Riotjune, i really think samurai had bows in this period, whereas medieval knight hadn't. Errrr. Europe probably didn't know what archers were all the way through even tho they came up with guns earlier. Errrrr. Welcome to the end of the era of samurai (which is roughly when knights reached Japan, thanks).
Knight vs. Samurai - Page 11
Forum Index > General Forum |
aseq
Netherlands3972 Posts
Riotjune, i really think samurai had bows in this period, whereas medieval knight hadn't. Errrr. Europe probably didn't know what archers were all the way through even tho they came up with guns earlier. Errrrr. Welcome to the end of the era of samurai (which is roughly when knights reached Japan, thanks). | ||
loupouk
France105 Posts
but i'm realistic too if it's not a movie, chuck norris > bruce lee and knight> samurai | ||
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
| ||
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
| ||
FragKrag
United States11545 Posts
On July 27 2008 09:54 RtS)Night[Mare wrote: btw, if you think samurais are not awesome enough, samurais were the only people who defeated the mongol invasion, which btw, conquered the whole known world. Nothing else affected that victory. NOTHING | ||
Terranator
Canada286 Posts
| ||
FragKrag
United States11545 Posts
| ||
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
| ||
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
| ||
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
| ||
swat
Australia142 Posts
Couldn't of you just edited your first post rather than going for a magical +5 postcount bump? There are too many contributing factors to put in to play to get a clear winner. If there were no outside factors though the knight would win easily. | ||
Showtime!
Canada2938 Posts
I'll just hop into my time machine and I'll get back to you guys later! *poof* | ||
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
Also, as has been said before in this thread, the Japanese weren't the only ones who defeated the Mongol Hordes. | ||
IzzyCraft
United States4487 Posts
On July 27 2008 10:21 Jyvblamo wrote: Umm... The Samurai weren't exactly fighting the battle-hardened soldiers of Genghis or Subedei, they were fighting the considerably weaker armies of Kublai Khan. Also, as has been said before in this thread, the Japanese weren't the only ones who defeated the Mongol Hordes. Mongols just controlled most of Asia and middle east not Europe(well a tiny part of it but w/e) lol something to consider | ||
FragKrag
United States11545 Posts
On July 27 2008 10:11 RtS)Night[Mare wrote: plus, the saracens fucking massacreed the stupid crusader knights, so they're no shit compared to samurai Think about what you just said. Europeans are not used to that kind of extreme heat. Your comparisons make no fucking sense. The army that was sent to Japan was of mainly Korean and Chinese, and then they lost most of their men in the journey. | ||
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
On July 27 2008 10:27 IzzyCraft wrote: Mongols just controlled most of Asia and middle east not Europe(well a tiny part of it but w/e) lol something to consider The level of control that they wielded over their conquered lands is also debatable, as they often left local government intact and only demanded tribute. | ||
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
On July 27 2008 10:28 FragKrag wrote: Think about what you just said. Europeans are not used to that kind of extreme heat. Your comparisons make no fucking sense. The army that was sent to Japan was of mainly Korean and Chinese, and then they lost most of their men in the journey. talk about sense, you mean like it has much sense a samurai battling a knight? if we're allowed to compare that i dont know why wouldnt be able to compare saracens to europeans. I mean we could actually compare those two, but i know what you mean. killing dragons make much sense too, because they were truly difficult foes to defeat!!!!!! | ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
![]() ![]() Samurai wins. | ||
FragKrag
United States11545 Posts
Edit: But this is coming from a black player. | ||
CommanderFluffy
Taiwan1059 Posts
Too much sc. | ||
| ||