• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:34
CEST 20:34
KST 03:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week0Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer6Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer Rain's Behind the Scenes Storytime Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Which UAE App Developers Are Leading the Innovatio
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 31607 users

Technological Singularity - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
November 01 2007 22:21 GMT
#21
Thank's a lot for the link's DrainX!

I'm very interested in the possibilites and limits of AI, and has been doing some simple programming with it.

HeadBangaa, your are right that computers can't be "smarter" than humans when they just follow instructions to perform computations, but there are other possibilities. The only one that I know of is "neural networking" where you simulate the connected cells in a brain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network
Enter a Uh
HeadBangaa
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States6512 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-11-01 22:50:36
November 01 2007 22:45 GMT
#22
On November 02 2007 07:21 jtan wrote:
Thank's a lot for the link's DrainX!

I'm very interested in the possibilites and limits of AI, and has been doing some simple programming with it.

HeadBangaa, your are right that computers can't be "smarter" than humans when they just follow instructions to perform computations, but there are other possibilities. The only one that I know of is "neural networking" where you simulate the connected cells in a brain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network

Even then, it still seems like a paradox.

If a programmer designed a mechanism which produces better-than-human results, then the moment the design was completed, the mechanism loses that attribute. Human knowledge was increased, and it's still just a really fast human-mind. An inductive proof seems appropriate here.

I don't see how a virtual neural network could be instantiated without being completely deterministic, unless modern computing itself was turned on its head.
People who fail to distinguish Socratic Method from malicious trolling are sadly stupid and not worth a response.
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
November 01 2007 23:01 GMT
#23
On November 02 2007 07:45 HeadBangaa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 02 2007 07:21 jtan wrote:
Thank's a lot for the link's DrainX!

I'm very interested in the possibilites and limits of AI, and has been doing some simple programming with it.

HeadBangaa, your are right that computers can't be "smarter" than humans when they just follow instructions to perform computations, but there are other possibilities. The only one that I know of is "neural networking" where you simulate the connected cells in a brain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network

Even then, it still seems like a paradox.

If a programmer designed a mechanism which produces better-than-human results, then the moment the design was completed, the mechanism loses that attribute. Human knowledge was increased, and it's still just a really fast human-mind. An inductive proof seems appropriate here.

I don't see how a virtual neural network could be instantiated without being completely deterministic, unless modern computing itself was turned on its head.

yeah but that's just the thing! It is essentially deterministic, but we could never predict what structure will evolve inside the network in practice.

Imagine that you plug in a camera that films my handwriting. You check the output of the system and when the system output's the right letters, you give a positive signal backwards strengthening the connections used for coming up with that letter. This way the system will keep rearranging itself and improve over time.
Here is an example of pretty much what I described, it really works: http://www.codeproject.com/library/NeuralNetRecognition.asp

Also, beeing a materialists and I think that the human mind also is a deterministic in the exact same way.
Enter a Uh
Funchucks
Profile Joined June 2007
Canada2113 Posts
November 01 2007 23:03 GMT
#24
On November 02 2007 07:45 HeadBangaa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 02 2007 07:21 jtan wrote:
Thank's a lot for the link's DrainX!

I'm very interested in the possibilites and limits of AI, and has been doing some simple programming with it.

HeadBangaa, your are right that computers can't be "smarter" than humans when they just follow instructions to perform computations, but there are other possibilities. The only one that I know of is "neural networking" where you simulate the connected cells in a brain.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network

Even then, it still seems like a paradox.

If a programmer designed a mechanism which produces better-than-human results, then the moment the design was completed, the mechanism loses that attribute. Human knowledge was increased, and it's still just a really fast human-mind. An inductive proof seems appropriate here.

I don't see how a virtual neural network could be instantiated without being completely deterministic, unless modern computing itself was turned on its head.

By including true random numbers in its inputs.

True randoms (at least based on quantum randomness) aren't hard to generate with the proper hardware. Some CPUs have them. Randomness is injected by "noisy" inputs such as microphones and cameras as well.

