• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 07:22
CET 13:22
KST 21:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3
Community News
Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon!12$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship4[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage3Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win9
StarCraft 2
General
Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon! RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) $3,500 WardiTV Korean Royale S4
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage Practice Partners (Official) [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION [ASL20] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Best Resume Writing Service in New Jersey for Care Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Career Paths and Skills for …
TrAiDoS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1559 users

Sengoku Mafia - Page 9

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 96 Next
seRapH
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9776 Posts
November 12 2010 20:09 GMT
#161
So now we have two plans that cannot coincide with each other. If we follow mine, then everything will be in the open and we can lynch the liars. If mafia all claim someone else's country then we can lynch one of the pair and attack the other, leaving us with one of each down. The only reason you might not want a non-aggression policy is if either A) you're mafia/communist or B) you're greedy and want a neighboring neutral nation. Thing is, if no one's allowed to take the neutrals, and no one's allowed to take other provinces at all, then there's little reason for you to take a neutral. I don't know the number of mafia in this game, so if there are more than I expect then this plan will backfire quite badly, but if its around 6 like I'm expecting and all town follows the plan I don't see much going wrong.

If we follow LSB's plan, well he's going to have to back it up because I don't like the risks it takes. What happens if you have 1 or more mafia in the SFIZ? What happens if you're mafia? What happens to the rest of us, should we all make alliances?
boomer hands
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
November 12 2010 20:11 GMT
#162
On November 13 2010 05:09 seRapH wrote:
If we follow LSB's plan, well he's going to have to back it up because I don't like the risks it takes. What happens if you have 1 or more mafia in the SFIZ? What happens if you're mafia? What happens to the rest of us, should we all make alliances?

This will not be a problem. If you are in SFIZ please message me if you have concerns.

The rest of you? Well, just let us be. We aren't going to be a problem.
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
DCLXVI
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States729 Posts
November 12 2010 20:13 GMT
#163
Alright checking in before I leave thanks caller for working around this, I am currently trying to find a way to get some internet connection where I am going, will try to keep up with the thread and post more if that works.
I can already see the ending
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
November 12 2010 20:15 GMT
#164
On November 13 2010 05:09 seRapH wrote:
So now we have two plans that cannot coincide with each other. If we follow mine, then everything will be in the open and we can lynch the liars. If mafia all claim someone else's country then we can lynch one of the pair and attack the other, leaving us with one of each down. The only reason you might not want a non-aggression policy is if either A) you're mafia/communist or B) you're greedy and want a neighboring neutral nation. Thing is, if no one's allowed to take the neutrals, and no one's allowed to take other provinces at all, then there's little reason for you to take a neutral. I don't know the number of mafia in this game, so if there are more than I expect then this plan will backfire quite badly, but if its around 6 like I'm expecting and all town follows the plan I don't see much going wrong.


Okay, town has an incentive to take provinces. Note this
A random province: It can be town, mafia, ect...
Your province: It is defiantly town.

You see? Town wins if they take care of others violently.

As for your idea, you're turning it into a lynching game, until the mafia comes, backstabs everyone, and doubles their influence in one night.

Not that great of an idea.
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
Caller
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Poland8075 Posts
November 12 2010 20:19 GMT
#165
On November 13 2010 05:02 Nemesis wrote:
Ok, I don't get this game. So what do we do during the day? Do we just randomly lynch a province or a person? If so does that province become neutral?

Also, mass claiming is always a bad idea.

day: if there is a majority of provinces voting for someone (i.e. 16/30) that person gets lynched.

else nothing.
Watch me fail at Paradox: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397564
seRapH
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9776 Posts
November 12 2010 20:21 GMT
#166
On November 13 2010 05:15 LSB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2010 05:09 seRapH wrote:
So now we have two plans that cannot coincide with each other. If we follow mine, then everything will be in the open and we can lynch the liars. If mafia all claim someone else's country then we can lynch one of the pair and attack the other, leaving us with one of each down. The only reason you might not want a non-aggression policy is if either A) you're mafia/communist or B) you're greedy and want a neighboring neutral nation. Thing is, if no one's allowed to take the neutrals, and no one's allowed to take other provinces at all, then there's little reason for you to take a neutral. I don't know the number of mafia in this game, so if there are more than I expect then this plan will backfire quite badly, but if its around 6 like I'm expecting and all town follows the plan I don't see much going wrong.


