• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:10
CEST 19:10
KST 02:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3
StarCraft 2
General
The New Patch Killed Mech! Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy herO joins T1 Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
BSL Season 21 BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW caster Sayle BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET
Tourneys
Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [ASL20] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Relatively freeroll strategies Siegecraft - a new perspective
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1622 users

World at War 2 Mafia - Page 22

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 20 21 22 23 24 155 Next
sinani206
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1959 Posts
July 06 2011 02:08 GMT
#421
On July 06 2011 11:00 Curu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 10:55 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:51 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:47 chaos13 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:46 Curu wrote:
Sandroba has a scumslip but at least he didn't vote for Operation Gunnerside (if he had after initial conversations with him, I would have bandwagoned the fuck out of him).

That said IMO lurkers hurt Town more than anything else. With a full active playerbase Mafia has to be active meaning more chances for scumslips and important information leaking out. If they can just hide in the lurkers, we have nothing to go on.

I'd like to lure out Cthsazsa, Zona , ~OpZ~ or gtrsrs as they haven't posted -anything- at all. Looks like there's one other for Zona so let's get that started.

##Vote: Zona


..you agree that he made a scum slip...and you vote for someone else.





What the fuck?


Willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now. If you notice, I'm the one that called him out on the scumslip first so believe me I'm putting weight into it. sandroba's been more active than most though and his posts actually have content in them.

My vote on him hinged on what operation he voted for and the one he did choose didn't set off my alarms.

Nothing is more dangerous than scum being able to hide amongst Townie lurkers so that's my modus operandi until all the lurkers start doing something useful.


This post is scummy as fuck.

It sounds like you and sandroba are both scum, and you screwed up by sharing his scumslip and now you want to come back and defend your ally.

Why should your vote hinge (to use your word) on which operation he voted for? Your vote should be for the scummiest player.

The whole lurker excuse is complete bullshit.

##Vote: sandroba
I propose a nuke of Curu


lol? Why would I even point out his scumslip if I didn't want to draw attention to it?

How cute, you ignore all the accusations on you in this thread and instead try to divert attention on me with something completely stupid and baseless. Seems like you're in a hurried panic, hmm?

My vote hinged on what operation he voted for because he had a whole argument formed based on Mafia's nukes being useless. If sandroba had gone against that whole line of argument he was making (and he was quite involved with it) then he would have appeared scummy as fuck. But he didn't.

Instead you now appear scummy as fuck. Saying a lurker excuse is bullshit without providing any reasoning? Proposing to nuke me because I didn't lynch based on a scumslip that I FIRST POINTED OUT? If I had wanted that scumslip unavoided I wouldn't have posted anything about it.

I still want to draw the lurkers out but I'd suggest everyone keeping a firm eye on you.


I acknowledge pressure votes of me in this thread, and that's why I'm accusing you. Note that the votes for me are pressure votes, not votes to kill me.

What I'm saying is you are covering your mistake of pointing it out by not voting him now. I'm saying you made a mistake by pointing it out in the first place and want to correct it.

There are other ways people can be scummy besides contradicting themselves. Just because sandroba didn't contradict himself doesn't mean he's clear at all.

The lurker excuse was bullshit because you are using it to draw attention away from sandroba by choosing to lurker-hunt instead. You announce the scumslip on sandroba and then don't pressure him and make the excuse of wanting to find scum among lurkers. You could have just voted for sandroba, but you want to defend him because you are both scum.
literally everything is wifom just shut the fuck up
Navillus
Profile Joined February 2011
United States1188 Posts
July 06 2011 02:11 GMT
#422
On July 06 2011 10:55 sinani206 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 10:51 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:47 chaos13 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:46 Curu wrote:
Sandroba has a scumslip but at least he didn't vote for Operation Gunnerside (if he had after initial conversations with him, I would have bandwagoned the fuck out of him).

That said IMO lurkers hurt Town more than anything else. With a full active playerbase Mafia has to be active meaning more chances for scumslips and important information leaking out. If they can just hide in the lurkers, we have nothing to go on.

I'd like to lure out Cthsazsa, Zona , ~OpZ~ or gtrsrs as they haven't posted -anything- at all. Looks like there's one other for Zona so let's get that started.

##Vote: Zona


..you agree that he made a scum slip...and you vote for someone else.





What the fuck?


Willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now. If you notice, I'm the one that called him out on the scumslip first so believe me I'm putting weight into it. sandroba's been more active than most though and his posts actually have content in them.

My vote on him hinged on what operation he voted for and the one he did choose didn't set off my alarms.