Anyway, I don't see determinism as relevant. Predictability and power to reach useful conclusions are the relevant considerations in comparing a machine intelligence to a human intelligence.
I serve my houseguests slices of butter.
HeadBangaa
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States6512 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-11-01 23:16:58
November 01 2007 23:13 GMT
#25
^ I think the distinction between true randomness and predictability is important theoretically, if not pragmatically.
edit: I didn't know that "true randoms" could be generated programmatically..
edit2: oh snap, physics to the rescue
People who fail to distinguish Socratic Method from malicious trolling are sadly stupid and not worth a response.
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-11-01 23:18:16
November 01 2007 23:16 GMT
#26
On November 02 2007 08:13 HeadBangaa wrote:
^ I think the distinction between true randomness and predictability is important theoretically, if not pragmatically.
edit: I didn't know that "true randomness" had been achieved.

"true randomness" through quantum mechanics is very much in the use and development, but there's still some discussion whether it is truly random or if it depends on local variables. There are some solid counterarguments vs the local variable theory, but some still defend it etc.
Enter a Uh
Funchucks
Profile Joined June 2007
Canada2113 Posts
November 01 2007 23:43 GMT
#27
Computers and brains alike can only be as inwardly non-deterministic as their component particles allow.

If the universe is deterministic, then so is the human brain.
I serve my houseguests slices of butter.
Jyvblamo
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Canada13788 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-11-01 23:59:25
November 01 2007 23:59 GMT
#28
Read the most recent Hugo-Award Winning Novel:
http://vrinimi.org/rainbowsend.html
Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge (He's awesome)
It deals with several interesting issues with a society approaching technological singularity.
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
November 02 2007 00:02 GMT
#29
Omg these videos are good. Just ordered some of the recommended readings.
Enter a Uh
DrainX
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Sweden3187 Posts
November 02 2007 02:58 GMT
#30
http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/vinge/misc/singularity.html

The Coming Technological Singularity:
How to Survive in the Post-Human Era



Vernor Vinge
Department of Mathematical Sciences
San Diego State University


(c) 1993 by Vernor Vinge
Hippopotamus
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
1914 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-11-02 03:39:40
November 02 2007 03:29 GMT
#31
It always boggles me how exactly the machines will be learning everything. I've been bothered by the idea that they can continually increase their own capability and I'm always wondering why people think we're so close to creating a computer of intelligence comparable to humans. It's not that it is impossible, but there're some things the computer will have to do that I'm not sure we're clear on. To be truly able to advance itself the computer will have to "understand". But how will it "understand"? It has to have some sort of paradigm by which to interpret information. Where will it get that if not from humans? But our interpretations aren't ideal, they're limited by who we are biologically. Can you come up with a superior method of interpreting data from only taking an inferior method to its limits?
potchip
Profile Joined October 2004
Australia260 Posts
November 02 2007 03:37 GMT
#32
Currently the number of processing units in the best computers are nowhere near that is in a human brain. But that is taking human brain celluar function as a model. Intelligent computers is foreseeable however because the capacity of computers can increase indefinately with new designs how electronics is scalable, whereas human brain power is limited biologically. I agree though it nothing 'around the corner'.
noob4ever
Profile Joined April 2005
Denmark59 Posts
November 02 2007 16:33 GMT
#33
"AI" in the future will just be incredible fast machines, to the point of appearing intelligent. But if they do something we dont want, it will just be a system failure. I think they will still need some programming. Makes me wonder, what the hell is thought proccesing in the bio-world? Is it programmed or some kind of "as we go along" selfprogramming? Someone mentioned magic. I think its magic how some billions of stupid braincells with chemical signalling, somehow via cooperation can produce thoughts, its just so weird I really cant see us humans make a simular system. I might add, Im neigher a believer or atheist but an agnostic, meaning I realise I dont know shit and never will, so might as well quit thinking about it. Lol.
yisun518
Profile Joined August 2004
Canada480 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-11-02 18:48:32
November 02 2007 18:46 GMT
#34
With the "Evolution of Clock" topic posted, I think its quite possible that a fast computer in the future can run a simulation combining millions of variables in the world with "survival of the fittest" conditions on vehicles, machines, intelligent beings, buildings.... eventually forseeing the evolutions in the future on almost everything.