Okay, town has an incentive to take provinces. Note this
A random province: It can be town, mafia, ect...
Your province: It is defiantly town.

You see? Town wins if they take care of others violently.

As for your idea, you're turning it into a lynching game, until the mafia comes, backstabs everyone, and doubles their influence in one night.

Not that great of an idea.

You haven't told me why your alliance is much better.

And unless the mafia's number's are gargantuan, and everyone defends, about THREE provinces can be taken by normal means (excluding special roles). Assuming there are 6 mafia in this game of 24, which is pushing it, and everyone defends, they'll need to stack the attacks. Even if they're missionaries or elite soldiers they can still only MAYBE 5. And if they're ALL missionaries or elite soldiers they can take 6. That's at worst 12 votes to 12, and guerillas and communists will come back the next day. We've also weeded out every mafia and have targets. Then the whole thing just turns into a strategy game.
boomer hands
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
November 12 2010 20:30 GMT
#167
On November 13 2010 05:21 seRapH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2010 05:15 LSB wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:09 seRapH wrote:
So now we have two plans that cannot coincide with each other. If we follow mine, then everything will be in the open and we can lynch the liars. If mafia all claim someone else's country then we can lynch one of the pair and attack the other, leaving us with one of each down. The only reason you might not want a non-aggression policy is if either A) you're mafia/communist or B) you're greedy and want a neighboring neutral nation. Thing is, if no one's allowed to take the neutrals, and no one's allowed to take other provinces at all, then there's little reason for you to take a neutral. I don't know the number of mafia in this game, so if there are more than I expect then this plan will backfire quite badly, but if its around 6 like I'm expecting and all town follows the plan I don't see much going wrong.


Okay, town has an incentive to take provinces. Note this
A random province: It can be town, mafia, ect...
Your province: It is defiantly town.

You see? Town wins if they take care of others violently.

As for your idea, you're turning it into a lynching game, until the mafia comes, backstabs everyone, and doubles their influence in one night.

Not that great of an idea.

You haven't told me why your alliance is much better.

And unless the mafia's number's are gargantuan, and everyone defends, about THREE provinces can be taken by normal means (excluding special roles). Assuming there are 6 mafia in this game of 24, which is pushing it, and everyone defends, they'll need to stack the attacks. Even if they're missionaries or elite soldiers they can still only MAYBE 5. And if they're ALL missionaries or elite soldiers they can take 6. That's at worst 12 votes to 12, and guerillas and communists will come back the next day. We've also weeded out every mafia and have targets. Then the whole thing just turns into a strategy game.


How good do you think the town's scum hunting skills are?
How good do you think the town's scum hunting skills will be if days consist of waiting for something to happen?

The mafia will be organized and able to influence the vote. This will easily pick off people.

Lets say there are 6 mafia. And there is a nice number of 20 people left total.

Mafia takes down three people. That boosts their voting numbers to 9, and then the town's voting numbers will be left at 8.

In addition, there probably won't be any neutral territory. The neutral territory will probably belong to the mafia, who fakeclaimed blue. So actually, they could pull of the maneuver at even higher numbers then 20.
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
seRapH
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9776 Posts
November 12 2010 20:36 GMT
#168
On November 13 2010 05:30 LSB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2010 05:21 seRapH wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:15 LSB wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:09 seRapH wrote:
So now we have two plans that cannot coincide with each other. If we follow mine, then everything will be in the open and we can lynch the liars. If mafia all claim someone else's country then we can lynch one of the pair and attack the other, leaving us with one of each down. The only reason you might not want a non-aggression policy is if either A) you're mafia/communist or B) you're greedy and want a neighboring neutral nation. Thing is, if no one's allowed to take the neutrals, and no one's allowed to take other provinces at all, then there's little reason for you to take a neutral. I don't know the number of mafia in this game, so if there are more than I expect then this plan will backfire quite badly, but if its around 6 like I'm expecting and all town follows the plan I don't see much going wrong.


