Three Kingdoms Mafia (三国演义)

On May 12 2010 04:52 Korynne wrote:
Yeah, I forgot the names... @_@ Especially the phoenix guy.

Also I remember the like "ji sheng yu, he sheng liang" line but I don't remember the other character in his name. xD

On May 14 2010 00:23 Caller wrote:
no it wont goddamit

we need more signups
or else im not running a game for a LONGGGG time

-_-

On May 15 2010 07:39 flamewheel91 wrote:
Caller boo you should send me le list when it starts.
Since I want to be lawling.

On May 15 2010 09:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
give fishball zhang jiao

On May 19 2010 03:15 Tricode wrote:
Curious question.

I been reading the rules and no where does it state that Yellow turbans can do anything other then recruit. So is it the yellow turbans goals to influence our votes to vote anyone, but them?

Just something to consider when looking at the yellow turbans.

On May 19 2010 03:19 Fishball wrote:


What are you talking about?
The CAN recruit. They just can't recruit a faction leader, as the whole group instantly dies if so.

On May 19 2010 03:20 Hesmyrr wrote:

Well, he will know the faction he is in. But Caller said the recruited member will not know any of his comrades.
Ask Caller.
Exactly, this is basically a cult game.

On May 19 2010 03:49 Caller wrote:

no
no
yes and ^_^

On May 19 2010 04:50 Caller wrote:

a) no, they don't even know that they are recruited. The only one that gets any confirmation is the leader.
b) no, he doesn't
c) That's all up to the discretion of the player. Just like in RTK, some people planned for defections ahead of time

On May 19 2010 06:08 Hesmyrr wrote:
Okay, guys.

This is critical. The fact you don't even know which side you are working for - and I promise you nobody but YT will inform the "victim" of their target - is highly disadvantageous for us neutrals. Hell, you may be playing game as usual when BAM! faction leader being an idiot gets himself killed, and who suffers for it? Us! Do you want to suffer such ignominy? I tell you not! Eighteen other neutrals listening to my voice, ponder my speech.

I will tell you of an way out. We will rebel against the injustice and wrestle control of the game out of these so-called leader's grasps. I propose...

NEUTRAL REVOLUTION

Take note of the winning condition Caller has listed:



You know what this means? Even when there is one faction leader remaining, as long as he doesn't overwhelm us, he can't win. Let's pull a Battler and turn around the chessboard. What do you see?

I see a four cult game, with us neutrals as Townies.

Let me stress that.

OUR PRIORITY AS NEUTRALS IS TO HUNT DOWN THE FOUR FACTION LEADERS, AND KILL THEM ALL. THEN IT WILL BE "TOWN" VICTORY, SINCE NEUTRALS (TOWN) IS THE ONLY FACTION REMAINING.

This plan is beneficial for all of us, this is the plan that makes sense, and this is EXACTLY what we should be doing. Neutrals, we are no longer neutrals. We are now comrades fighting for mutual victory, struggling against the tyranny of the cults awaiting us. Hereby I dedicate myself into finding, and killing, all the leader in this game. Who agrees with me?!?!?

On May 19 2010 09:32 Hesmyrr wrote:
I PM'd Caller. Caller confirmed that "all remaining neutral players win lawl". It is going to be pretty difficult, but at least we got the technicality out of the way.

On May 19 2010 17:50 Bill Murray wrote:
Everyone who is voting their armies to me, I *IMPLORE* you to shift your armies to hesmyrr. Trust my read on this one. I have a strong town read on him, and I would not make that good of a general.

On May 20 2010 01:31 LunarDestiny wrote:

From my understanding, YT aren't bad, they are just imba. The bad guys are the ones who are constantly lying.

On May 20 2010 02:17 ~OpZ~ wrote:
Well...It's probably because they keep their recruits...that's kinda scary...But if they recruit me then I guess I would have to be the best yellow turban I can be, right?

On May 20 2010 03:01 BrownBear wrote:
Well, yeah, YT are not BAD per se... but the imba-ness of their ability to keep their recruits that's drawing the ire of people right now.

Also, lol at everyone who thinks I'm the YT leader.

On May 20 2010 03:04 Hesmyrr wrote:


Okay, if you insist, let me put it in neutral perspective then.