This could play a part in technology singularity, an exhaustion method in "evolution simulation" to increase its own "intelligence"
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-11-02 19:33:20
November 02 2007 19:32 GMT
#35
On November 03 2007 01:33 noob4ever wrote:
"AI" in the future will just be incredible fast machines, to the point of appearing intelligent. But if they do something we dont want, it will just be a system failure.

Not necessarily.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network
It might take a while to understand, but it's possible for computers to work in about the same ways as brains. It has been done, and a lot of research is going on. The main problem right now is to make networks big and fast enough. A human brain has ~10^11 neorons with ~7000 connections each.

I think they will still need some programming. Makes me wonder, what the hell is thought proccesing in the bio-world? Is it programmed or some kind of "as we go along" selfprogramming? Someone mentioned magic. I think its magic how some billions of stupid braincells with chemical signalling, somehow via cooperation can produce thoughts, its just so weird I really cant see us humans make a simular system.

The brain is an extremely complex system, but it's not as hard as you might think to create. The DNA-code that builds the brain is not very long, it basicy describes how to build and connect one neuron and then "build 67482959432 more of those". And what you call selfprogramming is essentially connections between neurons being strengthend weakend or destroyed as a consequence of the strength of the signals passing through them.

I might add, Im neigher a believer or atheist but an agnostic, meaning I realise I dont know shit and never will, so might as well quit thinking about it. Lol.

I find that to be a pretty pessimistic world view
Enter a Uh
Mindcrime
Profile Joined July 2004
United States6899 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-11-02 19:42:06
November 02 2007 19:37 GMT
#36
On November 03 2007 01:33 noob4ever wrote:
I might add, Im neigher a believer or atheist but an agnostic, meaning I realise I dont know shit and never will, so might as well quit thinking about it. Lol.


Agnosticism is not a third way. You're either a theist or an atheist.
That wasn't any act of God. That was an act of pure human fuckery.
cava
Profile Blog Joined November 2002
United States1035 Posts
November 02 2007 19:44 GMT
#37
On November 02 2007 04:21 Eniram wrote:
You cannot stop judgement day.. Only delay it.
cava!
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
November 02 2007 19:53 GMT
#38
On November 03 2007 04:44 cava wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 02 2007 04:21 Eniram wrote:
You cannot stop judgement day.. Only delay it.

Actually the great day of the singularity sounds pretty much like an armageddon when the people in the videos speaks of it. Maybe they can get some research funding from the religios right haha
Enter a Uh
betaben
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
681 Posts
November 02 2007 19:56 GMT
#39
this verges on the turing machene thread, and whether a machine can replicate a human, "Shadows of the Mind" by Penrose is good for this.

As for artificial neural networks (ANN), I at least know they are used in high energy physics and out perform anything there (including humans).

Apparently, there are some stages Kurtwiel gives for replicating brains with computers, and a step before a human brain is a mouse brain. IBM have done this, making a computer big enough to simulate all the connections of a mouse brain.
jtan
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden5891 Posts
November 02 2007 19:59 GMT
#40
Interesting. What exactly is the application in physics are are talking about? Got any source?
Enter a Uh
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
#18
RotterdaM1037
FunKaTv 365
IndyStarCraft 317
SteadfastSC285
BRAT_OK 137
kabyraGe 107
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1037
mouzHeroMarine 793
FunKaTv 365
IndyStarCraft 317
SteadfastSC 285
BRAT_OK 137
RushiSC 124
ProTech62
EmSc Tv 23
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 236
Bonyth 93
scan(afreeca) 24
yabsab 17
GoRush 16
soO 16
Backho 12
Shine 8
Dota 2
Gorgc8716
qojqva1983
Counter-Strike
fl0m1631
flusha89
Other Games
tarik_tv55172
gofns28744
FrodaN1605
ceh91132
C9.Mang0528
Fuzer 143
Mew2King132
KnowMe91
Trikslyr74
UpATreeSC15
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream15587
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 23
EmSc2Tv 23
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta11
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2661
• WagamamaTV303
• Ler97
League of Legends
• Nemesis6025
• Jankos3169
• TFBlade1293
Other Games
• imaqtpie1088
• Shiphtur274
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 26m
RSL Revival
15h 26m
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
PiGosaur Monday
1d 5h
RSL Revival
1d 15h
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
[ Show More ]
SC Evo League
4 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-11
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.