Okay, town has an incentive to take provinces. Note this
A random province: It can be town, mafia, ect...
Your province: It is defiantly town.

You see? Town wins if they take care of others violently.

As for your idea, you're turning it into a lynching game, until the mafia comes, backstabs everyone, and doubles their influence in one night.

Not that great of an idea.

You haven't told me why your alliance is much better.

And unless the mafia's number's are gargantuan, and everyone defends, about THREE provinces can be taken by normal means (excluding special roles). Assuming there are 6 mafia in this game of 24, which is pushing it, and everyone defends, they'll need to stack the attacks. Even if they're missionaries or elite soldiers they can still only MAYBE 5. And if they're ALL missionaries or elite soldiers they can take 6. That's at worst 12 votes to 12, and guerillas and communists will come back the next day. We've also weeded out every mafia and have targets. Then the whole thing just turns into a strategy game.


How good do you think the town's scum hunting skills are?
How good do you think the town's scum hunting skills will be if days consist of waiting for something to happen?

The mafia will be organized and able to influence the vote. This will easily pick off people.

Lets say there are 6 mafia. And there is a nice number of 20 people left total.

Mafia takes down three people. That boosts their voting numbers to 9, and then the town's voting numbers will be left at 8.

In addition, there probably won't be any neutral territory. The neutral territory will probably belong to the mafia, who fakeclaimed blue. So actually, they could pull of the maneuver at even higher numbers then 20.

Your math is wrong.

6 mafia out of 20 town. That's 6:14
Takes three down, assuming they have special roles or happen to be adjacent to their targets, leaving 9:11
Now if everyone's nation claimed we could single out who the mafia are and organize a resistance, whereas if we didn't claim we would have no idea who owns which country and so who attacked who and which nation's voting who.

I don't think our scum hunting skills are astounding, but given enough time there's bound to be a slip-up.
boomer hands
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
November 12 2010 20:40 GMT
#169
On November 13 2010 05:36 seRapH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2010 05:30 LSB wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:21 seRapH wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:15 LSB wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:09 seRapH wrote:
So now we have two plans that cannot coincide with each other. If we follow mine, then everything will be in the open and we can lynch the liars. If mafia all claim someone else's country then we can lynch one of the pair and attack the other, leaving us with one of each down. The only reason you might not want a non-aggression policy is if either A) you're mafia/communist or B) you're greedy and want a neighboring neutral nation. Thing is, if no one's allowed to take the neutrals, and no one's allowed to take other provinces at all, then there's little reason for you to take a neutral. I don't know the number of mafia in this game, so if there are more than I expect then this plan will backfire quite badly, but if its around 6 like I'm expecting and all town follows the plan I don't see much going wrong.


Okay, town has an incentive to take provinces. Note this
A random province: It can be town, mafia, ect...
Your province: It is defiantly town.

You see? Town wins if they take care of others violently.

As for your idea, you're turning it into a lynching game, until the mafia comes, backstabs everyone, and doubles their influence in one night.

Not that great of an idea.

You haven't told me why your alliance is much better.

And unless the mafia's number's are gargantuan, and everyone defends, about THREE provinces can be taken by normal means (excluding special roles). Assuming there are 6 mafia in this game of 24, which is pushing it, and everyone defends, they'll need to stack the attacks. Even if they're missionaries or elite soldiers they can still only MAYBE 5. And if they're ALL missionaries or elite soldiers they can take 6. That's at worst 12 votes to 12, and guerillas and communists will come back the next day. We've also weeded out every mafia and have targets. Then the whole thing just turns into a strategy game.


How good do you think the town's scum hunting skills are?
How good do you think the town's scum hunting skills will be if days consist of waiting for something to happen?