First since there are three recruiters vs one YT recruiter, neutral's chance of becoming YT are much lower than possibility of becoming other faction. If YT manages to grow unabated, it effectively means that everyone not belonging to YT is literally screwed. This demands two strategy: 1) eliminate YT which is likely to become your enemy, or 2) beg for YT to recruit you. This is up to personal choice, but I don't know, I find first idea rather better than second idea.

Second YT recruiter is different from normal recruiter in one thing; they can get killed from choosing faction leader, while other three faction does not have to worry about such things.

Third Something happened, and YT leader is out. With him revealed chance of his victory decreases dramatically- wow, playing as neutral, it's time to change alliance! Oh wait, you are stuck. Too bad.

Even when you are aiming for faction fight, this demonstrates YT is horrible for your individual survival. And if we are going to play as Town, well, getting rid of strongest cult is obv.

On May 20 2010 03:20 Ace wrote:
I mean most people suck at finding scum, why would you even be worried about the YT leader being found?

On May 20 2010 03:26 Hesmyrr wrote:

What neutral victory? My post was specifically addressed to someone who wants to play individually instead of aiming for neutral victory. Your wording seem to dismiss my arguments by classifying it into my neutral policy, and make me suspect you either are budding up for the YT recruitment or has a role that is aligned positively with YT.

On May 20 2010 03:37 BrownBear wrote:


Wait, why are you bouncing? I don't understand.

On May 20 2010 03:45 Caller wrote:

k modkill it is

On May 20 2010 04:18 BrownBear wrote:
LR will probably just get modkilled, though... I guess since it's first day, we could get away with that, but otherwise why waste a KP on someone who is just going to die anyways?

On May 20 2010 04:46 Bill Murray wrote:
You don't want a victory for the neutrals?

On May 20 2010 05:18 L wrote:
Fishball's pretty much spamming while saying he doesn't want to play. Given he and I have had altercations in the past I'm wondering if that's intentionally done to make it look like he doesn't have a power role, or whether or not he is indeed a leader.

On May 20 2010 05:26 Bill Murray wrote:


I didn't understand your wording, which is why I asked

On May 20 2010 05:30 L wrote:

Nah, its more that I know you're prone to rage, hence why It kinda makes sense that you'd rage a bit. Your logic on the past page, however, hasn't been as unrefined as it normally is when you rage.

So its mostly a question of whether or not you're bluffing. This post basically states that you've got some kind of role, too, so I dunno.

On May 21 2010 07:53 Iaaan wrote:
Well, I guess Cao Cao being killed will make me happy in the future if I get recruited, but right now, I don't really care. I'm not really sure what to be posting, if I had good analysis on someone, it doesn't really benefit me, or anyone else who is neutral, to share it.

On May 21 2010 13:22 Iaaan wrote:
only problem I have with tricodes thing: Why did you decide to announce L's role to everyone if you are neutral? What did you hope gain from it? Makes sense if you are on someones team already, even if you do have detective abilities.

On May 21 2010 13:47 Caller wrote:

lol i didn't mention anything in the rules wheeeeee

On May 21 2010 22:19 Abenson wrote:
First of all, I would like to point out that L is not yellow
Why?
I am Taishi Ci, a Yellow Turban killer.
I have the ability to visit a person each night, and if he's yellow, he dies.
I visited L, and he didn't die.
I still believe he's a faction leader, but I want to confirm he's not yellow.

On May 21 2010 19:09 Radfield wrote:



Agreed, this sounds much more like a role check. I imagine an alignment check would simply come back as blue/red/yellow/etc. Given that it's a role check, it would be unlikely for it to not be accurate. I'm not even sure how an insane dt would work in this format, I mean, there's no bad guys or good guys really. Insane dt's work in normal mafia because everything is clear cut. Tricode maybe you could tell us your characters name, and we could run it through the LunarDestiny ROTK machine to see if there's any lore reasons you might not get an accurate result.


Currently I believe Tricode about his role check, and I think L is a likely faction leader. It's possible L is telling the truth though, as it would make sense for the YT's to sacrifice a member to kill off a faction leader. That would be an excellent trade for them. So if we imagine that Tricode is a YT, where does that get us. Well, for starters the YT's would have to KNOW L is the faction leader before they decide to sac a player to kill him. It makes no sense to try and kill L unless you suspect him of being a leader. So this means the YT's must have used some KP last night(or a role check, in which case Tricode is telling the truth anyways) to try and kill L, only to have it not go through, therefore they would claim that L is a faction leader, given that it's basically been confirmed faction leaders have veteran abilities. Only, L is just a regular townie, and happened to be saved by a medic, which threw off the YT calculations. This is basically what L is saying happened.

