EPTLaunch the fake at Caller plz
=D
World at War Mafia - Page 57
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
Launch the fake at Caller plz =D | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
-_-...Our eyes will be opened up in a very short time...But again... L please extend the day by launching the fake at Caller...who knows, he might actually post then. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
=D You're NK! ahhahahaha this might end up being funny. | ||
|
haster27
Taiwan809 Posts
Many are accepting his confession pretty leniently (which surprised me actually), so this is a food for thought. I find it highly unlikely that country such as NK, especially considering its abilities, do not have anti-town role; it is possible that Xelin, when ~OpZ~ pointed him out immediately with acceptable argument, panicked and tried to throw the suspicion off him by revealing himself, downgrading his perception from potential scum to one of those stupid foolish non-concensus-nuke-launching townies that is currently flooding the town. Current non-concensus nuker list Versatile Xelin tree.hugger (listed from top to bottom the greater need to lynch) | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
##nuke:Caller Away you go fake missiles. Away you go. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
Understand this: I nuke when I want to nuke, I don't nuke when I don't want to nuke. I didn't just nuke you for the hell of it, because I wouldn't nuke anyone for the hell of it. I nuked you for a reason. I'm also honest. I never tried to hide anything about why I nuked you. You disagree about my reasons, obviously, and I don't blame you at all, I think everyone would in your situation. But when I say that I will not nuke anybody, I mean that I will not nuke anybody. If the town lynches me, let it be because they believe me to be mafia, and not because they're afraid I'm just going to fly off the handle and start blasting away. | ||
|
haster27
Taiwan809 Posts
On March 28 2010 10:09 L wrote: Good fucking lord, chrome and/or TL is fucked right now. Couldn't get on in the last like 3 hours. ##nuke:Caller Away you go fake missiles. Away you go. Why don't you use FF? I assume those will work b/c I am having absolutely no problem with my Safari (mac). Also I think you can stop breathing down tree.hugger's neck for now- there are too many suspect & crazier non-concensus nukers present to bother about him right now. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On March 28 2010 10:21 haster27 wrote: Why don't you use FF? I assume those will work b/c I am having absolutely no problem with my Safari (mac). Also I think you can stop breathing down tree.hugger's neck for now- there are too many suspect & crazier non-concensus nukers present to bother about him right now. Nah, you should still be nuked immediately, as should Versatile and Xelin. The fact that town is going to let a backlog of people build up essentially means every subsequent nuke is more likely to hit as anti-nukes get scarce, and lynches are farther and farther off. This is pretty much what I said would happen in my first post, but no one bothered to listen. | ||
|
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
Here's a question that nobody's posed yet: Have any of the nukes yet fired been fake? So far, we can confirm the one nuke that's fallen, RoL's was a real nuke, and thus we can probably assume that his nuke on Caller was also real. There is no real reason to suppose, being town aligned that his nukes would be fake. And I know that my nuke was a real nuke, although I can't objectively prove that. But beyond that, I don't know. And I'm curious if all the nukes fired so far have actually been real nukes. The reason it's important to know, of course, is that a fake nuke is almost definitely a mark for the mafia, an attempt to waste a town anti-nuke. And since we've been blasting away with our anti-nukes, we've given cover for the mafia to launch nukes with the idea that they'll be shot down. I'll look a little deeper into this in an hour, but it's just about time I shut down this computer. Godspeed town, may the day never descend into night! | ||
|
Elemenope
Burkina Faso1704 Posts
On March 28 2010 10:23 L wrote: Nah, you should still be nuked immediately, as should Versatile and Xelin. The fact that town is going to let a backlog of people build up essentially means every subsequent nuke is more likely to hit as anti-nukes get scarce, and lynches are farther and farther off. This is pretty much what I said would happen in my first post, but no one bothered to listen. I assume by 'you', you mean tree.hugger/he, unless there's something I missed. | ||
|
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 28 2010 09:46 ~OpZ~ wrote: Versatile...I agree with your list of suspects for the most part...And actually think you're probably townie. A jack ass, but a townie. -_-...Our eyes will be opened up in a very short time...But again... L please extend the day by launching the fake at Caller...who knows, he might actually post then. lol. i think that's fair to say. however, i warned BM what happened, but apparently he didn't realize i have bigger balls than him. in any case, i wanted L dead because i believe him to be bad for the town, period. who knows, maybe i'll change my mind in the future. once a nuke was launched at him, i took the opportunity. i guess i underestimated how stupid BM is though, an impossible task though it is. one would think that at the point i nuked L, he would realize nuking me would only lead to his death. if he had been thinking long-term about the radiation levels and to keep himself alive, getting me lynched would have been a far better plan, because why wouldn't i retaliate? either way, for all you dummies who keep putting me at the top of your lynch lists, newsflash: i have a nuke coming at me. i will die. discuss other plans and other targets as i'm old news. further, town may want to think about their attempts to lynch/nuke townies who have broken the precious rules. you guys have got townies attacking townies while the mafia and third party sit back and watch the town do the work for them. yeah, you can blame the townies who acted without town-consensus, but what's done is done. if you want to win, it's time to move on past the blame game. someone has to take the high ground. | ||
