• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:12
CEST 22:12
KST 05:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou7Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" DreamHack Open 2013 revealed The New Patch Killed Mech! Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
The Lose More Card Is there anyway to get a private coach? BW General Discussion BSL Season 21 OGN to release AI-upscaled StarLeague from Feb 24
Tourneys
300$ 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup #4 [ASL20] Semifinal B Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Current Meta Roaring Currents ASL final [I] TvZ Strategies and Builds [I] TvP Strategies and Build
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1384 users

Practicing one champion vs play all of them

Forum Index > LoL General
Post a Reply
Normal
Gotmog
Profile Joined October 2010
Serbia899 Posts
January 22 2013 19:10 GMT
#1
I find it interesting that attitudes towards this are polar opposites in dota and lol community.

In LoL, people will tell you, hands down that becoming REALLY good with 2-3 champions is the way to go.
In Dota, people don't like to stick to one champion and just play through all of them, and they would tell you that you need to learn each champions abilities, all roles etc etc.

Obviously both sides have their pros/cons.

What do you guys think ?
The reason i am asking, is that for most of new players, it will be a choice between buying the whole lot of of 450-1350-3150 IP champs and playing them out. Thus having the ability to counter pick, deal with banning, play more roles, knowing what other champions can do etc.
OR saving for that expensive 6300ip champion, and playing him exclusively. Thus becoming really good at him, getting better at skill shots, judging what and when they can pull off, lane dominance etc etc.

1. Why is this so different in dota and lol ? (only reason i can think of is IP restrictions and skill shots which plague lol, while mechanics are brushed aside)
2. What do you think is the better option ?
"When you play the game of drones, you win or you die. There is no middle ground"
gtrsrs
Profile Joined June 2010
United States9109 Posts
January 22 2013 19:19 GMT
#2
the two aren't mutually exclusive

when i started playing, i played only shen for probably 300 straight games
i still learned what all the other champions do, the roles, and the intricacies of other champs

to be fair i started when there were like... 45 champs, so i could learn them every other week as they filtered in. it'd be much harder now, but still doable. just plan to lose against a champ the first time you see them, then learn what they do that game, and boom you're a better player by losing, and you can still play your favorite/only champ

in the end i'd say runes are more important than a wide champ pool so sticking to 1 champ isn't a bad idea
i play ... hearthstone =\^.^/= Winterfox
ZERG_RUSSIAN
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
10417 Posts
January 22 2013 19:23 GMT
#3
Honestly, do whatever makes you have fun, because that will keep you playing the game, and the more you play the game, the better you'll get. Some people like doing it with one champ, some people like doing it with a ton of them, but it doesn't matter. One is probably better than the other if we're measuring it in terms of how much skill you'll gain over a specific period of time but LoL isn't about how fast you can learn a skillset, IT'S ABOUT HAVING FUN.
I'm on GOLD CHAIN
Seuss
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States10536 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-22 19:42:09
January 22 2013 19:41 GMT
#4
There's no better option, it's going to depend on the player.

Consider a player who has done nothing but play Ashe, ever. 1000 Ashe games. This player probably knows Ashe inside and out, but even with the best observational skills their ability to play other AD carries, let alone other roles entirely, will be somewhat more limited. It's in this player's best interest to mess around with a greater variety of champions in order to flesh out their understanding of the game.

Now consider a player who constantly swaps champions and roles, never settling on anything. 1000 games later, this player probably knows a lot about many different champions, has a decent grasp of how each role makes decisions, and generally has some good big picture insights into the game. However, they haven't really mastered any particular champion, lack refinement in play or understanding of any given role, and probably have generalized builds that are often dodgy for specific picks. It's in this player's best interest to pick a champion and role and focus themselves.

