• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:28
CEST 09:28
KST 16:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202549RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion ASL20 Preliminary Maps Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [Update] ShieldBattery: 1v1 Fastest Support!
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 753 users

can someone solve this math riddle for me - Page 4

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
nemY
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States3119 Posts
July 23 2007 03:52 GMT
#61
On July 22 2007 14:18 MyLostTemple wrote:
i suck at math : [


That's why you have a brother.
thoraxe
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
United States1449 Posts
July 23 2007 04:11 GMT
#62
On July 22 2007 14:00 Gatsu wrote:
It s not 27$ + 2$ = 29$ but

27$ (what they pay) - 2$ (what was stolen) = 25$ (the real price of the room)



this is about right. You don't add the 2 cuz they were stolen i.e. subtract
Obama singing "Kick Ass" Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yghFBt-fXmw&feature=player_embedde
niteReloaded
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
Croatia5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-07-23 07:15:07
July 23 2007 07:13 GMT
#63
At first that monty hall problem was kinda weird to me, but now i thought of it, and - here's my explanation:
You have 3 boxes, one of them is the right box.
Still, you have only 2 options:
- Pick the right box - 33% chance.
- pick the wrong box - 66% chance.

Lets now analyze the odds for the switching strategy.
If you pick the right box, the host will remove one of the false boxes, you will switch and pick the remaining wrong box. As mentioned, this will happen whenever you pick the right box at the start.

However, if you initially pick the wrong box (66% chance), 2 boxes will remain, with one of them being the right box. Out of these 2 boxes, the host will remove the wrong one, and when you switch, u score the right box. This scenario occurs whenever your first choice is the wrong box, which happens in 66% of the cases.
Sr18
Profile Joined April 2006
Netherlands1141 Posts
July 23 2007 07:52 GMT
#64
On July 23 2007 11:56 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2007 11:43 Frits wrote:
The monty hall problem is a very simple riddle.

Choice 1 will always stay 33,3% no matter what they do, and there's sure to be a price. So the odds of the remaining doors together are 100%. So if you have 2 choices, and 1 is 33,3%, the other one has 66,6% chance of being the price. (100-33,3)

The case in which it wouldn't matter which door you took is when they take away one of the choices without knowing if that was the prize or not. (In which case it would be 33-33.)

Everyone here should be able to understand that.


Counter example:
Monty Hall with 10 doors. You can switch or not switch. Don't switch = 10% chance to win. By your explination above, switch should = 90%.


Switching would be 90%, if the host eliminates all but one of the doors you didn´t pick.
If it ain't Dutch, it ain't Park Yeong Min - CJ fighting!
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25980 Posts
July 23 2007 08:11 GMT
#65
On July 23 2007 16:52 Sr18 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2007 11:56 Chill wrote:
On July 23 2007 11:43 Frits wrote:
The monty hall problem is a very simple riddle.

Choice 1 will always stay 33,3% no matter what they do, and there's sure to be a price. So the odds of the remaining doors together are 100%. So if you have 2 choices, and 1 is 33,3%, the other one has 66,6% chance of being the price. (100-33,3)

The case in which it wouldn't matter which door you took is when they take away one of the choices without knowing if that was the prize or not. (In which case it would be 33-33.)

Everyone here should be able to understand that.


Counter example:
Monty Hall with 10 doors. You can switch or not switch. Don't switch = 10% chance to win. By your explination above, switch should = 90%.


Switching would be 90%, if the host eliminates all but one of the doors you didn´t pick.


Right.
Moderator
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-07-23 08:18:39
July 23 2007 08:17 GMT
#66
If your odds start at 33.3333% to fail on 3 doors, they obviously get better on 2 doors (50%) but if you add them both together its 83.333% chance to fail.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
mikeymoo
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
Canada7170 Posts
July 23 2007 08:20 GMT
#67
On July 23 2007 17:17 CharlieMurphy wrote:
If your odds start at 33.3333% to fail on 3 doors, they obviously get better on 2 doors (50%) but if you add them both together its 83.333% chance to fail.


...wrong.

It's the ORDER that the things happen in.

You pick a door. Let's say it's the wrong door.

There are two left, one of which is the correct one, the other, he eliminates. So switching after picking the wrong door is 100% to become the correct one.

