| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
PepsiMaxxxx
Sweden5452 Posts
On March 29 2013 13:56 SheepleArePeopleToo wrote: Thousands of North Koreans have turned out for a mass rally at the main square in Pyongyang in support of their leader's call to arms. - AP http://live.reuters.com/Event/North_Korea I hope you realize that the people are forced to participate in these kind of events. | ||
|
SheepleArePeopleToo
Sweden73 Posts
On March 29 2013 15:27 PepsiMaxxxx wrote: I hope you realize that the people are forced to participate in these kind of events. REALLY? STOP THE PRESSES! | ||
|
Blargh
United States2103 Posts
| ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
On March 29 2013 15:27 PepsiMaxxxx wrote: I hope you realize that the people are forced to participate in these kind of events. You aren't forced. There's a recommendation that you attend out of respect for the great leader. Slight difference. | ||
|
Bermuda
Belgium411 Posts
On March 29 2013 15:35 Amui wrote: You aren't forced. There's a recommendation that you attend out of respect for the great leader. Slight difference. And those who don't follow said recommandations, realise how wrong they were and usually suicide out of shame. | ||
|
Deleted User 183001
2939 Posts
On March 29 2013 09:55 EonuS wrote: Assassination of the leader would immediately start the war and is the worst case scenario to solve anything. He has orders planned for his generals in case something like this happens, someone else will take in charge and use nukes regardless. You are far too biased towards US though In WW1, the assassination of Franz of just the excuse to kick off a war that was a long time brewing. It was a Serbian terrorist group, but the war wasn't even between Austro-Hungary and Serbia (even though Serbian govt. wasn't behind it). It was every single European country that was mobilized for war and wanted an excuse to go to it. Now the assassination of Kim would be even more extreme, because it would be the government of the US assassinating the leader of a foreign country. That's not some event to make an excuse out of, that would be a direct act of war by the United States. We'd be the bad guys in this case, and while we are an imperial power, that's the stupid way to be going about doing things. We already have very low standing in the world as is, despite all the attempts at PR and bs'ing we do to try and change it. | ||
|
nttea
Sweden4353 Posts
On March 29 2013 15:53 Bermuda wrote: And those who don't follow said recommandations, realise how wrong they were and usually suicide out of shame. Or sign up for voluntary workcamp! | ||
|
DrCooper
Germany261 Posts
| ||
|
kamicom
United States180 Posts
I hope this isn't as trivial as it sounds, but why is it that ALL the photos regarding N. Korea have Kim Jong-Un as their centerpiece with officials smiling around him and guiding or showing him something? I know there are some weird respect rules like don't stand in front of the leader etc., but I don't understand it. Also DrCooper, I don't think your poker analogy is completely fit. It's more like the bluffer is going all-in against the entire table with the smallest stack under the gun. And that's not even the case since N. Korea knows if they actually initiate something, they're completely fucked. | ||
|
robson1
3632 Posts
| ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
| ||
|
jellyjello
Korea (South)664 Posts
On March 29 2013 10:51 Taekwon wrote: He's not crazy. He's smart. A maaaaaajor problem with a lot of cosmopolitan citizens: they lack the perspicacity to look through things from a bigger framework. War isn't about fighting anymore - in fact, winning or hegemony isn't about war anymore. Trust me, it's not lost on anyone outside of North Korea that they'd get obliterated if they so much as engage in any form of military engagement with the United States. The question is one of proliferation and of regional tensions. The nuclear test just conducted is North Korea's first uranium bomb (though not highly enriched). In other words, they have both capacities to produce Plutonium and Uranium technologies. Progress is now mostly a matter of whether or not they develop cruise and ballistic missiles capable of carrying these weapons (or progressing in making better bombs which is unlikely). The reason US/EU policy makers are worried about North Korea/Iran getting their hands on nukes isn't because they fear that they'd inanely try and shoot their nukes at New York. They're worried about selling the technology. Dr. AQ did the honors for Pakistan, and USSR gave North Korea hot cells to do plutonium separation. These are easily usable and regimentable technologies. The concern for genuine nuclear terror is also false. However, in what scenario would it be possibly good to have more and more states propagating nuclear weapons left and right? Kim Jong Un, young though as he may be, has all the cards he needs to pretend brinkmanship for a few more years.Unless you're part of the Kenneth Waltz school of nuclear optimism, any test is gawd awful news. North Korea, while incapable of espousing a nuke to an ICBM, they can easily marry a nuke to a centi-mile missile. In other words, South Korea and Japan are in danger. So what would they think? It becomes a question of US credibility and their nuclear umbrella - something that we clearly will not use. Does that mean we're going to use our tripwire troops in Fukashima and South Korea? Heck no. Thus, South Korea and Japan will push for belligerent policies, relations grow truculent and missile defense becomes questioned policy again. So? China freaks out. And that's never good news for reasons I certainly do NOT need to elaborate on. This scenario is all