Nothing is more dangerous than scum being able to hide amongst Townie lurkers so that's my modus operandi until all the lurkers start doing something useful.


This post is scummy as fuck.

It sounds like you and sandroba are both scum, and you screwed up by sharing his scumslip and now you want to come back and defend your ally.

Why should your vote hinge (to use your word) on which operation he voted for? Your vote should be for the scummiest player.

The whole lurker excuse is complete bullshit.

##Vote: sandroba
I propose a nuke of Curu


Ok so my pressure vote is now a half pressure/half legitimate accusation, because it's really scummy to hop back into a thread where you're being accused and just throw out one mediocre and one really weak accusation, it's still possible that sinani is just scared town, but he needs to post more to judge.
"TL gives excellent advice 99% of the time. The problem is no one listens to it." -Plexa
Curu
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada2817 Posts
July 06 2011 02:14 GMT
#423
On July 06 2011 11:08 sinani206 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 11:00 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:55 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:51 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:47 chaos13 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:46 Curu wrote:
Sandroba has a scumslip but at least he didn't vote for Operation Gunnerside (if he had after initial conversations with him, I would have bandwagoned the fuck out of him).

That said IMO lurkers hurt Town more than anything else. With a full active playerbase Mafia has to be active meaning more chances for scumslips and important information leaking out. If they can just hide in the lurkers, we have nothing to go on.

I'd like to lure out Cthsazsa, Zona , ~OpZ~ or gtrsrs as they haven't posted -anything- at all. Looks like there's one other for Zona so let's get that started.

##Vote: Zona


..you agree that he made a scum slip...and you vote for someone else.





What the fuck?


Willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now. If you notice, I'm the one that called him out on the scumslip first so believe me I'm putting weight into it. sandroba's been more active than most though and his posts actually have content in them.

My vote on him hinged on what operation he voted for and the one he did choose didn't set off my alarms.

Nothing is more dangerous than scum being able to hide amongst Townie lurkers so that's my modus operandi until all the lurkers start doing something useful.


This post is scummy as fuck.

It sounds like you and sandroba are both scum, and you screwed up by sharing his scumslip and now you want to come back and defend your ally.

Why should your vote hinge (to use your word) on which operation he voted for? Your vote should be for the scummiest player.

The whole lurker excuse is complete bullshit.

##Vote: sandroba
I propose a nuke of Curu


lol? Why would I even point out his scumslip if I didn't want to draw attention to it?

How cute, you ignore all the accusations on you in this thread and instead try to divert attention on me with something completely stupid and baseless. Seems like you're in a hurried panic, hmm?

My vote hinged on what operation he voted for because he had a whole argument formed based on Mafia's nukes being useless. If sandroba had gone against that whole line of argument he was making (and he was quite involved with it) then he would have appeared scummy as fuck. But he didn't.

Instead you now appear scummy as fuck. Saying a lurker excuse is bullshit without providing any reasoning? Proposing to nuke me because I didn't lynch based on a scumslip that I FIRST POINTED OUT? If I had wanted that scumslip unavoided I wouldn't have posted anything about it.

I still want to draw the lurkers out but I'd suggest everyone keeping a firm eye on you.


I acknowledge pressure votes of me in this thread, and that's why I'm accusing you. Note that the votes for me are pressure votes, not votes to kill me.

What I'm saying is you are covering your mistake of pointing it out by not voting him now. I'm saying you made a mistake by pointing it out in the first place and want to correct it.

There are other ways people can be scummy besides contradicting themselves. Just because sandroba didn't contradict himself doesn't mean he's clear at all.

The lurker excuse was bullshit because you are using it to draw attention away from sandroba by choosing to lurker-hunt instead. You announce the scumslip on sandroba and then don't pressure him and make the excuse of wanting to find scum among lurkers. You could have just voted for sandroba, but you want to defend him because you are both scum.


Ok explain one thing to me. Why did I point it out in the first place if we are both scum then? The whole bandwagon against sandroba is starting because of that scumslip. I POINTED OUT THAT SCUMSLIP. I'm not trying to back up and I'm not trying to cover my tracks. I drew attention to that scumslip because I wanted everyone to be aware of it. I just don't think it's as much grounds for serious pressuring yet based purely off of that.

You STILL haven't posted anything explaining your scummy posting that's getting you pressured and instead try to draw attention to me. That's just creating more confusion for Town. You're looking scummier by the second.