|
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 28 2010 07:28 Bill Murray wrote: how about you attack my arguments instead of attacking me? oh wait, too late in two senses. moron. wait....what was that? stop mumbling! no hunny bunny. first you remove the penis. THEN you talk. amateurs. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On March 28 2010 10:33 Elemenope wrote: I assume by 'you', you mean tree.hugger/he, unless there's something I missed. Yep, tree.hugger. I don't see why ANY of the non-consensus nukers aren't going to be killed prior to them getting another shot. | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On March 28 2010 10:42 Versatile wrote: lol. i think that's fair to say. however, i warned BM what happened, but apparently he didn't realize i have bigger balls than him. in any case, i wanted L dead because i believe him to be bad for the town, period. who knows, maybe i'll change my mind in the future. once a nuke was launched at him, i took the opportunity. i guess i underestimated how stupid BM is though, an impossible task though it is. one would think that at the point i nuked L, he would realize nuking me would only lead to his death. if he had been thinking long-term about the radiation levels and to keep himself alive, getting me lynched would have been a far better plan, because why wouldn't i retaliate? either way, for all you dummies who keep putting me at the top of your lynch lists, newsflash: i have a nuke coming at me. i will die. discuss other plans and other targets as i'm old news. further, town may want to think about their attempts to lynch/nuke townies who have broken the precious rules. you guys have got townies attacking townies while the mafia and third party sit back and watch the town do the work for them. yeah, you can blame the townies who acted without town-consensus, but what's done is done. if you want to win, it's time to move on past the blame game. someone has to take the high ground. Why wouldn't you retaliate to being lynched either? If town is attacking town, wasn't that directly caused by you and your gang of fucking nitwits? You're a fucking huge box of hypocritical puss. Here's the high ground: We nuke every player who nukes without the consent of the town. Period. If anyone else nukes, they know they're going to die for it. If townies want to nuke, cool beans, but they'll know the ToD is going to go up twice. The fact that tree.hugger and xelin haven't been nuked yet is a HUGE clue that they're mafia. If mafia saw both of them as guilt free nuke targets, they would have unleashed their shit a while ago while high fiving that they're listening to the town. So, once again; kill the morons who have nuked, then just stop fucking firing shit. Period. This is the only way forward without us getting into the exact same mess tomorrow. Everyone who's fired nukes has said "I've done bad shit, but lets look to the future.". What future? You nuking again in a day and saying "I've done bad shit, but lets look to the future" again? | ||
|
Iaaan
Canada578 Posts
| ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
On March 28 2010 10:53 Iaaan wrote: I think I missed what the point of extending the day AGAIN was..... Well, when I die and flip if i'm not saved, I'd kinda like people to nuke the people I'm telling them to nuke prior to them getting another opportunity to throw nukes out. That alone makes it worthwhile for me. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
I can't do it myself, as I've used the only one I have. | ||
|
Versatile
United States396 Posts
On March 28 2010 10:52 L wrote: Why wouldn't you retaliate to being lynched either? If town is attacking town, wasn't that directly caused by you and your gang of fucking nitwits? You're a fucking huge box of hypocritical puss. Here's the high ground: We nuke every player who nukes without the consent of the town. Period. If anyone else nukes, they know they're going to die for it. If townies want to nuke, cool beans, but they'll know the ToD is going to go up twice. The fact that tree.hugger and xelin haven't been nuked yet is a HUGE clue that they're mafia. If mafia saw both of them as guilt free nuke targets, they would have unleashed their shit a while ago while high fiving that they're listening to the town. So, once again; kill the morons who have nuked, then just stop fucking firing shit. Period. This is the only way forward without us getting into the exact same mess tomorrow. Everyone who's fired nukes has said "I've done bad shit, but lets look to the future.". What future? You nuking again in a day and saying "I've done bad shit, but lets look to the future" again? umm, i'm not RoL. i wouldn't have launched a nuke just to eff the town, that's not my style. so that point is null and void. and i don't have a future in this game. just letting you know your plan is not going to work. how the hell do you expect to control everyone in this game at this point? how are you going to personally ensure tree.hugger and xelin are nuked when you admittedly have no nukes? and hey, let's use your own point to delve into that deeper: why wouldn't they nuke someone back if they are nuked? why would they not retaliate if they're on their deathbeds essentially? no one is going to be attacked outright and take it laying down. but yeah, keep on trying to kill townies, even though that's the supposed reason you're railing against me. | ||
