Darm, why don't you speak up? There's going to be a lot of scrutiny of item player's. The only way a weak red/black who isn't confident in their play would act is by lurking.
Insane Mafia 2 - Page 55
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Darm, why don't you speak up? There's going to be a lot of scrutiny of item player's. The only way a weak red/black who isn't confident in their play would act is by lurking. | ||
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On March 26 2011 05:35 annul wrote: you do realize town doesnt get to pick the lynch today right Yep. | ||
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
Rean
Netherlands808 Posts
On March 26 2011 05:18 Coagulation wrote: PEOPLE LOVE LIST'S 1. RebirthOfLeGenD 2. Jackal58 3. OriginalName 4. Kenpachi 5. deconduo 6. Kavdragon 7. darmousseh 8. bumatlarge 9. GMarshal 10. Coagulation 11. orgolove 12. chaoser 13. Meapak_Ziphh 14. annul 15. kevconsim 16. Mr. Wiggles 17. CubEdIn 18. GGQ 19. ilovejonn 20. Amber[LighT] 21. BrownBear 22. Lemonwalrus 23. Rean 24. tnkted 25. Tackster 26. Lanaia 27. iGrok 28. Beneather 29. Insanious 30. Eiii if red means mafia: tackster and darmousseh are both IG players. | ||
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
darmousseh
United States3437 Posts
I'm trying to decide who to vote for, but it looks like it doesn't matter since bum is leading. We can't lynch today, no one has really done or said anything interesting. On day 0-1, theres always too much speculation going around. The whole annul thing is probably blown out of proportion and i'm also talking to people in the item game since it's important to make sure that the baddies don't get their hands on those items. The item game people 1. Coagulation - is not as crazy as normal. 2. darmousseh -thats me! 3. Jackal58 - not really anything interesting yet 4. annul - obviously of interest, but probably is town 5. Tackster - no idea 6. Lemonwalrus - nothing interesting Finding the two baddies is very very important and we will need to focus lynch targets probably on that group, but at the same time if the mafia is smart, they will leave people there alive until the last moment in order to drag out the amount of time spent on deciding who to lynch. The 6 of us are obviously high night kill targets too so identifying the baddies is the most important thing right now. My gut says coag is probably not town and that one of the newer players is also not town. | ||
OriginalName
Canada1140 Posts
On March 26 2011 05:18 Coagulation wrote: PEOPLE LOVE LIST'S 3. OriginalName Do you have a problem with me sir coag? | ||
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
@coag: how did you come to the conclusions on that list? @ lemonwalrus: i didn't have a problem with posting kittens and things myself, if you remember. My suspicions were based on the fact that you hadn't contributed anything meaningful analyitically to the town yet. | ||
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
| ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
1 - Present analyses, information and accusations. Behavior > information as of right now. 2 - I will discuss the most convincing arguments with my circle. We are all town here, so unless you want to insult my team's intelligence, I suggest you at least trust our opinion. 3 - We will present our verdict! Town of course can readdress anything, and after this lynch, will be the ultimate decision. The lynch candidates as of now: annul orgolove lemonwalrus iGrok deconduo Meapak has a nice analysis on annul, but maybe comment on his latest posts as well, I would like to see what you think of those. Kav put up iGrok and deconduo as potential scum, and I'd like to hear more on those. Hopefully when I come back I can organize this a little better. (Sorry annul, if my circle still thinks you are the best lynch, Im going to listen to them) | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
![]() | ||
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On March 25 2011 14:54 iGrok wrote: Okay, I thought I was done posting but I decided to check before I went to sleep. Won't be able to in the morning. Kavdragon, excellent points. I completely agree with you (except that I'm scummy - I look forward to reading your reasons). @Bumatlarge/Tackster, I think we should lynch annul. A) Lynch an item-gamer. B) Lynch an anti-town. Annul has been nothing but a distraction, and even if he is town (which I doubt), he's better off dead imo. lol. iGrok looks the most scummy to me imo. Hes acting like a 1st time player when he stated he was a veteran which ends up being SCUM Hes not reading carefully enough + Show Spoiler + To further give solid opinions, a few people I want on that list include: Annul: Reasons stated above. Deconduo: General scummy feel (Obviously I need to explain this further, but I'll do that when i get the time.) iGrok: More scummy play, including apposition to clearly town plans, putting down of plans without putting forward alternatives, and fanning arguments. (More on this to follow) + Show Spoiler [iGrok and some of his posts] + In Chronological Order after alignments were sent out: On March 24 2011 13:25 iGrok wrote: Annul, thats stupid reasoning. Alignment pms always have details about the alignment's group powers (if applicable). Do you have any evidence to the contrary? A blue counter-claiming would be nice. a confirmed scum lynch d1 would be nice ^^ Lets be more obvious On March 24 2011 13:11 iGrok wrote: Yeah, the slip was kind of apparent, unless scum is really bad :/. Your plan makes a lot of sense, especially if you have a circle. The only thing