I'm not trying to draw attention away from sandroba. I'm going in with guns blazing. Every single one of my posts at him has mentioned his scumslip. I just don't think he's shown to be more dangerous (yet) than many other people. You very much included.
wat
sinani206
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1959 Posts
July 06 2011 02:34 GMT
#424
On July 06 2011 11:14 Curu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 11:08 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 11:00 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:55 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:51 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:47 chaos13 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:46 Curu wrote:
Sandroba has a scumslip but at least he didn't vote for Operation Gunnerside (if he had after initial conversations with him, I would have bandwagoned the fuck out of him).

That said IMO lurkers hurt Town more than anything else. With a full active playerbase Mafia has to be active meaning more chances for scumslips and important information leaking out. If they can just hide in the lurkers, we have nothing to go on.

I'd like to lure out Cthsazsa, Zona , ~OpZ~ or gtrsrs as they haven't posted -anything- at all. Looks like there's one other for Zona so let's get that started.

##Vote: Zona


..you agree that he made a scum slip...and you vote for someone else.





What the fuck?


Willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now. If you notice, I'm the one that called him out on the scumslip first so believe me I'm putting weight into it. sandroba's been more active than most though and his posts actually have content in them.

My vote on him hinged on what operation he voted for and the one he did choose didn't set off my alarms.

Nothing is more dangerous than scum being able to hide amongst Townie lurkers so that's my modus operandi until all the lurkers start doing something useful.


This post is scummy as fuck.

It sounds like you and sandroba are both scum, and you screwed up by sharing his scumslip and now you want to come back and defend your ally.

Why should your vote hinge (to use your word) on which operation he voted for? Your vote should be for the scummiest player.

The whole lurker excuse is complete bullshit.

##Vote: sandroba
I propose a nuke of Curu


lol? Why would I even point out his scumslip if I didn't want to draw attention to it?

How cute, you ignore all the accusations on you in this thread and instead try to divert attention on me with something completely stupid and baseless. Seems like you're in a hurried panic, hmm?

My vote hinged on what operation he voted for because he had a whole argument formed based on Mafia's nukes being useless. If sandroba had gone against that whole line of argument he was making (and he was quite involved with it) then he would have appeared scummy as fuck. But he didn't.

Instead you now appear scummy as fuck. Saying a lurker excuse is bullshit without providing any reasoning? Proposing to nuke me because I didn't lynch based on a scumslip that I FIRST POINTED OUT? If I had wanted that scumslip unavoided I wouldn't have posted anything about it.

I still want to draw the lurkers out but I'd suggest everyone keeping a firm eye on you.


I acknowledge pressure votes of me in this thread, and that's why I'm accusing you. Note that the votes for me are pressure votes, not votes to kill me.

What I'm saying is you are covering your mistake of pointing it out by not voting him now. I'm saying you made a mistake by pointing it out in the first place and want to correct it.

There are other ways people can be scummy besides contradicting themselves. Just because sandroba didn't contradict himself doesn't mean he's clear at all.

The lurker excuse was bullshit because you are using it to draw attention away from sandroba by choosing to lurker-hunt instead. You announce the scumslip on sandroba and then don't pressure him and make the excuse of wanting to find scum among lurkers. You could have just voted for sandroba, but you want to defend him because you are both scum.


Ok explain one thing to me. Why did I point it out in the first place if we are both scum then? The whole bandwagon against sandroba is starting because of that scumslip. I POINTED OUT THAT SCUMSLIP. I'm not trying to back up and I'm not trying to cover my tracks. I drew attention to that scumslip because I wanted everyone to be aware of it. I just don't think it's as much grounds for serious pressuring yet based purely off of that.

You STILL haven't posted anything explaining your scummy posting that's getting you pressured and instead try to draw attention to me. That's just creating more confusion for Town. You're looking scummier by the second.

I'm not trying to draw attention away from sandroba. I'm going in with guns blazing. Every single one of my posts at him has mentioned his scumslip. I just don't think he's shown to be more dangerous (yet) than many other people. You very much included.


I KNOW THAT YOU POINTED OUT THAT SCUMSLIP. I've said that multiple times. What I'm saying is that you realize how big of a deal that is and don't want to lose a teammate day one.

I'd like an example of my "scummy posting that's getting me pressured" so I can explain it. Is that what you want?

What do you mean "more dangerous?" If he's scum, you vote for him. Period. It's obviously better to lynch him than someone else who might be town but isn't playing well. Sometimes people forget that town wins when all of the scum are dead. If sandroba is scum, you kill him.
literally everything is wifom just shut the fuck up
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 02:37 GMT
#425
sinani, what do you think of sandroba's explanation for it? If Curu and sandroba are scum together, why would he post that publicly before posting in the mafia QT?
Ciryandor
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3735 Posts
July 06 2011 02:38 GMT
#426
##Vote: Zona

He's supposed to be bloody active in the forums, though I'm not sure now that BW PL regular season is already over; so I'm wondering where he could be. In the same vein, why is Eiii's only recent comment not very relevant to the game? Is he lurking as well?

