US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1837
Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42685 Posts
| ||
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
Two Trump administration officials reportedly drafted a statement meant to be released by the Ukrainian government announcing investigations related to President Trump's political rivals in the U.S.The New York Times reported Thursday that Kurt Volker, Trump's former envoy to Ukraine who tendered his resignation last week, was involved in drafting the statement along with Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union (EU). The statement pledged Ukraine's support for an investigation into the energy company Burisma, where former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter sat on the board, as well as a probe into allegations that Ukrainian officials sought to help Hillary Clinton's campaign against Trump in 2016, the Times reported.The two officials reportedly drafted the statement in the weeks following a widely-scrutinized call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in late July during which Trump pressed the Ukrainian leader to open an investigation into Biden, the current Democratic presidential front-runner.It is not clear if the statement ever made it to Zelensky's desk, but a top aide to the Ukrainian leader was made aware of the drafted statement, the Times reported. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/464319-trump-officials-drafted-a-statement-for-ukraine-leader-pledging And Volker who was heared today, provided text messages that have a top diplomat saying that witholding aid for political campaigning was crazy, and then Sondland replied to him, nothing to see here, lets not talk about this on text any more. In newly disclosed text messages shared with Congress, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine writes to a group of other American diplomats that "I think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.” In the Sept. 9 exchange, obtained by ABC News, the concerns are expressed by Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat to Ukraine. Gordon Sondland, the United States Ambassador to the European Union, responds to Taylor, saying that charge is "incorrect." "Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump's intentions. The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelenskiy promised during his campaign," Sondland says. Sondland then suggests to the group take the conversations off line, typing, “I suggest we stop the back and forth by text.” It’s unclear whether the material obtained by ABC News included the full exchange. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/top-diplomat-ukraine-crazy-withhold-security-sasistance-political/story And WSJ says that Trump had the former ambassador to Ukraine removed, after complaints from Giuliani and others that she didn't want to work with them on getting Biden investigated. WASHINGTON—President Trump ordered the removal of the ambassador to Ukraine after months of complaints from allies outside the administration, including his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, that she was undermining him abroad and obstructing efforts to persuade Kyiv to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, according to people familiar with the matter. https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-ordered-ukraine-ambassador-removed-after-complaints-from-giuliani-others-11570137147 And because it's becoming a bit hard to deny, Trump now claims it all was his absolute right to do it all along | ||
Ben...
Canada3485 Posts
On October 04 2019 10:34 KwarK wrote: Does anyone know why Trump is tweeting images from Nickelback music videos and ramblings about moots? Asking for a concerned country. His behaviour today and yesterday has made it seem like his brain has gone into a meltdown of sorts. He barely makes any sense and seems to go into a rage rather quickly. But who knows. Maybe he's been like this behind the scenes for a long time, but now that he's lost basically everyone that will tell him no, he's not being prevented from bringing this side of him into public? Either way it's legitimately scary now. This guy is in charge of the most powerful military in the world and he's acting like a toddler. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44327 Posts
On October 04 2019 10:34 KwarK wrote: Does anyone know why Trump is tweeting images from Nickelback music videos and ramblings about moots? Asking for a concerned country. Every day he loses a bit more of the little sanity he has left. He's like the Dark Wanderer between Diablo 1 and 2, except he was never an actual hero or martyr. Border moats filled with snakes, alligators, and spikes? Is Mexico going to pay for that too? And I feel like we should be playing Collusion Bingo in our homes, as we currently have records of Trump and his buddies traitorously working with or trying to extort for their own personal gain: Russia, Ukraine, Australia, China, and Italy. Question though, because he's clearly scared of being impeached: Why does Trump care about being impeached, since he won't be removed from office? Here's what's likely to happen, imho: 1. The impeachment inquiry will lead to an impeachment vote, because of course it will (and it should); 2. House Democrats will (and should) impeach Trump; 3. Senate Republicans will not convict or remove Trump from office (especially because the vote isn't anonymous); 4. Trump will tell his constituents that he's still the best president of all time because he remains in power; 5. Trump's supporters will believe him, and very few will leave his side if they haven't already. So even though the impeachment process will be important historically and morally for the majority of Americans, I really don't see it weakening Trump's current base, or even making reelection any harder. (I think Trump's reelection will be almost entirely predicated on which Democratic candidate we elect in the primary to run against Trump.) | ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4332 Posts