Everyone probably falls somewhere between these two players. What you really want is a balance between the two, enough focus to understand your role and favored champions really well, but enough breadth of experience and understanding to have a clear picture of the game and where you fit in.
"I am not able to carry all this people alone, for they are too heavy for me." -Moses (Numbers 11:14)
socommaster123
Profile Joined May 2010
United States578 Posts
January 22 2013 19:46 GMT
#5
If you actually want to get better at the game it's best to learn 3 champs in each roles, if you want to play the game for fun, play them all.
Idra White Ra Sheth DRG SaSe Thorzain GOGO!
GregMandel
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
France822 Posts
January 22 2013 19:48 GMT
#6
Also, some people, like me, can't stand to always play the same champ, and even the same role ( I main support but I love top and mid )

I think it's really up to the people concerned to choose on how they are and how they want to play this game.

Because messing around a lot on many champs and many roles won't get you to 2k elo ( its really unlikely at least ) whereas practicing a lot on 3 to 5 champions ( less than 3 seems really not enough because at high elo if you're that good you'll probably have your 2 mains ban or firstpicked ) you can reach dat elo and then maybe extend even more and get into competitive play.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RD8QLNiolfk - Racing with the sun
necrosed
Profile Joined March 2011
Brazil885 Posts
January 22 2013 19:48 GMT
#7
Burden of Knowledge is something that plagues DotA. You HAVE to play almost every hero so you learn how he works. LoL is a lot more intuitive about that.
Shadow of his former self.
Sufficiency
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada23833 Posts
January 22 2013 23:01 GMT
#8
I group my champion pools in 3 categories, the ones I prefer to play, the ones I play situationally (usually as a counterpick or a pick to support a certain comp), and the ones I will never play. Say for mid lane, I currently prefer to play TF, Morde, and Katarina; I also play Swain, Karthus, and Cassiopeia. I would probably never play (say) Ahri or Ryze in ranked even though they are pretty strong and I own them.

I am really fickle when it comes to my champion pool though. Small buffs/nerfs really affect how I place my champions in my pool.
https://twitter.com/SufficientStats
Alaric
Profile Joined November 2009
France45622 Posts
January 22 2013 23:13 GMT
#9
People don't get told to "play 2-3 champions" in LoL, but rather to "play 2-3 champions per role". It narrows down to "2-3 champions" if they're able to focus on only one role (think how Shake always gets jungle, or Smash always gets top), but they still need side champions in other roles in case they don't get what they want.
And it doesn't mean "don't play the others at all", you still need to get a grasp of how they work.
Cant take LMS hipsters serious.
ZERG_RUSSIAN
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
10417 Posts
January 23 2013 00:14 GMT
#10
I can still name every champ's passive gggggggggggggggg
I'm on GOLD CHAIN
kainzero
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States5211 Posts
January 23 2013 00:56 GMT
#11
Pub-level DotA is not as matchup dependent as LoL is, nor are the laning assignments set and you have to be prepared to deal with anything. In addition, laning phase could be either really long or really short. You tend to learn heroes, not roles. It doesn't help that certain heroes can play multiple roles depending on their item build.

On the other hand, if you know your matchups in LoL, you can crush your lane and win the game, given the long length of laning phase.

With that said, you still need to practice heroes in DotA specifically. If you don't play any micro-based hero often, your micro skills will be terrible. No amount of Antimage play will prepare you to play as Meepo or Chen, and you need to play them for many, many games to get competent with them. And signature heroes still exist, so it's not like people aren't specializing in DotA either.

CatharsisUT
Profile Joined March 2011
United States487 Posts
January 23 2013 03:45 GMT
#12
I agree with 5hit, I'd say it depends on your goal. I play to have fun, so I have a list of champs I want to be able to play well and mostly practice those 10-15, but sometimes I think "screw it, I really want to play TF this game." I go for it, because it's fun.