As far as I'm concerned, the simple way to clear this up is to have the medic role claim. I don't understand why people think that roleclaiming medic would suddenly make you a target? There's no mafia here. A medic absolutely doesn't threaten the faction leaders one bit, and doesn't threaten the townies. Why would anyone waste kp on a medic? If anything, it makes you slightly more likely to be recruited is all.

So I'll be voting Tricode for now, unless a medic pops up and verifies what L has said. Of course it's possibly that L is a faction leader that had both a medic and vig/assassin target him last night, but oh well. Basically, as a neutral townie(hell, any alignment), I don't really care who flops what. But this will give us some interesting info at the very least.

Also Tricode, even if you're telling the truth and L flops leader, it doesn't make you any more trustworthy as the game progresses, because you could be recruited at any time. In fact you would likely be recruited YT with powers such as yours.

On May 22 2010 00:02 Radfield wrote:
I disagree, alignment/role checkers and Assassins would make excellent recruits. Sure they might decide to not help their leaders, but that goes for every role in the game.

On May 22 2010 00:02 Radfield wrote:
Plus YT recruits will always play to their fullest given that they can't be swiped away.

On May 22 2010 00:02 Radfield wrote:
And remember that the leaders have the option of getting Caller to notify a new recruit. For instance, if I got a msg saying I was recruited to the green team, and then the green leader contacted me the same day, I'd be pretty damn sure that I'm on the green team. Given that all players likely have a role, it would be bad practice for leaders to not tell their members that they've been recruited. Also given that we're down to three factions(possibly two after today) there will be much less member swiping by the leaders. Which again makes it more likely for the leaders to tell people they've been recruited.

On May 22 2010 00:02 Radfield wrote:
Anyways, alignment/role checkers and assassins make excellent recruits, because as a faction leader you would be able to find and eliminate potential threats, and also find good roles to recruit.

On May 22 2010 02:44 ~OpZ~ wrote:




Well if we are all playing to win...And our win conditions change...Then I suppose we would play for whomever recruited us then.

On May 22 2010 07:41 L wrote:

Fishball gave you the name for Sun Shangxian. Not Sun Ren. Sun Ren is 孫仁.

She has a different name in ROTK, afaik.

On May 22 2010 08:08 LunarDestiny wrote:
Yes, Lady Sun, , and Sun Ren are the same person.

But the question I am asking is Sun Ren is a very less used name for her. I played tons of ROTK games, watch tons of ROTK related films, and read the novel and I still don't know when I first saw Sun Ren.


That aside, giving the recruiters the list of names could have very bad in the late game. Well, I already gave mine so there is no turning back.

On May 22 2010 10:18 BrownBear wrote:


There you are! Nameclaim pls?

On May 22 2010 10:45 LunarDestiny wrote:

How many uses there is/are? Please say 6 (hence the term 七擒七縱孟獲)

On May 22 2010 11:16 johnnyspazz wrote:
okaay sooo i don't have access to a computer for like a day and jesus christ the thread doubles??? can someone give me a heads up on what i should know?

On May 22 2010 11:46 johnnyspazz wrote:
how does escape recruitment ability work if the leaders can decide if you are notified or not if you are recruited? does caller pm you saying, "you are being recruited, counter action?"

On May 22 2010 12:13 johnnyspazz wrote:

haha you are so bitter i love it

On May 22 2010 10:47 Fishball wrote:
After reading so many pages regarding our current situation, I'd still say stick with Tricode's original proposal, then kill Tricode if things did not go as planned.

I DON'T CARE who is lying. It is all a distraction. Just kill them one by one if need be.

On May 23 2010 03:09 ~OpZ~ wrote:

They both did have better posts about Ma Chao...Anyway...

I dunno whom to believe...probably more so Fishball said he might quit earlier...MyHeroNoob hasn't really been posting...Whole things wild.

On May 23 2010 03:08 Radfield wrote:



Should we all quote our own posts now Fishball to show how smart we are

On May 23 2010 03:18 LunarDestiny wrote:
Yeah, I knew that Sun Ren stuff was bullshit. Now time to get the remiaining 2

On May 23 2010 03:43 L wrote:

Nah, you guys can deal with it during the night because I should be daykilled, which opens all the vig power and anti-YT power to be used on people who have double claimed.

