Werewolves Invade TeamLiquid

On August 11 2011 19:43 Forumite wrote:

It´s not a bug, it´s a feature.

On August 13 2011 05:49 DropBear wrote:
I just pmd like 10 people iv played past games with harrassing them to join

On August 15 2011 03:54 DropBear wrote:
Ok first couple of thoughts:

- Many of the usual suspects in speaking out early and setting the tone (e.g. sandroba, GMarshal) are not playing so people need to step up a bit more than usual.

- Blues look much less useful than usual. Both strains of detective can only detect certain scum, medics are either silencers or can't repeat saves, veterans don't even know they are veterans so they can't try to draw scum fire, watchers have a really small chance of getting any information until at least day 3. Not only this several traits which would normally could be considered blue roles are now possible Mafia roles. We need to win this through analysis.

- If there are any rivals in play, please delay your tunnelling until a bit later in the game. We don't want early lynches being concentrated on someone who only helps one person win the game, we need them to be Mafia. Worry about your evil twin later on.

On August 15 2011 07:10 Forumite wrote:
Mass claiming, I haven´t seen that many arguments for or against, mostly it´s people just agreeing. Those in Dropbears post are powerfull roles (except the Rival), isn´t claiming just giving ammo to the scum? Does knowing those roles help Town? Doesn´t it help Scum more than it helps Town?

There might be benefit to Rival claiming, if they all claim, and that is that scum can´t claim rival later on, to defend themselves when they are accused of tunneling without reason. We can´t know if everyone claims, though, so people can still do it.

On August 09 2011 01:00 Ciryandor wrote:

I will not compensate for ignorance!

On August 15 2011 07:51 Navillus wrote:


Because if my read is right on him he could easily make himself look scummier by acting nooby again while not actually making him any more likely to be scum.

On August 15 2011 08:20 Nisani201 wrote:
I think we should hold off discussion on Varp's FoS on Slam until Slam gets a chance to defend himself.

On August 15 2011 08:22 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
so you think we should hold off discussion on Varp's FoS on Slam until Slam gets a chance to defend himself?

kurumi wrote:
they
are
coming
ineedhelpidon'thavetoomuchtime
the deadline is reversed
it is coming faster
2133
idon't have too much time
help me

User was temp banned for this post.

On August 16 2011 04:07 Nisani201 wrote:

Because they can't.

On August 16 2011 04:13 GreYMisT wrote:
So Mafia couldn't kill last night, but other actions could be taken right?

and lol at the HuK picture.

On August 16 2011 04:34 Nisani201 wrote:

Maybe he doesn't want a townie to get lynched because of stupid evidence like that.

In other news, I think we should start discussing Slam. He hasn't posted yet, but I don't really see what information we would gain from him "defending" himself that isn't already in Varp's chat log. And I highly doubt that the logs are fake because it's so easy for Slam to just nullify them anyways. What are people's thoughts?