On the other hand, if your goal is to climb ELO, the thinking is the same as Starcraft: If you can execute one build for each race at a Masters level and everything else at a Platinum level, you're a Masters player. If you can execute a ton of builds at a Diamond level, you're still in Diamond. If you can play 1 champ at an 1800 level but nothing else, you can climb to 1800.
ZERG_RUSSIAN
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
10417 Posts
January 23 2013 04:43 GMT
#13
That's how I got plat S1 in spite of how bad I was, no joke

l0L
I'm on GOLD CHAIN
BluePanther
Profile Joined March 2011
United States2776 Posts
January 23 2013 04:58 GMT
#14
I play 3 or so for each role a lot, and then sometimes i play something if it fits the team comp really well (and I've played enough aram with them). eventually i play enough like that, that i'm comfortable playing them normally.
Decypher
Profile Joined January 2013
United States37 Posts
January 23 2013 05:32 GMT
#15
I, for one, support playing one champ to really master the champ. Once you know everything and anything there is to know about that champ, your matchups/your lanes, you can then learn other champs/lane but IMO, I think it is better to stick to 1-2 champs. (In a ranked situation of course). I know this is the lamest thing since sliced bread but let's use my favorite Bruce lee quote and change it into a LoL quote.

"“I fear not the summoner who has practiced 100 champs once, but I fear the summoner who has practiced one champ 10,000 times.”"
“I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times.”
Eppa!
Profile Joined November 2010
Sweden4641 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-23 06:44:43
January 23 2013 06:37 GMT
#16
I think around 6-8 champs is the ideal number if you want to versatile and be able to compete.


That said, you still need to play every champ a 4-5 times to get a good understanding of them.

I personally think 3 for every role is too much. I play 0 top 2 jungle 3 ad carry, 4 support(since its same same but different) i don't mid ever so i play 0 there. I have been forced into top once in all my games never been forced into mid. My junglers are Lee and Zed which can top lane and mid lane fine if needed.

"Can't wait till Monday" Cixah+Waveofshadow. "Needs to be monday. Weekend please go by quickly." Gahlo
Capped
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom7236 Posts
January 23 2013 06:50 GMT
#17
On January 23 2013 09:14 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote:
I can still name every champ's passive gggggggggggggggg


thats awesome in a name the champs passive quiz, but do you know what the passives do? XD

I certainly dont know 50% of the champs skills / passives / crap by name or can recall them, but when i come up against them i'll know how they play, what they can do, and when im going to get fucked. I basically know their skillsets by heart, but not by name.

I know how to play a few champs for each role, like its been said already 2/3 each role is good, knowing every champ in the game is hard, but you need to know them to improve / be competitive. You can play the champs once each to get a general grasp, but most of it comes from playing against them and seeing what they can do and how you can assfudge them when they do it.
Useless wet fish.
winthrop
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Hong Kong956 Posts
January 23 2013 09:01 GMT
#18
when it came to ban and picks
and when it came to your role is taken
Incredible Miracle
Aphasie
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Norway474 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-23 09:37:32
January 23 2013 09:18 GMT
#19
I take it youre new. I was new last october with no prior moba experience and for the most part Ive stayed in the jungle, playing various champs. It has been a fun time, but i can say it hasnt developed my last-hitting as much as I wanted to. Im now looking to expand more to mid and top (Ive played some heros in those lanes throughout).

Im no expert, but I think building up a stack of champions you like/intrigues you is the best way to go about it. Buy and play the champions you like. But when a new free rotation comes in, play the free heros that are interesting or you see very often in games. Just a handful of games with popular heros will let you deal with them much more easily, cuz youll know when they are weak/strong/what items they need/etc.

Some heros, like Trundle for instance, you "never" see and he doesnt interest me much, so i never considered playing him.

my 2 cents...

Edit:

By the way, what do you (more experienced, mid-high ELO, etc) guys think about all-pick vs. draft pick when learning the game? All-pick certainly lets you churn out mores games. Ive tried to draft from time to time, but its so frustrating to have to go through 5 drafts and wait 15 mins for a game to start. However the matchups seem more balanced and more meaningful. More games vs. better games - whats the consensus?

