EPTTL Mafia XXXIV: Pokemafia - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
We know one of the two are mafia. Since there is no such thing as a raichu/electrode. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
All we do now is wait for Eiii to claim Can I send Eiii a PM to prod him into checking this thread? If not, can you Doc H | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
All right, I also ran through the numbers Lynching Node and DCLXIV Node is telling the truth. Night 4: 7/4/1. D3 hits Eiii Day 5: Eiii is raichu: 4/4/1, very iffy situation... Lylo all the way Day 5: Eiii is mafia: 5/3/1 not too bad DCLXVI is telling the truth Night 4: DCLXVI stuck his bomb on townie: 6/4/1 LYLO Night 4: DCLXVI stuck his bomb on scum: 7/3/1 very good chances | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 19 2010 16:13 DCLXVI wrote: Also, how did you manage to determine d3 was SK and get him to claim? I'm very good at guessing. Imagine this setup. I have a hat and inside is either a big rock, or a crisp $20 bill. Now, I pose to you the question. What is inside? If you guess correctly you get what's inside + Show Spoiler + You guess $20 because being correct about a big rock is worthless I did this to Hesmyrr in Segunko Mafia | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 19 2010 12:38 LSB wrote: Day 4: 8/5/1 Miss Both Night 4:6/5/1. Mafia Victory Hit one, miss one Night 4: 7/4/1 (If miss mafia) Day 5:4/4/1 LYLO (If hit mafia) Day 5:5/3/1 Advantageous to not Double lynch Hit two mafia Night 4:8/3/1 (If miss mafia) Day 5:5/3/1 Advantageous to not Double lynch (If hit mafia) Day 5:6/2/1 Very close to victory The numbers are going to be a bit worse if we go for DC and a scummy player, with a bigger chance of immediatly loosing. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
Also, if you tell us who you placed the bomb on, it would be extreamly helpful in determing what to do. Also, remeber, we have not yet decided who to trust. My idea of lyching Node+DCLXIV trusts no one. + Show Spoiler + Technically its lower, because he chose to place the bomb before the kills were made. But that isn't really relevant. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 19 2010 20:00 Eiii wrote: I've been lurking recently because after reading through the thread each day, I just haven't found myself with any reason to post. You guys gave me a reason this time around, though.. ...because today I learned that either I'm miller or node is scum! Given how fragile the current situation is I'm more inclined to believe node is just lying and trying to throw off our double lynch to all but secure a mafia victory. DC's actions recently don't make him look 100% clean, but neither do node's-- plus, I don't think it's totally believable that a dt would be lucky enough to hit mafia twice on his first two tries. :/ What did your role PM say? Pikachu? | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
I still don't trust DCLXVI. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
Although I do agree what Node did was unwise, it did force you to claim Hatter, and I'm not so sure about the validity of the claim | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
Brb Btw I've created a pastebin of the past 50 pages so it's easy to search through now that my "All" functionality is broken. http://pastebin.com/rhtjdf4b | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
He hasn't helped town at all. I went through his posts and haven't found anything worth mentioning. Maybe this. On December 10 2010 13:03 dinmsab wrote: Imo, I think it's inevitable to lynch inactives. I'm an amateur at this but in my last game I was mafia and I tried to stay low. So yeah, from my perspective inactives might be mafia, worse case scenario they're just bored pikachus. So not much harm there. Although if we have solid leads and clues on active players, I believe that should take priority. All right, now to look at how he played other games Incognito's TL Mafia XVI Townie. He makes 3 worthless posts. + Show Spoiler + On January 22 2010 02:14 dinmsab wrote: Yeah, you just sealed your fate right there. On January 23 2010 00:04 dinmsab wrote: Almost anything would get you lynched in this game, except for when your actually asking for it.  