##Vote: Dunkirk Operation

It gives us more return to do this, we're assured of extra lives for Brit Townies unlike the ambiguity of "Up to 3 nukes" of Gunnerside (which implies anything from 1-3; and may even involve a scum counter-op to reduce the number), and Watchtower just stops everything (but if people start voting that way it just slows down the nuke-throwing people are going to do by a day, no more, no less.

And I don't want anyone to nuke anyone just yet, it's unwarranted to be throwing the septic tank around in the air just yet. Maybe target proposals for the next day, but no more than that.
에일리 and 아이유 <3 - O Captain 박재혁 ・゚✧*:・*゚+..。✧・゚:*・..。 ✧・゚ :・゚* ゜・*:・ ✧・゚:・゚:.。 ✧・゚ SPARKULING ・゜・:・゚✧*:・゚✧。*゚+..。 ✧・゚: ✧・゚:*・゜・:・゚✧*::
GMarshal
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States22154 Posts
July 06 2011 02:38 GMT
#427
/shakes head

you never lynch the most vocal players day 1, as theres a more than even chance they are town, if they are really vocal and scum then by day 2 their true colors will probably be apparent.
Moderator
Curu
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada2817 Posts
July 06 2011 02:42 GMT
#428
On July 06 2011 11:34 sinani206 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 11:14 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 11:08 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 11:00 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:55 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:51 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:47 chaos13 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:46 Curu wrote:
Sandroba has a scumslip but at least he didn't vote for Operation Gunnerside (if he had after initial conversations with him, I would have bandwagoned the fuck out of him).

That said IMO lurkers hurt Town more than anything else. With a full active playerbase Mafia has to be active meaning more chances for scumslips and important information leaking out. If they can just hide in the lurkers, we have nothing to go on.

I'd like to lure out Cthsazsa, Zona , ~OpZ~ or gtrsrs as they haven't posted -anything- at all. Looks like there's one other for Zona so let's get that started.

##Vote: Zona


..you agree that he made a scum slip...and you vote for someone else.





What the fuck?


Willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now. If you notice, I'm the one that called him out on the scumslip first so believe me I'm putting weight into it. sandroba's been more active than most though and his posts actually have content in them.

My vote on him hinged on what operation he voted for and the one he did choose didn't set off my alarms.

Nothing is more dangerous than scum being able to hide amongst Townie lurkers so that's my modus operandi until all the lurkers start doing something useful.


This post is scummy as fuck.

It sounds like you and sandroba are both scum, and you screwed up by sharing his scumslip and now you want to come back and defend your ally.

Why should your vote hinge (to use your word) on which operation he voted for? Your vote should be for the scummiest player.

The whole lurker excuse is complete bullshit.

##Vote: sandroba
I propose a nuke of Curu


lol? Why would I even point out his scumslip if I didn't want to draw attention to it?

How cute, you ignore all the accusations on you in this thread and instead try to divert attention on me with something completely stupid and baseless. Seems like you're in a hurried panic, hmm?

My vote hinged on what operation he voted for because he had a whole argument formed based on Mafia's nukes being useless. If sandroba had gone against that whole line of argument he was making (and he was quite involved with it) then he would have appeared scummy as fuck. But he didn't.

Instead you now appear scummy as fuck. Saying a lurker excuse is bullshit without providing any reasoning? Proposing to nuke me because I didn't lynch based on a scumslip that I FIRST POINTED OUT? If I had wanted that scumslip unavoided I wouldn't have posted anything about it.

I still want to draw the lurkers out but I'd suggest everyone keeping a firm eye on you.


I acknowledge pressure votes of me in this thread, and that's why I'm accusing you. Note that the votes for me are pressure votes, not votes to kill me.

What I'm saying is you are covering your mistake of pointing it out by not voting him now. I'm saying you made a mistake by pointing it out in the first place and want to correct it.

There are other ways people can be scummy besides contradicting themselves. Just because sandroba didn't contradict himself doesn't mean he's clear at all.

The lurker excuse was bullshit because you are using it to draw attention away from sandroba by choosing to lurker-hunt instead. You announce the scumslip on sandroba and then don't pressure him and make the excuse of wanting to find scum among lurkers. You could have just voted for sandroba, but you want to defend him because you are both scum.