Edit2: Some heros lets you learn things faster. I think ziggs, tf, panth for instance lets you get better global map-awareness cuz of their ults. Might be a good choice to learn heros that excels at some skills.
ZERG_RUSSIAN
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
10417 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-23 09:30:25
January 23 2013 09:29 GMT
#20
On January 23 2013 15:50 Capped wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2013 09:14 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote:
I can still name every champ's passive gggggggggggggggg


thats awesome in a name the champs passive quiz, but do you know what the passives do? XD

I certainly dont know 50% of the champs skills / passives / crap by name or can recall them, but when i come up against them i'll know how they play, what they can do, and when im going to get fucked. I basically know their skillsets by heart, but not by name.

I know how to play a few champs for each role, like its been said already 2/3 each role is good, knowing every champ in the game is hard, but you need to know them to improve / be competitive. You can play the champs once each to get a general grasp, but most of it comes from playing against them and seeing what they can do and how you can assfudge them when they do it.

Sorry, I should have been more precise, I know what every champ's passive does.

I can't name even 1/4 of them, but I can tell you what they do.
I'm on GOLD CHAIN
Maxtor
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom273 Posts
January 23 2013 11:53 GMT
#21
I'm one of those people that thinks that its best to learn a couple of champions and stick to them. I believe that you learn how to deal with "counters" and other unpleasant situations. Playing every champion once or twice doesn't really give the person in depth knowledge of what to do in any given situation. Where as experience with a select few would.

On January 23 2013 18:18 Aphasie wrote:
By the way, what do you (more experienced, mid-high ELO, etc) guys think about all-pick vs. draft pick when learning the game? All-pick certainly lets you churn out mores games. Ive tried to draft from time to time, but its so frustrating to have to go through 5 drafts and wait 15 mins for a game to start. However the matchups seem more balanced and more meaningful. More games vs. better games - whats the consensus?

Edit2: Some heros lets you learn things faster. I think ziggs, tf, panth for instance lets you get better global map-awareness cuz of their ults. Might be a good choice to learn heros that excels at some skills.


Personally, I find that being in draft is much better because you're able to prepare accordingly for your match up, changing runes/masteries appropriately. Better games should provide better practice and be more enjoyable really allowing you to play more games.
Gotmog
Profile Joined October 2010
Serbia899 Posts
January 23 2013 12:09 GMT
#22
On January 23 2013 18:18 Aphasie wrote:
I take it youre new. I was new last october with no prior moba experience and for the most part Ive stayed in the jungle, playing various champs. It has been a fun time, but i can say it hasnt developed my last-hitting as much as I wanted to. Im now looking to expand more to mid and top (Ive played some heros in those lanes throughout).

Im no expert, but I think building up a stack of champions you like/intrigues you is the best way to go about it. Buy and play the champions you like. But when a new free rotation comes in, play the free heros that are interesting or you see very often in games. Just a handful of games with popular heros will let you deal with them much more easily, cuz youll know when they are weak/strong/what items they need/etc.

Some heros, like Trundle for instance, you "never" see and he doesnt interest me much, so i never considered playing him.

my 2 cents...


Well, i am not really new. I just had a brake from lol since May xD
I know every champion does up to Varus patch, and since i started again, i have learned most of the new ones as well. )I am asking more out of curiosity. )

But i have only 15 champions i bought from IP, and basic 2 rune pages

Very interesting advice so far. And its as i would expect , do something in between. Have 2-3 champions for ~4roles you play.

Also, i was thinking that if you wanted to specialize in only one champion, it would be ideal if it was some versatile champ that can play 3+ roles...on top of my head, lee sin/nidalee/gragas/kennen/kayle/nunu....
"When you play the game of drones, you win or you die. There is no middle ground"
imBLIND
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
United States2626 Posts
January 23 2013 12:26 GMT
#23
Pick a lane you like.
Invest the rest of your IP on champs, runes, and pages for that lane.
solomid.net or mobafire your opponent before the 2 minute mark to figure out their skills.

