• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:03
CEST 15:03
KST 22:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202559RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 905 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3996

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3994 3995 3996 3997 3998 5125 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28665 Posts
July 07 2023 05:22 GMT
#79901
They do give puberty blockers in scandinavia, even Sweden still gives them despite their change in policy a few years back. (They're harder to get than they used to be though.)

So I'm not saying that the profit motive isn't a corrupting factor in the US, but the claim that puberty blockers and hrt wouldn't be a thing if America had socialized health care seems countered by both existing in countries that have socialized health care. Maybe the claim is that they wouldn't have been developed outside a for profit system I guess, that'd be logically consistent..
Moderator
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42653 Posts
July 07 2023 05:43 GMT
#79902
On July 07 2023 10:35 Falling wrote:
Yeeeah, we don't frame it that way because that is an... incredible... way of describing basic human processes. We also don't choose to be born, when to walk, we don't choose to turn on our language acquisition ability or to connect that synapse or prune the other one. The body has a developmental process that marches on so successfully that people have started calling the human race a virus of all things. The idea that that very successful process could be compared in any meaningful way as to the dangers of taking hard drugs really beggars belief. And quite frankly if puberty is a significant decision on par with taking hard drugs, shouldn't everybody be deferred until they are older to make such a life changing decision?

I also am rather doubtful that it's quite as simple as 'deferring' puberty as though we simply hit pause/ unpause, no consequences at all.

The body has a reproductive process that marches on so successfully that people have started calling the human race a virus of all things and yet we undo all of that with condoms because we're not animals. Evolutionary success of the species is not a good benchmark for social policy, that's why we don't work harder and harder every year to increase teen pregnancy rates.

We don't choose our own births as that would violate causality but we do choose when to give birth. Your own examples undermine your point. And as women will tell you, pregnancy is incredibly tough on the body, it would be reasonable to compare the seriousness of that decision with a decision to start doing hard drugs. Basic human processes can also be choices and they can be choices that have extremely significant consequences.

And yes, there likely is an argument to be made that teen puberty is probably not optimal in a world in which we could choose to defer it. We already use hormone blockers to treat precocious puberty in individuals whose bodies trigger puberty too young and nobody complains about that. It's just a question of how young is too young.

I'm not planning to legislate that we drug the population with hormone blockers to enforce delayed puberty on everyone but it's weird that people on the right are trying to force sex hormones on children who don't want them yet. Delaying it until they're older and able to make the right choice for themselves seems like the kind of thing people on the right would go for and yet they're desperate for confused 12 year olds to get flooded with hormones that make them stupid and sexually exploitable.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10495 Posts
July 07 2023 07:05 GMT
#79903
Using science to make drugs that can be given to children to delay the natural onset of puberty sounds very much not like something conservatives would go for
ZeroByte13
Profile Joined March 2022
765 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-07 07:31:48
July 07 2023 07:20 GMT
#79904
On July 07 2023 07:39 Mohdoo wrote:
No I'm saying if we released a patch tomorrow where the words were magically erased from English as if they never existed, nothing negative would occur.
John told Maria and Angela he needs to visit boss today.
John told Maria and Angela they need to visit boss today.
I see many, many cases when using he/she makes sentences like this much clearer, don't you agree?

Of course you could argue there are workaround, like using names.
John told Maria and Angela that John need to visit boss today. (sounds clumsy though)
John told Maria, Angela and Elena that Maria, Angela and Elena need to visit boss today. (super clumsy)

I'm pretty sure that if I was forced to not use he/she when talking to the people I know, it would make our communication significantly more complex and less clear.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42653 Posts
July 07 2023 07:25 GMT
#79905
On July 07 2023 16:05 BlackJack wrote:
Using science to make drugs that can be given to children to delay the natural onset of puberty sounds very much not like something conservatives would go for

Hormones are drugs. They're chemicals that your body reacts to. Just because your body makes them doesn't mean they're not, just like how insulin or adrenaline or endorphins are drugs.

With that in mind, hormone blockers seem more like anti-drugs than drugs to me. You take them and your body stays the same.