Ok explain one thing to me. Why did I point it out in the first place if we are both scum then? The whole bandwagon against sandroba is starting because of that scumslip. I POINTED OUT THAT SCUMSLIP. I'm not trying to back up and I'm not trying to cover my tracks. I drew attention to that scumslip because I wanted everyone to be aware of it. I just don't think it's as much grounds for serious pressuring yet based purely off of that.

You STILL haven't posted anything explaining your scummy posting that's getting you pressured and instead try to draw attention to me. That's just creating more confusion for Town. You're looking scummier by the second.

I'm not trying to draw attention away from sandroba. I'm going in with guns blazing. Every single one of my posts at him has mentioned his scumslip. I just don't think he's shown to be more dangerous (yet) than many other people. You very much included.


I KNOW THAT YOU POINTED OUT THAT SCUMSLIP. I've said that multiple times. What I'm saying is that you realize how big of a deal that is and don't want to lose a teammate day one.

I'd like an example of my "scummy posting that's getting me pressured" so I can explain it. Is that what you want?

What do you mean "more dangerous?" If he's scum, you vote for him. Period. It's obviously better to lynch him than someone else who might be town but isn't playing well. Sometimes people forget that town wins when all of the scum are dead. If sandroba is scum, you kill him.


Uhh, go look at the accusations against you. Don't pretend you haven't seen them, you acknowledged that you were being pressured but didn't post anything to explain yourself.

If I didn't want to lose a "teammate" day one I never would have mentioned that scumslip in the first place. Honestly what advantage would that give to me? Explain it. If we're both scum, what advantage would me pointing out his scumslip give me? Town cred? I could only gain that if I followed up immediately with a full-out conviction to lynch him and the lynch went through.

I don't know that he's scum. He has a scumslip but he gave his reasoning for that. You, on the other hand, have done nothing but try to redirect attention to me when there's pressure on you. Even then, you haven't brought up one legitimate reason against me besides that I pointed out a scumslip but am not foaming-at-mouth lynching the person responsible behind it. I explained my reasoning. Hell, sandroba even explained his reasoning for the slip. The only person who hasn't done anything constructive is you.

I'm done arguing with you. We're just distracting the Town now and you don't seem to want to throw up anything constructive besides rehashing your non-points.
wat
sandroba
Profile Joined April 2006
Canada4998 Posts
July 06 2011 02:50 GMT
#429
I like that no one comented ON MY HUGE FUCKING CASE on palmar that proves he is scum, then vote for me for something I already explained. First of all you are calling that scum slip (it's a mistake btw, based on previous games knowledge) before we even know how many fucking kp mafia actually has. Good job.
Also anyone that agreed to my plan should be voting to lynch palmar regardless since he broke the no nukes rule, shorttened the day and possibly took away an extra life from another player for no reason. He didn't even follow his own plan. God knows if he has nukes or not.
Use your head and vote for palmar. He is 100% scum.
sinani206
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1959 Posts
July 06 2011 02:55 GMT
#430
On July 06 2011 11:42 Curu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 11:34 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 11:14 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 11:08 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 11:00 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:55 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:51 Curu wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:47 chaos13 wrote:
On July 06 2011 10:46 Curu wrote:
Sandroba has a scumslip but at least he didn't vote for Operation Gunnerside (if he had after initial conversations with him, I would have bandwagoned the fuck out of him).

That said IMO lurkers hurt Town more than anything else. With a full active playerbase Mafia has to be active meaning more chances for scumslips and important information leaking out. If they can just hide in the lurkers, we have nothing to go on.

I'd like to lure out Cthsazsa, Zona , ~OpZ~ or gtrsrs as they haven't posted -anything- at all. Looks like there's one other for Zona so let's get that started.

##Vote: Zona


..you agree that he made a scum slip...and you vote for someone else.





What the fuck?


Willing to give the benefit of the doubt for now. If you notice, I'm the one that called him out on the scumslip first so believe me I'm putting weight into it. sandroba's been more active than most though and his posts actually have content in them.

My vote on him hinged on what operation he voted for and the one he did choose didn't set off my alarms.

Nothing is more dangerous than scum being able to hide amongst Townie lurkers so that's my modus operandi until all the lurkers start doing something useful.


This post is scummy as fuck.

It sounds like you and sandroba are both scum, and you screwed up by sharing his scumslip and now you want to come back and defend your ally.

Why should your vote hinge (to use your word) on which operation he voted for? Your vote should be for the scummiest player.

The whole lurker excuse is complete bullshit.

##Vote: sandroba
I propose a nuke of Curu


lol? Why would I even point out his scumslip if I didn't want to draw attention to it?

