| Forum Index > LoL General |
Starting Page 94 spamming will in GD will be warned, please don't post for the sake of post count. Keep it civil. Please take website feedback to http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/website-feedback/ | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On January 11 2015 13:47 GolemMadness wrote: Yeah, like what's with "players" watching anime? I'd love to see Faker watching anime, but he'd never do that because he actually spends time playing the game. my opinion of faker took a dive when he failed to beat beginner chess on windows 7. smh faker | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35152 Posts
On January 11 2015 22:58 Mensol wrote: Day 391: Still no skin. I dont even want to write anymore. They said they don't expect all the skins to be distributed till the 14th. | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
I'm only really good with flex picks were I designate different skins to different roles (yes I actually do this) | ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
| ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
ok the Annie guide is mostly bad too, at least he formatted better. actually the Annie guide is really bad holy shit fuck the formatting, RoA+tear on a champion with a midgame power spike is just... and to justify lucidity boots based on tibbers cd?????? tibbers has like 2/3 uptime lategame, and comes up faster than flash w/o cdr. At least the half ass urgot guide doesn't tell you to build stupid stuff. | ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
On January 12 2015 01:21 Scip wrote: The influx of new guides in strategy section makes me think, do we want it to make a rule that they have to post a link to their account so we can more easily dismiss the bullshit as completely unproven and untested? This will be something I propose to the rest of staff. There should obv be some level of merit when it comes to posting strategy. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
I think guides should get a mods-approved tag, kind of like TSM's featured guides. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Prog
United Kingdom1470 Posts
| ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On January 12 2015 01:29 Slusher wrote: to be fair to Scrip the Urgot guide is pretty bad, and that's coming from a man you know to have a 100% Urgot winrate. ok the Annie guide is mostly bad too, at least he formatted better. actually the Annie guide is really bad holy shit fuck the formatting, RoA+tear on a champion with a midgame power spike is just... and to justify lucidity boots based on tibbers cd?????? tibbers has like 2/3 uptime lategame, and comes up faster than flash w/o cdr. At least the half ass urgot guide doesn't tell you to build stupid stuff. To be fair, it's better than building roa/iceborn on Annie top as it was happening week ago in every game i played with guys saying "PM me 3 weeks later when this build is going to be sick good" | ||
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On January 12 2015 01:23 Slusher wrote: I mean my guides probly would have been deleted because I'm a normal only scub and you yourself have complemented my guides in the past. What guides did you write? I don't remember anyway, if I approved your guides, it'd be because the content was good, not to suck your normal elo dick. Knowing you are a normal only player if the guide was good, I'd approve it regardless, but if it was shit I could just instantly dismiss it easily. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
This is especially true with unconventional picks/lanes. Also, like Scip said above, I am interested in good guides with well-reasoned details and arguments. Whether or not the writer is a Diamond+ player is not really that important. | ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
Practically speaking, it's probably best to just have a 1-thread-per-champ for the purposes of discussion, with an OP who's willing to go back and change the OP based on discussion. The writer doesn't have to necessarily be good, but they have to be willing to edit their OP extensively, and be willing to listen when someone who clearly knows better suggests change. Guides each getting their own thread leads to a lot of subforum clutter, and TL's format isn't really built to handle a lot of shit guides and waiting for them all to drift off the front page because thread order isn't popularity-based. | ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
On January 12 2015 01:55 TheYango wrote: My personal view is that once the discussion moves past the first 5-ish pages, nobody looks at the guide in the OP that seriously anymore anyway. Practically speaking, it's probably best to just have a 1-thread-per-champ for the purposes of discussion, with an OP who's willing to go back and change the OP based on discussion. The writer doesn't have to necessarily be good, but they have to be willing to edit their OP extensively, and be willing to listen when someone who clearly knows better suggests change. I've never seen anyone who had both of those properties I'd be more willing to believe unicorns exist | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
On January 12 2015 01:46 oo_Wonderful_oo wrote: To be fair, it's better than building roa/iceborn on Annie top as it was happening week ago in every game i played with guys saying "PM me 3 weeks later when this build is going to be sick good" was the player named "Bad Morde bot"?? that guy fucking loves iceborne | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On January 12 2015 01:58 Slusher wrote: was the player named "Bad Morde bot"?? that guy fucking loves iceborne Well F you I rarely build that item. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Wardi Open
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
Replay Cast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
RSL Revival
PiGosaur Monday
WardiTV Summer Champion…
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