But either way, we're not talking about anything more than choice here. Giving people the choice over what chemicals they want ravaging their body and the option to not have any chemicals ravaging their body if they don't want them. Aren't you guys meant to like choice?
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Silvanel
Profile Blog Joined March 2003
Poland4726 Posts
July 07 2023 07:45 GMT
#79906
Most hormon blocking drugs are really hard on the body and have some really serious side effects (especially during puberty). They really shouldnt be given to anyone without proper medical reason.
Pathetic Greta hater.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42653 Posts
July 07 2023 07:51 GMT
#79907
On July 07 2023 16:45 Silvanel wrote:
Most hormon blocking drugs are really hard on the body and have some really serious side effects (especially during puberty). They really shouldnt be given to anyone without proper medical reason.

I'm not advocating for forcing them on anyone. I'm advocating against politicians in the US banning doctors from prescribing them to people who want them.

The American conservative movement believes that politicians have the right to decide medical care for trans kids. I disagree.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10495 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-07 08:08:55
July 07 2023 08:08 GMT
#79908
On July 07 2023 16:25 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2023 16:05 BlackJack wrote:
Using science to make drugs that can be given to children to delay the natural onset of puberty sounds very much not like something conservatives would go for

Hormones are drugs. They're chemicals that your body reacts to. Just because your body makes them doesn't mean they're not, just like how insulin or adrenaline or endorphins are drugs.

With that in mind, hormone blockers seem more like anti-drugs than drugs to me. You take them and your body stays the same.

But either way, we're not talking about anything more than choice here. Giving people the choice over what chemicals they want ravaging their body and the option to not have any chemicals ravaging their body if they don't want them. Aren't you guys meant to like choice?


Yes it does. Drugs are the things that are produced outside of the body and are then administered to the body to cause an affect. The insulin your pancreas produces is not a drug. You're usually Mr. "words have meanings." I remember you explaining to Stealthblue after he used the term recession incorrectly, "We have a bunch of different words with different meanings and it’s important to use the ones with meanings that match what we’re trying to say." But as soon as it serves your argument then suddenly naturally occurring hormones are "drugs" and women can have penises and men can get pregnant.
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3188 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-07 08:27:32
July 07 2023 08:12 GMT
#79909
On July 07 2023 16:25 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2023 16:05 BlackJack wrote:
Using science to make drugs that can be given to children to delay the natural onset of puberty sounds very much not like something conservatives would go for

Hormones are drugs. They're chemicals that your body reacts to. Just because your body makes them doesn't mean they're not, just like how insulin or adrenaline or endorphins are drugs.

With that in mind, hormone blockers seem more like anti-drugs than drugs to me. You take them and your body stays the same.

But either way, we're not talking about anything more than choice here. Giving people the choice over what chemicals they want ravaging their body and the option to not have any chemicals ravaging their body if they don't want them. Aren't you guys meant to like choice?

I don’t think you’re gonna get far with “they’re anti-drugs, not drugs.” Antagonists are kind of a big percentage of the pharmacopeia, I don’t think anybody would normally consider them “not really drugs” just because they’re blocking a receptor rather than activating it.

Puberty blockers are drugs like any other. They’re safe and effective, we’ve prescribed them for decades to kids for precocious puberty. Like any drug they’ve got side effects, and it’s up to patients and doctors (and patients’ parents, depending) to decide what’s best. If I thought puberty was going to do long-term damage to my body I might never fully undo, I’d probably consider the tradeoff worth it.

Some trans people take decades to figure out who they are, others are pretty confident about it at like age 5 and never really waver. In the latter case, I think forcing them to go through unwanted puberty because “what if they change their minds??? *clutches pearls*” is fucked. I understand a rule like “we’re gonna put you on puberty blockers for a year before we just jump straight into hormonal interventions,” but a blanket ban on childhood interventions would be fucking devastating for a lot of these kids.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42653 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-07 08:32:38
July 07 2023 08:24 GMT
#79910
On July 07 2023 17:08 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2023 16:25 KwarK wrote:
On July 07 2023 16:05 BlackJack wrote:
Using science to make drugs that can be given to children to delay the natural onset of puberty sounds very much not like something conservatives would go for

Hormones are drugs. They're chemicals that your body reacts to. Just because your body makes them doesn't mean they're not, just like how insulin or adrenaline or endorphins are drugs.

