|
|
Don't ward tri-brush, ward the brush behind red buff instead. So many people shit their vision wards into tri-brush for control and it means literally nothing.
|
Yeah, but that has the same problem as warding mid. I just can't walk there and leave my adc alone in lane for 30+ seconds.
|
On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL.
Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold)
|
On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold)
http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euw
Dunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase.
|
On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase.
But this doesn't factor in all the people who don't play ranked at all which is probably a significant amount.
|
On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase.
He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher.
|
|
|
On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher.
He also said Plat 1 is the top 0.5% though.
On August 19 2013 20:07 Itsmedudeman wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. But this doesn't factor in all the people who don't play ranked at all which is probably a significant amount.
Only if you consider unranked people to be below bronze. In reality their skill levels are probably more of a bell curve, much like the ranked one. In that case it would only really matter for the challenger percentile, seeing as that's a fixed number of players.
I'm currently in my placements (and judging from my skill elvel compared to friends I play with, I'm probably around low silver), and I'm now playing with worse players than I was when leveling this 'smurf'.
|
On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher.
Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%...
I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group.
|
On August 19 2013 20:13 Mikau wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. He also said Plat 1 is the top 0.5% though. Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:07 Itsmedudeman wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. But this doesn't factor in all the people who don't play ranked at all which is probably a significant amount. Only if you consider unranked people to be below bronze. In reality their skill levels are probably more of a bell curve, much like the ranked one. In that case it would only really matter for the challenger percentile, seeing as that's a fixed number of players. I'm currently in my placements (and judging from my skill elvel compared to friends I play with, I'm probably around low silver), and I'm now playing with worse players than I was when leveling this 'smurf'.
I don't think it'd be too far of a fetch to assume that most unranked players are generally going to be on the lower end of the bell curve. I rarely ever see "unranked" players in my normals who are at platinum or above skill level.
It's funny cause meteos said he had to start playing ranked once his normal matchmaking queue times began to be 20+ minutes long. Faker also said he couldn't find any games in normals so he was "forced" to play ranked.
|
On August 19 2013 20:13 Mikau wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. He also said Plat 1 is the top 0.5% though. Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:07 Itsmedudeman wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. But this doesn't factor in all the people who don't play ranked at all which is probably a significant amount. Only if you consider unranked people to be below bronze. In reality their skill levels are probably more of a bell curve, much like the ranked one. In that case it would only really matter for the challenger percentile, seeing as that's a fixed number of players. I'm currently in my placements (and judging from my skill elvel compared to friends I play with, I'm probably around low silver), and I'm now playing with worse players than I was when leveling this 'smurf'.
I think that normals skill level is lower on average than that of the ranked ladders(due to less tryharding, more learning, less incentive and other draft related factors). I would imagine that it's a bell curve with a peak somewhere around 2-300 MMR(~3-4 divisions) lower than ranked. But a lot of the friends I have never touch ranked games apart from when end of season rewards are rolled out, in which case I have to carry them to gold or whatever.
|
On August 19 2013 20:17 mr_tolkien wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%... I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group.
Yeah, i was just crunching some numbers, i didn't have the much needed data that you have provided  Still 0,25% is pretty lulzy.
Wasn't me who said 0,5% was plat 1 or higher ^^
On August 19 2013 19:51 Simberto wrote:
Yeah, but that has the same problem as warding mid. I just can't walk there and leave my adc alone in lane for 30+ seconds.
It shouldn't take you that long, perhaps 10-15 seconds at max.
|
On August 19 2013 20:17 mr_tolkien wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%... I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group.
Seems like Diamond I is less exclusive than RIOT intended
There are fewer players in Diamond II than Diamond I... Guess those Diamond II players can feel special.
|
On August 19 2013 20:22 Sponkz wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:17 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%... I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group. Yeah, i was just crunching some numbers, i didn't have the much needed data that you have provided Still 0,25% is pretty lulzy. Wasn't me who said 0,5% was plat 1 or higher ^^ Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 19:51 Simberto wrote:
Yeah, but that has the same problem as warding mid. I just can't walk there and leave my adc alone in lane for 30+ seconds. It shouldn't take you that long, perhaps 10-15 seconds at max.
And then there's the akward moment when their botlane colapse on you because they saw you going there and your adc does nothing.
I mean obviously deep wards are better than river wards, but there's a lot of risk involved in going so deep into enemy territory, especially at the beggining of the game.
|
On August 19 2013 20:28 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:17 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%... I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group. Seems like Diamond I is less exclusive than RIOT intended There are fewer players in Diamond II than Diamond I... Guess those Diamond II players can feel special.
Tbh you're either D5 0 points or D1 when you're in Diamond.
