Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 Missing - Page 25
Forum Index > General Forum |
Takuma
146 Posts
| ||
HelpMeGetBetter
United States764 Posts
| ||
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On March 18 2014 07:12 HelpMeGetBetter wrote: Was there this much attention to the Air France plane? Were all these theories going around back then too? They found wreckage and bodies within a week. It was the Black Boxes that took 2 years to find. ( I believe they found them under 10,000 feet of water, which was part of the problem.) But they had flight tracking data almost to where it dropped in the water, but it was a big issue of "Why?" until just a few years ago. That one was a pretty freak & strange problem. | ||
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On March 18 2014 06:47 Takuma wrote: Turns out the plane may be in Iran. Post a source or at least some supporting evidence (beyond two Iranian passengers). There's enough stupid theories flying around already. | ||
buhearns
Austria23 Posts
Also look for "rcair1"s sanity checks (there's a newer one in the above posted thread - not the one in part 31). | ||
Dogfoodboy16
364 Posts
http://music.yahoo.com/news/courtney-love-thinks-she-may-found-missing-malaysian-201504477-rolling-stone.html | ||
r.Evo
Germany14080 Posts
Did Malaysian Airlines 370 disappear using SIA68/SQ68 (another 777)? Theory being discussed in various subreddits: /r/flying /r/news /r/aviation Someone explaining the whole thing with a detailed album. MH-370 in red, SIA68 in blue. | ||
Assault_1
Canada1950 Posts
| ||
TheFish7
United States2824 Posts
| ||
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
On March 18 2014 12:33 r.Evo wrote: I didn't see this over the last couple of pages so I'll throw it in here. Absolute worst case it's an example of explanations getting rather crazy. Did Malaysian Airlines 370 disappear using SIA68/SQ68 (another 777)? Theory being discussed in various subreddits: /r/flying /r/news /r/aviation Someone explaining the whole thing with a detailed album. MH-370 in red, SIA68 in blue. jesus...that's a crazy possibility but the worst part is it's not even out of the realm of reality. far out... | ||
ilikeredheads
Canada1995 Posts
On March 18 2014 12:33 r.Evo wrote: I didn't see this over the last couple of pages so I'll throw it in here. Absolute worst case it's an example of explanations getting rather crazy. Did Malaysian Airlines 370 disappear using SIA68/SQ68 (another 777)? Theory being discussed in various subreddits: /r/flying /r/news /r/aviation Someone explaining the whole thing with a detailed album. MH-370 in red, SIA68 in blue. Damn.....definitely crazy but not stupid idea. | ||
SidianTheBard
United States2474 Posts
| ||
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On March 18 2014 13:58 SidianTheBard wrote: Why do these planes even have the option to turn off radar / ACARS / whatever else that tracks their location? Just seems something like that shouldn't really have a deactivation option. cause logic man, logic. | ||
skyR
Canada13817 Posts
On March 18 2014 13:58 SidianTheBard wrote: Why do these planes even have the option to turn off radar / ACARS / whatever else that tracks their location? Just seems something like that shouldn't really have a deactivation option. Because they're electrical devices that are capable of causing a short. | ||
iTzSnypah
United States1738 Posts
| ||
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On March 18 2014 13:58 SidianTheBard wrote: Why do these planes even have the option to turn off radar / ACARS / whatever else that tracks their location? Just seems something like that shouldn't really have a deactivation option. Fires happen a lot more than hijacks. Still, you need to know what you're doing. As for the "hiding behind another plane" theory, the only problem is that it seems too perfectly logical, given the information we have. The hijacker(s) had an extremely detailed plan for Radar avoidance, took over the plane at the perfect time to "disappear", had some very specific reason to be tracking North through the Andaman Sea and knew that nearly all Active Military Radar is shut off during the Night. Plus, it's hard as hell to pick out a Plane from Spy-Sat data, especially at night, (can't use Light data at night), so picking that data out from two "stacked" planes makes it even harder. Now the question becomes if it stuck with the other flight all the way through India or just part of the way. Likeliest destination still seems to be one of the " 'Stans", as there's enough abandoned Soviet military sites that you could land the plane without much issue, without anyone being much the wiser. | ||
yyfpulls
United States2185 Posts
On March 18 2014 12:33 r.Evo wrote: I didn't see this over the last couple of pages so I'll throw it in here. Absolute worst case it's an example of explanations getting rather crazy. Did Malaysian Airlines 370 disappear using SIA68/SQ68 (another 777)? Theory being discussed in various subreddits: /r/flying /r/news /r/aviation Someone explaining the whole thing with a detailed album. MH-370 in red, SIA68 in blue. lol reminds me of Dark Knight Rises intro We're in Batman territory now. | ||
Antisocialmunky
United States5912 Posts
They reenacted the flight to confirm radar and ping data. They are also focusing on the northern arc now. | ||
Go0g3n
Russian Federation410 Posts
| ||
arbiter_md
Moldova1219 Posts
| ||
| ||