EPT[Patch 5.3] Lunar Revel General Discussion - Page 52
| Forum Index > LoL General |
Free coaching for LL members: http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/shopkeepers-inn/478757-na-free-coaching-for-tl-members-gold-v-and-below | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
On February 25 2015 00:23 Alaric wrote: That's pretty long. Perfect for when the login system fucks up. | ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On February 25 2015 00:25 Gahlo wrote: Perfect for when the login system fucks up. Enough to sit in queue in Friday's evening. Damn, no smooth transitions ): | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
On February 25 2015 00:25 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote: Enough to sit in queue in Friday's evening. Damn, no smooth transformations ): There's probably buttons on the login screen to change it. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23460 Posts
On February 24 2015 23:52 Alaric wrote: Seraph's/Deathcap/Void Staff/Thornmail core lategame Cass build. Activate Seraph's, press S, watch enemy marksman kill himself. Teut you're way too serious. im not serious your post was just dumb its not funny its just a trivial calculation wtf thorn is a flat damage return so you just add your molten shield damage to your thorn return and compare your damage/ehp ratios (armourxhp versus mrxhp) real talk though how does thornmail interact with crit and nasus q | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
I assume it also reflects damage dealt by Poppy's and Viktor's Q, eg. converting damage to magic doesn't matter. I'm more curious about Morde's Q because it's an on-hit effect that applies spell-based effects (Rylai's, spellvamp, etc.) but not on-hit effects (doesn't crit, doesn't lifesteal). | ||
|
obesechicken13
United States10467 Posts
On February 25 2015 02:58 Alaric wrote: It reflects them too, or at least should, given Nasus' interaction between lifesteal and stacks. Which means it should apply to Riven's passive damage too. I assume it also reflects damage dealt by Poppy's and Viktor's Q, eg. converting damage to magic doesn't matter. I'm more curious about Morde's Q because it's an on-hit effect that applies spell-based effects (Rylai's, spellvamp, etc.) but not on-hit effects (doesn't crit, doesn't lifesteal). Poppy's Q doesn't apply lifesteal either, just spell vamp. I'm not sure if the spellblade component (from sheen) applies lifesteal though. | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
On February 24 2015 21:04 AsnSensation wrote: I dont have time to watch it but why are people calling tryndamere a pedophile in the reddit comments? that's pretty harsh. Actually that point of the video i felt was spot on. He was talking abou how all of tryndamere's tweets contain words like stalker or rebroadcast or bully To say if he were to just throw pedophile in when talking about tryndamere over and over even if he does not explicitly say tryndamere is one the impression is made | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On February 25 2015 03:18 Slusher wrote: Actually that point of the video i felt was spot on. He was talking abou how all of tryndamere's tweets contain words like stalker or rebroadcast or bully To say if he were to just throw pedophile in when talking about tryndamere over and over even if he does not explicitly say tryndamere is one the impression is made EU has much less stringent Libel laws. IMO, in Britain Thorin might actually be legally correct that Tryndamere was Libeling StarlordLucian. E-Stalking is a crime so it falls right into the wheelhouse. Bullying is an act of moral disrepute, so that is again, a strong one. The statements, if believed, would certainly cause financial and reputational damage so its all there. And the qualifications really only help out in America because we set the bar much higher than other countries. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On February 25 2015 03:18 Slusher wrote: Actually that point of the video i felt was spot on. He was talking abou how all of tryndamere's tweets contain words like stalker or rebroadcast or bully To say if he were to just throw pedophile in when talking about tryndamere over and over even if he does not explicitly say tryndamere is one the impression is made thing is since riot owns everything they can say whatever the fuck they want and it doesn't matter. reddit doesn't understand this apparently or the way riot's content market works. they obviously will enforce piracy of tehir sponsored content producers just like apple will enforce piracy claims of app makers on the app store. | ||
|
Nos-
Canada12016 Posts
New champion. Giving me some serious dota vibes | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On February 25 2015 04:22 oneofthem wrote: thing is since riot owns everything they can say whatever the fuck they want and it doesn't matter. reddit doesn't understand this apparently or the way riot's content market works. they obviously will enforce piracy of tehir sponsored content producers just like apple will enforce piracy claims of app makers on the app store. The TOS and EULA are binding on Riot until they change them... | ||
Chexx
Korea (South)11232 Posts
On February 25 2015 04:23 Nos- wrote: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/champion-reveal/bard-wandering-caretaker New champion. Giving me some serious dota vibes would you kindly make a own thread for it? | ||
|
Mensol
14536 Posts
Bard looks so imbalanced. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
739
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
Also releasing a somewhat roaming support? Yeah that's doto vibes. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On February 25 2015 04:27 cLutZ wrote: The TOS and EULA are binding on Riot until they change them... they still reserve the copyright and can interpret their idea of content creator etc to get this guy shut down. they can shut him down with a dmca claim without having to justify it. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On February 25 2015 04:23 Nos- wrote: http://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/champion-reveal/bard-wandering-caretaker New champion. Giving me some serious dota vibes Well, his Q is pretty much Shackleshot made into a skillshot, so... | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On February 25 2015 04:32 oneofthem wrote: they still reserve the copyright and can interpret their idea of content creator etc to get this guy shut down. they can shut him down with a dmca claim without having to justify it. Having a licence, and the TOS is a license, is a defense to a copyright infringement claim. The plain text of the current TOS can't be interpreted to support that view. They can change that, like I said, but there is a reason they keep going to these strange pseudo-moral justifications. Twitch might accept their DMCA notice because most hosts are fairly weak on those things, but that doesn't mean that they would legally prevail under a neutral arbitrator or judge. | ||
| ||