is that no one knows their powers yet... I hope you and your body guards don't get good ones :/ I don't think Jackal is confirmed anything right now. I'll vote for you unless a better campaign comes along. Lol. He doesnt want Bum with a good role so id assume its terrible play (like me ![]() On March 24 2011 14:13 iGrok wrote: There also the fact that the mayor can choose the lynch, and can rely on active scumhunters' advice. The leader in this case only has to make the final decision, and I'd rather that be a confirmed town who will listen to scumhunters than an unknown or even probable town. Of course, this relies on no counterclaims in the next, oh, 12 hours or so i guess. Somethings offbeat or is it just me? On March 24 2011 14:24 iGrok wrote: This is night. Day1 starts when the 24hr n0 starts iirc Feeding off of Lanaia's newbieness. On March 25 2011 02:24 iGrok wrote: Okay, here's what I have so far: Bum slipped hard early on, so he claimed blue. This opened up an opportunity for him to act as a mouth for the blues and lets us get a confirmed townie as mayor (assuming no counterclaim, if there is a counter claim I will re-assess the situation). And a confirmed townie as Mayor lets us get Lynch 1 under our control. However, kavdragon makes a convincing argument, and I know that when I'm scum I usually try to snipe the best hunters first, so protecting them is a must. Hopefully, when roles are revealed, there will be some Medics/Doctors who can protect our best analysts. But they could also be used to protect bum. Brownbear's analysis of bum's situation was good, but I think a little flawed. Its worth trading N blues for N scum, and so if Bum really is blue, the best thing that could happen is that scum counter claims. However, if there is a CC, the other blues shouldn't back up bum. 2 for 1 Blue to Scum isn't a good trade imo, and we'll have to lynch 1 blue at least. Scum doesn't have to keep claiming up to 4-4. Currently, my vote is split between bum and kav, although I think if bum shows decent analysis d1 he'd steal my vote. A useless wall of text but theres a key info here. He states that hes a Veteran. Well hes doing shit lol cause this is all common sense. ..... On March 25 2011 02:27 iGrok wrote: This is an excellent point. I'm going to go vote no on the poll now spam spam On March 25 2011 04:02 iGrok wrote: Suppose 2 people remain in the item game, 1 scum and 1 town, and both are killed at night - who gets the item? Why is he asking this On March 25 2011 05:39 iGrok wrote: Tackster, note that I'm vote for Bum conditional to a good CC (obviously a half-assed cc I'll just laugh at). If so, I'll probably vote chaoser. But a blue mouth with longevity would be really useful to have. So even if there is a CC, I propose we lynch the CCer first, and then bum if the CC flips blue. I mean its been long enough that any CC has to be doubtful, right? You shouldn't lynch someone off their role unless their role is GodFather straight up or Serial Killer or some obvious Scum/3rd Party Role On March 25 2011 06:39 iGrok wrote: Seems like thats exactly what hes doing, tackster Spam Spam Spam Next Post to look at 858 Ill bbl. iGrok, I call you SCUM | ||
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 26 2011 06:18 tnkted wrote: and @annul: what are your thoughts on the IG players? i have many thoughts about IG players. i cant tell you what they are, though, because it will interfere with my strategy to win us item game. as long as bumatlarge is laying off of me, i am sure he will have no problems picking one of the other 5 to blow up tonight. depending on the flip tonight i can tell you more. | ||
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
Rean
Netherlands808 Posts
Out of the 6 players currently i've got a gut feeling that Annul is scum (my gut feeling for Annul is notoriously bad though >.>), and as for the second scum... I really don't have a clue, without access to some of the pm's going around it's hard to judge, so i think we're gonna need to rely on IG players to give us some solid analysis. I reckon it's best to DT check annul for now (miller claims will NOT be believed this time ![]() | ||
annul
United States2841 Posts
On March 26 2011 06:26 Rean wrote: Hmmm. It's probably in black's best interest to start killing off the item-game players as fast as possible, while the red's would want to take it easy there to prevent black taking the cake, since black is arguably the biggest threat to the red team at the moment. So with 1 night-kill a time, it comes down to some good analysis and a few lucky medic/dt's for town to walk away with the items. Out of the 6 players currently i've got a gut feeling that Annul is scum (my gut feeling for Annul is notoriously bad though >.>), and as for the second scum... I really don't have a clue, without access to some of the pm's going around it's hard to judge, so i think we're gonna need to rely on IG players to give us some solid analysis. I reckon it's best to DT check annul for now (miller claims will NOT be believed this time ![]() rofl yeah rean, lets only say what i said 30 times yesterday... oh, and annul is scum. | ||
annul
United States2841 Posts
i am dead tomorrow or earlier. don't waste a DT on me. DT somebody else in item game. | ||
Rean
Netherlands808 Posts
On March 26 2011 06:23 annul wrote: and bumatlarge: if you and the entire town wants me dead, give me one night to live. vote me out day 2 or something. there is something i need to do. first you want to be voted out day 2 at the earliest and now your fate is sealed? the fuck? | ||
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
| ||