The mafia will be organized and able to influence the vote. This will easily pick off people.

Lets say there are 6 mafia. And there is a nice number of 20 people left total.

Mafia takes down three people. That boosts their voting numbers to 9, and then the town's voting numbers will be left at 8.

In addition, there probably won't be any neutral territory. The neutral territory will probably belong to the mafia, who fakeclaimed blue. So actually, they could pull of the maneuver at even higher numbers then 20.

Your math is wrong.

6 mafia out of 20 town. That's 6:14
Takes three down, assuming they have special roles or happen to be adjacent to their targets, leaving 9:11
Now if everyone's nation claimed we could single out who the mafia are and organize a resistance, whereas if we didn't claim we would have no idea who owns which country and so who attacked who and which nation's voting who.

I don't think our scum hunting skills are astounding, but given enough time there's bound to be a slip-up.

Oops, okay accidently subtracted.

Sure then, if there are 17 people left.

The story is still the same. In addition, notice that we can only take down 1 mafia per turn, especially if they have grown to be a juggernaut.

Lets say that there are 6 mafia out of 20. And everyone is town

6 mafia countries take over three provinces
9 mafia provinces, and we lynch a province with only 1 mafia (11 town left)
8 mafia provinces, and then they take over 3 more provinces
11 Mafia provinces (8 town left)

gg. In fact, the mafia can probably pull this off faster than 20 people left.

Secondly, an organized resistance is going to be hard to pull off if you have a limited amount of protects.
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
Coagulation
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States9633 Posts
November 12 2010 20:42 GMT
#170
that map looks so sexy.
seRapH
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9776 Posts
November 12 2010 20:49 GMT
#171
On November 13 2010 05:40 LSB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2010 05:36 seRapH wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:30 LSB wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:21 seRapH wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:15 LSB wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:09 seRapH wrote:
So now we have two plans that cannot coincide with each other. If we follow mine, then everything will be in the open and we can lynch the liars. If mafia all claim someone else's country then we can lynch one of the pair and attack the other, leaving us with one of each down. The only reason you might not want a non-aggression policy is if either A) you're mafia/communist or B) you're greedy and want a neighboring neutral nation. Thing is, if no one's allowed to take the neutrals, and no one's allowed to take other provinces at all, then there's little reason for you to take a neutral. I don't know the number of mafia in this game, so if there are more than I expect then this plan will backfire quite badly, but if its around 6 like I'm expecting and all town follows the plan I don't see much going wrong.


Okay, town has an incentive to take provinces. Note this
A random province: It can be town, mafia, ect...
Your province: It is defiantly town.

You see? Town wins if they take care of others violently.

As for your idea, you're turning it into a lynching game, until the mafia comes, backstabs everyone, and doubles their influence in one night.

Not that great of an idea.

You haven't told me why your alliance is much better.

And unless the mafia's number's are gargantuan, and everyone defends, about THREE provinces can be taken by normal means (excluding special roles). Assuming there are 6 mafia in this game of 24, which is pushing it, and everyone defends, they'll need to stack the attacks. Even if they're missionaries or elite soldiers they can still only MAYBE 5. And if they're ALL missionaries or elite soldiers they can take 6. That's at worst 12 votes to 12, and guerillas and communists will come back the next day. We've also weeded out every mafia and have targets. Then the whole thing just turns into a strategy game.


How good do you think the town's scum hunting skills are?
How good do you think the town's scum hunting skills will be if days consist of waiting for something to happen?

The mafia will be organized and able to influence the vote. This will easily pick off people.

Lets say there are 6 mafia. And there is a nice number of 20 people left total.

Mafia takes down three people. That boosts their voting numbers to 9, and then the town's voting numbers will be left at 8.

In addition, there probably won't be any neutral territory. The neutral territory will probably belong to the mafia, who fakeclaimed blue. So actually, they could pull of the maneuver at even higher numbers then 20.

Your math is wrong.