With that in mind, hormone blockers seem more like anti-drugs than drugs to me. You take them and your body stays the same.

But either way, we're not talking about anything more than choice here. Giving people the choice over what chemicals they want ravaging their body and the option to not have any chemicals ravaging their body if they don't want them. Aren't you guys meant to like choice?


Yes it does. Drugs are the things that are produced outside of the body and are then administered to the body to cause an affect. The insulin your pancreas produces is not a drug. You're usually Mr. "words have meanings." I remember you explaining to Stealthblue after he used the term recession incorrectly, "We have a bunch of different words with different meanings and it’s important to use the ones with meanings that match what we’re trying to say." But as soon as it serves your argument then suddenly naturally occurring hormones are "drugs" and women can have penises and men can get pregnant.

Words do have meanings but you’re not in charge of defining them.

That attempted gotcha is also completely irrelevant to my point. Call them chemicals that induce a physiological response if it makes you happier. The point is that these chemicals are extremely potent and permanently alter the physical and mental state of the children exposed to them.

Any argument that claims that these children are old enough to have their bodies ravaged by these chemicals must also concede that they’re old enough to not have their bodies ravaged by them.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
ZeroByte13
Profile Joined March 2022
765 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-07-07 08:46:50
July 07 2023 08:27 GMT
#79911
TBF, all definitions of drugs I've found so far say it's something you consume to have affect on your body, not something your body produces.
I.e. every definition I found says "given to a person", "consumed", "in order to have a desired effect", i.e. everything points at being created outside of the body.
I guess it's possible to find a definition that will mention "or produced by your body", but it seems like at least vast majority of definitions don't say that.

But definition of drugs was not the point of this discussion in general, I guess. So I (we) digress.
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10495 Posts
July 07 2023 08:48 GMT
#79912
On July 07 2023 17:24 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2023 17:08 BlackJack wrote:
On July 07 2023 16:25 KwarK wrote:
On July 07 2023 16:05 BlackJack wrote:
Using science to make drugs that can be given to children to delay the natural onset of puberty sounds very much not like something conservatives would go for

Hormones are drugs. They're chemicals that your body reacts to. Just because your body makes them doesn't mean they're not, just like how insulin or adrenaline or endorphins are drugs.

With that in mind, hormone blockers seem more like anti-drugs than drugs to me. You take them and your body stays the same.

But either way, we're not talking about anything more than choice here. Giving people the choice over what chemicals they want ravaging their body and the option to not have any chemicals ravaging their body if they don't want them. Aren't you guys meant to like choice?


Yes it does. Drugs are the things that are produced outside of the body and are then administered to the body to cause an affect. The insulin your pancreas produces is not a drug. You're usually Mr. "words have meanings." I remember you explaining to Stealthblue after he used the term recession incorrectly, "We have a bunch of different words with different meanings and it’s important to use the ones with meanings that match what we’re trying to say." But as soon as it serves your argument then suddenly naturally occurring hormones are "drugs" and women can have penises and men can get pregnant.

Words do have meanings but you’re not in charge of defining them.

That attempted gotcha is also completely irrelevant to my point. Call them chemicals that induce a physiological response if it makes you happier. The point is that these chemicals are extremely potent and permanently alter the physical and mental state of the children exposed to them.

Any argument that claims that these children are old enough to have their bodies ravaged by these chemicals must also concede that they’re old enough to not have their bodies ravaged by them.


That wasn't a gotcha. I was going for something between a "pwn the libs" and a "/mic drop."
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44302 Posts
July 07 2023 09:10 GMT
#79913
On July 07 2023 16:25 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2023 16:05 BlackJack wrote:
Using science to make drugs that can be given to children to delay the natural onset of puberty sounds very much not like something conservatives would go for

Hormones are drugs. They're chemicals that your body reacts to. Just because your body makes them doesn't mean they're not, just like how insulin or adrenaline or endorphins are drugs.

With that in mind, hormone blockers seem more like anti-drugs than drugs to me. You take them and your body stays the same.

But either way, we're not talking about anything more than choice here. Giving people the choice over what chemicals they want ravaging their body and the option to not have any chemicals ravaging their body if they don't want them. Aren't you guys meant to like choice?