the more likely especially considering how the Senkaku islands dispute is going. Furthermore, Abe Shinjo is now the new PM of the Japanese diet and he is pretty much as war hawk as you get in Japan. He's pushing for the eradication of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution. He really isn't helping considering citizens in Japan that support getting rid of A9 is close to 50% now. You are correct in the assessment of the accountability of the nuclear warhead, but the bigger picture is that China is finally getting fed up with supporting NK policies. The problem is not whether there will be a war between US and NK, but rather where do China and Russia stand in all this shit storm. It's clear that the new leader of NK doesn't quite have the support that his dad used to have. Never imagined that US would actually send two B-2 bomers to SK, and that was only possible because both China and Russia gave it a green light. | ||
|
Shinta)
United States1716 Posts
On March 28 2013 06:17 micronesia wrote: I'm not sure if this was an attempt to disagree with me or if you were just adding some perspective. Keep in mind that a lot of what we know now about Japan was not common knowledge until after the war ended. The allies during WW2 disagreed with you apparently. It's a good thing you have a tremendous amount of credibility on the topic so I can just believe you over them. You are making it pretty clear that absolutely nothing can be said to you, and absolutely no facts would be able to change your mind on this issue so there's no more point in discussing it (not that this thread is the ideal place to discuss it anyway, despite it being marginally relevant). No it is not common sense. It is your own personal theory (not that you are the only person who feels this way, I'm sure). Telling me to look up the source proves that you are full of shit. I like your logic. Yeah I did agree with you about one thing. It is completely true that there were many better options that the US could have taken, and it wasn't the Allies that disagreed with me, it was the US and their own personal goals. You don't have to discuss anything with me, but that doesn't change the validity of my statements. Give me some "facts" that could change my mind, but keep in mind they should be some that can actually change my mind. Not just facts that defend the same US standpoints that I'm criticizing. And if you don't want to look something up that you don't know, you're the one that's "full of shit". Sorry for the harsh language, just quoting your words sir. | ||
|
ImFromPortugal
Portugal1368 Posts
BREAKING: North Korean Photo Reveals ‘U.S. Mainland Strike Plan’ Information revealed in official North Korean military photo shows would-be U.S. attack http://www.nknews.org/2013/03/breaking-north-korean-photo-reveals-u-s-mainland-strike-plan/ | ||
|
Technique
Netherlands1542 Posts
On March 29 2013 20:49 ImFromPortugal wrote: BREAKING: North Korean Photo Reveals ‘U.S. Mainland Strike Plan’ Information revealed in official North Korean military photo shows would-be U.S. attack http://www.nknews.org/2013/03/breaking-north-korean-photo-reveals-u-s-mainland-strike-plan/ About as serious as the American president in this picture. ![[image loading]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qW-msRGSIpY/TWLt29b3LXI/AAAAAAAAAAU/_vxBudParGA/s1600/game01b.jpg) | ||
|
DMKraft
476 Posts
On March 29 2013 20:49 ImFromPortugal wrote: BREAKING: North Korean Photo Reveals ‘U.S. Mainland Strike Plan’ Information revealed in official North Korean military photo shows would-be U.S. attack http://www.nknews.org/2013/03/breaking-north-korean-photo-reveals-u-s-mainland-strike-plan/ Does NK know that just by using google maps you can work out it is about 30% less distance to hit the east coast if they go over the arctic? NK Scientists: NO WAY straight lines are the shortest route, I check it with a ruler on my map. DW NY I think you are safe. Also do those hats get bigger each year? Or is it a rank thing? | ||
|
ImFromPortugal
Portugal1368 Posts
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/n-korea-warns-rockets-are-ready-to-settle-accounts-with-us.php | ||
|
DonKey_
Liechtenstein1356 Posts
On March 29 2013 20:49 ImFromPortugal wrote: BREAKING: North Korean Photo Reveals ‘U.S. Mainland Strike Plan’ Information revealed in official North Korean military photo shows would-be U.S. attack http://www.nknews.org/2013/03/breaking-north-korean-photo-reveals-u-s-mainland-strike-plan/ Hmmm the most important information I got out of those photos was that Kim Jung Un uses an Apple computer. Very interesting. | ||
|
Pik
Germany176 Posts
On March 29 2013 21:31 DonKey_ wrote: Hmmm the most important information I got out of those photos was that Kim Jung Un uses an Apple computer. Very interesting. So Steve Jobs was really a North Korean Spy!!! I knew it... | ||
Zandar
Netherlands1541 Posts
On March 29 2013 21:31 DonKey_ wrote: Hmmm the most important information I got out of those photos was that Kim Jung Un uses an Apple computer. Very interesting. Well in all fairness, when you hear Apple zealots praising Steve Jobs, or North Koreans talking about their beloved leader, it's not all that different  | ||
| ||
The PiG Daily
Best Games of HSC
Lambo vs SKillous
uThermal vs Gerald
SKillous vs Serral
ShoWTimE vs Arrogfire
Clem vs Elazer
Reynor vs Jumy
PiGStarcraft603
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
CranKy Ducklings
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Jaedong
YSC vs hero
SC Evo League
ByuN vs Classic
Cure vs Solar
IPSL
Dragon vs Ret
Patches Events
RSL Revival
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
Bonyth vs Hawk
GSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