Or

Pick a champ you like.
Get runes for him.
Play him in the top, mid and jungle (unless you pick an adc or pure support char)
Then pick a lane you like.

And finally, force yourself to go to other lanes in order to not be completely screwed over in ranked games if you're planning to go on the ladder.
im deaf
IamPryda
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1186 Posts
January 26 2013 23:27 GMT
#24
As a new player I am kinda going through this I have been playing mainly ash alot and doing well but I also want to learn some other roles beside carry and different players and I can def see a drop in play but in the long run it will make me better
Moar banelings less qq
Sbrubbles
Profile Joined October 2010
Brazil5776 Posts
January 27 2013 01:01 GMT
#25
I think everyone should spend some time learning jungle and support, preferably with simple(but not necessarily easy)-to-use heroes like nunu and janna. I think those two roles teach you more about game flow and map awareness than the others. Also, playing new roles is fun!
Bora Pain minha porra!
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-01-27 03:00:48
January 27 2013 02:33 GMT
#26
On January 23 2013 04:10 Gotmog wrote:
I find it interesting that attitudes towards this are polar opposites in dota and lol community.

In LoL, people will tell you, hands down that becoming REALLY good with 2-3 champions is the way to go.
In Dota, people don't like to stick to one champion and just play through all of them, and they would tell you that you need to learn each champions abilities, all roles etc etc.

Obviously both sides have their pros/cons.

What do you guys think ?
The reason i am asking, is that for most of new players, it will be a choice between buying the whole lot of of 450-1350-3150 IP champs and playing them out. Thus having the ability to counter pick, deal with banning, play more roles, knowing what other champions can do etc.
OR saving for that expensive 6300ip champion, and playing him exclusively. Thus becoming really good at him, getting better at skill shots, judging what and when they can pull off, lane dominance etc etc.

1. Why is this so different in dota and lol ? (only reason i can think of is IP restrictions and skill shots which plague lol, while mechanics are brushed aside)
2. What do you think is the better option ?


To be any good at LoL, you really should be good with a bare minimum of 5 champions (one for each role in the current meta), in case you are forced to play a role that you don't normally play. You also need to be good with back-ups in case your main is banned. So no, LoL players really don't just stick with one or two champions. Also, you are still expected to know all of your opponents' abilities.
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11320 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-08 03:37:54
February 08 2013 03:36 GMT
#27
On January 27 2013 11:33 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2013 04:10 Gotmog wrote:
I find it interesting that attitudes towards this are polar opposites in dota and lol community.

In LoL, people will tell you, hands down that becoming REALLY good with 2-3 champions is the way to go.
In Dota, people don't like to stick to one champion and just play through all of them, and they would tell you that you need to learn each champions abilities, all roles etc etc.

Obviously both sides have their pros/cons.

What do you guys think ?
The reason i am asking, is that for most of new players, it will be a choice between buying the whole lot of of 450-1350-3150 IP champs and playing them out. Thus having the ability to counter pick, deal with banning, play more roles, knowing what other champions can do etc.
OR saving for that expensive 6300ip champion, and playing him exclusively. Thus becoming really good at him, getting better at skill shots, judging what and when they can pull off, lane dominance etc etc.

1. Why is this so different in dota and lol ? (only reason i can think of is IP restrictions and skill shots which plague lol, while mechanics are brushed aside)
2. What do you think is the better option ?


To be any good at LoL, you really should be good with a bare minimum of 5 champions (one for each role in the current meta), in case you are forced to play a role that you don't normally play. You also need to be good with back-ups in case your main is banned. So no, LoL players really don't just stick with one or two champions. Also, you are still expected to know all of your opponents' abilities.