|
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On March 28 2010 10:45 L wrote: Yep, tree.hugger. I don't see why ANY of the non-consensus nukers aren't going to be killed prior to them getting another shot. On March 28 2010 10:55 L wrote: Well, when I die and flip if i'm not saved, I'd kinda like people to nuke the people I'm telling them to nuke prior to them getting another opportunity to throw nukes out. That alone makes it worthwhile for me. Jesus. Christ. Do you ever listen? On March 27 2010 12:17 tree.hugger wrote: Also to address L's point, I'd don't see myself nuking anyone else in the near future. On March 27 2010 13:06 tree.hugger wrote: That's not true, you can trust what I say. I haven't said one dishonest thing this game—no matter what you think about the 'quality' of my comments. When I said I'd vote for myself if you flipped green, I meant it. When I say I won't be nuking in the near future, I mean it. Argue against my decisions and ideas, but there's no benefit for me in deceiving anybody. On March 28 2010 06:46 tree.hugger wrote: Dude, are you blind? How many times do I need to say that I won't be firing another nuke out in the foreseeable future? Do you have trust issues? Did you take it hard when you learned the tooth fairy was a lie or something? I'm not going to nuke. I'm not going to nuke. I'm not going to nuke. On March 28 2010 10:18 tree.hugger wrote: Understand this: I nuke when I want to nuke, I don't nuke when I don't want to nuke. I didn't just nuke you for the hell of it, because I wouldn't nuke anyone for the hell of it. I nuked you for a reason. I'm also honest. I never tried to hide anything about why I nuked you. You disagree about my reasons, obviously, and I don't blame you at all, I think everyone would in your situation. But when I say that I will not nuke anybody, I mean that I will not nuke anybody. If the town lynches me, let it be because they believe me to be mafia, and not because they're afraid I'm just going to fly off the handle and start blasting away. Here's my problem L. I know full well that you don't believe me when I say that I won't throw off a nuke for the hell of it. I can't help that, you're entitled to your own special interpretation of reality. But at the very least, acknowledge this instead of blindly flogging the same dead horse over and over again. And while your at it, please tell me why exactly you don't believe that I won't fire off more nukes. Here's my argument, L, still following me? I have absolutely no reason to nuke anyone else this game. A nuke is already incoming at you, so even if I wanted to nuke you again, even if I didn't think I hadn't learned enough from the first time, even if I thought you were somehow worth the special attention, I wouldn't have to nuke you, because Versatile has already done it. That said, I do not want to nuke you again, you're not worth it, and I think I've gotten enough out of my first nuke for it not to be cost-efficient for me to do it again. And there is nobody else out there right now for whom I have sufficient suspicions against to warrant firing off another nuke. And finally, thanks to you, it's still day 1, and I can't nuke anyway. *** Your idea for counter-nuking the people who've nuked already is ill-conceived and anti-town. As versatile has pointed out, AND demonstrated, nuking people who've already been shown to have nukes is just downright stupid and suicidal. It's one thing for you to suggest that someone else nukes the person who nuked first. But then, who'd be willing to carry that judgment out, when it would possibly lead to a retaliatory nuke against themselves? In your scenario, all that happens is more dead townies, all in the name of justice. To quote Mahatma Gandhi; "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
umm, i'm not RoL. i wouldn't have launched a nuke just to eff the town, that's not my style. so that point is null and void. You're worse. And yeah, throwing 3 nukes is kinda anti-town.Here's my problem L. Here's mine: You're probably mafia and you're going to nuke again come daytime. I really don't give a shit about you say you're going to do, you already nuked once and should die immediately. Lets look at the facts: you said once I died you'd be okay with dying. Right? Right. So if that's the case, I'm probably going to get nuked in 3 hours because Versatile's a complete loser. I'm going to flip town. When that happens why would you resist being nuked given that you admit that you'd LYNCH YOURSELF at that point? Do you just want to tie up another town lynch? Think about it. There's no way out of it. As versatile has pointed out, AND demonstrated, nuking people who've already been shown to have nukes is just downright stupid and suicidal. No, Versatile has demonstrated that she is anti-town by THROWING OUT THREE NUKES. Do you fucking THINK before you post? WHAT IS THERE TO STOP PEOPLE FROM NUKING WHOMEVER THEY WANT IF YOU THINK THAT COUNTER-NUKING ISNT AN OPTION? We're already going to have our lynches booked until day 3. The more nukes that are fired according to your plan, the less disincentive there is to nuke. Do you not get why that might be bad? Do you not understand how fucked that is? But then, who'd be willing to carry that judgment out, when it would possibly lead to a retaliatory nuke against themselves? In your scenario, all that happens is more dead townies, all in the name of justice. So essentially here you state that people should be willing not to nuke you because you'd nuke them back? But you just said you aren't going to nuke anymore. So why wouldn't someone nuke you at this point? | ||
| ||
