data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
Darth, are we allowed to post during the night cycles?
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
![]() Darth, are we allowed to post during the night cycles? | ||
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
| ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
##Vote: YellowInk | ||
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
citi.zen - 2 (Korynne, BM) Korynne - 1 (Chezinu) YellowInk - 5 (lakrismamma, youngminii, rastaban, Abenson, BrownBear) rastaban - 1 (Hesmyrr) To Roleblocker: If the majority doesn't change, please roleblock YellowInk. | ||
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
| ||
L
Canada4732 Posts
Each of us should vote for 3 people we think we should roleblock. Out of the top 3 candidates, the roleblocker himself selects one and tells no one of his choice. In doing this, the threat of the easy lynch/recruitment is lessened, and mafia can't decide to frame people by selectively opting for no-hits. The only issue is that on day 3 we'd need the roleblocker to come out and say what's goin on, but day 3 is already our do or die day. We can switch the jailer to him perpetually thereafter if there is no counter claim. There's a 1/8 chance, or so, that the roleblocker is recruited prior to that point, but given how the coroner works and how mafia can manipulate their own hits, I don't see a superior alternative. That said, I'd be very accomodating to tossing yellowink into the first pool of 3. Better then killing a potentially good player. | ||
L
Canada4732 Posts
On July 03 2010 10:13 rastaban wrote: What about for lynch, Abenson is getting close to lynch, and I don't think we have any eveidence to support that since he has started speaking up. He posted on page 31 or so. He's generally really bad, so between him and a player I'm not 100% certain about, I'd probably choose him. | ||
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
| ||
citi.zen
2509 Posts
On July 03 2010 10:17 L wrote: I'd prefer the following Idea when it comes to roleblocking: Each of us should vote for 3 people we think we should roleblock. Out of the top 3 candidates, the roleblocker himself selects one and tells no one of his choice. In doing this, the threat of the easy lynch/recruitment is lessened, and mafia can't decide to frame people by selectively opting for no-hits. The only issue is that on day 3 we'd need the roleblocker to come out and say what's goin on, but day 3 is already our do or die day. We can switch the jailer to him perpetually thereafter if there is no counter claim. There's a 1/8 chance, or so, that the roleblocker is recruited prior to that point, but given how the coroner works and how mafia can manipulate their own hits, I don't see a superior alternative. That said, I'd be very accomodating to tossing yellowink into the first pool of 3. Better then killing a potentially good player. Wait, wouldn't this defeat the whole purpose here? | ||
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
| ||
L
Canada4732 Posts
On July 03 2010 10:22 citi.zen wrote: Show nested quote + On July 03 2010 10:17 L wrote: I'd prefer the following Idea when it comes to roleblocking: Each of us should vote for 3 people we think we should roleblock. Out of the top 3 candidates, the roleblocker himself selects one and tells no one of his choice. In doing this, the threat of the easy lynch/recruitment is lessened, and mafia can't decide to frame people by selectively opting for no-hits. The only issue is that on day 3 we'd need the roleblocker to come out and say what's goin on, but day 3 is already our do or die day. We can switch the jailer to him perpetually thereafter if there is no counter claim. There's a 1/8 chance, or so, that the roleblocker is recruited prior to that point, but given how the coroner works and how mafia can manipulate their own hits, I don't see a superior alternative. That said, I'd be very accomodating to tossing yellowink into the first pool of 3. Better then killing a potentially good player. Wait, wouldn't this defeat the whole purpose here? If we're chain blocking the same person twice, there's no action that needs to be taken on a no-hit night before day 3 anyways. Don't see how this defeats the purpose, but feel free to tell me. | ||
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
On July 03 2010 09:55 rastaban wrote: L is the GF so it is ok ![]() Darth, are we allowed to post during the night cycles? Yes. | ||
L
Canada4732 Posts
On July 03 2010 10:24 DarthThienAn wrote: Thoughts? Continue playing Lufia 2, or scramble up a pretty Lynch post? Lufia 2. Do the 100 floor dungeon. Kill the boss slime. Gives us time to chat. | ||
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On July 03 2010 10:23 L wrote: And Elyas is different? Its way too late to get someone else bussed in, so we're pretty much forced to policy lynch and pick the least shitty out of the two candidates. you are probably right, and most of the votes for Elyas aren't from people on right now so too late to do anything. | ||
DarthThienAn
United States2734 Posts
On July 03 2010 10:25 L wrote: Show nested quote + On July 03 2010 10:24 DarthThienAn wrote: Thoughts? Continue playing Lufia 2, or scramble up a pretty Lynch post? Lufia 2. Do the 100 floor dungeon. Kill the boss slime. Gives us time to chat. Well I'm not extending the day, lol. I'm not that far yet. Just got the Sky guy, which is like the 4th major key I think? | ||
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On July 03 2010 10:25 L wrote: Show nested quote + On July 03 2010 10:22 citi.zen wrote: On July 03 2010 10:17 L wrote: I'd prefer the following Idea when it comes to roleblocking: Each of us should vote for 3 people we think we should roleblock. Out of the top 3 candidates, the roleblocker himself selects one and tells no one of his choice. In doing this, the threat of the easy lynch/recruitment is lessened, and mafia can't decide to frame people by selectively opting for no-hits. The only issue is that on day 3 we'd need the roleblocker to come out and say what's goin on, but day 3 is already our do or die day. We can switch the jailer to him perpetually thereafter if there is no counter claim. There's a 1/8 chance, or so, that the roleblocker is recruited prior to that point, but given how the coroner works and how mafia can manipulate their own hits, I don't see a superior alternative. That said, I'd be very accomodating to tossing yellowink into the first pool of 3. Better then killing a potentially good player. Wait, wouldn't this defeat the whole purpose here? If we're chain blocking the same person twice, there's no action that needs to be taken on a no-hit night before day 3 anyways. Don't see how this defeats the purpose, but feel free to tell me. we lose the benefit knowing who was and wasn't scum that night. How do you see the mafia abusing the method of us RBing someone specific? | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2![]() Jaedong ![]() Shuttle ![]() Hyuk ![]() actioN ![]() ggaemo ![]() Rush ![]() Soulkey ![]() TY ![]() ZerO ![]() [ Show more ] Killer ![]() Snow ![]() Pusan ![]() Sharp ![]() Sea.KH ![]() Hyun ![]() Barracks ![]() sorry ![]() Mind ![]() [sc1f]eonzerg ![]() Aegong ![]() Terrorterran ![]() JYJ27 ajuk12(nOOB) ![]() SilentControl ![]() Noble ![]() IntoTheRainbow ![]() eros_byul ![]() Counter-Strike Other Games tarik_tv12486 crisheroes600 B2W.Neo550 DeMusliM431 Beastyqt418 elazer400 Lowko357 hiko307 Hui .163 Mew2King145 Fuzer ![]() Liquid`VortiX115 djWHEAT108 Trikslyr35 QueenE22 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • LUISG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • intothetv ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends |
Big Brain Bouts
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Invitational
Epic.LAN
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
Clem vs Zoun
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
SOOP
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
|
|