TL Mafia XXVIII - Page 5
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 11:13 Pandain wrote: How do you know it was a PM? Maybe I'm a psychotic liar. Didn't think about that, did you? Maybe we're all in a dream and the idea that that PM was sent to you was planted. Maybe this game is a lie. MaybRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 12:05 youngminii wrote: If you would read the thread once in a while, you would've read my reasoning earlier. It's okay, I'm kind enough to explain it again. There's no reason for scum to pin me along with Subversion. If Subversion is scum, then tree.hugger wouldn't be lynching him (unless it's epically bad bussing). If Subversion's isn't scum, then what's the point of 'pinning' me to Subversion? It makes no logical sense. Anyway, what's wrong with you people. You lynch DTA and say 'we fucked up' and 'we didn't learn anything'? I'll come back when I have some free time and lay down a solid argument against chaoser. Until then, have fun. Still on me huh? I've got something on you too =p | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 12:37 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: ? am i just misreading it? how is what he said an answer for "why don't you think tree.hugger is red, given all the sketchy shit you say he's doing?" nah, I totally agree, he's dodging | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 12:51 Subversion wrote: so excited to see who died. even tho i really think it might be me, lolz. what a scummy thing to say... | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 13:07 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Or, youngminii, you could answer the question and clarify your position for the rest of the town. As it is right now, you are 1) dodging the question 2) becoming hostile I was not hostile - the post you made about tree huggers PM's is actually pretty important and I didn't really follow your thought process. You obviously know a lot about tree hugger, yet you are refusing to share this information with the town. Why? I looked back in the thread and didn't see the clarifying post you mentioned before. I don't understand why you're so uncooperative. Like I said, if i was in your position, i would be thinking pretty hard about tree hugger being scum, especially since he'd been pushing for Subversions lynch over chaoser - someone who you thought (think) was red. But you don't think he's scum. I asked why, a reasonable question, and you haven't answered. Why are you dodging the questions? he's pushing me hard too | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 13:10 Pandain wrote: He did partially answer the question. He said if Subversion was scum, than Tree.Hugger wouldn't be lynching him. However that does leave off the question if he thought subversion wasn't scum. Youngmini can explain himself better than I just did, but you get the point. Also, I'm highly suscipious especially of Chaoser because it seems to me that as soon as day started, youngmini started getting hammered. Lay off, I don't want this to become another bandwagon. Let him explain. He got on my back, I'mma get on his. he's been on my ass, bringing me up even when we've clearly moved on. Day 2 was a clusterfuck of a day. The reason DTA died and not me is due to sheer luck. I was, I think 1 vote away from him. He just got the bad end of the stick. If i was really mafia you think they'd leave it so damn close? I've already told you about why you shouldn't have posted that PM before night ended but apparently that doesn't matter in my PRO-TOWN play. Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 13:29 youngminii wrote: I would like you to find the post in which I said "mafia made no mistakes so far". I also do not recall saying "I'm excited about the kills", but I sure am excited to see Day 3 and what happened on Night 2. Please don't pull things out of your ass and please stop coming to false conclusions. Thanks. wasn't talking about you, was talking about subversion | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 12:51 Subversion wrote: so excited to see who died. even tho i really think it might be me, lolz. that one don't change it to make people think i'm talking about you, I was clearly referring to this. It's a page back for christ's sake. Also, all those possibilities you listed, what's more likely? mafia playing badly? them all being AFK when people generated about 5 pages of discussion in the last 2 hours? or them flaming the flames on a couple townies killing each other? | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 13:37 youngminii wrote: That's so dumb holy fucking Christ. Apologies for the mess I made. Anyway, back to chaoser. Why are you bringing up subversion? I don't see what this has to do with anything we were talking about. Subversion's scumness doesn't have a thing to do with what I said previously. not to fan the flames anymore, but if you'll notice, in that message, i quoted pandain. not you. he said that he had problems with my saying that subversion was scummy. I was explaining to him why I said it. Thanks, and hope we all calm down. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 13:51 Pandain wrote: Now that things have settled, I think now would be a good time for everyone who hasn't voted to double lynch to do so now. I really feel like we should've had it for this day, but I guess we'll have to wait. Opinions? Anyone see why we SHOULDN'T double lynch? If not, I urge all of you to vote so now. can't vote right now btw, gotta wait till day | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 14:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote: We know we have two kp roles, one is a vig, the other could be hatter or vig. we don't know, it wasn't revealed | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 15:36 SiNiquity wrote: If BC is lying, then there were only 2 hits last night. If there were only 2 hits last night, then no Vigilante fired a shot (unless Mafia stacked, but this seems highly unlikely). Therefore when we call for a Vigilante to claim, some Mafia could claim it worry-free, since no one else could claim it. Worse yet, this Mafia member that claimed could be Godfather and have picked the Vigilante role, so there's no way to know there either (or BC is GF under the guise of a Veteran). Thus both the claiming Vigilante and BC would need to be checked. If neither were Mafia, only then would we know for sure. I couldn't sleep knowing stuff was going down =]. Even from what you say, if BC IS lying and someone lies with him and claims Vigi, even if they are GF and picked vigi as role, we just check BC. If he flips red, the person who claimed Vigi is in the shithole and we get a 2 for 1. Aside from that, I will post about why it is 100% in our favor for Vigi to claim. | ||
| ||