I disagree. You should definitely have backups but it is extremely slim chance that all of your 3-4 champs will be banned outright, so I'd say 5 is a good medium but not one per role but rather 2-3 roles you're particularly good at. Any others you should really just play to figure out how they work. Even better if you can find people to play with, even a single one.
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
moochu
Profile Joined August 2009
Australia374 Posts
February 08 2013 05:02 GMT
#28
Wouldn't say learn one or two champs or learn all of them. Well this actually applies more to those who solo queue but I think learning how to play 1-2 heroes in each role is the best. There is nothing i hate more than when people get into ranked games, someone calls a lane and then a person is like "but i only know how to play top" etc etc. I wish there was some sort of testing system before you got placed into ranked where you have to win at least a couple games in each role, would hopefully increase some empathy between players ie realizing you can't expect jungle ganks to magically to appear when you over push your lane and other lanes are struggling or how much effort it takes to be a good support.

If you've got a team I guess for the sake of performance it would be much more better play few champs in your set role.
Zdrastochye
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
February 08 2013 05:33 GMT
#29
On January 23 2013 18:29 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2013 15:50 Capped wrote:
On January 23 2013 09:14 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote:
I can still name every champ's passive gggggggggggggggg


thats awesome in a name the champs passive quiz, but do you know what the passives do? XD

I certainly dont know 50% of the champs skills / passives / crap by name or can recall them, but when i come up against them i'll know how they play, what they can do, and when im going to get fucked. I basically know their skillsets by heart, but not by name.

I know how to play a few champs for each role, like its been said already 2/3 each role is good, knowing every champ in the game is hard, but you need to know them to improve / be competitive. You can play the champs once each to get a general grasp, but most of it comes from playing against them and seeing what they can do and how you can assfudge them when they do it.

Sorry, I should have been more precise, I know what every champ's passive does.

I can't name even 1/4 of them, but I can tell you what they do.


I can name every skill including passives of every champion in the game.

Get on my level.

Soon I'll know every ratio on every ability, but that's for another time (never).
Hey! How you doin'?
W2
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1177 Posts
February 09 2013 08:23 GMT
#30
There's diminishing returns when you play a champ too much.
Hi
Sufficiency
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada23833 Posts
February 09 2013 08:38 GMT
#31
On January 27 2013 11:33 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2013 04:10 Gotmog wrote:
I find it interesting that attitudes towards this are polar opposites in dota and lol community.

In LoL, people will tell you, hands down that becoming REALLY good with 2-3 champions is the way to go.
In Dota, people don't like to stick to one champion and just play through all of them, and they would tell you that you need to learn each champions abilities, all roles etc etc.

Obviously both sides have their pros/cons.

What do you guys think ?
The reason i am asking, is that for most of new players, it will be a choice between buying the whole lot of of 450-1350-3150 IP champs and playing them out. Thus having the ability to counter pick, deal with banning, play more roles, knowing what other champions can do etc.
OR saving for that expensive 6300ip champion, and playing him exclusively. Thus becoming really good at him, getting better at skill shots, judging what and when they can pull off, lane dominance etc etc.

1. Why is this so different in dota and lol ? (only reason i can think of is IP restrictions and skill shots which plague lol, while mechanics are brushed aside)
2. What do you think is the better option ?


To be any good at LoL, you really should be good with a bare minimum of 5 champions (one for each role in the current meta), in case you are forced to play a role that you don't normally play. You also need to be good with back-ups in case your main is banned. So no, LoL players really don't just stick with one or two champions. Also, you are still expected to know all of your opponents' abilities.


I think 2-3 roles is enough. 5 is a stretch.
https://twitter.com/SufficientStats
Tal
Profile Blog Joined May 2004
United Kingdom1017 Posts
February 09 2013 11:15 GMT
#32
To play in ranked you need 2 to 3 roles (it helps if ones support), with 2-3 champs for each. There are some players who seem to get by with less, but by only being able to play one role force other players into roles they're not great at. Ideally you should be ok in all 5 at a pinch.

