|
On June 12 2010 11:30 ohN wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? Too many if's. We see what happens and then go from there.
Ah... there's only one 'if"
|
On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? Why exactly are you asking me instead of doing some thinking on your own?
|
On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid?
I'll wait for the town to decide whoever they want checked out.
I just threw my idea out there because no one else had any.
If I were mafia I wouldn't of risked myself by coming out and saying i'm the 2ND DT in the game with everyone believing that there is only 1 DT in the first place. I welcome any watcher/tracker.
Well there's a 50% chance i'm completely useless in terms of checking people out and on top of that making people believe I am protown.
|
Ok since we have 2 DT's and we need to figure out their sanity how about both LuDwig and I check the same person and respond with our results.
While having the watchers and trackers on us and our targets? Then we can try and work something out with the information we get.
I know there's a lot of drawbacks to this method but it's just a suggestion for the time being.
|
On June 12 2010 11:35 L wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? Why exactly are you asking me instead of doing some thinking on your own?
lol well apparently you're the man with the plan... also I was asking the town. No need to get all defensive
|
FREEAGLELAND26781 Posts
On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets.
Okay back. Oops JSpazz?
Radfield I vote for myself knowing the prevalence of bandwagons, thus didn't want to add to either JSpazz or meeple.
Yeah L is right, especially in Incognito's case--he doesn't allow changes for DT checks, not sure about the other actions. DT checks are also returned as soon as possible, remember?
Given that we have claims from 2 DTs, a watcher, and a tracker, how would it be to consolidate everything? Say like...
MooCow and LuDwig- check meeple. meeple flips a coin to watch one of the two. tree.hugger flips a coin to track one of the two. Out of all this we should be able to get something, at least...
(50% chance that watcher and tracker find the same target, so...
Thoughts?
Also:
On June 12 2010 11:37 MooCow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? I'll wait for the town to decide whoever they want checked out. I just threw my idea out there because no one else had any. If I were mafia I wouldn't of risked myself by coming out and saying i'm the 2ND DT in the game with everyone believing that there is only 1 DT in the first place. I welcome any watcher/tracker. Well there's a 50% chance i'm completely useless in terms of checking people out and on top of that making people believe I am protown.
WiFOM, don't use it. There are so many damn 'ifs'.
|
On June 12 2010 11:51 meeple wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 11:35 L wrote:On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? Why exactly are you asking me instead of doing some thinking on your own? lol well apparently you're the man with the plan... also I was asking the town. No need to get all defensive
I'm not being defensive. I'm wondering why you're purposely not answering your own question. This post hasn't really answered the question either, so feel free to get to it whenever you feel like doing some work.
|
damn sucks i wasn't around to post more
oh well gl town
|
Good morning town! (or good night in the game)
I am agree with moocow strategy..check the same target to understand our sanity! Tell me who!
|
ok, so my reason for voting opz:
On June 11 2010 01:53 ~OpZ~ wrote:
I'm not sure. Usually I agree with the inactive lynch and more discussion, but as Radfield said, inactivity should not be a problem this game. Role claiming usually comes as a last resort? Why would we push for roleclaiming THIS early. It's pretty ridiculous if you ask me.
I'd guess the mafia are planning privately right now. So they probably aren't posting too much. If we're serious about this role claiming, we're giving them a lot to decide. Who claims what, risk/reward type shit.
But since we've had a dt claim we can use him to our advantage. So we must get his sanity established...Do we have him check somebody, and then lynch the person the next day? Just check and hope mafia kills the person? Maybe he's paranoid? Lots of problems come up from this.
I dunno what the best course of action is, I'm not usually that good at coming up with plans for the town.
=(
That post as many pointed out does alot of speculating on what mafia are doing so immediately he was noted as probably mafia.
At the point where all but 6 had claimed, I guessed 2-3 scum still hadn't claimed, opz on the list. Which made him the best suspect at the time. Also placed that vote incase I didn't get back to the thread before voting closed.
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
Our DT's checking the same person is a great idea, but the thing we have to remember is that we need to lynch whomever they check in order to start establishing sanity. I think we should figure out who we want to lynch tomorrow, and investigate them tonight.
If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid?
We act the exact same way as if it came back green, we lynch them.
