|
On November 10 2010 06:10 youngminii wrote: a lot of people ignored that fact because they were swayed by the mafia when they decided to support pandain with lots of 'reasoning'
KILL PANDAIN
Again, where are the reasons why people think I'm scum.
|
oops missed RoL's recent post.
On November 10 2010 05:32 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Two claimed investigative roles in the game remaining is what I think you mean. We still have IS and Kitaman, but if you disagree that Kita could be considered an investigative role then you can't very well say yours is either. If you want to count that ends us with 4 supposed investigative roles that are public as of now, which is ignoring the possibility that someone in the game has a role and just hasn't claimed. You, Kita, KtheZ and IS are the ones who have claimed investigative roles, three of you remain.
I honestly have no idea how KtheZ got lynched to be honest. As far as my vote on Hyperbola goes, it seemed like a good lynch and I wasn't hear to see all the band wagoning and lack of resistance against it, or maybe I would of thought twice, however I doubt it. I also voted for you if you remember, and I blame the chaos of the day for letting you get off the hook. I was busy and didn't get to catch up until the day actually ended and here we are.
The thing is, if you think someone is scum you have to be open to the possibility that they are not as well, usually that doesn't lead to such an extreme level of aggression. Being overly aggressive like you have been is a clear mafia tell, and yes you can say you would pursue anyone to the ends of the earth but keep in mind I have played with you before and I know that is bullshit. In team melee mafia you posted a pretty good analysis but let the mafia team dismiss it and continue running the town. So saying that you are always aggressive when you believe someone is mafia is a load of shit. You attacked people multiple times this game with half an idea in your head and just continued ramming into a wall hoping to cause an effect, and in previous games when you actually put thought and time into something you don't even pressure your opinion and your thoughts, you just let yourself get ignored then killed the following night.
Does that really sound consistent with what you are saying? Again, if there's a godfather there's got to be a reason why. Mainly, for immunity from DT checks/alignment cops. Now, what you're saying is I'm godfather. If that was true, then why would there be a godfather if there's only two investigative roles(one of them even random.) I don't count kita as an investigative role, he's a watcher/tracker or w/e.
As for me not being agressive previous games, note that I said "If I think someone is scum." In those games, I was persuaded that they were in fact not scum. If no one gives reasons why someone is not scum, after I give my argument, then I will go ahead on my own belief they are scum. That's why me and Dr. H were just in intense debate, because we were running around in circles but had different interpertations of certain facts that were essential to the debate.
|
So you wrote an analysis on someone because you didn't think they were scum?
As for me not being agressive previous games, note that I said "If I think someone is scum." In those games, I was persuaded that they were in fact not scum. If no one gives reasons why someone is not scum, after I give my argument, then I will go ahead on my own belief they are scum. That's why me and Dr. H were just in intense debate, because we were running around in circles but had different interpertations of certain facts that were essential to the debate.
you out yourself here. In those games you put real effort into proving someone was scum but were discouraged away from it, now in this game you are scum and you attack people and you are claiming you are MORE convinced in this game that those you accused of scum are/were scum which is how you justify attacking them without a second thought? It seems like you are admitting in your previous games that you applied more caution to your accusations while in this game you seem to haphazardly attacked people with unruly conviction.
The only reason you would be MORE relentless in a game then you are now is either a complete change in personality or a different role which is making you act differently. The choice seems obvious considering that was only 1-2 games ago. If you want to add further evidence on top of that you are MORE SURE in an insane mafia set up of someones role where everything is erratic and hectic then you were in a standard F11 set up where everything plays out normally. Do you see the issue here? You should be more confident in a game with more open information but instead you somehow are more confident in this game where the roles are crazy and people motivations can never be 100% sure until they flip.
|
Off to work though, see you all when the day comes.
|
On November 10 2010 06:40 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:So you wrote an analysis on someone because you didn't think they were scum? Show nested quote + As for me not being agressive previous games, note that I said "If I think someone is scum." In those games, I was persuaded that they were in fact not scum. If no one gives reasons why someone is not scum, after I give my argument, then I will go ahead on my own belief they are scum. That's why me and Dr. H were just in intense debate, because we were running around in circles but had different interpertations of certain facts that were essential to the debate.