So if you have a 2/3 of picking the wrong door initially, you have 2/3 of a chance to win after switching.
o_x | Ow. | 1003 ESPORTS dollars | If you have any questions about bans please PM Kennigit
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
July 23 2007 08:22 GMT
#68
monty hall is not that special if the selection bias of the host is made clear. much stuff over presentation. for ppl used to precisely stated conditions, vaguness will be a pain
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
JeeJee
Profile Blog Joined July 2003
Canada5652 Posts
July 23 2007 08:44 GMT
#69
i hated explaining monty hall problem to others, but i've foudn a really simple solution that everyone can clearly understand

you only lose by switching if you picked the right box to begin with. what are the odds of picking the right box to begin with?

that's usually enough =p
(\o/)  If you want it, you find a way. Otherwise you find excuses. No exceptions.
 /_\   aka Shinbi (requesting a name change since 27/05/09 ☺)
[r]h_probe
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States188 Posts
July 23 2007 09:14 GMT
#70
On July 23 2007 17:17 CharlieMurphy wrote:
If your odds start at 33.3333% to fail on 3 doors, they obviously get better on 2 doors (50%) but if you add them both together its 83.333% chance to fail.


LOL
Frits
Profile Joined March 2003
11782 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-07-23 11:21:26
July 23 2007 11:17 GMT
#71
On July 23 2007 11:56 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2007 11:43 Frits wrote:
The monty hall problem is a very simple riddle.

Choice 1 will always stay 33,3% no matter what they do, and there's sure to be a price. So the odds of the remaining doors together are 100%. So if you have 2 choices, and 1 is 33,3%, the other one has 66,6% chance of being the price. (100-33,3)

The case in which it wouldn't matter which door you took is when they take away one of the choices without knowing if that was the prize or not. (In which case it would be 33-33.)

Everyone here should be able to understand that.


Counter example:
Monty Hall with 10 doors. You can switch or not switch. Don't switch = 10% chance to win. By your explination above, switch should = 90%.


Nope it still counts, what you forgot is when adding doors, obviously you have to divide the chance by that added amount.

Choice 1 will be 10% no matter what they do like I said right? And there's still sure to be a price so:

100 - 10 = 90 % chance of ONE of the 8 doors left being the right one.

90/8 = 11,25% of getting it right when switching.

On July 23 2007 17:17 CharlieMurphy wrote:
If your odds start at 33.3333% to fail on 3 doors, they obviously get better on 2 doors (50%) but if you add them both together its 83.333% chance to fail.


What are you even calculating here? The question is should he switch or not. I don't understand what you did here at all. :p
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
July 23 2007 11:36 GMT
#72
Maybe I'm not sure how the show works but what I meant is: The first choice you make between 3 doors is 66% chance to win and a 33% chance to lose out of 3 doors. If you get a winner the first time and try to get the other winner which is now a 50/50 shot you've just made your odds worse because essentially its like you picked 2 doors at once, Which is going to be a fail at 83% of the time, correct? or is it 66%?
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Frits
Profile Joined March 2003
11782 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-07-23 11:45:15
July 23 2007 11:43 GMT
#73
On July 23 2007 20:36 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Maybe I'm not sure how the show works but what I meant is: The first choice you make between 3 doors is 66% chance to win and a 33% chance to lose out of 3 doors. If you get a winner the first time and try to get the other winner which is now a 50/50 shot you've just made your odds worse because essentially its like you picked 2 doors at once, Which is going to be a fail at 83% of the time, correct? or is it 66%?



I still have no idea what you mean.

Here's how the show works:

-3 doors, 1 prize (so 33% of getting it right if picking a random).
-You pick 1 door.
-The host removes 1 of the remaining 2 doors, and you know he removed the one which isn't the one with a prize.

Now the question is this: Will he have more chance of winning if he switches or not.



answer: Yes he should, 66% of the other one being right, 33% of getting it right if he keeps the original pick
[r]h_probe
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States188 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-07-23 11:58:44
July 23 2007 11:56 GMT
#74
On July 23 2007 20:17 Frits wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2007 11:56 Chill wrote:
On July 23 2007 11:43 Frits wrote:
The monty hall problem is a very simple riddle.

Choice 1 will always stay 33,3% no matter what they do, and there's sure to be a price. So the odds of the remaining doors together are 100%. So if you have 2 choices, and 1 is 33,3%, the other one has 66,6% chance of being the price. (100-33,3)

The case in which it wouldn't matter which door you took is when they take away one of the choices without knowing if that was the prize or not. (In which case it would be 33-33.)

Everyone here should be able to understand that.


Counter example:
Monty Hall with 10 doors. You can switch or not switch. Don't switch = 10% chance to win. By your explination above, switch should = 90%.