6 mafia out of 20 town. That's 6:14
Takes three down, assuming they have special roles or happen to be adjacent to their targets, leaving 9:11
Now if everyone's nation claimed we could single out who the mafia are and organize a resistance, whereas if we didn't claim we would have no idea who owns which country and so who attacked who and which nation's voting who.

I don't think our scum hunting skills are astounding, but given enough time there's bound to be a slip-up.

Oops, okay accidently subtracted.

Sure then, if there are 17 people left.

The story is still the same. In addition, notice that we can only take down 1 mafia per turn, especially if they have grown to be a juggernaut.

Lets say that there are 6 mafia out of 20. And everyone is town

6 mafia countries take over three provinces
9 mafia provinces, and we lynch a province with only 1 mafia (11 town left)
8 mafia provinces, and then they take over 3 more provinces
11 Mafia provinces (8 town left)

gg. In fact, the mafia can probably pull this off faster than 20 people left.

Secondly, an organized resistance is going to be hard to pull off if you have a limited amount of protects.

Well in my plan once we know who the mafia are we can start attacking, and those who aren't adjacent and have no navy can protect. My reasoning is that if border nations attack they can't be converted and still be protected. So in your scenario:

8:11
We outnumber them, and likely have more special roles, and so it becomes a strategic game leaning towards our advantage (though I will admit mafia may gain a very slight positional advantage if they play their first 3 conquests right).
boomer hands
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
November 12 2010 20:51 GMT
#172
The issue isn't that you'll have a numbers advantage. The issue is that you won't have a province advantage.

Provinces are necessary to control the lynch and direct it. And directed 'town' action will fail as easily some other group can take control.
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
seRapH
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9776 Posts
November 12 2010 20:56 GMT
#173
What makes you so sure we won't have a province advantage? If nobody takes neutrals in the beginning, then there will be no province advantage.

In the end I still don't see an alternative, since the only other one so far is anarchy with people doing what they want, which will inevitably end in mafia victory. No one really needs to roleclaim, but nation claiming lets us keep tabs on votes, which, imo is essential.
boomer hands
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
November 12 2010 21:01 GMT
#174
On November 13 2010 05:56 seRapH wrote:
What makes you so sure we won't have a province advantage? If nobody takes neutrals in the beginning, then there will be no province advantage.

In the end I still don't see an alternative, since the only other one so far is anarchy with people doing what they want, which will inevitably end in mafia victory. No one really needs to roleclaim, but nation claiming lets us keep tabs on votes, which, imo is essential.

Oh
So no one takes the neutrals? That makes things a lot simpler for the mafia.

The mafia can easily double their numbers then. Because a neutral territory you don't have to send two people to fight for. You can just use one country.

So say there were 17 town. And 6 mafia.
Mafia in one turn takes 6 provinces and double's their size.

Neutrals need to be taken to stop quick expansion.
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
Caller
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Poland8075 Posts
November 12 2010 21:04 GMT
#175
please dont forget to read the rules carefully
Watch me fail at Paradox: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397564
seRapH
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9776 Posts
November 12 2010 21:05 GMT
#176
On November 13 2010 06:01 LSB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2010 05:56 seRapH wrote:
What makes you so sure we won't have a province advantage? If nobody takes neutrals in the beginning, then there will be no province advantage.

In the end I still don't see an alternative, since the only other one so far is anarchy with people doing what they want, which will inevitably end in mafia victory. No one really needs to roleclaim, but nation claiming lets us keep tabs on votes, which, imo is essential.

Oh
So no one takes the neutrals? That makes things a lot simpler for the mafia.

The mafia can easily double their numbers then. Because a neutral territory you don't have to send two people to fight for. You can just use one country.

So say there were 17 town. And 6 mafia.
Mafia in one turn takes 6 provinces and double's their size.

Neutrals need to be taken to stop quick expansion.

But there are 18 town and 6 mafia right now, if they do take neutrals it turns into 18 vs 12, a decisive advantage for town!

Unless of course you're saying that we'll be lynching a lot of town for these first few days for no reason. I'm under the impression that we don't even need to lynch though...