On May 23 2010 05:04 LunarDestiny wrote:
So only 3 hours till night begins. I have a bad feeling I won't make it pass the night...

On May 23 2010 05:09 LunarDestiny wrote:
The fact the Diao Chan dies out of nowhere in Night 1 still bothers me.

On May 23 2010 05:29 Radfield wrote:
Ask and yee shall receive Bill. Two people have not name claimed, and Fishball actually name claimed two different names. I might have missed some stuff so if anyone see's any omission let me know.

1. Bill Murray yuan shao
2. Hesmyrr Action Blocker Lu Xun
3. johnnyspazz Zhang Liao
4. Radfield Zhuge Liang
5. Scamp Guan Yu
6. Ohn
7. Falcynn Sima Yi
8. Iaaan
9. L Sun Quan
10. BloodyCobbler Huang Gai
11. MyHeroNoob Able to desert Meng Huo
12. Xelin Roleblocking Jian Wei
13. BrownBear Vigilante Zhao Yun
14. Tricode Role Cop Lu Meng
15. TwotoneTerran Ma Chao
16. Abenson YT Killer Taishi Ci
17. ~Opz~ No Role Lu Bu
18. Barth ??? Diao Chan
19. Trezequet23 Kills any leader who tries to recruit him Cao Pi
20. Fishball Able to desert Meng Huo AND Qin Shi Huang
21. Lunardestiny Xu Zhu
22. Last Romantic Leader Cao Cao
23. DarthThienAn zhou yu
24. Jugan Zhang Fei

On May 23 2010 06:48 LunarDestiny wrote:
Liu Ci was the Emperor for Shu also and he sucks hardcore.

On May 22 2010 02:42 Fishball wrote:


No. Bodyguards roles and the such will not have a choice, as their abilities are passive.

On May 19 2010 09:04 Fishball wrote:


As cool as this idea sounds, it wouldn't really work. It is too hard to work, as all the neutrals would have to be on the same page.
Also, leaders can still "recruit" you whether you like it or not.
Still, I like this idea. I would be way more motivated to play for myself, instead of leader(player) I don't like.

For this to work, basically everyone has to role claim; Their character and powers. Then we organize our night and day KP, to trim down the leaders to two. We then kill them at the same time in order to prevent "a single party outnumbering the other" situation.
Of course there are a lot more smaller details to sort out, but this is the main idea.

So your role is awesome, if it's true. Can you explain exactly how it works, please?

If you want collateral, just let me know, and I'll roleclaim to you first. I am still neutral.

On May 23 2010 03:54 LunarDestiny wrote:
For the case of Meng Huo's double claim. At least one of them is telling the truth. The other one... might not be a recruiter. What is bothering me is the remaining people who hasn't nameclaim. I ask one more time, please go forth and name claim.

Remaining 3:
6. Ohn
8. Iaaan
24. Jugan

On May 24 2010 14:11 Bill Murray wrote:
fishball for 3rd recruiter

On May 25 2010 00:12 Abenson wrote:
Since I want the neutrals to win right now, would it be okay to announce that I got recruited?

On May 25 2010 03:38 BrownBear wrote:
Also, dammit, Fishball. I may have not had time to switch my night action off of MyHeroNoob.

I attempted to switch to Jugan, because dude hasn't been active at all and all the other doubleclaims are being taken care of. However, it might not have been in time. We'll see.

On May 25 2010 05:56 XeliN wrote:
I'll change it to Fishball if Caller allows, was going to go for him but then I remembered Bill was quite vocal and then after didnt say much which usually strikes me as suspicious. I didn't realise he'd alrdy claimed.

On May 25 2010 03:38 BrownBear wrote:
Also, dammit, Fishball. I may have not had time to switch my night action off of MyHeroNoob.

I attempted to switch to Jugan, because dude hasn't been active at all and all the other doubleclaims are being taken care of. However, it might not have been in time. We'll see.

On May 25 2010 07:22 LunarDestiny wrote:
Fishball, mind if you give us your character name. The reason is if one of us die and we didn't lie about our character name, the stuffs we said are highly believable.

On May 25 2010 07:30 LunarDestiny wrote:
Tricode you found a leader again... the chance of that. We also don't know if you are lying or not(no offense since you say you are now on the dark side (yellow turban)...

