• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:42
CEST 16:42
KST 23:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon1[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent9Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway13
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues22LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris76
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues What happened to Singapore/Brazil servers?
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
The Korean Terminology Thread Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA) [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent FlaSh on ACS Winners being in ASL ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group B [ASL20] Ro16 Group A Is there English video for group selection for ASL BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Iron Harvest: 1920+ General RTS Discussion Thread Diablo IV S10 Infernal Tides Guide
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1457 users

UK Politics Mega-thread - Page 199

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 197 198 199 200 201 641 Next
In order to ensure that this thread meets TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we ask that everyone please adhere to this mod note.

Posts containing only Tweets or articles adds nothing to the discussions. Therefore, when providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments will be actioned upon.

All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting.

https://www.registertovote.service.gov.uk
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4337 Posts
July 06 2016 10:52 GMT
#3961
On July 06 2016 19:07 Dan HH wrote:
Poll shows Welsh voters now support EU membership
http://www.itv.com/news/wales/2016-07-05/poll-shows-welsh-voters-now-support-eu-membership/

Polls already shown to be wrong by both 2015 election and the eu referendum.
Cameron already said no second referendum.
And yes my mistake.TTIP not TTP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
July 06 2016 10:59 GMT
#3962
On July 06 2016 17:28 WhiteDog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 06 2016 16:55 RoomOfMush wrote:
On July 06 2016 15:53 WhiteDog wrote:
On July 06 2016 15:14 KwarK wrote:
On July 06 2016 15:08 WhiteDog wrote:
On July 06 2016 14:10 KwarK wrote:
On July 06 2016 13:59 WhiteDog wrote:
On July 06 2016 13:55 KwarK wrote:
On July 06 2016 13:45 WhiteDog wrote:
On July 06 2016 10:21 forsooth wrote:
[quote]
If the US wants the EU to fall apart, why did the Obama administration make a point of campaigning to keep the UK in the EU?

That's laughable, the two french at the source of the european union (Monnet and Schuman) were paid by american secret services... The european union is, in some way, the result of an american desire to see peace in europe. That's even more laughable considering modern US care less and less about europe, and has been switching its focus from us to south america and china.
Meanwhile biggest european leaders - De Gaulle, Churchill - didn't care about europe. De Gaulle famously called it "the machin" (the thing).

So apparently the housing market is crumbling in england because everybody is taking back its money.

In 1940 the Churchill government proposed a full political integration of Britain and France. He was very pro European integration although he didn't necessarily see Britain as being a part of it. Presenting Churchill as opposed to Europe is absurd, he was extremely interested in Europe and the European project. Anyone who knows anything about him knows that.

He took Victor Hugo's idea of a united state of europe in a speech, he was not, at all, invested in the creation of europe as it happened, and was rather dubious on its actual form. He clearly stated that he refused to be absorbed by europe, what do you need more ?
My guess is you take what you want in history.

Churchill thought Britain apart from Europe and wanted her and her Empire to do its own thing. However he was extremely in favor of political and economic integration and cooperation as the only way to end what appeared to be an endlessly repeating cycle of war between France and Germany as Europe struggled to reconcile the new superpower into the structure. I'm in the process of listening to his history of the Second World War which I'd highly recommend and much of the first book is dedicated to the failure of the Versailles peace and the structural causes of war in Europe, and what can be done to prevent it. The European Coal and Steel Community was in many ways his dream, the binding of the means of war of France, Germany and Benelux while Britain stands aloof. What Churchill didn't predict was the rapid fall from grace of Britain and the necessity for integration within that system as an equal partner.

In response to the edit, no, Churchill explicitly called for and was involved in designing the first institution of what became the EU. It's there in his own hand.

I don't understand : did he, at one point in his life argued for an integration of the UK in europe ? The answer is no, it's actually the opposite ; after hus participation to the first discussion on the european union he decided not to be part of it.

But he strongly believed that there should be a European Union.

Likz De Gaulle ("europe from atlantic to oural")... Or Hugo for that matter. It doesn't mean anything "a european union" - he never invested his country in this european union, and De Gaulle viewed this european union - not the dream of a partial unification of european people - as an administrative mess.

Because its not easy to do big governments. It takes time, trial and error. If you (as a country) are not happy with how the EU works you need to work on it to improve it. Leaving it does not help anyone.
Just because something is not perfect does not mean it can not improve. You need to work, work, work instead of cry, cry, cry.

