none of the three have posted anything I could build a solid case on. But their apparent faith in each others alignment bothers the hell out of me. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:32 p4NDemik wrote: I don't care about Chaosquo at all. What I care about is that you went with the case of a player who didn't even believe in the case enough to vote for Chaosquo. There was NO support leading up to your vote. No one giving a compelling case. You look like you are just making a lazy vote that you don't care about at all. You lead on like you want Macpo lynched but the motive looks to be clearly that of a mafia - to cover up your true alignment and to make you look town. And VE I know we have a lot of candidates. The important thing is that we get the ones we feel the most strongly about. And I feel like this case is a home run. Clear cut. Lazy voting behavior. He even manages to bus his own team member while voting for someone else. You can make the exact same case against the guy you're talking too. | ||
|
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
1) I need to vote and explain myself - enter line 1: "I am voting Chaosquo. I like cybercheeses case against him the most." GREAT DONE! 2) I need to distance myself from Macpo, he's a goner - enter "I propose that we lynch this macpo guy (even if town, he's no real loss/he won't be able to reestablish his innocence even if he's town) and Caosque." He even says "this macpo guy" yeah "this guy I have no relation to at all, I don't know him, never did, don't get any ideas" 3) (again I'm less sure on this but it fits if BM is mafia) BM looks to be in trouble tomorrow, we can't lose our mafia sheriff, I need to inject some doubt - gives you the junk between where he "can't understand" and "can't see it" It don't think I could write up a more clear cut case. His not even being able to provide any solid reasoning for disliking a BM lynch just makes me more set. ##vote Bill Murray ##vote supersoft | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On January 19 2012 13:40 Jackal58 wrote: You can make the exact same case against the guy you're talking too. But this guy claimed Blue D1 and soaked up a shot last night LIKE BAUS. p4N I get what you're saying - and because I agree with your case, I'm unvoting kingjames in favor of supersoft. Again...like baus. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
##Vote: supersoft | ||
| ||