Trezeguet23, sorry to say but I got to believe that Tricode is telling the truth since he has good history for day 2. If he is lying, he probably will be one of our target in the future.

On May 24 2010 13:02 Fishball wrote:
Trezequet23's claim of Cao Pi being able to kill the recruiter, if the recruiter isn't Cao Cao doesn't really make sense (Judging based on my knowledge of the Three Kingdoms). I would send Abenson on him, as I have a hunch he could be YT.

On May 25 2010 07:23 Tricode wrote:


To only find you have the ability to recruit and 2 night hits. Congrats!

ADD:

Ok, I have some good news and some bad news.

Which do you prefer to hear?

Well to bad, I get to pick for you. Bad news first.

I have forced into slavery to work for the YTs! Isn't that great! But unfortunately for these idiots they haven't told me who I'm working for or anything other then I have been recruited for them.

Good news time!

Well even though I was recruited I don't know who I'm working for so I will just continue my goal of killing leaders and guess who is our next Target! That's right Trezeguet23!

Now I have a proposal! There might be a chance he is YT! Well if he is, I die with him. But what if we role block him and let me find the other leader?

This might cause problems in the long run, but the town can take that chance if they want. Remember it is just a proposal. So it's up to you the neutrals to decide what to do.

Otherwise down with Trezeguet23!

On May 25 2010 11:42 DarthThienAn wrote:
Soon to die:
Trezequet23
Tricode
other YTs

On May 25 2010 11:46 BrownBear wrote:


Yep >

Also, Abenson, you're pretty useless from here on out. Sorry, bro.

On May 26 2010 00:00 Radfield wrote:
Fishball, I'm assuming you mean that Trezguet will die today with the daykill, and not tonight.

If that's the case you have my vote, and I urge everyone else to vote Fishball as well.

On May 26 2010 08:24 LunarDestiny wrote:
So this is what I am going to do

##Kill Trezequet23

So the army owner should go for another suspect.

On May 26 2010 10:05 LunarDestiny wrote:
It is too late indeed since I also pmed Caller for letting him know that I wish to kill Trezequet23.

On May 26 2010 10:31 DarthThienAn wrote:


important thing to know is: it's two night hits. LR died in one lynch.

On May 26 2010 10:32 LunarDestiny wrote:
SHIT, time is running out. As of now, I am killing Trezequet23. Should i make change or should I not?

On May 26 2010 10:32 Abenson wrote:


I'll hereby roleclaim neutral (at least I still think I'm neutral)
Assuming that I get informed when I get recruited, I'm neutral.

On May 26 2010 10:38 LunarDestiny wrote:
Bah, so johnnyspazz...

On May 26 2010 10:42 Abenson wrote:
I never said i'm not a YT killer, and I have never said i'm in a faction

On May 25 2010 00:12 Abenson wrote:
Since I want the neutrals to win right now, would it be okay to announce that I got recruited?

On May 26 2010 06:13 Bill Murray wrote:
can you read?

my real power is in relation to the day lynch
if you shan't lynch me i shan't use it
when you use it trez i will show you whats up
if you dayvig me i will kill the person attacking me

On May 26 2010 11:15 johnnyspazz wrote:
yeah i hate dumb people like you in general too
teehee

On May 26 2010 11:26 Fishball wrote:
So I thought about it in the shower. LunarDestiny should hit BM.

- He already confirmed himself as a YT.
- All the stuff he brought up is pretty much bullshit. (Read the last 5 pages, too much to reference) Either he is lying, or both him and Abenson are both lying.
- He says he will kill the killer if hit, and he will have oh-so-shiny real powers if lynch. I call this a HUGE bluff. If Trez is indeed the leader, there is a high probability for him to have 2 lives. BM knows a lynch will kill Trez, therefore tries to draws fire to himself instead and have a someone "hit" Trez. Trez will survive if he has 2 lives.



- If we kill BM and kill Trez, but Trez is not the leader OR Trez is the leader but the rest of the YT did not die alongside with him, it's still a good move, as we get 2 YT's.

On May 26 2010 12:21 LunarDestiny wrote:
Fishball, I don't like Lu Xun being a Wei.

On May 26 2010 18:59 XeliN wrote:


Hey Dickhead stop being a crabby patch doll, like I said earlier if your gonna make accusations back them up otherwise your just a whiney QQ fagmatron.