On October 04 2019 10:34 KwarK wrote: Does anyone know why Trump is tweeting images from Nickelback music videos and ramblings about moots? Asking for a concerned country. Just showing how Biden lied about Ukraine, getting it out there.The video got 13 million views within the first 24 hours.If it was just a boring, serious video it’d maybe had got 2-3 million tops. Now - We’ve got Schiff making a dramaticised interpretation of the Transcript and Pelosi claiming on TV that those were Trumps own words.Even the interviewer Stephanopoulos had to tell her “Those were not the Presidents own words.”Dems just falling to pieces, absolute disaster for them. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_BleVqhw8Ps | ||
Sermokala
United States13927 Posts
On October 04 2019 13:35 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Just showing how Biden lied about Ukraine, getting it out there.The video got 13 million views within the first 24 hours.If it was just a boring, serious video it’d maybe had got 2-3 million tops. Now - We’ve got Schiff making a dramaticised interpretation of the Transcript and Pelosi claiming on TV that those were Trumps own words.Even the interviewer Stephanopoulos had to tell her “Those were not the Presidents own words.”Dems just falling to pieces, absolute disaster for them. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_BleVqhw8Ps Trump just admitted to everything the dems were acuseing him of. So what if Bidens and his son are actually corrupt its not what he'll be impeached over. Its that he withheld military aid to Ukraine to get them to publicly start an investigation against him. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15689 Posts
| ||
Biff The Understudy
France7889 Posts
On October 04 2019 13:35 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Just showing how Biden lied about Ukraine, getting it out there.The video got 13 million views within the first 24 hours.If it was just a boring, serious video it’d maybe had got 2-3 million tops. Now - We’ve got Schiff making a dramaticised interpretation of the Transcript and Pelosi claiming on TV that those were Trumps own words.Even the interviewer Stephanopoulos had to tell her “Those were not the Presidents own words.”Dems just falling to pieces, absolute disaster for them. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_BleVqhw8Ps I always understand better your opinions and your weird outlook on facts when I look at your sources. For your sanity and ours, why don't you get other sources than youtube channels called "GOP War room"? I mean, I don't know what quality of analysis you expect for yourself, but at least you probably want to be taken seriously. | ||
Biff The Understudy
France7889 Posts
On October 04 2019 11:16 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Every day he loses a bit more of the little sanity he has left. He's like the Dark Wanderer between Diablo 1 and 2, except he was never an actual hero or martyr. Border moats filled with snakes, alligators, and spikes? Is Mexico going to pay for that too? And I feel like we should be playing Collusion Bingo in our homes, as we currently have records of Trump and his buddies traitorously working with or trying to extort for their own personal gain: Russia, Ukraine, Australia, China, and Italy. Question though, because he's clearly scared of being impeached: Why does Trump care about being impeached, since he won't be removed from office? Here's what's likely to happen, imho: 1. The impeachment inquiry will lead to an impeachment vote, because of course it will (and it should); 2. House Democrats will (and should) impeach Trump; 3. Senate Republicans will not convict or remove Trump from office (especially because the vote isn't anonymous); 4. Trump will tell his constituents that he's still the best president of all time because he remains in power; 5. Trump's supporters will believe him, and very few will leave his side if they haven't already. So even though the impeachment process will be important historically and morally for the majority of Americans, I really don't see it weakening Trump's current base, or even making reelection any harder. (I think Trump's reelection will be almost entirely predicated on which Democratic candidate we elect in the primary to run against Trump.) It's weird that votes are not anonymous for a process like that. The similar process in France also requires two thirds of congresspeople votes but is anonymous. I hope that they change that in the future. At the moment no GOP official can do the right thing without committing utter political suicide. I don't believe in the integrity of most of those people, but right now the process ties their hands. | ||
Taelshin
Canada418 Posts
Feels like a desperate deflection to avoid actually addressing what Nettle's wrote in his post. Also I tried to find the full interview from ABC's YT channel but it seem's they themselves have clipped it, Perhaps in time they will release the full thing. | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21682 Posts
On October 04 2019 16:58 Taelshin wrote: Biden lying isn't relevant to the President threatening to withhold aid in exchange for an investigation into his political rivals, and it becomes less true with every country that Trump asks.@Biff, I looked at that link, its literally just the clip from ABC news with Pelosi and Stephanopoulos as described in NettleS post. What exactly is your issue with it? You can find clips from every main stream media source on random YT channels, if there's no added commentary I'm unsure why it matters. Feels like a desperate deflection to avoid actually addressing what Nettle's wrote in his post. Also I tried to find the full interview from ABC's YT channel but it seem's they themselves have clipped it, Perhaps in time they will release the full thing. The transcript is online, we can all read it, I have. Yes they are technically not the Presidents exacts words because the transcripts specifically say that to avoid them being used as evidence in court, to bad for Trump impeachment is not a court of law and the meaning of the text is clear enough. President Zelenskyy: ...I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost. ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes. The President: I would like you to do us a favor though... | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
Sent.