How cute, you ignore all the accusations on you in this thread and instead try to divert attention on me with something completely stupid and baseless. Seems like you're in a hurried panic, hmm?

My vote hinged on what operation he voted for because he had a whole argument formed based on Mafia's nukes being useless. If sandroba had gone against that whole line of argument he was making (and he was quite involved with it) then he would have appeared scummy as fuck. But he didn't.

Instead you now appear scummy as fuck. Saying a lurker excuse is bullshit without providing any reasoning? Proposing to nuke me because I didn't lynch based on a scumslip that I FIRST POINTED OUT? If I had wanted that scumslip unavoided I wouldn't have posted anything about it.

I still want to draw the lurkers out but I'd suggest everyone keeping a firm eye on you.


I acknowledge pressure votes of me in this thread, and that's why I'm accusing you. Note that the votes for me are pressure votes, not votes to kill me.

What I'm saying is you are covering your mistake of pointing it out by not voting him now. I'm saying you made a mistake by pointing it out in the first place and want to correct it.

There are other ways people can be scummy besides contradicting themselves. Just because sandroba didn't contradict himself doesn't mean he's clear at all.

The lurker excuse was bullshit because you are using it to draw attention away from sandroba by choosing to lurker-hunt instead. You announce the scumslip on sandroba and then don't pressure him and make the excuse of wanting to find scum among lurkers. You could have just voted for sandroba, but you want to defend him because you are both scum.


Ok explain one thing to me. Why did I point it out in the first place if we are both scum then? The whole bandwagon against sandroba is starting because of that scumslip. I POINTED OUT THAT SCUMSLIP. I'm not trying to back up and I'm not trying to cover my tracks. I drew attention to that scumslip because I wanted everyone to be aware of it. I just don't think it's as much grounds for serious pressuring yet based purely off of that.

You STILL haven't posted anything explaining your scummy posting that's getting you pressured and instead try to draw attention to me. That's just creating more confusion for Town. You're looking scummier by the second.

I'm not trying to draw attention away from sandroba. I'm going in with guns blazing. Every single one of my posts at him has mentioned his scumslip. I just don't think he's shown to be more dangerous (yet) than many other people. You very much included.


I KNOW THAT YOU POINTED OUT THAT SCUMSLIP. I've said that multiple times. What I'm saying is that you realize how big of a deal that is and don't want to lose a teammate day one.

I'd like an example of my "scummy posting that's getting me pressured" so I can explain it. Is that what you want?

What do you mean "more dangerous?" If he's scum, you vote for him. Period. It's obviously better to lynch him than someone else who might be town but isn't playing well. Sometimes people forget that town wins when all of the scum are dead. If sandroba is scum, you kill him.


Uhh, go look at the accusations against you. Don't pretend you haven't seen them, you acknowledged that you were being pressured but didn't post anything to explain yourself.

If I didn't want to lose a "teammate" day one I never would have mentioned that scumslip in the first place. Honestly what advantage would that give to me? Explain it. If we're both scum, what advantage would me pointing out his scumslip give me? Town cred? I could only gain that if I followed up immediately with a full-out conviction to lynch him and the lynch went through.

I don't know that he's scum. He has a scumslip but he gave his reasoning for that. You, on the other hand, have done nothing but try to redirect attention to me when there's pressure on you. Even then, you haven't brought up one legitimate reason against me besides that I pointed out a scumslip but am not foaming-at-mouth lynching the person responsible behind it. I explained my reasoning. Hell, sandroba even explained his reasoning for the slip. The only person who hasn't done anything constructive is you.

I'm done arguing with you. We're just distracting the Town now and you don't seem to want to throw up anything constructive besides rehashing your non-points.

I'm saying that you made a mistake.

You might have been trying to bus your teammate to gain towncred later game but later changed your mind. There are other reasons as well.

Also, there's nothing wrong with FoSing you while I'm under pressure, because I'm under pressure because I wasn't contributing. This is the start of my contribution. I'm trying to add to discussion.

What does everyone else think of my accusation on sandroba and Curu?
literally everything is wifom just shut the fuck up
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 03:00 GMT
#431
On July 06 2011 11:50 sandroba wrote:
I like that no one comented ON MY HUGE FUCKING CASE on palmar that proves he is scum, then vote for me for something I already explained. First of all you are calling that scum slip (it's a mistake btw, based on previous games knowledge) before we even know how many fucking kp mafia actually has. Good job.
Also anyone that agreed to my plan should be voting to lynch palmar regardless since he broke the no nukes rule, shorttened the day and possibly took away an extra life from another player for no reason. He didn't even follow his own plan. God knows if he has nukes or not.
Use your head and vote for palmar. He is 100% scum.