I'm also a little hesitant to use the term "drugs" to describe hormones naturally produced within a body, perhaps because conversations about drugs tend towards decriminalization, legalization, over-the-counter medication, prescription, big pharma, and all those other buzzwords/topics. Hormones are chemicals and drugs have chemicals too (because just about everything is chemistry lol), but I'd distinguish between "naturally producing hormones" and "voluntarily taking drugs". Also, thankfully, I don't really think the semantics centering around using the term "drugs" makes or breaks your arguments or perspectives anyway, so it may not be a hill worth dying on, if it'll only end up derailing your points.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28665 Posts
July 07 2023 09:12 GMT
#79914
On July 07 2023 17:12 ChristianS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2023 16:25 KwarK wrote:
On July 07 2023 16:05 BlackJack wrote:
Using science to make drugs that can be given to children to delay the natural onset of puberty sounds very much not like something conservatives would go for

Hormones are drugs. They're chemicals that your body reacts to. Just because your body makes them doesn't mean they're not, just like how insulin or adrenaline or endorphins are drugs.

With that in mind, hormone blockers seem more like anti-drugs than drugs to me. You take them and your body stays the same.

But either way, we're not talking about anything more than choice here. Giving people the choice over what chemicals they want ravaging their body and the option to not have any chemicals ravaging their body if they don't want them. Aren't you guys meant to like choice?

I don’t think you’re gonna get far with “they’re anti-drugs, not drugs.” Antagonists are kind of a big percentage of the pharmacopeia, I don’t think anybody would normally consider them “not really drugs” just because they’re blocking a receptor rather than activating it.

Puberty blockers are drugs like any other. They’re safe and effective, we’ve prescribed them for decades to kids for precocious puberty. Like any drug they’ve got side effects, and it’s up to patients and doctors (and patients’ parents, depending) to decide what’s best. If I thought puberty was going to do long-term damage to my body I might never fully undo, I’d probably consider the tradeoff worth it.

Some trans people take decades to figure out who they are, others are pretty confident about it at like age 5 and never really waver. In the latter case, I think forcing them to go through unwanted puberty because “what if they change their minds??? *clutches pearls*” is fucked. I understand a rule like “we’re gonna put you on puberty blockers for a year before we just jump straight into hormonal interventions,” but a blanket ban on childhood interventions would be fucking devastating for a lot of these kids.


Yeah I think the central debate isn't whether puberty blockers and hormonal treatment should ever be administered, but when it should be and when it should not be. I don't think 'the science' is settled on this one. In Sweden they saw an uptick in girl's aged 13-17 who requested puberty blockers and they became more restrictive with administering them, under the reasoning that for girls who first reported a feeling of gender dysphoria at this age, more of them would regret treatment. However, for children who feel that way from they are 3 years old, it's basically never 'just a phase'.

Norway disagrees with Sweden and has become more liberal in the same time period. I'm not arguing either side. I think the 'when do children get full authority to make their own decisions' is a tricky question, and especially if it concerns undergoing treatment that should ideally be administered before they normally get to make decisions of that nature. Trusting the medical community is fine and reasonable, but this doesn't look like a global warming type of consensus, at the very least there will be individuals where some recommend treatment and others do not.

Moderator
Magic Powers
Profile Joined April 2012
Austria4091 Posts
July 07 2023 09:30 GMT
#79915
The key question is whether a person can lead a life worth living. Everything else is secondary. It doesn't matter if it's their own body or a foreign substance causing them harm.
If you want to do the right thing, 80% of your job is done if you don't do the wrong thing.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44302 Posts
July 07 2023 10:06 GMT
#79916
On July 07 2023 18:30 Magic Powers wrote:
The key question is whether a person can lead a life worth living. Everything else is secondary. It doesn't matter if it's their own body or a foreign substance causing them harm.


That's a fair point, and I do think we're all aware that there are risks and concerns attached to both scenarios: taking puberty blockers in the first place, as well as not allowing anyone to take puberty blockers at all. I hope that medical research continues to develop and let us know what the pros and cons are, as well as if there are ways to mitigate the risks to taking puberty blockers, so that more people can be comfortable taking (and letting their teenagers take) them, if the situation calls for it. I think people are even more cautious than usual because the target demographic is kids experiencing a significant medical decision, and parents may not understand the pros and cons of this whole conversation, especially if they're anti-trans and don't want to engage at all.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Uldridge
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium4764 Posts
July 07 2023 11:06 GMT
#79917
On July 07 2023 18:30 Magic Powers wrote:
The key question is whether a person can lead a life worth living. Everything else is secondary. It doesn't matter if it's their own body or a foreign substance causing them harm.


