| Forum Index > LoL General |
Remember guys, this is the general discussion thread. Keep whine/QQ posts in the appropriate QQ memorial thread! Thanks! | ||
|
Zdrastochye
Ivory Coast6262 Posts
On April 01 2012 23:08 Dandel Ion wrote: And i can take a pretty good guess at how many people actually buy a champ with that RP Hopefully you guess better than you "deduce". | ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
On April 01 2012 23:00 Zdrastochye wrote: Outscale everyone? Lee Sin? Huh? Olaf, Nasus, Irelia, Riven all scale harder than Lee as common top laners. Yes, but LeeSin absolutely poops on Nasus, Irelia, and Riven. I dunno about Olaf though. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
Flicky
England2666 Posts
On April 01 2012 17:44 TheYango wrote: Also note the new Riven skin that's on her champion page, but not in the store yet: ![[image loading]](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xILYpar7juc/T3gJICEnDnI/AAAAAAAAB-4/9c2vIrbPnvk/s1600/3-D+Mode.png) Given the theme, they'll probably make this one available Easter weekend. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/1o79S.jpg) I wasn't a fan of Bunny Riven until I saw the above artwork. Now that that isn't the actual art, I'm back to not being a fan again. | ||
|
ManyCookies
1164 Posts
| ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
On April 01 2012 23:44 Shikyo wrote: Nor Riven personally, the E slow doesn't do much and she greatly outharrasses Lee Sin in the early levels Voyboy and sOAZ disagree with you Shikyo. LeeSin has much greater burst damage, all Riven can do is get off a W stun and a couple autos then LE just trololol W's out. Thing is LeeSin QQ does more damage than Riven W and two auto's. | ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
On April 02 2012 00:17 iCanada wrote: Voyboy and sOAZ disagree with you Shikyo. LeeSin has much greater burst damage, all Riven can do is get off a W stun and a couple autos then LE just trololol W's out. Thing is LeeSin QQ does more damage than Riven W and two auto's. W gives like a million armour aswell. | ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
On April 01 2012 23:49 Flicky wrote: I wasn't a fan of Bunny Riven until I saw the above artwork. Now that that isn't the actual art, I'm back to not being a fan again. I dunno, I think it looks pretty damn good,. ![[image loading]](http://i646.photobucket.com/albums/uu188/xsdesigns/bunnyriven1.png) | ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
And gives Lee like a ton of free lane sustain with the second one even at level 1. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
| ||
|
Unentschieden
Germany1471 Posts
Personally I think LoL is a bit borderline about it. In Lol there aren´t any activly "ugly" girls (example: female mundo). There are certainly champions that are activly sexy/flirty as part of the character (MS. Fortune, Evelynn, Caitlyn...) but on the other side these champions aren´t primarly defined by their sex. LoL also doesn´t offer fanservice skins like Hon does via bikini genderswap skins (Just check "Blitz" and his alternative skin right now!). The vast majority of Lolskins stays true to the character of the original with certain twists, Rivens is sexy true but it´s also a joke on the fact that she spends the fight constantly hopping and dashing. Counterpoint: It could have been a full suit like Teemos easter skin. How do you think about the issue? | ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
I wouldn't call soraka sexy either. Not to mention GP, Trynd, Pant, men aren't that manly. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
On April 02 2012 00:55 Unentschieden wrote: Regarding the Riven skin, I´m curious how Teamliquid thinks about the objectification of Women in LoL if there is even any. Personally I think LoL is a bit borderline about it. In Lol there aren´t any activly "ugly" girls (example: female mundo). There are certainly champions that are activly sexy/flirty as part of the character (MS. Fortune, Evelynn, Caitlyn...) but on the other side these champions aren´t primarly defined by their sex. LoL also doesn´t offer fanservice skins like Hon does via bikini genderswap skins (Just check "Blitz" and his alternative skin right now!). The vast majority of Lolskins stays true to the character of the original with certain twists, Rivens is sexy true but it´s also a joke on the fact that she spends the fight constantly hopping and dashing. Counterpoint: It could have been a full suit like Teemos easter skin. How do you think about the issue? OBJEFICATION OF MEN IN LOL IS SO BAD MAN. Every champion has like bodybuilder muscles. It's not realistic! Even fighters aren't built like that. We need to protest for mens rights. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
ManyCookies
1164 Posts
but on the other side these champions aren´t primarly defined by their sex. Except Miss Fortune, but she's borderline parody anyway. And Sona, who exemplifes the heritage of traditional gender roles in a modern society. I don't get the impression that they're actively attempting or dissuading fanservice in general; if it'll make a good skin, then why the hell not. And if it doesn't, then Riot will avoid it. Lux's initial look was really.... cheerleaderish. Then they changed into something respectable after they realized it didn't really fit. Obviously some skins are just pure fanservice (French Maid Nidalee) but by no means are they a significant percentage. And if it makes a skin work on more than one level, then why not. Counterpoint: It could have been a full suit like Teemos easter skin. But that makes the skin a lot less fitting just for the sake of making it platonic. | ||
|
sob3k
United States7572 Posts
| ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
| ||
|
ibreakurface
United States664 Posts
On April 02 2012 00:55 Unentschieden wrote: Regarding the Riven skin, I´m curious how Teamliquid thinks about the objectification of Women in LoL if there is even any. Personally I think LoL is a bit borderline about it. In Lol there aren´t any activly "ugly" girls (example: female mundo). There are certainly champions that are activly sexy/flirty as part of the character (MS. Fortune, Evelynn, Caitlyn...) but on the other side these champions aren´t primarly defined by their sex. LoL also doesn´t offer fanservice skins like Hon does via bikini genderswap skins (Just check "Blitz" and his alternative skin right now!). The vast majority of Lolskins stays true to the character of the original with certain twists, Rivens is sexy true but it´s also a joke on the fact that she spends the fight constantly hopping and dashing. Counterpoint: It could have been a full suit like Teemos easter skin. How do you think about the issue? The male roles are just as stereotyped, why aren't we complaining about that "issue." | ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
On April 02 2012 00:55 Unentschieden wrote: Regarding the Riven skin, I´m curious how Teamliquid thinks about the objectification of Women in LoL if there is even any. Personally I think LoL is a bit borderline about it. In Lol there aren´t any activly "ugly" girls (example: female mundo). There are certainly champions that are activly sexy/flirty as part of the character (MS. Fortune, Evelynn, Caitlyn...) but on the other side these champions aren´t primarly defined by their sex. LoL also doesn´t offer fanservice skins like Hon does via bikini genderswap skins (Just check "Blitz" and his alternative skin right now!). The vast majority of Lolskins stays true to the character of the original with certain twists, Rivens is sexy true but it´s also a joke on the fact that she spends the fight constantly hopping and dashing. Counterpoint: It could have been a full suit like Teemos easter skin. How do you think about the issue? I don't really think its an issue... Hell look like a page earlier in this thread... Someone thought Riven was a guy. Obviously she just a sexual object. lol. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
Classic vs SHIN
Maru vs TBD
herO vs TBD
Wardi Open
IPSL
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
BSL 21
StRyKeR vs Artosis
OyAji vs KameZerg
OSC
OSC
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
OSC
Wardi Open
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