you out yourself here. In those games you put real effort into proving someone was scum but were discouraged away from it, now in this game you are scum and you attack people and you are claiming you are MORE convinced in this game that those you accused of scum are/were scum which is how you justify attacking them without a second thought? It seems like you are admitting in your previous games that you applied more caution to your accusations while in this game you seem to haphazardly attacked people with unruly conviction. The only reason you would be MORE relentless in a game then you are now is either a complete change in personality or a different role which is making you act differently. The choice seems obvious considering that was only 1-2 games ago. If you want to add further evidence on top of that you are MORE SURE in an insane mafia set up of someones role where everything is erratic and hectic then you were in a standard F11 set up where everything plays out normally. Do you see the issue here? You should be more confident in a game with more open information but instead you somehow are more confident in this game where the roles are crazy and people motivations can never be 100% sure until they flip.
No. The reason in this game is because no one is giving me a convincing argument that these people AREN'T scum. As for writing an analysis on someone I didn't think was scum, who was that?
|
so day post is coming up in a few minutes right?
|
United States4053 Posts
i have the nagging feeling i'm dying tonight
|
|
United States4053 Posts
On November 10 2010 08:01 LunarDestiny wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Precious was my kill, Ace. Don't ever take precious away from me. WTF
|
United States4053 Posts
On November 10 2010 08:01 infinitestory wrote:WTF for emphasis: WTF
|
Give us 30 minutes guys, gotta sort shit out. Lotta people gonna die tonight, murrayitis might trigger.
|
Nooooo, why must Murrayitis trigger?
Sméagol was clean until some dirty guy touched me at night.
|
On November 10 2010 08:03 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Give us 30 minutes guys, gotta sort shit out. Lotta people gonna die tonight, murrayitis might trigger. hot damn things are gonna get interesting.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Phew, good thing I always stalk people wearing my handy protective bubble.
|
i hope i'm not infected (it tells you if you are infected right?)
|
On November 10 2010 08:02 infinitestory wrote:for emphasis: WTF
I think he's saying he shot Decondou and apparently ace didn't. But I'm not sure why he didn't say so right away....
|
United States4053 Posts
On November 10 2010 08:08 Glasse wrote: i hope i'm not infected (it tells you if you are infected right?) no
i know i wasn't infected yesterday because drh poked me :D
but i still think the mafia are hitting me
|
On November 10 2010 08:08 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2010 08:02 infinitestory wrote:On November 10 2010 08:01 infinitestory wrote:On November 10 2010 08:01 LunarDestiny wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Precious was my kill, Ace. Don't ever take precious away from me. WTF for emphasis: WTF I think he's saying he shot Decondou and apparently ace didn't. But I'm not sure why he didn't say so right away....
maybe he can't or have some kind of weird role or w/e
this makes me 100% sure ace is red
|
dude i just realized something... we have a KP :S I think getting deconduo would be smart as he's not a total lurker like veldril so lynch chances are lower and cubedin has chance of getting killed by mafia The day is still long though, we have a lot of time to think about it
----------------------------------------- Original Message From LunarDestiny: Messed Up at my last pm. Read the mod pm if you haven't read it yet.
We need three people (Veldril, deconduo and CubEdIn) dead to win.
Veldril - easy, since they are hinting that tomorrow it is a double lynch. Getting an inactive won't be too hard.
Deconduo - Low posting and relatively inactive. This is second in terms of difficulty.
CubEdIn - This is much harder. He claimed as medic and succeed in some ways. Not dying meaning he could have protected himself. DrH not dying which means he could have protected DrH. DC(666 dude) not dying which means he also could have protected DC. Lets hope the mafia will help us killing CubEdIn.
I currently don't have anything else on my mind. But don't say or hint anything about this new form group unless we both agree it is beneficial for us to do so.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 10 2010 08:01 LunarDestiny wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Precious was my kill, Ace. Don't ever take precious away from me.
Please tell me you are just trolling us :/
|
|
|
|