EPT[Patch 4.21] Rek'Sai General Discussion - Page 22
| Forum Index > LoL General |
Starting Page 94 spamming will in GD will be warned, please don't post for the sake of post count. Keep it civil. Please take website feedback to http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/website-feedback/ | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
Goumindong
United States3529 Posts
On December 16 2014 11:06 chalice wrote: rest assured that educating or illuminating you in any way, shape, or form was not my intent when i posted that image. So what was the point? And yes sufficiency i know its gold lead at 10 minutes. Not sure how that changes my comment. | ||
|
IamPryda
United States1186 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35165 Posts
On December 16 2014 11:18 IamPryda wrote: I am fine with the way the Khalista ult works. I think if she's picked up at the pro level it will open up some insane new comps and allow some of the lower mobility tanks get more play. And the Yasturbation combo. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On December 16 2014 11:15 Goumindong wrote: So what was the point? And yes sufficiency i know its gold lead at 10 minutes. Not sure how that changes my comment. You are not going to argue correlation vs causation again, are you.... | ||
|
Goumindong
United States3529 Posts
On December 16 2014 11:26 Sufficiency wrote: You are not going to argue correlation vs causation again, are you.... Reverse causation or endogeneity (you're not going to suggest that good at 10 minutes is exogenous are you?) with is not "correlation vs causation" but no I just don't understand the point of a graph that says the sky is blue. | ||
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On December 16 2014 11:29 Goumindong wrote: Reverse causation or endogeneity (you're not going to suggest that good at 10 minutes is exogenous are you?) with is not "correlation vs causation" but no I just don't understand the point of a graph that says the sky is blue. I mean I think seeing the relative win % is actually kind of neat. Obviously the more you area ahead the more likely you are to win, but this puts some actual numbers on that. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On December 16 2014 11:29 Goumindong wrote: Reverse causation or endogeneity (you're not going to suggest that good at 10 minutes is exogenous are you?) with is not "correlation vs causation" but no I just don't understand the point of a graph that says the sky is blue. Let me tell you a story. Back in high school, I had to do chemistry lab reports. I like chemistry, but I hated labs because I would usually do something wrong (i.e. not following the instruction carefully enough) so I can never get more than 50% of the theoretical yield while most of my colleagues could get around 80%+. So, when I write my lab report, I will always say that one source of my error is impurity with the chemicals I am working with. Technically, it's not wrong - pretty much nothing is 100% pure. I can apply this criticism to any experiment I perform. | ||
|
Goumindong
United States3529 Posts
On December 16 2014 11:33 onlywonderboy wrote: I mean I think seeing the relative win % is actually kind of neat. Obviously the more you area ahead the more likely you are to win, but this puts some actual numbers on that. Kind of. But it doesn't really tell us an effect of gold just a statement that if you're winning by x you're likely to have that win %. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On December 16 2014 11:29 Goumindong wrote: Reverse causation or endogeneity (you're not going to suggest that good at 10 minutes is exogenous are you?) with is not "correlation vs causation" but no I just don't understand the point of a graph that says the sky is blue. the graph says how blue the sky is. dunno why you making such a fuss, not like he put some grand hypothesis that the graph is supposed to prove... | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
Goumindong
United States3529 Posts
The complaint most common in economics is a poor instrumental variable. My complaint is, generally with what you've been proposing, that you didn't bother to find one and didn't even realize that you might need one, because you didn't understand the structure of the system. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On December 16 2014 12:16 Goumindong wrote: Omitted variable bias usually isn't a thing. The complaint most common in economics is a poor instrumental variable. My complaint is, generally with what you've been proposing, that you didn't bother to find one and didn't even realize that you might need one, because you didn't understand the structure of the system. So, instead of throwing buzz words at people, just make some simple suggestion at chalice on how to find these more intricate structures of the system using your expertise in economics. Because that's very constructive and a LOT more impressive. In fact it would be very interesting and would actually show how much you know about econometric principles. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35165 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
I think Goumindong obviously has some expertise on econometrics that the rest of us here lack. I think it would be nice to see how an economist would conduct a study on "how important is gold lead at 10 minutes". I think there is a lot to be learned here. | ||
|
JazzVortical
Australia1825 Posts
Although, I like the new Void Portal item in theory. It got a buff on the PBE that gives bonus AD and AP based on your armour and magic resist when you are near the portal. In addition, if it goes though as is on PBE, it will be only the 2nd item currently in the game that gives both Armour and Magic Resist. Neat. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On December 16 2014 12:51 JazzVortical wrote: Can we go back to harshly criticising every move Riot makes, instead of arguing about statistical garbage? Although, I like the new Void Portal item in theory. It got a buff on the PBE that gives bonus AD and AP based on your armour and magic resist when you are near the portal. In addition, if it goes though as is on PBE, it will be only the 2nd item currently in the game that gives both Armour and Magic Resist. Neat. Now you reminded me that I am still bitter over the removal of Sword of the Divine. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35165 Posts
On December 16 2014 12:51 JazzVortical wrote: Can we go back to harshly criticising every move Riot makes, instead of arguing about statistical garbage? Although, I like the new Void Portal item in theory. It got a buff on the PBE that gives bonus AD and AP based on your armour and magic resist when you are near the portal. In addition, if it goes though as is on PBE, it will be only the 2nd item currently in the game that gives both Armour and Magic Resist. Neat. It got changed today to buff voidspawn after the 3rd instead. | ||
|
kongoline
6318 Posts
| ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
| ||
| ||