Nope it still counts, what you forgot is when adding doors, obviously you have to divide the chance by that added amount.

Choice 1 will be 10% no matter what they do like I said right? And there's still sure to be a price so:

100 - 10 = 90 % chance of ONE of the 8 doors left being the right one.

90/8 = 11,25% of getting it right when switching.


Wrong!

Look at it this way:
10 doors
You choose one door ----> 1/10 chance of getting it right no matter what!
Out of the 9 other doors the host reveals 8


So essentially you are either choosing 1 of two groups:
The group of one or the group of 9 (of which 8 have been revealed)

Therefore it is a 90% prob of getting it right if you switch!
There is no "dividing the chance by that added mount"!

To further illustrate my point, lets make the problem even bigger: say you to choose a number between 1 in a million. There is 1 random correct number.

Then someone (who obviously knows what the number is) says it is either your number or it is a different one they tell you. You would have to be absolutely insane to stick with your number because it is a 1/1000000 shot no matter what where as the other number is 999999/1000000



oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
July 23 2007 12:01 GMT
#75
well if the host only reveals 1 door, then it is as frits said. that the host always opens an empty door is the key to this problem.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Cambium
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States16368 Posts
July 23 2007 12:07 GMT
#76
On July 22 2007 13:53 zizou21 wrote:
ok i need someone to break this down and explain it to me because i am retarded

-3 guys go to a hotel which is 30 bucks a night, so they each pay 10
-the clerk forgets that its a special night or some bullshit and its only $25 a nyte
-he gives the bellboy $5 to give it to the 3 dudes which r prob renting a room for hot gay sex but thats irrelevant
-the bellboy rips them off and pockets 2$ and gives 1$ to each one

OK so they each payed 10$ at first but got 1$ back each ($9 x 3 = $27). the bellboy pocketed 2$

27 + 2 = 29! o noez wheres the missing dollar?

anyway i kno theres some kind of faulty calculation in there, but i just dont remember where and since im an idiot i cant figure it out. dont try to explain this to me by solving it backwards. I KNOW THERES NO MISSING DOLLAR, i just want to understand where and how the riddle tricks the reader

i know tl.net is here for my problems


I don't get why this makes sense...

Ok, they paid 9$ each, so they are out 27 dollars.

The bellboy takes 2$.

27-2=25, which is how much the room costs...
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
Cambium
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States16368 Posts
July 23 2007 12:17 GMT
#77
On July 23 2007 20:43 Frits wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2007 20:36 CharlieMurphy wrote:
Maybe I'm not sure how the show works but what I meant is: The first choice you make between 3 doors is 66% chance to win and a 33% chance to lose out of 3 doors. If you get a winner the first time and try to get the other winner which is now a 50/50 shot you've just made your odds worse because essentially its like you picked 2 doors at once, Which is going to be a fail at 83% of the time, correct? or is it 66%?



I still have no idea what you mean.

Here's how the show works:

-3 doors, 1 prize (so 33% of getting it right if picking a random).
-You pick 1 door.
-The host removes 1 of the remaining 2 doors, and you know he removed the one which isn't the one with a prize.

Now the question is this: Will he have more chance of winning if he switches or not.



answer: Yes he should, 66% of the other one being right, 33% of getting it right if he keeps the original pick


Nice how this turned into a Monty Hall problem.

I didn't really understand this problem until I read "Curious Incident of a Dog at a Nighttime" (or something like that).

IIRC, they used pictures to illustrate the problem, and it really cleared things up.

Like someone already mentioned above, if you switch, you'll win 66% of the time.

For instance, the boxes are:

L L W

You choose 1st box, host removes 2nd box, you switch, you win.
You choose 2nd box, host removes 1st box, you switch, you win.
You choose 3rd box, host removes either 1st or 2nd box, you switch, you lose.

So you win 2/3 of the time, and you lose 1/3 of the time.

Whereas if you don't switch

L L W

You choose 1st box, host removes 2nd box, you lose.
You choose 2nd box, host removes 1st box, you lose.
You choose 3rd box, host removes 1st or 2nd box, you win.

You lost 2/3 of the time, and you win 1/3 of the time.

By switching, you double your chance of winning.
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36374 Posts
July 23 2007 12:24 GMT
#78
it's easier if you visualize it with 100 doors

you pick door #1

host eliminates doors #2-99

would you switch to door #100 or would you stick with #1?
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
geometryb
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States1249 Posts
July 23 2007 12:27 GMT
#79
On July 23 2007 12:45 evanthebouncy! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2007 12:40 geometryb wrote:
if anyone needs more convincing, you can just write a program to run this 1,000 times.

in the first group, you make the person not switch.

in the second group, you make the person switch.

and keep track of how many times each person wins and see who wins more. this avoids all the thinking that makes my head hurt.


