I'm not going to have access to my comp for ~4 hours, but while i was sleeping I got a pm from DrH explaining that my puzzle is directly related to my item. If you guys think knowing the item will help with solving the puzzle, I'll tell it when i get back.

shit syllogism is good at puzzles

Trotske

410 Posts

August 05 2011 16:31 GMT

#203

On August 05 2011 22:35 Mig wrote:

Show nested quote +

I was not speculating on the role set-up from nothing.

Show nested quote +

This combined with there being a n0 where no townies have claimed to have had to do anything to do makes it seem to me that recruiter is the most likely setup.

The part about meapak being the one selected is speculation but he makes the most logical sense to me. Regardless there is nothing wrong with speculating on the setup at the beginning of day 1.

While I like the thinking about the recruiter If I were one I would probably try to get to you mig considering your meta is if we haven't found scum by d2 mig is scum. so I really don't think a lynch at one of our vet players is a good idea until we have something more than a educated guess.

I would much rather vote for curu or palmer for both of their annoying posts but that doesn't mean they are scum.

I'm thinking that if there is a recruiter they just got picked last night or they can't recruit every night or town would be at a huge disadvantage.

Coagulation

United States9633 Posts

August 05 2011 17:50 GMT

#204

##vote Trotske

redFF

United States3910 Posts

August 05 2011 17:50 GMT

#205

K. regarding the intentions thing. In n0 i got a role pm as townie saying i had good intentions, I was asking the intentions of others in the hope i could easily confirm some people. I've actually come to think that we all recieved the same role pm n0, and that our real roles/alignments were given out at the start of day1.

You sense that something may have changed about the party members who slowly begin to return to the main dining chamber. You are not sure what it is yet.

Trotske

410 Posts

August 05 2011 17:57 GMT

#206

On August 06 2011 02:50 Coagulation wrote:
##vote Trotske

reasons?

Varpulis

United States2517 Posts

August 05 2011 18:45 GMT

#207

Meta argument: bad. You can play really well one game and really terribly the next, but if your behavior is the same, and your arguments follow the same logic, i'll call you town as easily in the second as in the first.

Lynch based on behavior in the game, and actions with scum motivations, not because he hasn't filled his quota.

Trotske who do you think is scummy?

Varpulis

United States2517 Posts

August 05 2011 18:53 GMT

#208

Reread his post and it's not really a meta argument, but a statement relying heavily on meta. The statement: "I would much rather vote for curu or palmar for both of their annoying posts but that doesn't mean they are scum" doesn't sit will with me.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

August 05 2011 19:20 GMT

#209

So did someone attempt sending in 1,594, 1594 or 3? Based on the link above

Might be too far fetched if the answer is "logical" because there's no one clear answer based on that

Meapak_Ziphh

United States6789 Posts

August 05 2011 19:21 GMT

#210

##Vote: Amber[light]

DoctorHelvetica

United States15034 Posts

August 05 2011 19:21 GMT

#211

there is a severe misunderstanding of the puzzle so i will intervene this once. there is more than one number input in the combination.

syllogism

Finland5948 Posts

August 05 2011 19:23 GMT

#212

On August 06 2011 04:21 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
there is a severe misunderstanding of the puzzle so i will intervene this once. there is more than one number input in the combination.

Well that was the initial assumption, but the problem to me is that there are so many possibilities, it's hard to rule anything out and you only get one chance. Of course, we just could be missing something incredibly obvious.

bumatlarge

United States4567 Posts

August 05 2011 20:24 GMT

#213

And don't we have to find the safe under the stage to? afaik, we have not seen a stage.