|
On November 03 2010 15:42 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Could you point out exactly what posts you're talking about? I'm not sure exactly what you mean
I think I must of confused a post from the 70's when I was reading the current pages. I thought you mentioned being role blocked again since the last day post but I seem to be wrong. God this game is fucking confusing. But specifically the post I was referring to in regards to your actions and my thoughts on the possibility of a BD were referencing the second day post where that precursor post to annul's death indicates someone getting poked by "people" indicating more than one person.
So I was trying to theorize what could of transpired as opposed to you getting role blocked which would also explain the multiple pokes on a single individual, assuming that paragraph was actually referring to the power of poking that you and possibly others have. Although I guess assuming prod referred to poke was a gambit in itself, but it seemed like a safe wager.
|
Placeholder post for the morning, I'm done wading through twenty pages trying to find where I left off 
|
On November 03 2010 10:58 Nemesis wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2010 09:51 CubEdIn wrote:On November 03 2010 09:41 Nemesis wrote:On November 03 2010 09:21 Nemesis wrote:On November 03 2010 09:16 bumatlarge wrote:
Here are some theories also. Rolebloker targetted Dr.H we assume, right? Dr.H is immune to M-rus. Mafia has a now dead PD. I think mafia is very conservative in their actions for fear of the virus. Which makes me think that town is likely to have a virus spreading role if they found some unprecedented infected.
I suggest a medic considers dr. h as a target, since he is immune and becoming a clearer townie day by day. M-rus spreads whenever someone infected visits someone uninfected during the night. Other than that maybe mafia has a role that can spread it. As for the night phase, I think I want to talk about medic's best target for this night: 1. DoctorH - He just lost his only bodyguard 2. DCLXVI - Even if node is lying about his role, mafia has to target DC or else node is lynched. 3. Node - If node is not lying about his role, that is a big benefit for town. That is 1 less kill point for mafia as long as node stays alive. Hmm actually I suggest to CubedIn to protect DCLXVI, because that would confirm his role + he can tell us if DCLXVI was actually hit as he is the only known medic at this point. Yeah that sounds good and all, as long as someone protects me. I don't really care for DCL THAT much at this point, honestly. Maybe if he'd post more often.. Don't forget that by doing this you will most likely confirm your role too.
It will confirm my role if mafia kills me while I'm protecting someone else. Other than that, there's no 100% confirmation. There could be more than one doctor, we could over-protect him.
Let me explain a few facts which make this decision a bad one:
1. Trying to convince a blue to do do something is a bad thing.
I got your point, you think he should be protected, I will consider it. But under no circumstance will I say "ok i'll do that" right here, because then the Mafia will know that I'm unprotected. You can suggest that someone protects him, and I assure you that doctors will read that post. But don't go out of your way to convince one particular doctor (me) to do it, because that draws very unwanted attention from the mafia.
2. Since mafia knows my role, I need to be protected by someone when I go out.
Like everyone else around, I'd like to keep playing this game. You can see that already some people aren't very fond me of me (like L). They might be doctors, and since we don't know how many they are in total, it's very risky for me to protect anyone but myself, because then I'd be risking a lot, unless someone else will protect me. And if they're willing to, why not just protect the guy I'm going for in the first place?
3. We should protect people who matter.
We don't even know for sure if 666 can be saved. He hasn't been of much help so far, actually caused quite a bit of confusion. I need to be sure that if I risk sacrificing myself for him, he matters more than I do. And right now, honestly, I don't. To tell you the truth, I was going to protect Fishball tonight, as I trusted him most out of the blues, and since he's part of the PM circle, the Mafia might have wanted him dead. But now that he's gone, I don't have such strong feelings about anyone else in the game.
So, as a bottom line, I guess most important thing is not to go overboard with convincing a specific person to defend x player. The suggestion will do.
|
*P.S.: When I said "trusted him most out of the blues", I meant the semi-confirmed ones, that posted their roles (like Dr.H, Glasse, 666, etc).
|
Not being able to PM is standard Mafia. PMing is weak and kills the game. Learn how to scumhunt, thx.
|
On November 03 2010 19:14 Ace wrote:
Not being able to PM is standard Mafia. PMing is weak and kills the game. Learn how to scumhunt, thx.
Right, you seem to be doing a might good job.
Please point us to the next innocent bystander that looks odd to you.
|
|
|
On November 03 2010 20:42 CubEdIn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2010 19:14 Ace wrote:
Not being able to PM is standard Mafia. PMing is weak and kills the game. Learn how to scumhunt, thx. Right, you seem to be doing a might good job. Please point us to the next innocent bystander that looks odd to you.
you're barking up the wrong tree... would advise to back off and never do it again...
|
Oh I'm sorry, it just seems rude that the person who started a bandwagon against an innocent blue would be the one preaching about "learning to scumhunt".
Besides, what's he gonna do? Lynch me as well to prove me right?
|
On November 03 2010 21:52 Amber[LighT] wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2010 20:42 CubEdIn wrote:On November 03 2010 19:14 Ace wrote:
Not being able to PM is standard Mafia. PMing is weak and kills the game. Learn how to scumhunt, thx. Right, you seem to be doing a might good job. Please point us to the next innocent bystander that looks odd to you. you're barking up the wrong tree... would advise to back off and never do it again...
