EPTOn October 12 2012 11:04 GreYMisT wrote:
For once no bans or replacements. weird.
For once no bans or replacements. weird.
O.o spooky
TL Mafia Ban List - Page 151
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
O.o spooky | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On October 12 2012 11:04 GreYMisT wrote: For once no bans or replacements. weird. That's what you get for hosting an awesome game that fills up in an hour  | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On December 07 2012 04:44 kushm4sta wrote: chrono ban is the worst ban because the game takes an eternity to finish Secret strats: Don't get banned | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
Dandel also needed replaced, but had a valid reason, so seems mitigated, probably just deserves a warning. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Kushm4sta is permantly banned from all of my games. I will let other hosts take with that what they will. | ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On December 13 2012 19:54 iGrok wrote: I would like to see kush play a newbie game, then progress forward based on his behavior there. As is, he had a pre-emptive removal from my game and now a permaban from GreYMisT. I'm willing to chalk it up to TL mafia being very different from his expectations if he plays in some newbies and keeps his nose clean so to speak. he played in a bunch of newbies before | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On December 13 2012 19:54 iGrok wrote: I would like to see kush play a newbie game, then progress forward based on his behavior there. As is, he had a pre-emptive removal from my game and now a permaban from GreYMisT. I'm willing to chalk it up to TL mafia being very different from his expectations if he plays in some newbies and keeps his nose clean so to speak. He was also painfully disruptive in Looney Lynching. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On December 14 2012 00:28 Mementoss wrote: Yeah I played in Looney Lynching and I found that he was fine to play with. He was readable and putting in effort. I think the GreYMisT perma-ban is fine, and I probably won't allow him into any games I might host. I think hes good otherwise it should just be at the hosts disgresion. I'm talking disruptive regarding violating the "no discussing modkills during the game" rule, and then proceeding to be snarky as hell about it in ways that really weren't any better. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On December 14 2012 00:32 marvellosity wrote: Not everyone's a good boy all the time, JH. You and I both know that No. But intentionally pissing in a co-hosts cheerios repeatedly because they remind you of the rules is above and beyond us. | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
Normally, I would ignore it, but one of the hosts goes to school with him, and specifically reminded him to at least vote, and he blew it off. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
jinglehell hates me for some reason due to this pm conversation (I will remove it at your request jinglehell) I really didn't mean to be an asshole to you in any way. The only really bad thing I did was the suicide move in chronotrigger. Please let me in your games memetoss! + Show Spoiler + Original Message From JingleHell: This isn't a debate. I'd rather this not turn into a big thing, but a passive aggressive insult is generally pretty obvious. To explain how the statements aren't contradictory, discussing a "what if X happens" scenario in no way requires "X should happen" or "X will happen" statement. Treating it, in thread, like it's inevitable, or should happen, is inappropriate. That sort of thing is for PMs or postgame. As an example, if someone's activity was barely sufficient to avoid a modkill, saying "X barely posted above the minimum, one post and a vote" would be fine if you were using it as part of an analysis. Saying "X will get modkilled if he doesn't start posting more, he barely posted above the minimum with one post and a vote" would be inappropriate. | ||
| ||