At the moment I'm not completely sure he is scum. He did break the rules we had outlined and nuked for no reason though. My idea of nuke policy has changed after reading through N0 more closely, and while Palmar's stance is iffy, I'm debating between him being an outspoken townie with misplaced ideals and mafia/conspirator.
So for breaking teh rulez:

##Unvote: sandroba
##Vote: Palmar
sinani206
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1959 Posts
July 06 2011 03:01 GMT
#432
On July 06 2011 09:00 syllogism wrote:
I'm not happy with how quite a few approached the campaign options (by the way GMarshal, do you still think Gunnerside is the best one?), but I'm going to highlight Sinani206 first as he has been lurking.
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2011 03:58 sinani206 wrote:
On July 06 2011 03:44 Caller wrote:
I will say though that not all missiles are created equal.


So scum missiles do more damage?
##Operation Gunnerside

Many players were guilty of this kind of hasty/shallow/poor analysis, but this seems particularly worrisome as it looks like an attempt to gain town cred rather than a town person voting for the best option. All nukes are lethal without nuclear resistance/extra lives and I think it's safe to assume few roles will have such perks. Thus, these "special" nukes aren't really a bigger threat than regular ones, especially as scum doesn't know who is resistant. Moreover, there's no reason to think only scum roles could have such nukes or that the campaign would prioritize "special nukes".

Sinani206 would you explain why you put so little effort into this?

Kurumi's analysis of the options was strange as well.

##vote Sinani206


I don't agree that extra lives are a better choice that killing the scum's nukes.
The nukes go through the extra lives.
Destroying three nukes that can kill anything is better than protecting three people that can still be hit by those nukes.
literally everything is wifom just shut the fuck up
chaos13
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada885 Posts
July 06 2011 03:02 GMT
#433
On July 06 2011 11:55 sinani206 wrote:


What does everyone else think of my accusation on sandroba and Curu?


Weak. I can see the argument against sandroba, but he has been very pro-town besides it, and provided a reasonable explanation for it. Further, as GM said if he is scum he is being vocal enough that some mild scrutiny will reveal his alignment. Your case against Curu is pithy. There's nothing behind it. You're accusing him of being scum for calling out what could be a potential scum slip
Navillus
Profile Joined February 2011
United States1188 Posts
July 06 2011 03:03 GMT
#434
On July 06 2011 11:50 sandroba wrote:
I like that no one comented ON MY HUGE FUCKING CASE on palmar that proves he is scum, then vote for me for something I already explained. First of all you are calling that scum slip (it's a mistake btw, based on previous games knowledge) before we even know how many fucking kp mafia actually has. Good job.
Also anyone that agreed to my plan should be voting to lynch palmar regardless since he broke the no nukes rule, shorttened the day and possibly took away an extra life from another player for no reason. He didn't even follow his own plan. God knows if he has nukes or not.
Use your head and vote for palmar. He is 100% scum.


I think you made a strong case but would like to focus on one or two people at a time and right now I really want to focus on sinani (then probably kurumi who is basically lurking after making a really scummy post) who I pressure voted just because of some slight scumminess/lurking but his response to everyone was way over the top and really suspicious, so I think we should keep on that for now.
"TL gives excellent advice 99% of the time. The problem is no one listens to it." -Plexa
heist
Profile Joined April 2011
United States720 Posts
July 06 2011 03:04 GMT
#435
On July 06 2011 02:52 prplhz wrote:
I like Watchtower. If we find a real scum tomorrow then the guy will probably launch all nukes before he dies. Watchtower prevents this and we eliminate scum nukes when scum dies. Dunkirk sounds alright too but relies on bad mafia and not good town. Gunnerside sounds a little weak since it looks like everybody accepted the GMdroba plan now.

Also, if Palmar only has duds he should launch right now. Preferably at lurker.


Anyone else find what he was urging completely wrong directions for the town? For one he advocated Watchtower. Not only will this stop our current plan from being implemented it is clearly and by far the worst of the three options from initial assessment. He even mentions the "plan" as a deterrent from Gunnerside but doesn't mention its implications in Watchtower. Dunkirk reasoning is just... what?

Also he urges Palmar to launch dud nukes when its been stated that they won't do anything to stop other nukes. What benefit could he have possibly wanted from launching dud-nukes?

Palmar's reason for sending the nukes was that it supports his credibility that he has no nukes (a little flimsy, but I'll take it for now) However this couldn't have been what he was thinking of when he urges Palmar to launch dud-nukes. What is prplhz's reasoning?