Well this seems rather foreboding now doesn't it?
|
On November 03 2010 22:01 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2010 21:52 Amber[LighT] wrote:On November 03 2010 20:42 CubEdIn wrote:On November 03 2010 19:14 Ace wrote:
Not being able to PM is standard Mafia. PMing is weak and kills the game. Learn how to scumhunt, thx. Right, you seem to be doing a might good job. Please point us to the next innocent bystander that looks odd to you. you're barking up the wrong tree... would advise to back off and never do it again... Well this seems rather foreboding now doesn't it?
every game where someone criticizes aces ability to play turns into the "ace telling everyone how bad they are and why he is awesome" show
thats why this is a bad idea and an argument like this will only distract the town and cause a whole bunch of personal bullshit/flaming/etc.
|
On November 03 2010 20:42 CubEdIn wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2010 19:14 Ace wrote:
Not being able to PM is standard Mafia. PMing is weak and kills the game. Learn how to scumhunt, thx. Right, you seem to be doing a might good job. Please point us to the next innocent bystander that looks odd to you.
Last I checked I'm only 1 vote out of 16.
But wait what's this?
You voted for him too!
So are you going to blame me for leading you to vote him off? Or are you going to accuse yourself for participating in killing "an innocent bystander"? You're responsible just as much as I am. In fact you're even more responsible since I at least stood by my reasoning and didn't play the blame game.
*sniff* *sniff*
This is starting to smell familiar.
|
On November 03 2010 22:01 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2010 21:52 Amber[LighT] wrote:On November 03 2010 20:42 CubEdIn wrote:On November 03 2010 19:14 Ace wrote:
Not being able to PM is standard Mafia. PMing is weak and kills the game. Learn how to scumhunt, thx. Right, you seem to be doing a might good job. Please point us to the next innocent bystander that looks odd to you. you're barking up the wrong tree... would advise to back off and never do it again... Well this seems rather foreboding now doesn't it?
Some battles are just not worth fighting. You won't get a lot of information by doing that anyway.
|
I never blamed you. I just said it was rude to claim that other people learn how to scumhunt, when your snowball hurt the town.
I fail to see how I'm more to blame, since my vote didn't change anything, but your posts started it.
Either way, it's not about blame, it's about hypocrisy, if you wish. You shouldn't act high-and-mighty after you don' gon' goofed.
Also, I like how you're playing the "i'm only 1 vote" after you admitted causing the band-wagon, and saying that you would "gladly do it again".
Very smart play, I must say. Excuse me for not being scared of you.
|
why would you be scared of him if you were a town player
|
Yea, I'd gladly lynch a guy caught in multiple lies. No insane bus driver claims are going to fly around here. Sounds like you just wanna play a sheep and act like you had no part in the guy's death.
If my arguments convinced you then why are you so upset that I'd gladly do it again. Surely you must have agreed with something right?
Right.
|
On November 03 2010 22:17 CubEdIn wrote:
I never blamed you. I just said it was rude to claim that other people learn how to scumhunt, when your snowball hurt the town.
I fail to see how I'm more to blame, since my vote didn't change anything, but your posts started it.
Either way, it's not about blame, it's about hypocrisy, if you wish. You shouldn't act high-and-mighty after you don' gon' goofed.
Also, I like how you're playing the "i'm only 1 vote" after you admitted causing the band-wagon, and saying that you would "gladly do it again".
Very smart play, I must say. Excuse me for not being scared of you.
You serious? Aeres' play was horrible and we needed to act. If you don't act on a scumtell play then we would have just sat and lynched another dead-end townie. There's no way you can say Ace is responsible for the lynch. That's not really fair since it's not like he was the very first person to complain about his play.
Oh wow you didn't vote to lynch him. Throw a party because you're the first person to ever do that!
It wasn't a "don' gon' goofed" moved. It was a strategic town move that eased significant confusion. Aeres made the mistake, not Ace. The role he had should not have been used that way, but it was a good try if there was more to hide off of...
|
yo Cubicle I got a question.
Aeres claims bodyguard and Cruiseship Captain.
How can he draw a scum hit if he won't even be there?
rofl
|
On November 03 2010 22:27 Ace wrote:
yo Cubicle I got a question.
Aeres claims bodyguard and Cruiseship Captain.
How can he draw a scum hit if he won't even be there?
rofl
Well a scum hit ordered on someone who's not there would result in a wasted Mafia KP, wouldn't it?
|
On November 03 2010 22:32 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On November 03 2010 22:27 Ace wrote:
yo Cubicle I got a question.
Aeres claims bodyguard and Cruiseship Captain.
How can he draw a scum hit if he won't even be there?
rofl Well a scum hit ordered on someone who's not there would result in a wasted Mafia KP, wouldn't it?
He means; Aeres claimed BG and Cruiseship Captain, therefore Mafia knows that he can evade a hit, therefore Mafia target someone else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