On January 25 2010 22:47 dinmsab wrote: Clues help indeed, just don't trust them 100% for certain. Ignoring clues would be a total waste imo. Red Army Mafia Spam, but I don’t know his alignment, so any read is probably usless [GG] Team Liquid Mafia – Resurrection Mafia Leader. Well he actually was active this game. And played good townie who listens to the town circle by supporting Ace. + Show Spoiler + On December 15 2008 06:50 dinmsab wrote: I was going to vote for Folca, but you Hyperbola changed my mind. Its true Folca is a jerk, but we cant just go kill off random townies if we're planning to win this. Good work Hyperbola. Spammny Vote reasons On December 16 2008 07:57 dinmsab wrote: imo, at this rate mafia could be acting as either one of those... and i believe that blues are more likely to stay in the shadows and avoid the spotlight rather than mafia. Killing off inactive players is indeed a good move when you dont have any clues on what to do next, but that doesnt mean your going to get a guaranteed mafia kill. Right people should just do whatever Ace tells them too since he's the one making the most sense, but that doesnt mean we can trust him completely with a list of blues. Supports Ace, a townie, and his circle On December 17 2008 06:47 dinmsab wrote: Well, it cant be helped.. we were on a very good start when we got ver lynched with the help of ace, and now suddenly out of nowhere 2 DTs just got owned. Its just natural that people will shift their blame to someone.. and since Ace did most of the decision making and he was working with an "anonymous" dt, not to mention he is also likely to be with contact with most of the blues at this moment, people would shift their attention to him. Although i'd say we put our suspicions of ace on hold, and first continue to deal with the list that the dt gave us. Continues to support ace On December 18 2008 19:23 dinmsab wrote: Clear out the list first, like ace said its a guaranteed mafia hit. Then we can move on with the other suspects. Btw, assuming ace isnt lying to us, and indeed another medic appeared... then wouldnt it be wise if we kill atkzerg first? I dont think that townie claiming to be a medic would have any reason to lie about his position, unless he is a bored townie and just wants to see another medic dead. Follows Ace Conclusion: Probably town: As mafia he put some effort into his posts. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 19 2010 16:52 Gabriel wrote: I have the strongest feeling that he is mafia because i played a game with him (i joined the mafia later in the game). In few words he just doesnt post at all (i think it was mafia resurrection with bc as host, i played under malongo id). Iif you look at his voting pattern he has been an early voter both times, hinting that he doesnt want to die to a modkill but that he is not interested into posting (he has like 3 posts). More than anything voting just too early for a bandwagonably (if thats a word) player (Gabriel). Now it is pretty clear that he is not blue and it doesnt make sense for him to be green. He is the kind of player that just afk in that case without voting. On December 19 2010 15:45 Gabriel wrote: Wait. You had a bomb on shockeyy and me when shockeyy died. Why didnt you redirect the lynch on you at that stage? You could have roleclaimed at that time to clean up shockeyy and me protecting the SK that was helping the town. Never thought of it? | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 20 2010 05:36 Infundibulum wrote: I don't know. I kind of agree with deconduo (who has popped out of the woodwork here) that Node's claim doesn't make much since from a mafia perspective. They are in a strong position right now and don't need to risk much, unless they're going for style. I dunno Node's meta though so IDK if he's the kind of player that does those sort of things. What you say also makes sense though. Node's story is VERY convenient. Remember Pandain's "checks" from the Insane mafia game where he lied about very convenient checks? I get the same vibe from the checks Node says he made. Also did Node claim he was roleblocked before this post? If I was roleblocked I'd probably claim ASAP, since it gives the town information. I'm undecided on this as of yet but either way Node lying doesn't help his case here. I think we also need to look at inactives - BrownBear, Oceanic, chaoser, are names that have been bugging me. You haven't been really active either... | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
Day 1: Kenpachi Day 2: Gabriel Day 3: Shockeyy 2. BrownBear Day 1: Missed vote Day 2: Brownbear Day 3: D3_crescentia 3. Eiii Day 1: Kenpachi Day 2: Zeks Day 3: D3_crescentia 4. GGQ Day 1: Zeks Day 2: Zeks Day 3: Shockeyy 5. LSB Day 1: Kenpachi Day 2: Shockeyy Day 3: Shockeyy 9. dinmsab Day 1: Zeks Day 2: Gabriel Day 3: Gabriel 11. DCLXVI Day 2: Zeks Day 3: D3_crescentia 14. Node Day 1: Zeks Day 2: Zeks Day 3: DCLXVI 15. KtheZ Day 1: Zeks Day 2: Zeks Day 3: Shockeyy 18. Oceanic Day 1: Zeks Day 2: Zeks Day 3: Oceanic 19. Gabriel Day 1: Zeks Day 2: Zeks Day 3: Shockeyy 24. Kavdragon Day 1: Kenpachi Day 2: Gabriel Day 3: D3_crescentia 26. Infundibulum Day 1: Zeks Day 1: Zeks Day 3: Shockeyy 30. d3_crescentia Day 1: Hesmyrr Day 2: Shockeyy Day 3: DCLXVI | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 20 2010 08:12 BrownBear wrote: I disagree with you, but then, I'm biased against town alliances w/ 3rd parties. They never work out well for anyone. Personally, my view is that if we know who MewTwo is, we should lynch him. End of story. What do you think we should do today if we don't work with MewTwo then? Also, how will the numbers look like? | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/5751/mafiaendgame.jpg)