QUESTION FOR CALLER: DO WE NEED TO LYNCH EVERYDAY?
boomer hands
Caller
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Poland8075 Posts
November 12 2010 21:05 GMT
#177
On November 13 2010 06:05 seRapH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2010 06:01 LSB wrote:
On November 13 2010 05:56 seRapH wrote:
What makes you so sure we won't have a province advantage? If nobody takes neutrals in the beginning, then there will be no province advantage.

In the end I still don't see an alternative, since the only other one so far is anarchy with people doing what they want, which will inevitably end in mafia victory. No one really needs to roleclaim, but nation claiming lets us keep tabs on votes, which, imo is essential.

Oh
So no one takes the neutrals? That makes things a lot simpler for the mafia.

The mafia can easily double their numbers then. Because a neutral territory you don't have to send two people to fight for. You can just use one country.

So say there were 17 town. And 6 mafia.
Mafia in one turn takes 6 provinces and double's their size.

Neutrals need to be taken to stop quick expansion.

But there are 18 town and 6 mafia right now, if they do take neutrals it turns into 18 vs 12, a decisive advantage for town!

Unless of course you're saying that we'll be lynching a lot of town for these first few days for no reason. I'm under the impression that we don't even need to lynch though...

QUESTION FOR CALLER: DO WE NEED TO LYNCH EVERYDAY?

no
Watch me fail at Paradox: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397564
LSB
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States5171 Posts
November 12 2010 21:08 GMT
#178
Whoops, I mean 17 Players. Not town. Sorry about that.

So what do you propose? Stalemate?
Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. Bus Driver can never target themselves I'm sorry
seRapH
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9776 Posts
November 12 2010 21:12 GMT
#179
On November 13 2010 06:08 LSB wrote:
Whoops, I mean 17 Players. Not town. Sorry about that.

So what do you propose? Stalemate?

That is my fail-safe plan.

Fail-safe, not insta-win. I honestly do not see how it could possibly fail if everyone nation claims. Mafia would not be able to win, communists would not be able to win. Unless of course there's an obscene number of mafia to start, as in 1/3 or more.
boomer hands
Caller
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Poland8075 Posts
November 12 2010 21:15 GMT
#180
i've been receiving a few questions involving this and here's my answer:

question: if a night action fails, will we be notified?
answer: no. day will only show any results-i.e. if a country has been conquered or not. successful defenses will not be revealed, for example. Special night actions also will not be revealed nor will failures be revealed.
Watch me fail at Paradox: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397564
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 96 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 70
CranKy Ducklings67
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Reynor 394
OGKoka 211
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 2375
Sea 2129
GuemChi 2108
firebathero 595
Pusan 425
Soma 318
Stork 262
Leta 242
Last 206
Light 183
[ Show more ]
Hyun 178
sSak 108
Snow 92
Killer 87
Rush 84
Barracks 81
ToSsGirL 70
hero 59
ZerO 59
Mong 55
Backho 52
Shine 44
JulyZerg 42
Sharp 37
Sea.KH 32
Movie 27
zelot 21
Noble 15
scan(afreeca) 11
Icarus 9
Terrorterran 8
IntoTheRainbow 8
Dota 2
XcaliburYe251
BananaSlamJamma215
Counter-Strike
x6flipin655
zeus594
oskar127
edward64
Other Games
singsing1805
B2W.Neo453
crisheroes277
DeMusliM146
Happy143
XaKoH 119
Mew2King68
Fuzer 64
Liquid`LucifroN38
ZerO(Twitch)4
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL170
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 53
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 13
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV267
League of Legends
• Jankos2633
• Stunt188
Upcoming Events
LAN Event
2h 38m
OSC
9h 38m
Replay Cast
10h 38m
OSC
23h 38m
LAN Event
1d 2h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 14h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 21h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 23h
LAN Event
2 days
IPSL
2 days
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
2 days
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs Sterling
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
LAN Event
3 days
IPSL
3 days
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
BSL 21
3 days
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.