EPTRusso-Ukrainian War Thread - Page 147
| Forum Index > General Forum |
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. | ||
|
SSIII
China60 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14154 Posts
If you want to be treated like a big boy on the world stage you need to accept that people will treat you like a big boy. Otherwise isolate yourself and stop trading with the world. | ||
|
SSIII
China60 Posts
Come on, we all know who is the target if Russia fell. We don't want to pick a side, but we have to. Zelensky recently said he is satisfied with China's choice,which means, in my comprehension, -had not supportted Russia openly. | ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
On June 25 2022 13:33 SSIII wrote: A stab on the back of your friend sounds like a big boy action? Come on, we all know who is the target if Russia fell. We don't want to pick a side, but we have to. Zelensky recently said he is satisfied with China's choice,which means, in my comprehension, -had not supportted Russia openly. If your friend commits crimes against humanity, I think it is appropriate to stop being friends with them... | ||
|
SSIII
China60 Posts
On June 25 2022 13:52 Ghostcom wrote: If your friend commits crimes against humanity, I think it is appropriate to stop being friends with them... Why your country did not quit NATO when NATO killed at least tens of thousands civilians in Asia? Is it not against humanity because the people you killed are not 'civilized' humans? | ||
|
Magic Powers
Austria4478 Posts
On June 25 2022 21:27 SSIII wrote: Why your country did not quit NATO when NATO killed at least tens of thousands civilians in Asia? Is it not against humanity because the people you killed are not 'civilized' humans? NATO has never started a war, much less committed genocide or systematic killing of cilians. I don't know what sources you're relying on, but they've been feeding you lies. If a NATO member shows aggression against another country, other NATO members are not bound to come to their aid. This is because NATO is not an offensive alliance, but a defensive pact. NATO members are bound to come to the defense of a NATO member who's home soil (not property) is attacked by another country. | ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5834 Posts
On June 25 2022 21:27 SSIII wrote: Why your country did not quit NATO when NATO killed at least tens of thousands civilians in Asia? Is it not against humanity because the people you killed are not 'civilized' humans? Where? And deliberately? | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24066 Posts
Israel being a country engaged in an ongoing criminal occupation and attempted ethnic cleansing that has western support. | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28840 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On June 25 2022 22:19 Liquid`Drone wrote: While NATO is the wrong term to use, Denmark was one of the countries supporting the invasion of Iraq, which can in many ways be compared to the invasion of Ukraine. There are also ways in which it differs, and ways denmark differs from China, but some degree of whataboutism is kinda warranted. None of this justifies current support for Russia or inaction, but I highly understand opposition to a perceived western holier than thou attitude. Whataboutism is never warranted, or even acceptable. All it does is derail a discussion. If you want to argue the legality of an action according to international law, one can bring examples of successful cases of such application of laws as justification, but it makes no sense to say: "but they also broke the law, so it's fine". | ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28840 Posts
| ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5834 Posts
On June 25 2022 22:19 Liquid`Drone wrote: While NATO is the wrong term to use, Denmark was one of the countries supporting the invasion of Iraq, which can in many ways be compared to the invasion of Ukraine. There are also ways in which it differs, and ways denmark differs from China, but some degree of whataboutism is kinda warranted. None of this justifies current support for Russia or inaction, but I highly understand opposition to a perceived western holier than thou attitude. Really? How can the two be compared? | ||
|
r00ty
Germany1080 Posts
The official reason for the invasion was made up bullshit and everybody involved in the decision knew it. | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
You've successfully derailed the thread. Rename it to the Iraq War thread now. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Drone
Norway28840 Posts
 | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
r00ty
Germany1080 Posts
On June 25 2022 23:30 JimmiC wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 25 2022 23:12 r00ty wrote: The official reason for the invasion was made up bullshit and everybody involved in the decision knew it. And it was to unseat a horrible dictator and still worked out horribly, even with trillions spent on rebuilt, the blitz working and used as an example of what not to do. So when Russia did the unprovoked attack of a democracy to expand their territory, countries around the world, rightfully so, said this is bad stop. We should and you are right. Just answered a question, there were similarities. | ||
| ||