I think that the medic should protect Meeple tonight, and that Meeple should watch tree.hugger. That should protect our watcher and tracker, and if the mafia decides to go after one of the dt's then at least it clears up some of the confusion for the town. If the mafia goes after me as per usual, that's great because it buys the town more time. Anyone who has claimed green should NOT be getting protection.
Of course there is a good chance that some of our blue claimers are vets/hatters, but we can let the mafia stew over that.
Targets for tonights investigations and the day 2 lynch:
Scummy in my eyes
~opz~
AFJ
citi.zen
Not active enough
Redtooth
Foolishness
I think we should be looking at targets who claimed near the end of the roleclaim. Mafia were likely trying to see whether we had a glut of green claims or blue claims, and where it would be easiest to hide.
9 flamewheel
10 Vivi57
11 redtooth
12 citi.zen
13 ~OpZ~
14 MooCow
15 Foolishness
16 meeple
Chezinu
Moocow and meeple get a pass from any lynchs for the moment, as they will probably start dying anyways, and if they survive we can deal with them then.
Discounting Chez as a crazy person, that makes the last five green to claim Vivi, redtooth, citi.zen, Opz and foolishness
Thoughts?
|
I suppose we should start with not active enough people...
they are not usefull to town both as towny or scum..
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 12 2010 19:52 LuDwig- wrote:
I suppose we should start with not active enough people...
they are not usefull to town both as towny or scum..
Agreed, although it's still early in the game and everyone has contributed at least some. The more I think about it the more it seems like we should just check/lynch whoever seems most scummy.
I'd like to hear other peoples opinions on who to lynch though.
|
On June 12 2010 20:19 Radfield wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 19:52 LuDwig- wrote:
I suppose we should start with not active enough people...
they are not usefull to town both as towny or scum.. Agreed, although it's still early in the game and everyone has contributed at least some. The more I think about it the more it seems like we should just check/lynch whoever seems most scummy. I'd like to hear other peoples opinions on who to lynch though.
My opinion is that, rather than speculating endlessly on who is more or less "active" (ie - posting nonsense) we should wait for the night actions to come in.
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On June 12 2010 22:45 citi.zen wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 20:19 Radfield wrote:On June 12 2010 19:52 LuDwig- wrote:
I suppose we should start with not active enough people...
they are not usefull to town both as towny or scum.. Agreed, although it's still early in the game and everyone has contributed at least some. The more I think about it the more it seems like we should just check/lynch whoever seems most scummy. I'd like to hear other peoples opinions on who to lynch though. My opinion is that, rather than speculating endlessly on who is more or less "active" (ie - posting nonsense) we should wait for the night actions to come in.
The reason we should discuss this now, is because we need to decide on a day 2 lynch candidate during night one. The best way to begin to establish sanity is to lynch whomever the dt's check. So while we could just leave it up to them to decide, I think it makes more sense to discuss it as a group and figure out who the best target is.
Your plan is to not bother having people post for the next 10 hours and just wait for the night to end?
I realize we don't have a lot of information to go on right now, but that's why we need to encourage people to post their thoughts. And we do have some info, we have the Day 1 votes, our role-claims, the order the role-claims came in, and everyone's (short) posting history. It's enough for some conjecture.
|
On June 12 2010 12:56 L wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 11:51 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:35 L wrote:On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? Why exactly are you asking me instead of doing some thinking on your own? lol well apparently you're the man with the plan... also I was asking the town. No need to get all defensive I'm not being defensive. I'm wondering why you're purposely not answering your own question. This post hasn't really answered the question either, so feel free to get to it whenever you feel like doing some work.
It was a question to make people think and discuss... if they're both checking the same person (me?) then we can see which detective to trust and kinda follow their lead.
|
On June 13 2010 02:25 meeple wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 12:56 L wrote:On June 12 2010 11:51 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:35 L wrote:On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? Why exactly are you asking me instead of doing some thinking on your own? lol well apparently you're the man with the plan... also I was asking the town. No need to get all defensive I'm not being defensive. I'm wondering why you're purposely not answering your own question. This post hasn't really answered the question either, so feel free to get to it whenever you feel like doing some work. It was a question to make people think and discuss... if they're both checking the same person (me?) then we can see which detective to trust and kinda follow their lead.
I think we should check on someone that we want to lynch to help find out the sanity level of the DTs.
