Left or Right Brained? Check this image. - Page 3
Forum Index > General Forum |
chocolat
Australia68 Posts
| ||
Smurg
Australia3818 Posts
Have you seen it both ways chocolat? | ||
Elwood Blues
United States261 Posts
| ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On October 12 2007 16:46 chocolat wrote: Well ask yourself is the doll motioning towards her left or right? If right, then its clockwise. If left, then its anti-clockwise. It is moving in a circular motion towards her right, hence it is a clockwise motion. lol i feel you my friend. all of sudden it starts move in a circular motion to her left. | ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32252 Posts
| ||
Smurg
Australia3818 Posts
On October 12 2007 16:50 IntoTheWow wrote: it was counter clock wise, i read the focus part to change it, and now i cant change it back lol | ||
KoveN-
Australia498 Posts
I close my eyes and imagine it turning clockwise or anti-clockwise and open them and it does it every time;o | ||
Polis
Poland1292 Posts
On October 12 2007 16:08 chocolat wrote: I think this is very inaccurate as I usually consider myself more logical than creative as I am more inclined into the scientific world rather than the artistic world. I saw it CLOCKWISE at first also, as for science that is more tricky following the list: RIGHT BRAIN FUNCTIONS uses feeling "big picture" oriented imagination rules symbols and images present and future philosophy & religion can "get it" (i.e. meaning) believes appreciates spatial perception knows object function fantasy based presents possibilities impetuous risk taking All of those are also important in science, Einstein said that imagination is very important. Other things like religion can be sub effect of useful work of right part of the brain. I think that understanding of science give me "spiritual" feeling. I can't be sure becouse in Church give me only impression, that religion is stupid, and no feelings attached to it at all. Can't say that symbols or images work on me at all, I am good at math also. I am definitely more interesting in general theory not in details that I only like when they are necessary to understand theory, and presented as part of it to make full picture. | ||
fonger
United Kingdom1218 Posts
| ||
Elwood Blues
United States261 Posts
worked for me at least :p | ||
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
You want to focus on her legs, as other's have said. Notice one of her leg is the base, aka it does not move but only rotates. We will call this the base leg The other one spins around it in a circle, clockwise or counter-clockwise. Lets call this the swing leg You see her turning one way, for the most of us it remains that way for a good deal. If you focus on her legs, you notice her swing leg repeatedly going behind the base leg and in front. Start counting with your sequence. When the swing leg is in front, say front, and when it is behind the base, say back. So now you should be counting: Front, Back, Front, Back, Front, Back. Now only focusing on the legs, and do Front, Back, Front, Back, Front, FRONT, back, front, back It will feel very unnatural for awhile, but just keep counting the front-back in reverse order and really try to believe/perceive the dancer's leg spinning in the same direction you are talking about. Direction should change shortly if you really focus on counting it. Oh yeah I'm right-brained, although I managed to get stuck on counter for a good while keke. | ||
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
| ||
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
THen it turned CCW and HOLY SHIT. | ||
kAra
Germany1254 Posts
| ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
| ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
I can cause my vision to switch every 1.5 rotations without fail | ||
Pika Chu
Romania2510 Posts
LOL.. actually LOL now i can see it counter too.. lmao this a very nice one! | ||
bboyldy
Korea (North)664 Posts
| ||
Pika Chu
Romania2510 Posts
5min later: ok now i can make it spin like i want | ||
Pika Chu
Romania2510 Posts
On October 12 2007 17:16 bboyldy wrote: so .. its saying if you see it clockwise = dumb, if you see it counter-clockwise = smart? Not at all. | ||
| ||