There's nothing inbetween.
|
On August 19 2013 20:28 SagaZ wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:22 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 20:17 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%... I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group. Yeah, i was just crunching some numbers, i didn't have the much needed data that you have provided Still 0,25% is pretty lulzy. Wasn't me who said 0,5% was plat 1 or higher ^^ On August 19 2013 19:51 Simberto wrote:
Yeah, but that has the same problem as warding mid. I just can't walk there and leave my adc alone in lane for 30+ seconds. It shouldn't take you that long, perhaps 10-15 seconds at max. And then there's the akward moment when their botlane colapse on you because they saw you going there and your adc does nothing. I mean obviously deep wards are better than river wards, but there's a lot of risk involved in going so deep into enemy territory, especially at the beggining of the game.
There is no risk, warding your own jungle, brother.
|
On August 19 2013 20:33 mr_tolkien wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:28 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:17 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%... I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group. Seems like Diamond I is less exclusive than RIOT intended There are fewer players in Diamond II than Diamond I... Guess those Diamond II players can feel special. Tbh you're either D5 0 points or D1 when you're in Diamond. There's nothing inbetween.
Seems like something similar goes for all leagues. A lot more in V than in the rest of the divisions, and fewest in II with I, III and IV being about equal.
|
On August 19 2013 20:34 Sponkz wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:28 SagaZ wrote:On August 19 2013 20:22 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 20:17 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%... I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group. Yeah, i was just crunching some numbers, i didn't have the much needed data that you have provided Still 0,25% is pretty lulzy. Wasn't me who said 0,5% was plat 1 or higher ^^ On August 19 2013 19:51 Simberto wrote:
Yeah, but that has the same problem as warding mid. I just can't walk there and leave my adc alone in lane for 30+ seconds. It shouldn't take you that long, perhaps 10-15 seconds at max. And then there's the akward moment when their botlane colapse on you because they saw you going there and your adc does nothing. I mean obviously deep wards are better than river wards, but there's a lot of risk involved in going so deep into enemy territory, especially at the beggining of the game. There is no risk, warding your own jungle, brother.
My bad, missunderstood
|
On August 19 2013 21:02 SagaZ wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 20:34 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 20:28 SagaZ wrote:On August 19 2013 20:22 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 20:17 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 17:26 Simberto wrote:
Considering it's ~ top 0.5% of the ranked population, i guess one could call it that. Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%... I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group. Yeah, i was just crunching some numbers, i didn't have the much needed data that you have provided Still 0,25% is pretty lulzy. Wasn't me who said 0,5% was plat 1 or higher ^^ On August 19 2013 19:51 Simberto wrote:
Yeah, but that has the same problem as warding mid. I just can't walk there and leave my adc alone in lane for 30+ seconds. It shouldn't take you that long, perhaps 10-15 seconds at max. And then there's the akward moment when their botlane colapse on you because they saw you going there and your adc does nothing. I mean obviously deep wards are better than river wards, but there's a lot of risk involved in going so deep into enemy territory, especially at the beggining of the game. There is no risk, warding your own jungle, brother. My bad, missunderstood
This quote chain is getting ridiculous.
|
On August 19 2013 21:04 Itsmedudeman wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2013 21:02 SagaZ wrote:On August 19 2013 20:34 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 20:28 SagaZ wrote:On August 19 2013 20:22 Sponkz wrote:On August 19 2013 20:17 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:11 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:On August 19 2013 20:04 mr_tolkien wrote:On August 19 2013 20:03 Mikau wrote:On August 19 2013 17:57 Sponkz wrote:
[quote]
Holy fack, i thought top 0,5% was diamond 1 or above. Turns out it's a mere 0,0125% who's diamond 1 LOL. Where are you getting these numbers? I'm kinda curious where my friends and I stand in terms of the rest of the LoL playerbase (us ranging from bronze to gold) http://www.lolsummoners.com/stats/rankings/euwDunno who's spouting this bullshit. Diamond is already more than 1% of the playerbase. He said Diamond I, not simply all Diamond players. If 1.2% of all players are Diamond V or higher, its reasonable that less than 0,1% is Diamond I or higher. Diamond I is ~0.25% according to the graph. Not 0.0125%... I'm Diamond I and I'm terrible as fuck lol, It's a pretty big group. Yeah, i was just crunching some numbers, i didn't have the much needed data that you have provided Still 0,25% is pretty lulzy. Wasn't me who said 0,5% was plat 1 or higher ^^ On August 19 2013 19:51 Simberto wrote:
Yeah, but that has the same problem as warding mid. I just can't walk there and leave my adc alone in lane for 30+ seconds. It shouldn't take you that long, perhaps 10-15 seconds at max. And then there's the akward moment when their botlane colapse on you because they saw you going there and your adc does nothing. I mean obviously deep wards are better than river wards, but there's a lot of risk involved in going so deep into enemy territory, especially at the beggining of the game. There is no risk, warding your own jungle, brother. My bad, missunderstood This quote chain is getting ridiculous.
I think it can only get better
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