So we should decide on someone soon because the night is almost over. ACTIVITY?!
|
On June 13 2010 02:46 MooCow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2010 02:25 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 12:56 L wrote:On June 12 2010 11:51 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:35 L wrote:On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? Why exactly are you asking me instead of doing some thinking on your own? lol well apparently you're the man with the plan... also I was asking the town. No need to get all defensive I'm not being defensive. I'm wondering why you're purposely not answering your own question. This post hasn't really answered the question either, so feel free to get to it whenever you feel like doing some work. It was a question to make people think and discuss... if they're both checking the same person (me?) then we can see which detective to trust and kinda follow their lead. I think we should check on someone that we want to lynch to help find out the sanity level of the DTs. So we should decide on someone soon because the night is almost over. ACTIVITY?!
The problem with checking someone that we want to lynch... is that they might turn up red and while that would bag up some red it also wouldn't tell us anything about the sanity of the cops.
|
On June 13 2010 02:50 meeple wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2010 02:46 MooCow wrote:On June 13 2010 02:25 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 12:56 L wrote:On June 12 2010 11:51 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:35 L wrote:On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:
damn.
[quote]
Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? Why exactly are you asking me instead of doing some thinking on your own? lol well apparently you're the man with the plan... also I was asking the town. No need to get all defensive I'm not being defensive. I'm wondering why you're purposely not answering your own question. This post hasn't really answered the question either, so feel free to get to it whenever you feel like doing some work. It was a question to make people think and discuss... if they're both checking the same person (me?) then we can see which detective to trust and kinda follow their lead. I think we should check on someone that we want to lynch to help find out the sanity level of the DTs. So we should decide on someone soon because the night is almost over. ACTIVITY?! The problem with checking someone that we want to lynch... is that they might turn up red and while that would bag up some red it also wouldn't tell us anything about the sanity of the cops.
Eh?! Getting a red like that is totally worth not knowing the sanity level of the DT's imo.
Besides it only slows the us down by a bit if we don't know the DT sanity level but it's a huge gain getting a mafia.
What do you guys think of Chez? If he is going to get mod killed from inactivity we can experiment on him. I hope not though because he seems like a fun mafia guy to play with.
|
On June 12 2010 07:47 Radfield wrote:
Blue Roles: Seems very unlikely that we have two detectives, also seems unlikely that Ludwig is not a detective, as he roleclaimed very early on, and really doesn't seem like the type of player to roleclaim blue if he's mafia. Personally I think Moocow is lying, but he should get a pass for the moment given our claiming plan. He's an obvious target for the mafia, so if he hasn't died after a few nights, we start thinking about lynching him.
If any blue roles have claimed green in the thread(medics/vets/hatters etc.), you should think about roleclaiming to tree.hugger or ludwig, who strike me as very likely pro-town.
Lynch candidates for tonight seem to be meeple and Jspazz. I disagree with both of these choices. Unfortunately I don't have a real great alternative right now, as I don't have time to scour for people who are coasting. Redtooth and Foolishness both posted early on, but haven't given much input once the roleclaims really starting coming in, and haven't given input into lynching. Vivi57 kinda falls in this category as well. Probably other people as well. Also, I really don't like that Flamewheel voted for himself, abstaining is a bad thing for the town, but he's probably town, as I doubt a mafia would want to draw attention to himself.
Honestly AcrossFiveJulys(and Citi.zen for that matter) still strikes me as possible mafia, but he's been active, which is worth a lot of suspicion. I'd honestly rather have an active mafia then an inactive townie.
In reference to the mafia hitting moocow, or ludwig, one would prob be med protected and the other is prob a vet or hatter...So killing him after a few days if he lives (and doesn't take a hit), which he is almost guaranteed to do because the mafia won't want to fuck themselves over would be kinda pointless...I feel it would be a waste of a lynch to lynch moocow. Ludwig claimed first, and language barrier/relative mafia newbie, I'd take his claim as the real...But don't disregard MooCow's claim, because he most assuredly is blue.
On June 12 2010 07:51 meeple wrote:
Ahaha... why is when I leave the thread it turns into a "I hate meeple crapfest"... for christ's sake people just relax. I'm bound to scramble in here on the deadline in any case.