+ Show Spoiler +

On May 26 2010 16:29 Bill Murray wrote:
post 10 = me explaining i'm not 100% sure I'm even YT, and I would want to see Trez die before me

On May 27 2010 10:39 Radfield wrote:



Hit me with a breakdown of your actions. This thread has been real drawn out and i forget alot of what has gone on.

As far as I know, you pushed hard to lynch Trez yesterday. This doesn't count against being the green leader, because of course the green leader would also push hard for lynching trez yesterday. In fact, everyone was and should have been pushing to lynch trez yesterday. It was obvious.

So what other actions make you not a leader? I'm not trying to be snarky here, I just can't think of any.

On May 27 2010 10:43 Radfield wrote:



Don't search or quote anything. I'll do the fact checking. You just tell me in your own words what you've done.

On May 27 2010 10:47 DarthThienAn wrote:
Question to everyone:

How did barth die night 1?

Brownbear didn't do it, which means we have another vigilante or something. It wasn't Radfield's random power either because he got YT killer and got roleblocked anyway. So what happened there? Second vig, please RC if you are alive.

BC, do you know what Jugan's role was?

On May 27 2010 12:15 Scamp wrote:


Except that's a picture oh Huang Zhong, not Huang Gai.

On May 27 2010 12:23 Iaaan wrote:
well, gg.

You were very vocal this game Fishball (: Never seen you post so much before.

On May 27 2010 21:52 Hesmyrr wrote:
I think it was all about charisma and public conception; I still recall how most people were skeptical of my plan until Lost Romantic and L was caught consecutively. If that had not happened I don't think enough people would have got behind the plan for neutral victory to work. Honestly most people came into this game expecting faction fight, so turning people against it initially was the hardest task- which is why I over-villainized faction leaders day 1 immediately after Caller threw out some fuel to work with. After THAT post no one was going to openly support the idea of faction fight (even neutrals since their primary goal is to survive, which is not going against town's consensus naturally does. And no leader would have recruited the neutral who planted target on himself.) I would have immediately taken the risk, reveal myself to the first recruit (mouthpiece was necessary to organize future recruits after all) and appease him/her as best as I can lol.

Yellow Turban, because its members could not be recruited, was closest to the actual cult and could have been very powerful had not Trezquet23 drew so much suspicion to himself. If you knew you were going to get checked I would definitely have sent him PM in advance that I was recruiting him. 'Appease' is key word here- when idea of neutral victory got dominant the power balance between recruiter and neutrals got reversed. There seem to be plenty of opinions who said this was not the game was meant to be played so if you were nice about it, I think people would have been acceptable. Hell, L even said "lol your plan sucks b/c this" and I still tried my hardest to save him before giving up for moral victory. I am especially curious after knowing Fishball's ability why he gave up- Fishball was seen as pro-town by day 2~3, so if he worked to keep people away from suspecting his true ability, BC could potentially have lived just enough to make it.

My theorycraft best plan for the what leaders should have done

1) Have the recruited members contact me or L. Set up an alliance whose conduit will be recruited members so that faction leaders identity can necessarily be kept secret. I had idea about using anonymous quickboard.

2) Role-claim wisely. I did it several times as Mafia and it isn't that hard -_- Almost all leaders got caught because of that. Fishball also needed to fake-role/nameclaim so BC's strength became that much stronger.

3) BC publicly claims himself as faction leader, or deliberately give off an "scumslip". Use all three faction members to spread ideas that BC must be lynched.

BC survives. 3 people recruited night 2, L is protected (by me) and BC is immune.

On May 28 2010 04:58 DarthThienAn wrote:


I think you guys could have won.. all you to do was recruit me and/or BrownBear, and then Radfield and tell us. I would have switched loyalty immediately - dunno about BrownBear - and could easily have said, "oh Fishball is neutral".

It might have been tough if Falcynn came back and started being active and watched the right people. You had to get BrownBear after me though for the KP - he might have been a sacrificial lamb at some point, but there was no way you would get him with a day lynch, until you guys were dominating.

If you didn't recruit me or BB that night it would have been a toss-up, because, if the town agreed to kill BC and check you (Fishball), then BB and I were planning or switching anyway lol. So BC would have been dead the next day.

On May 28 2010 04:58 DarthThienAn wrote:
If you didn't recruit me or BB that night it would have been a toss-up, because, if the town agreed to kill BC and check you (Fishball), then BB and I were planning or switching anyway lol. So BC would have been dead the next day.