Werewolves Invade TeamLiquid

On August 11 2011 19:43 Forumite wrote:

It´s not a bug, it´s a feature.

On August 13 2011 05:49 DropBear wrote:
I just pmd like 10 people iv played past games with harrassing them to join

On August 15 2011 03:54 DropBear wrote:
Ok first couple of thoughts:

- Many of the usual suspects in speaking out early and setting the tone (e.g. sandroba, GMarshal) are not playing so people need to step up a bit more than usual.

- Blues look much less useful than usual. Both strains of detective can only detect certain scum, medics are either silencers or can't repeat saves, veterans don't even know they are veterans so they can't try to draw scum fire, watchers have a really small chance of getting any information until at least day 3. Not only this several traits which would normally could be considered blue roles are now possible Mafia roles. We need to win this through analysis.

- If there are any rivals in play, please delay your tunnelling until a bit later in the game. We don't want early lynches being concentrated on someone who only helps one person win the game, we need them to be Mafia. Worry about your evil twin later on.

On August 15 2011 07:10 Forumite wrote:
Mass claiming, I haven´t seen that many arguments for or against, mostly it´s people just agreeing. Those in Dropbears post are powerfull roles (except the Rival), isn´t claiming just giving ammo to the scum? Does knowing those roles help Town? Doesn´t it help Scum more than it helps Town?

There might be benefit to Rival claiming, if they all claim, and that is that scum can´t claim rival later on, to defend themselves when they are accused of tunneling without reason. We can´t know if everyone claims, though, so people can still do it.

On August 09 2011 01:00 Ciryandor wrote:

I will not compensate for ignorance!

On August 15 2011 07:51 Navillus wrote:


Because if my read is right on him he could easily make himself look scummier by acting nooby again while not actually making him any more likely to be scum.

On August 15 2011 08:20 Nisani201 wrote:
I think we should hold off discussion on Varp's FoS on Slam until Slam gets a chance to defend himself.

On August 15 2011 08:22 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
so you think we should hold off discussion on Varp's FoS on Slam until Slam gets a chance to defend himself?

kurumi wrote:
they
are
coming
ineedhelpidon'thavetoomuchtime
the deadline is reversed
it is coming faster
2133
idon't have too much time
help me

User was temp banned for this post.

On August 16 2011 04:07 Nisani201 wrote:

Because they can't.

On August 16 2011 04:13 GreYMisT wrote:
So Mafia couldn't kill last night, but other actions could be taken right?

and lol at the HuK picture.

On August 16 2011 04:34 Nisani201 wrote:

Maybe he doesn't want a townie to get lynched because of stupid evidence like that.

In other news, I think we should start discussing Slam. He hasn't posted yet, but I don't really see what information we would gain from him "defending" himself that isn't already in Varp's chat log. And I highly doubt that the logs are fake because it's so easy for Slam to just nullify them anyways. What are people's thoughts?

On August 19 2011 11:52 Varpulis wrote:
##vote Nisani201

Nisani's claim is very convenient. I just read the role list again, and he's not a cop, he's a journalist. In a nutshell, journalists don't find scum and can't. it's an investigative role that will return town 80% of the time. That safe a claim, combined with the fact that the medic that claimed to him just kicked the bucket make me very skeptical.

Also, i've got a pretty solid town read on Jackal.

Has anybody claimed the kill on Navillus, or was that a scumhit? It was separated from the other two kills last night, so I'm inclined to believe that we have a vig.

On August 19 2011 08:04 Forumite wrote:
Okay, something is going on here. Either Trotske and Hiro really are Rivals, and Hiro is trying to get Trotske killed by lying about it, Trotske is scum and is trying to get Hiro lynched with this rival accusation, or both are scum. They are both sticking to their stories, so it doesn´t look like Trotskes PM was a trick. Town don´t lie, but Rival Town has other priorities, they need to kill a player and stay alive, both are anti-Town goals, as they divert from scumhunting. Being rivals doesn´t make them Scum, but if they really are scum pretending to be Rivals, being known as Rivals is a good way to hide scummy behavior. I don´t like it, so I´m putting on the pressure.

##Vote: Trotske

Quoted posts: + Show Spoiler +

On August 20 2011 06:41 Nisani201 wrote:

Because you're scum.

On August 17 2011 10:01 Varpulis wrote:
Slam500 is probably going to get modkilled. Look at his posts. all of the one's ingame are between 6-8 kst. He's probably not going to remember to check the thread before the deadline, because it's 11am in our timezone.

TAA's posts are good on a whole, imo. I don't think he's scum and i don't think we should lynch him.

I do like the case against DropBear though. His posts are almost 100% devoted to his claiming plan and discussing mechanics, and his only post regarding who he wants to lynch/who he thinks is scum is
no explanation, nothing. This is exactly the kind of semi-abstain vote i was talking about in the beginning of the game. I think i missed this post before, didn't realize he had voted at the same time.

On August 17 2011 10:01 Varpulis wrote:
Slam500 is probably going to get modkilled. Look at his posts. all of the one's ingame are between 6-8 kst. He's probably not going to remember to check the thread before the deadline, because it's 11am in our timezone.

TAA's posts are good on a whole, imo. I don't think he's scum and i don't think we should lynch him.

I do like the case against DropBear though. His posts are almost 100% devoted to his claiming plan and discussing mechanics, and his only post regarding who he wants to lynch/who he thinks is scum is
no explanation, nothing. This is exactly the kind of semi-abstain vote i was talking about in the beginning of the game. I think i missed this post before, didn't realize he had voted at the same time.

On August 18 2011 01:19 Varpulis wrote:
why did it specify the scumteam he was from? Never seen that before.
multiple scumteams possibly?

Does anybody want to claim the kill on Navillus and explain why the fuck they killed him?

On August 20 2011 05:36 Varpulis wrote:



Is leader the trait that lets him substitute the leading vote-getter for somebody else?

Original Message From TheAwesomeAll:
i think we should tie the lynch with a lurker, there are simply too many of them atm. Before posting in the thread i want to discuss it with you and some other people that seem likely town to me. these people are lurking hardcore

12. Sevryn

9. Da-Muffinman

15. DroneAllDay

4. Trotske

13. sinani206 *not nisani

What do you think? ALso who to lynch first? sinani seems relatively scummy to me since he isnt active. Da muffinman on the other hand seems relatively town to me since he got called out and is prolly afk. Also if DB is scum muffin prolly isnt.
the main point is that we just lynch one of these guys, ur in?

Original Message From hiro protagonist:
ok I am down for this, If you can work out the logistics and PM me I could switch votes if need be. let me know. also, snotboogie would be a good lurker lynch as well.