I really don't like his judgments and am suspicious of anyone who supported Watchtower. No one else has posts this seemingly scummy (although Sinani's outburst has caught my eye)
so I will be voting for him to pressure him.

##Vote: prplhz
sandroba
Profile Joined April 2006
Canada4998 Posts
July 06 2011 03:12 GMT
#436
What reason does a townie has to prove he's not lying by commiting an anti-town action, when no one was even pressuring him. That's right NONE. No one even questioned the fact that he had nukes or not. He had no reason as townie to "prove it".
Now scum has plenty of reasons to prove they are not lying, they are afraid and must take suspicion away from them even before people start noticing them. Palmar knows he's doomed and is using his last breath to fuck with us. Let's lynch him!
Curu
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada2817 Posts
July 06 2011 03:15 GMT
#437
On July 06 2011 11:50 sandroba wrote:
I like that no one comented ON MY HUGE FUCKING CASE on palmar that proves he is scum, then vote for me for something I already explained. First of all you are calling that scum slip (it's a mistake btw, based on previous games knowledge) before we even know how many fucking kp mafia actually has. Good job.
Also anyone that agreed to my plan should be voting to lynch palmar regardless since he broke the no nukes rule, shorttened the day and possibly took away an extra life from another player for no reason. He didn't even follow his own plan. God knows if he has nukes or not.
Use your head and vote for palmar. He is 100% scum.


I don't like metagame arguments because there's so much WIFOM possible there's it's a clusterfuck.

The main argument I see against Palmar is that he fired a supposed dud when nothing good could come out of it (either he hits a Vet and costs them a life or nothing happens). He claims ignorance of the rules but it's pretty apparent IMO in the OP. He does look pretty scummy since I can't find anything to gain for Town from his actions and only possible losses.

Right now I find sinani much more scummy though. And I still want these lurkers to come out and contribute something.
wat
sandroba
Profile Joined April 2006
Canada4998 Posts
July 06 2011 03:19 GMT
#438
No, it's not. Read it carefully and you will see that palmar is playing extremelly anti-town AND has gone through a behaviour change that is extremelly mafia oriented way. It's not WIFOM at all (this term gets throw around incorrectly a lot). It's pure conclusive behaviour analysis.
sandroba
Profile Joined April 2006
Canada4998 Posts
July 06 2011 03:19 GMT
#439
thrown*
PaqMan
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States1475 Posts
July 06 2011 03:23 GMT
#440
On July 05 2011 20:05 Kurumi wrote:
I have two nukes and I won't use them ever. I can see Caller rofling after only four nukes being shot and Conspirator winning. I don't want to lose because I nuked like a mad man. I'd rather lose thanks to shitty analysis of mine and poor leadership. You can discuss nuking plans, I am off from those because I am not going to use them.


Best fucking Idea in the game. No one use their nukes. It's simple as that.

##Dunkirk Operation

An extra life never hurts
t(ツ)t
Prev 1 20 21 22 23 24 155 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
#27
WardiTV882
TKL 282
IndyStarCraft 216
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 282
IndyStarCraft 216
BRAT_OK 90
UpATreeSC 86
MindelVK 29
Codebar 19
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 13854
Hyuk 5068
Calm 4424
Sea 3148
Bisu 1175
GuemChi 1129
Horang2 994
Flash 578
Mini 512
EffOrt 459
[ Show more ]
Larva 237
Soma 188
actioN 186
Soulkey 164
Snow 78
Killer 75
Hyun 69
Dewaltoss 58
TY 57
Mind 45
ggaemo 41
JYJ37
Aegong 25
Rock 24
ivOry 16
Movie 15
soO 14
scan(afreeca) 13
Sacsri 12
Bale 9
Shine 7
SilentControl 7
HiyA 6
Dota 2
Gorgc7045
qojqva4375
Dendi1341
BananaSlamJamma237
Counter-Strike
fl0m1150
byalli265
FunKaTv 40
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor239
Other Games
singsing2055
FrodaN962
ceh9530
Beastyqt496
Lowko326
Sick287
Liquid`VortiX214
C9.Mang0123
ArmadaUGS115
mouzStarbuck110
KnowMe94
ToD73
Mew2King56
Trikslyr50
XcaliburYe48
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL600
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• iHatsuTV 11
• Reevou 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3261
League of Legends
• Nemesis4530
• imaqtpie321
Other Games
• Shiphtur209
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 50m
WardiTV Invitational
17h 50m
WardiTV Invitational
21h 20m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Online Event
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.