I am a watcher so that settle everyone down a bit. Chez might not ever rc... whatever. I never roleclaimed to Ludwig~ and he should check his pms to confirm, since I definitely never told him that. I was talking with Ludwig since I wanted to get an idea why he roleclaimed so quickly with L's plan and whether or not I can trust him or not. I'll be back in a bit with my vote on who to lynch and the reasoning in a little bit.
You should of been pming tree.hugger, he claimed FIRST. Not to mention he doesn't even really like L...lmao -_-...Silly rabbit.
On June 12 2010 08:08 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:
radfield why do you think tree.hugger is our most confirmed? because he RC'd first? that's not necessarily 100% townie behavior, because if he's a mafia who realized that L's plan sucks he's the one that set it in motion by being the first to RC...
Again, we agree. Tree.Hugger doesn't even like L...Kinda weird he was the first to jump on L's plan...You know...Given L didn't even jump on his own plan? -_-
On June 12 2010 11:35 meeple wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 11:30 ohN wrote:On June 12 2010 11:26 meeple wrote:On June 12 2010 11:02 L wrote:On June 12 2010 10:29 MooCow wrote:On June 12 2010 10:21 ohN wrote:damn. On June 12 2010 10:19 L wrote:
Yeah, not enough people caring if johnny would die :/.
Anyways, so the plan basically goes like this; Tracker tracks our DTs. Watchers watch any of our blues. If one of DTs is bullshitting, we'll be able to figure it out immediately. DTs can check our blues if they want, but given the sanity issue I can understand another checks.
Sound decent? Comments plz. Sounds decent. blues should post who they're watching and chezinu should rc imo. I'm investigating meeple because he was 2nd highest on the votes for being lynched and no one else recommended any other candidates. Please do not send in your night action right away!!! Important that we talk about our 2 DT check targets. If one of our dt's checks come back red... do we act? How likely is he paranoid? How likely is he's really mafia and just pretending to be paranoid? Too many if's. We see what happens and then go from there. Ah... there's only one 'if"
4, naive, paranoid, insane...and sane and actually found a mafia...
Anyway, if it comes back red? We lynch. Duh?...And we just believe he's insane....Unless it comes back green the some day in the future.
Also, I'm scummy for posting my idea on what the mafia will probably do? I was COMPLETELY against L's plan to role claim? Why the hell would I go along with a plan I feel is retarded? A5J seemed to of agreed with that logic, but people started without any real discussion of L's plan and just decided to follow it. -_-
On June 12 2010 23:17 Radfield wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2010 22:45 citi.zen wrote:On June 12 2010 20:19 Radfield wrote:On June 12 2010 19:52 LuDwig- wrote:
I suppose we should start with not active enough people...
they are not usefull to town both as towny or scum.. Agreed, although it's still early in the game and everyone has contributed at least some. The more I think about it the more it seems like we should just check/lynch whoever seems most scummy. I'd like to hear other peoples opinions on who to lynch though. My opinion is that, rather than speculating endlessly on who is more or less "active" (ie - posting nonsense) we should wait for the night actions to come in. The reason we should discuss this now, is because we need to decide on a day 2 lynch candidate during night one. The best way to begin to establish sanity is to lynch whomever the dt's check. So while we could just leave it up to them to decide, I think it makes more sense to discuss it as a group and figure out who the best target is. Your plan is to not bother having people post for the next 10 hours and just wait for the night to end? I realize we don't have a lot of information to go on right now, but that's why we need to encourage people to post their thoughts. And we do have some info, we have the Day 1 votes, our role-claims, the order the role-claims came in, and everyone's (short) posting history. It's enough for some conjecture.
I liked moocow's idea or checking meeple. He had the second most votes, but that doesn't mean much. It was his idea. BUT Meeple did claim watcher soooooo....Lol...I think that puts a big X on that idea...
On June 13 2010 03:00 MooCow wrote:
What do you guys think of Chez? If he is going to get mod killed from inactivity we can experiment on him. I hope not though because he seems like a fun mafia guy to play with.
Chez...Inactive? Lulz...You better enjoy the quiet moments while you can. Lol.
P.s. if they turn up red, lynch red....you either sane or paranoid....So...we would kinda have it down unless they hit another red the next night...(Who was nailing the fuck outta faction leaders in Caller's game? Lmao...epic dt status)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