Load of uninformed crap. Or maybe you see De Gaulle and Churchill as whiners. They didn't invest their countries in the EU for sovereignty reasons, nothing else.
Also, the inhability to actually change europe is one of the main argument for the brexit in my opinion. People have been saying this fot 30 years.

What part of my post was "uninformed"? It was all opinion and no facts anywhere. It is impossible to ever BE informed about that.
I said its hard to do big government and it takes lots of work to do it right. What is uninformed about that?

Do you at least understand that working together (in a general sense, not as the EU) is more beneficial than working against each other?
The EU might not be a good implementation of a bigger governing body, but that doesnt mean international cooperation is a bad thing.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9127 Posts
July 06 2016 10:59 GMT
#3963
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4337 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-06 12:04:28
July 06 2016 11:56 GMT
#3964
A few years back there was a gem from the independent regarding France showing just how "strong" the EU economies are.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/france-is-totally-bankrupt-french-jobs-minister-michel-sapin-embarrasses-francois-hollande-with-8471077.html

'France is totally bankrupt': French jobs minister Michel Sapin embarrasses Francois Hollande with shocking statement on state of the country's economy

Unexpected news came during a radio interview yesterday and calls into further question Hollande's controversial 'tax and spend' policies


Why be in an economic union with a totally bankrupt nation? Please tell me! Even the ministers admit it!


Also i appreciate Corbyns words regarding the Chilcot enquiry

Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour leader, begins by paying tribute to those killed, and to their relatives. He met some relatives yesterday, he says.

He says the report should not have taken this long.

He says the “overwhelming weight of international legal opinion” says the invasion was illegal.

It had devastating consequences, he says, fuelling terrorism and war across the region.

By any measure the invasion and occupation of Iraq “has been for many a catastrophe”.

He says it has led a break-down in trust in politics.

While the governing class got it wrong, many people got it right. Some 1.5m people marched against the war, he says.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10757 Posts
July 06 2016 12:30 GMT
#3965
You start with "a few years back".
I check my map and realise: France is still around.
+ French people/companies are still buying/selling stuff.


I wonder why anyone is even still answering you.
Tula
Profile Joined December 2010
Austria1544 Posts
July 06 2016 12:55 GMT
#3966
On July 06 2016 20:56 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
A few years back there was a gem from the independent regarding France showing just how "strong" the EU economies are.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/france-is-totally-bankrupt-french-jobs-minister-michel-sapin-embarrasses-francois-hollande-with-8471077.html
Show nested quote +

'France is totally bankrupt': French jobs minister Michel Sapin embarrasses Francois Hollande with shocking statement on state of the country's economy

Unexpected news came during a radio interview yesterday and calls into further question Hollande's controversial 'tax and spend' policies


Why be in an economic union with a totally bankrupt nation? Please tell me! Even the ministers admit it!


Also i appreciate Corbyns words regarding the Chilcot enquiry
Show nested quote +

Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour leader, begins by paying tribute to those killed, and to their relatives. He met some relatives yesterday, he says.

He says the report should not have taken this long.

He says the “overwhelming weight of international legal opinion” says the invasion was illegal.

It had devastating consequences, he says, fuelling terrorism and war across the region.

By any measure the invasion and occupation of Iraq “has been for many a catastrophe”.

He says it has led a break-down in trust in politics.

While the governing class got it wrong, many people got it right. Some 1.5m people marched against the war, he says.



You are aware that by the standards applied to that statement Britain would also have been "totally bankrupt" before Austerity started to work on reducing national debt? Most of the western nations would be bankrupt if they were private persons, but they aren't so people still borrow them money. Things become dicier if like Greece the market doesn't want to borrow them more money, but that has more to do with confidence in the country than any real numbers.

So wild guess which country just tanked the "confidence rating" ?
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
July 06 2016 13:12 GMT
#3967
On July 06 2016 21:55 Tula wrote:
So wild guess which country just tanked the "confidence rating" ?

Is it Hungary? I bet it is Hungary.
Shield
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Bulgaria4824 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-06 17:28:25
July 06 2016 17:24 GMT
#3968
It would have been funny if it wasn't for economical decline...

+ Show Spoiler +




Also, Michael Gove messed up...

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/michael-gove-twitter-insults_uk_577b8963e4b073366f0faf62

I can't help but think most of Brexit guys are complete morons who don't care about economy.
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
July 06 2016 18:11 GMT
#3969
On July 07 2016 02:24 Shield wrote:
It would have been funny if it wasn't for economical decline...