Either way though, learning a wide spread champs is incredibly helpful, because it makes you aware of how to lane against them, cooldowns and so on. I feel far more confident laning against champs I have used a lot, because I know exactly what they are capable of doing.
It is what you read when you don't have to that determines what you will be when you can't help it.
GolemMadness
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Canada11044 Posts
February 09 2013 11:31 GMT
#33
If you're not a pro gamer and you only play one role and refuse to play anything else then I hate you.
http://na.op.gg/summoner/userName=FLABREZU
Capped
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom7236 Posts
February 09 2013 13:27 GMT
#34
5 champs per role, all 5 roles - 25 champions.

Why?

The literal worst thing that can happen is your forced to play X role, 3 of your champions for that role are banned out and another is taken by someone.

Then your left with 1 champ you can play ^^ not taking into account counterpicks and whatnot but that chances of 4/5 of your champs being bent over is minimal, your usally have the pick of 3-4 to counterpick with
Useless wet fish.
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11320 Posts
February 09 2013 14:41 GMT
#35
On February 09 2013 22:27 Capped wrote:
5 champs per role, all 5 roles - 25 champions.

Why?

The literal worst thing that can happen is your forced to play X role, 3 of your champions for that role are banned out and another is taken by someone.

Then your left with 1 champ you can play ^^ not taking into account counterpicks and whatnot but that chances of 4/5 of your champs being bent over is minimal, your usally have the pick of 3-4 to counterpick with


The chances of that scenario as well are minimal. I'd say either find champs capable of multiple roles (Shen's been amazing both for top and jungle, for example) if you're really preparing for everything. You want to have the lowest number of champions you play, as long as you feel very comfortable that you will be able to pick one. 25 is definitely a stretch because mastering that many champions and adapting to current meta will take a huge amount of time, and although the rewards will be great if you are proficient with all 25 of them, I'd still say you could put that time into even 15 and play those 15 a lot better than the 10 redundant ones.
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
Capped
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom7236 Posts
February 09 2013 16:03 GMT
#36
^ Well multi-role champs are awesome yeah, i didnt mention that..it does the same job only with less champs.

Like nida, lee, lux etc
Useless wet fish.
Tal
Profile Blog Joined May 2004
United Kingdom1017 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-09 16:26:37
February 09 2013 16:26 GMT
#37
Elise can play every role


(except AD )
It is what you read when you don't have to that determines what you will be when you can't help it.
Keniji
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Netherlands2569 Posts
February 09 2013 17:02 GMT
#38
I play like 5 champs and I never had the situation in ranked that I was forced to play anything different nor did I had the feeling that a bigger champion pool would have been of huge benefit.

I have some more champs I play to a decent level (for my standards) but I never have to play them.
Lylat
Profile Joined August 2009
France8575 Posts
February 09 2013 17:11 GMT
#39
I think it's interesting to practice one or two champs a lot for solo queue but it's not if you play competitively because the other team will just ban the champ you're good at..
For example the NA guy called "Best Riven NA" is a sick Riven player and own solo queue, same with XJ9 he's really good with Vi..
winthrop
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Hong Kong956 Posts
February 10 2013 05:49 GMT
#40
just play kayle,,
Incredible Miracle
Purge
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada372 Posts
February 15 2013 11:26 GMT
#41
On February 10 2013 02:11 Lylat wrote:
I think it's interesting to practice one or two champs a lot for solo queue but it's not if you play competitively because the other team will just ban the champ you're good at..
For example the NA guy called "Best Riven NA" is a sick Riven player and own solo queue, same with XJ9 he's really good with Vi..