Or you can think this way:

You have 100000000000000000 boxes
You pick one, knowing you have 1/100000000000000000 chances
Host eliminate 999999999999998 boxes, 2 remains

You better switch.


if you want more experimental results then i guess.
Cambium
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States16368 Posts
Last Edited: 2007-07-23 12:45:14
July 23 2007 12:28 GMT
#80
On July 23 2007 20:56 [r]h_probe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 23 2007 20:17 Frits wrote:
On July 23 2007 11:56 Chill wrote:
On July 23 2007 11:43 Frits wrote:
The monty hall problem is a very simple riddle.

Choice 1 will always stay 33,3% no matter what they do, and there's sure to be a price. So the odds of the remaining doors together are 100%. So if you have 2 choices, and 1 is 33,3%, the other one has 66,6% chance of being the price. (100-33,3)

The case in which it wouldn't matter which door you took is when they take away one of the choices without knowing if that was the prize or not. (In which case it would be 33-33.)

Everyone here should be able to understand that.


Counter example:
Monty Hall with 10 doors. You can switch or not switch. Don't switch = 10% chance to win. By your explination above, switch should = 90%.


Nope it still counts, what you forgot is when adding doors, obviously you have to divide the chance by that added amount.

Choice 1 will be 10% no matter what they do like I said right? And there's still sure to be a price so:

100 - 10 = 90 % chance of ONE of the 8 doors left being the right one.

90/8 = 11,25% of getting it right when switching.


Wrong!

Look at it this way:
10 doors
You choose one door ----> 1/10 chance of getting it right no matter what!
Out of the 9 other doors the host reveals 8


So essentially you are either choosing 1 of two groups:
The group of one or the group of 9 (of which 8 have been revealed)

Therefore it is a 90% prob of getting it right if you switch!
There is no "dividing the chance by that added mount"!

To further illustrate my point, lets make the problem even bigger: say you to choose a number between 1 in a million. There is 1 random correct number.

Then someone (who obviously knows what the number is) says it is either your number or it is a different one they tell you. You would have to be absolutely insane to stick with your number because it is a 1/1000000 shot no matter what where as the other number is 999999/1000000



I don't understand the problem, do you guys reveal one more door or reveal eight more (say we have ten doors).

If you only reveal one more, it doesn't affect the total outcome whether you switch or you don't switch.

Say you have ten doors and one goat.

GGGGGGGGGC

If you don't switch, you have 10% chance of winning.

If you switch:
If you pick door 1-9, you switch, each case generates 9 more subcases, one that you win, and eight that you lose.
If you pick door 10, you switch, you have 9 more subcases, all of wich you lose.

So...
9/90 = 10%

Either way, switch or no switch, you have 10% chance of winning.


nvm, it still improves the probability slightly.

It's still 1/10 if you don't switch.

If you switch, since he kills a door,
You get a 1/8 probability of getting it right.

So...

9/80 which is 11.25% vs the original 10%

Same goes for 100 obviously

1% vs ( 99 / 980 = ) ~1.0102 %

So for 10 doors, what if we remove 2?

If we don't switch, still 10%

If we switch, now you have a 1/7 chance if you switch if you choose the wrong door first, which is 9/10. But we lose (0%) if we have the right one at first (so 1/10)
What's the probability? 9/70 = 0.129

What about three doors?

Still 10% if we don't switch,
but 9/60 = 15% if we do.

What about removing eight doors?
Still 10% if we don't switch,
If we do, after removing eight doors, we have only two doors left!
If our first door has a goat (9/10), then we win (100%)
If our first door has a car (1/10), then we lose (0%)

So, this gives us 90% chance to win ( 9/10 * 1 + 1/10 * 0 ).

In other words, if we don't switch, we are not taking advantage of the "removing a door" rule, by removing a door, we naturally increase our likelihood of winning.
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 32m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft559
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 1705
actioN 418
Leta 410
Zeus 138
Dewaltoss 58
Noble 33
ajuk12(nOOB) 26
Sacsri 22
soO 15
Britney 0
Dota 2
XcaliburYe141
BananaSlamJamma75
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K703
Other Games
summit1g8930
SortOf97
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1327
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Sammyuel 41
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt865
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
2h 32m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 3h
OSC
1d 6h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.