+ Show Spoiler +

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a6HNXtdvVQ


Also, Michael Gove messed up...

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/michael-gove-twitter-insults_uk_577b8963e4b073366f0faf62

I can't help but think most of Brexit guys are complete morons who don't care about economy.


The irony almost hurts.
Luolis
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
Finland7113 Posts
July 07 2016 00:03 GMT
#3970
To all Brexiters

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


User was warned for this post
pro cheese woman / Its never Sunny in Finland. Perkele / FinnishStarcraftTrivia
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-07 01:31:12
July 07 2016 01:30 GMT
#3971
To all the bitter europhiles, do please try to understand that we knew the pound would fall and that investment would slow in the short term. A mere three percent of leave voters named the economy as their primary concern as opposed to fifty-three percent for sovereignty. I know it must be tempting for you to blame the British people for this result, but nothing comes from nothing, and, shockingly, that includes mass popular discontent with a political institution. The EU is the primary cause of discontent with the EU. Obviously. They need to take responsibility.

The EU is a plastic construction that holds the institutions of ancient nations and the will of their peoples in contempt. Without very, very substantial scaling back of its ambitions, it has no future. The problem is that it is designed in such a way as to bypass the will of the people, and is populated with second-rate ideologues who put their dream of a united Europe first, every single time. The threat of Brexit was not enough to persuade them to scale back, and neither was research showing that the majority of people in Europe outside of the UK want to stop/reverse integration. So there will be no scaling back, and that leaves disintegration as the only option.

Short term economic instability is the price we have to pay for breaking loose from a broken organisation. That the British people decided to take this risk demonstrates:
a) Severe discontent with the EU and its practices.
b) Self confidence.
c) Principles overriding fear.
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
July 07 2016 07:45 GMT
#3972
On July 07 2016 10:30 bardtown wrote:
To all the bitter europhiles, do please try to understand that we knew the pound would fall and that investment would slow in the short term. A mere three percent of leave voters named the economy as their primary concern as opposed to fifty-three percent for sovereignty. I know it must be tempting for you to blame the British people for this result, but nothing comes from nothing, and, shockingly, that includes mass popular discontent with a political institution. The EU is the primary cause of discontent with the EU. Obviously. They need to take responsibility.

The EU is a plastic construction that holds the institutions of ancient nations and the will of their peoples in contempt. Without very, very substantial scaling back of its ambitions, it has no future. The problem is that it is designed in such a way as to bypass the will of the people, and is populated with second-rate ideologues who put their dream of a united Europe first, every single time. The threat of Brexit was not enough to persuade them to scale back, and neither was research showing that the majority of people in Europe outside of the UK want to stop/reverse integration. So there will be no scaling back, and that leaves disintegration as the only option.

Short term economic instability is the price we have to pay for breaking loose from a broken organisation. That the British people decided to take this risk demonstrates:
a) Severe discontent with the EU and its practices.
b) Self confidence.
c) Principles overriding fear.

Extremelly well said. This is exactly how I feel.
sorry for dem one liners
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10757 Posts
July 07 2016 07:56 GMT
#3973
In which way exactly did the eu attack your sovereignity and how does leaving it help with anything, assuming you don't want to cut off your market?

I get why people voted like this, but i also think it was shortsighted and either will harm the UK badly or the UK won't gain barely any sovereignity while losing your voice in the EU parlament/comission (like switzerland or norway).
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-07 09:07:38
July 07 2016 09:04 GMT
#3974
shortsighted is to assume EU union won't evolve.
Ex: assume EU won't get/have an army, won't have conscription, won't start proxy wars to serve EU corporation interests.
ARE YOU PRO WAR!?!?!?!...
(ps: Juncker asshole is probably still sore from losing the Middle East because he didn't have an army)

if i were UK right now(a ruler of), i'd make it a tax heaven and put switz out of business; move the whole Panama fiscal fiasco in London too.
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
Deleted User 101379
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
4849 Posts
July 07 2016 09:10 GMT
#3975
On July 07 2016 18:04 xM(Z wrote:
shortsighted is to assume EU union won't evolve.
Ex: assume EU won't get/have an army, won't have conscription, won't start proxy wars to serve EU corporation interests.
ARE YOU PRO WAR!?!?!?!...
(ps: Juncker asshole is probably still sore from losing the Middle East because he didn't have an army)

if i were UK right now(a ruler of), i'd make it a tax heaven and put switz out of business; move the whole Panama fiscal fiasco in London too.