Even then Its not too bad because if they are giving you respect bans they have 1 less ban to use against you. You can use that to your advantage if you learn something else :D (froggennivia, hotshotnidaleegg, regis lb, Toyz Orianna, I can go on...)/
"Never do an enemy a small injury." - Machiavelli
Metafour
Profile Joined November 2011
United States137 Posts
February 18 2013 00:44 GMT
#42
Wanna be good: Play a pool of champions in one role. Want to be great: Know every champion and all of his abilities.

imo. ^.^
"As you think, so shall you become." @JayJackson94
Tatari
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States1179 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-18 02:55:03
February 18 2013 02:54 GMT
#43
I've practiced only one champion for extensive periods of time. During season 2, I had 656 games on Graves alone. I learned not just how to make him work during laning, teamfighting, late game, hyper carry if necessary, etc. but how to deal with other champions as Graves.

I took the liberty of devoting season 3 to Vayne, with 333 games on her so far. I know her far enough to the point where I'm much more comfortable picking her against a Draven or Graves than a safer pick like Ezreal, and I'm more worried about the billion possibilities of how my support can fulfill Murphy's Law.

At least in LoL, you can go champion specific and still learn about any other champion while learning that one champion and how to deal with the rest of the cast. DotA is nowhere as restricted as LoL in terms of roles.
A fed jungler is no longer a jungler, but a terrorist.
Tula
Profile Joined December 2010
Austria1544 Posts
February 18 2013 04:21 GMT
#44
Bot lane might be complicated on another level, because you need not only learn the matchup of your own champion, but also how he works with and against all possible supports on bot lane.

Anyway, on topic I've always played a pretty wide selection of champions (mostly without sense or system), but since S3 started I've pretty much restricted myself to jungle/top (prefferebly jungle, but not all ranked queues agree ) and 3 champions max within those roles. So far I can clearly see a marked improvement in my own games when i get to play one of those 3 junglers.

Restricting myself to a single champion might work, but my favorite jungler has been Xin this season so it would be fairly unrealistic (been banned quite a bit lately and is often picked fast by the enemy team as well). Still the point remains, if you want to get good (instead of just having fun) stick to a smallish champion pool and really learn the ins and outs of those.

Out of interest, if you say you simply want to play 1 champion in ranked how often do you have to dodge queues to get that role? :p Even with jungle not being quite as popular as mid or Top I've had up to 5 games in a row where other people insisted they had to jungle.
zodde
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1908 Posts
February 18 2013 04:54 GMT
#45
It's kind of unrealistic to play just one champion in every single game if you play soloq. Even if your champion doesn't get banned or picked often, people will "steal" your role.

I do think that focusing most of your attention on a single champion is a good way to climb the ladder, just look at Destiny. Just make sure you have some backup champions if you don't get to play your ace.

If you play normals with friends, or ranked 5s, it can be possible to get your desired champion every single game though.

Also, when you reach a certain level, you might have to expand your champion pool. Some champions have lanes that are almost unplayable at high levels, when you can't expect your opponent to make stupid mistakes. But for getting to that higher level of play? Go ahead and play 90% of your games with a single champ.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 48m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Clem_sc2 744
mouzHeroMarine 607
UpATreeSC 116
JuggernautJason42
Railgan 32
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 17579
Shuttle 416
EffOrt 409
Mini 222
Dewaltoss 99
Aegong 29
scan(afreeca) 21
NaDa 12
Dota 2
Gorgc4962
monkeys_forever24
Counter-Strike
fl0m1244
pashabiceps535
byalli335
Stewie2K270
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu434
Other Games
Grubby2659
FrodaN1396
ScreaM819
B2W.Neo660
ToD155
KnowMe131
Skadoodle131
C9.Mang0112
Pyrionflax111
ArmadaUGS93
Trikslyr71
QueenE42
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL334
Other Games
BasetradeTV51
StarCraft 2
angryscii 38
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 13
• Reevou 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota246
League of Legends
• TFBlade960
Other Games
• imaqtpie1229
• Shiphtur180
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
3h 48m
Replay Cast
13h 48m
OSC
19h 48m
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 2h
The PondCast
1d 13h
OSC
1d 15h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Online Event
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.