[Patch 1.0.0.136: Lulu] General Discussion - Page 244

On April 11 2012 00:47 Two_DoWn wrote:
You cant reomve a champ for being weak though. Gets to be WAY too bad a precident. If you remove Eve, do you remove Kat? Do you remove Karma? How bout someone no one plays like Teemo?

On April 11 2012 00:47 Two_DoWn wrote:
You cant reomve a champ for being weak though. Gets to be WAY too bad a precident. If you remove Eve, do you remove Kat? Do you remove Karma? How bout someone no one plays like Teemo?

On April 11 2012 00:53 Numy wrote:


I think what he means is remove her from ranked and then buff her so he can still have fun? I don't know sounds dodgy

On April 11 2012 00:47 Requizen wrote:
I assume this might go in the QQ thread, but there are just some champs that I refuse to play because they're gay as fuck to play against and I have too much respect for myself and my fellow players to do that to them. I will never play Trynd, Sion, Zilean, Morg, Rumble, or Shaco in any real amount because every time I see them on the screen it just makes me think, "Well fuck you too guy."

Edit: Oh, and fuck Yorick in top lane too. He's balanced, sure, but too annoying for me to care about balance when talking about.

On April 11 2012 00:47 Two_DoWn wrote:
You cant reomve a champ for being weak though. Gets to be WAY too bad a precident. If you remove Eve, do you remove Kat? Do you remove Karma? How bout someone no one plays like Teemo?

On April 11 2012 01:04 Zergneedsfood wrote:
Well, while we're discussing this, why not just remove the newest champions from ranked until the next patch? That way, overpowered champions don't clog up the ranked games and force everyone to ban the new champion all the time. I know people would want to play the new champ, but figuring out a new champion doesn't really sound like the mentality you would have if you were trying to raise your ELO.

On April 11 2012 00:59 WaveofShadow wrote:

I have that attitude as well but a completely different set of champions I apply it to, except Yorick, 'cause fuck that guy. Not fun to play OR play against.

Vayne used to be on my no-play list but the million nerfs helped bring her down in my eyes. Vlad is on my list, still don't own him. I forget who else. As far as Shaco goes, the fun of playing him certainly outweighs the 'anti-fun' it is to play against him. I suggest trying him out sometime.

On April 11 2012 01:21 greggy wrote:
What's wrong or unfun about trynd, zilean or rumble? None of them are the yorick level of bullshit.

On April 11 2012 01:37 BlackPaladin wrote:
I hate how champs have these things called abilities that I actually need to play against.

On April 11 2012 01:45 Requizen wrote:

Lol, I just hate how some are way more annoying than others. Zil gets basically free harass and amazing protection, so does Rumble and Yorick with harass, Yorick also gets to block skillshots with an army and double his Vayne, and you have to base your entire post-6 laning/roaming phase around whether or not Trynd has his ult up. I'm not saying any of them need to be removed, I just dislike them from a preferential standpoint.

On April 11 2012 00:56 Two_DoWn wrote:

It just cant work. All those champs are considered weak in ranked. Hell, Soniv STILL gets yelled at for picking viktor. How do you say "X champion is to weak for ranked and picking him is pretty much ensuring that the other team will win."

People would move from demanding eve be removed from ranked to other champs too. When in reality, although Eve IS the only unviable champion in the game, every other champ is perfectly viable. So people would use the one unviable champ to push for the removal of perfectly viable ones.

Only there is no way to PROVE that one champ is unviable while the rest are viable.