I have trouble parsing this post. Can you elaborate please?
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
July 07 2016 09:12 GMT
#3976
which part?
During an interview on 8 March, Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said that the EU needed its own military, in order to deal with the Russian threat, as well as to restore the bloc’s standing around the world.

Not everyone agrees. Germany and France support Juncker’s idea, while Poland, Romania, the Czech Republic and Slovakia insist that NATO should remain the guarantor of security on the European continent. The EurActiv network reports.
http://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/uk-central-europe-frown-at-juncker-s-european-army/
they will make an army eventually.
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4337 Posts
July 07 2016 09:23 GMT
#3977
Yes, EU army is on the cards.
Remove national armies and replace with an EU army makes it far harder for countries to leave the EU.
This is also why they are calling for all countries within the EU that do not currently use the Euro to start using it, to make it harder for them to leave.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9127 Posts
July 07 2016 10:16 GMT
#3978
On July 07 2016 10:30 bardtown wrote:
To all the bitter europhiles, do please try to understand that we knew the pound would fall and that investment would slow in the short term. A mere three percent of leave voters named the economy as their primary concern as opposed to fifty-three percent for sovereignty. I know it must be tempting for you to blame the British people for this result, but nothing comes from nothing, and, shockingly, that includes mass popular discontent with a political institution. The EU is the primary cause of discontent with the EU. Obviously. They need to take responsibility.

The EU is a plastic construction that holds the institutions of ancient nations and the will of their peoples in contempt. Without very, very substantial scaling back of its ambitions, it has no future. The problem is that it is designed in such a way as to bypass the will of the people, and is populated with second-rate ideologues who put their dream of a united Europe first, every single time. The threat of Brexit was not enough to persuade them to scale back, and neither was research showing that the majority of people in Europe outside of the UK [want to stop/reverse integration. So there will be no scaling back, and that leaves disintegration as the only option.

Short term economic instability is the price we have to pay for breaking loose from a broken organisation. That the British people decided to take this risk demonstrates:
a) Severe discontent with the EU and its practices.
b) Self confidence.
c) Principles overriding fear.

Is it though? I don't think Britain is an outlier because your people care more about 'sovereignty' than other EU members. But it might have something to do with the fact that British people rank dead last in knowing even the most basic things about what the EU is and does: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb83/eb83_publ_en.pdf

And it definitely has something to do with the fact that no other member's media publishes as many lies about the EU, with no loss in circulation regardless of how many hundreds of claims are undeniably proven lies: http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/06/daily-chart-15

Or how about the myriad of stories like this of people thinking this vote was about muslim immigration? When according to the last Eurobarometer the UK has 48% positive / 46% negative opinion of EU migrants, but 39% positive / 55% negative opinion of non-EU migrants? http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb83/eb83_anx_en.pdf

But worst of all is that all the leave arguments were things that can only happen if you leave EEA, not just EU. But this referendum was only about EU and that will be used by your political class to keep you in EEA. There will never be a referendum to leave EEA. Why are we even talking about muh sovereignty and migration when at best this will get you a pass to some fishing and agricultural regulations.

I'm not suggesting that there aren't legitimate reasons to leave the EU, but I don't think you're even convincing yourself that this was an informed vote rather than an emotional vote, let alone convince others..
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-07 11:39:19
July 07 2016 11:29 GMT
#3979
On July 07 2016 19:16 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 07 2016 10:30 bardtown wrote:
To all the bitter europhiles, do please try to understand that we knew the pound would fall and that investment would slow in the short term. A mere three percent of leave voters named the economy as their primary concern as opposed to fifty-three percent for sovereignty. I know it must be tempting for you to blame the British people for this result, but nothing comes from nothing, and, shockingly, that includes mass popular discontent with a political institution. The EU is the primary cause of discontent with the EU. Obviously. They need to take responsibility.

The EU is a plastic construction that holds the institutions of ancient nations and the will of their peoples in contempt. Without very, very substantial scaling back of its ambitions, it has no future. The problem is that it is designed in such a way as to bypass the will of the people, and is populated with second-rate ideologues who put their dream of a united Europe first, every single time. The threat of Brexit was not enough to persuade them to scale back, and neither was research showing that the majority of people in Europe outside of the UK [want to stop/reverse integration. So there will be no scaling back, and that leaves disintegration as the only option.

Short term economic instability is the price we have to pay for breaking loose from a broken organisation. That the British people decided to take this risk demonstrates:
a) Severe discontent with the EU and its practices.
b) Self confidence.
c) Principles overriding fear.