Big problem is that children, and humans in general, have difficulties with knowing what a change will do for their mental state in the long term.
I feel like regretting taking hormone blockers or HRT will have a long lasting impact on your mental state and there should be sufficient insight in the requestor before every party complies.
It's obviously going to be a subset, but a subset there needs to be a safety check built in for.
Taxes are for Terrans
Magic Powers
Profile Joined April 2012
Austria4091 Posts
July 07 2023 11:29 GMT
#79918
On July 07 2023 20:06 Uldridge wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2023 18:30 Magic Powers wrote:
The key question is whether a person can lead a life worth living. Everything else is secondary. It doesn't matter if it's their own body or a foreign substance causing them harm.


Big problem is that children, and humans in general, have difficulties with knowing what a change will do for their mental state in the long term.
I feel like regretting taking hormone blockers or HRT will have a long lasting impact on your mental state and there should be sufficient insight in the requestor before every party complies.
It's obviously going to be a subset, but a subset there needs to be a safety check built in for.


We have safety checks. The children are being evaluated numerous times throughout their journey, and they receive the combined protection of their parents and the psychiatrists treating them. What more can be done?
If you want to do the right thing, 80% of your job is done if you don't do the wrong thing.
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
July 07 2023 11:32 GMT
#79919
On July 07 2023 16:51 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2023 16:45 Silvanel wrote:
Most hormon blocking drugs are really hard on the body and have some really serious side effects (especially during puberty). They really shouldnt be given to anyone without proper medical reason.

I'm not advocating for forcing them on anyone. I'm advocating against politicians in the US banning doctors from prescribing them to people who want them.

The American conservative movement believes that politicians have the right to decide medical care for trans kids. I disagree.


Doctors are proven bad actors on this particular question.

If the guild of lobotomizers was somehow still considered respectable, there would be no difference between them and the AMA.
Freeeeeeedom
Silvanel
Profile Blog Joined March 2003
Poland4726 Posts
July 07 2023 11:35 GMT
#79920
@cLutZ
Can You elaborate a little? What do You mean that doctors "are proven bad actors"?
Pathetic Greta hater.
Prev 1 3994 3995 3996 3997 3998 5125 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
11:00
2025 - Final Day
Solar vs ClassicLIVE!
Cure vs TBD
Serral vs TBD
EWC_Arena13439
ComeBackTV 3169
TaKeTV 679
Hui .577
JimRising 304
Fuzer 263
3DClanTV 256
Rex251
EnkiAlexander 218
CranKy Ducklings127
Reynor108
BRAT_OK 62
SpeCial37
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena13002
Hui .577
JimRising 314
Fuzer 263
Rex 239
Reynor 116
UpATreeSC 56
BRAT_OK 55
SpeCial 36
StarCraft: Brood War
Nal_rA 5818
Horang2 5481
Shuttle 2743
Bisu 2128
BeSt 1207
Larva 921
EffOrt 877
Barracks 416
actioN 395
Mini 381
[ Show more ]
Stork 353
Soma 221
ggaemo 210
Snow 208
JYJ164
TY 125
Hyun 114
Soulkey 113
Backho 106
Rush 71
sorry 55
Sharp 46
sSak 33
Sacsri 19
Shinee 19
Aegong 14
soO 13
Terrorterran 12
Stormgate
BeoMulf76
Dota 2
Gorgc4160
XcaliburYe206
420jenkins105
KheZu93
League of Legends
febbydoto3
Counter-Strike
fl0m1669
sgares151
Other Games
gofns6887
singsing2104
B2W.Neo1367
Beastyqt620
ArmadaUGS102
QueenE82
KnowMe81
djWHEAT32
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV396
League of Legends
• Nemesis4690
Upcoming Events
OSC
57m
CranKy Ducklings
20h 57m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d
CSO Cup
1d 2h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 4h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 19h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
4 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.