Poland9197 Posts
| ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44327 Posts
On October 04 2019 18:36 Dangermousecatdog wrote: I think one of the wierdest things about all this is Trump supporters thinking that what Trump did is fine. How can they possibly think this is fine? This is how autocracies happen in weak democracies. Should the Democrats use their control of American power and money and go after political rivals as well, when in power? I think that many of them see it as justified- and even necessary- through the lens of "Trump is just checking up on everything and vetting other people, like a responsible president, because there are so many serious issues and corrupt people out there", not realizing that what he's doing is exactly him being a corrupt person creating a host of serious issues. | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
![]()
micronesia
United States24680 Posts
| ||
farvacola
United States18826 Posts
| ||
Nouar
France3270 Posts
On October 04 2019 19:45 Dangermousecatdog wrote: I don't know, I really can't see how they think it is appropriate, unless they are anti-democracy. To use state power to denounce political opponents is exactly what autocrats do to retain power. It is the defining usage of state power that autocracies operate under. If Trump isn't removed, then it sets a dangerous precedent. Whoever is next in power will likely forever be in power, be it Republican or Democrat. And so American democracy dies. They are pro-Trump, not pro-democracy. It's akin to fanatism, a cult. Everything must be viewed through that lens. He is justified in doing so because the democrats want his skin, there will always be a justification in the eyes of a madman. What baffles me is the amount of people that are enthralled and still approve of him. Democracy, norms, acceptable behaviour... All of these are irrelevant as long as they target the object of the cult. It's even more improbable to me as it's a lot of humble americans, trusting a billionaire that swindled other people for a living, to "know them, care for them and save them". I shouldn't be surprised since there are already a lot of tele-evangelists/swindlers doing the same thing in the country. It's just so foreign to me... The others need to have impeccable behaviour, but everything is permitted for their Lord almighty. Even just following the law to target the boss is not acceptable (see the whistleblower. He followed all regulations, and even if he contacted Congress for guidance, it's hardly an issue. But in the eyes of Trump and minions, it's a traitor, and publicly advocating for him and his sources to be exposed as traitors/spies and dealt with by hanging is acceptable). The laws must be changed to accomodate, and all usual agreements are non-enforceable, and all loopholes are fair game. (not voting on justices, requiring the agreement of state senator to appoint judges, having all acting-whatever which means no background checks for anyone, not filling the SEC with people, blocking appointments to international court of justices etc etc) Indeed, the end of democracy. These are crazy times. | ||
ZerOCoolSC2
8983 Posts
U.S. employers added 136,000 jobs in September — a sign of continued resilience in the labor market amid growing signals that the economy is losing steam. The unemployment rate fell to 3.5% — the lowest since December 1969. Job gains for the two previous months were revised up by a total of 45,000. An index of manufacturing activity released on Tuesday showed the factory sector contracting for the second consecutive month. Factories shed 2,000 jobs in September. Source | ||
| ||