Is it though? I don't think Britain is an outlier because your people care more about 'sovereignty' than other EU members. But it might have something to do with the fact that British people rank dead last in knowing even the most basic things about what the EU is and does: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb83/eb83_publ_en.pdf

And it definitely has something to do with the fact that no other member's media publishes as many lies about the EU, with no loss in circulation regardless of how many hundreds of claims are undeniably proven lies: http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/06/daily-chart-15

Or how about the myriad of stories like this of people thinking this vote was about muslim immigration? When according to the last Eurobarometer the UK has 48% positive / 46% negative opinion of EU migrants, but 39% positive / 55% negative opinion of non-EU migrants? http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb83/eb83_anx_en.pdf

But worst of all is that all the leave arguments were things that can only happen if you leave EEA, not just EU. But this referendum was only about EU and that will be used by your political class to keep you in EEA. There will never be a referendum to leave EEA. Why are we even talking about muh sovereignty and migration when at best this will get you a pass to some fishing and agricultural regulations.

I'm not suggesting that there aren't legitimate reasons to leave the EU, but I don't think you're even convincing yourself that this was an informed vote rather than an emotional vote, let alone convince others..

Really most anti brexit arguments have been stupid to a point ... Another posters asked me "do you believe it's positive to work with others ?" like it's really relevant to the subject, and now your argument is "You are dumb and uninformed".
Yeah most basic citizens do not understand the complicated mess that is the EU and is uninformed on it. And why is it so ? It has a lot to do with how the EU is structured, with all those acronyms for every new plan / institution and whatelse, even the separation of powers in the european union is unclear, as powers are shared between institutions rather than split like in all other state.
This administrative mess is also a serious grievance towards the EU, and the lack of information / simple understading of the EU is also a reason to vote against it.

PS : I have a little news for you, people were also uninformed on the EU when they voted for it.
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
Deleuze
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United Kingdom2102 Posts
July 07 2016 11:42 GMT
#3980
the lack of information / simple understading of the EU is also a reason to vote against it.


No. That is a reason get off your backside and learn about it.

"I don't know about something, therefore I am against it."

Has it really come to this.
“An image of thought called philosophy has been formed historically and it effectively stops people from thinking.” ― Gilles Deleuze, Dialogues II
Prev 1 197 198 199 200 201 641 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 19m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 416
mouzHeroMarine 373
IndyStarCraft 157
goblin 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 62249
Rain 4528
Bisu 3759
Flash 2692
Shuttle 2029
Larva 746
Mini 727
firebathero 678
BeSt 677
Light 652
[ Show more ]
EffOrt 573
Stork 419
hero 313
Barracks 307
sSak 260
actioN 247
Rush 171
Soma 159
Snow 111
Mong 87
Mind 75
Nal_rA 55
PianO 52
TY 43
Backho 40
Sharp 33
sorry 25
Yoon 23
Sacsri 21
Terrorterran 17
scan(afreeca) 16
soO 16
HiyA 11
Noble 10
yabsab 9
Shine 8
Rock 7
sas.Sziky 3
Dota 2
Gorgc6897
qojqva3306
Dendi1441
League of Legends
Reynor66
Counter-Strike
zeus833
ScreaM775
byalli328
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude29
amsayoshi17
Westballz3
Other Games
hiko983
crisheroes438
DeMusliM418
Happy240
Hui .228
ArmadaUGS203
Liquid`VortiX129
QueenE62
KnowMe53
SortOf52
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick734
StarCraft 2
CranKy Ducklings144
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3557
• Jankos1099
• TFBlade421
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h 19m
Moja vs Babymarine
Solar vs TBD
sOs vs goblin
Nice vs INexorable
sebesdes vs Iba
Nicoract vs TBD
NightMare vs TBD
OSC
9h 19m
ReBellioN vs PAPI
Spirit vs TBD
Percival vs TBD
TriGGeR vs TBD
Shameless vs UedSoldier
Cham vs TBD
Harstem vs TBD
RSL Revival
19h 19m
Cure vs SHIN
Reynor vs Zoun
Kung Fu Cup
21h 19m
The PondCast
22h 19m
RSL Revival
1d 19h
Classic vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Maru
Online Event
1d 21h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 21h
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
Maestros of the Game
2 days
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Clem vs herO
Serral vs Bunny
Reynor vs Zoun
Cosmonarchy
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
BSL Team Wars
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Copa Latinoamericana 4
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.