EPTWorld Chess Championship 2013 - Page 52
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Chess discussion continues here | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
| ||
|
Shock710
Australia6097 Posts
On November 16 2013 00:10 Jetaap wrote: This conference room is terrible, the sound is horrible and it's really hard to hear, not to mention the interview girl has a very thick accent. Edit: anand looks devastated though For me i think her accent is fine, its accented but clear. (plus :O shes extremely beautiful) | ||
|
chesshaha
United States1117 Posts
| ||
|
TAMinator
Australia2706 Posts
On November 16 2013 00:13 Shock710 wrote: For me i think her accent is fine, its accented but clear. (plus :O shes extremely beautiful) I'd play chess with her all day errday | ||
|
ne0lith
537 Posts
My dark knight rises whenever I see her. User was banned for this post. | ||
|
Figgy
Canada1788 Posts
On November 16 2013 00:12 kwizach wrote: I love how Anand's 45. ...Rc1+ happened RIGHT after this :-D Much easier to play out the games in your head when you have Houdini and Rybka shouting out Ra4 at you and telling you everything will be golden without you yourself having to look at the lines. Much much harder OTB after 2 hours of play against the best in the world. | ||
|
kwizach
3658 Posts
On November 16 2013 00:45 Figgy wrote: Much easier to play out the games in your head when you have Houdini and Rybka shouting out Ra4 at you and telling you everything will be golden without you yourself having to look at the lines. Much much harder OTB after 2 hours of play against the best in the world. Absolutely! I was simply amused by him making that statement just before the game took a major turn  | ||
|
Taekwon
United States8155 Posts
Cmon anand, fight back! | ||
|
urboss
Austria1223 Posts
On November 15 2013 23:18 Z-BosoN wrote: thanks^ As a side note, this shows how little I know of endgames, I have no idea why anands move was a blunder, even looking at the engine lines Guess I'll find out in 12 moves or something I don't think that even the players saw at that point that 45. Rc1+ was a blunder. Of course it's easy to look at the engine line and everyone's screaming "Blunder!". Mind that the engine shows you one out of hundreds of possible lines. All of those need to be calculated over the board. | ||
|
urboss
Austria1223 Posts
"Tarrasch said, 'before the endgame the gods have placed the middlegame.' Sadly for Anand, in the endgame the gods have placed Carlsen!" | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18416 Posts
| ||
|
urboss
Austria1223 Posts
45. ... Ra1! 46. ... Re1! 51. ... Re2! | ||
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21243 Posts
| ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
| ||
|
Kaal
Djibouti2514 Posts
| ||
|
KillerDucky
United States498 Posts
On November 16 2013 03:50 urboss wrote: The people on TCEC did a more thorough analysis and apparently Anand missed 3 (!) drawing chances: 45. ... Ra1! 46. ... Re1! 51. ... Re2! If Anand missed 3 drawing chances, does that mean Carlsen handed back 2 won games? Or more likely it just means Anand missed 3 chances to create a clear draw? | ||
|
Heteronomous
2 Posts
| ||
|
MacWorld
Sweden227 Posts
| ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
| ||
|
KillerDucky
United States498 Posts
| ||
| ||
