EPTOn September 26 2012 08:00 jinorazi wrote:
i'd rather eat healthy and exercise
i'd rather eat healthy and exercise
Might not save you anyway.
[Trade] Your balls for 15 more years of life - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Grettin
42414 Posts
Might not save you anyway. | ||
|
TangYiChen
Korea (South)195 Posts
| ||
|
AngryMag
Germany1040 Posts
On September 26 2012 08:18 Frozenhelfire wrote: I find my balls pretty inconvenient and they get in the way. I don't plan on having kids, so I'd probably do this if I knew it had no affect on orgasms or other chemical / hormonal balances. Dude, you won't have much ink left in your pen without balls, you wouldn't need to worry about orgasms. What did you do in biology classes all these years for fucks sake... | ||
|
Orek
1665 Posts
On September 26 2012 07:55 Blazinghand wrote: I don't think I'd have the balls to make a decision like that. Q.E.D. case closed gg wp | ||
|
Vorgrim
Korea (North)1601 Posts
| ||
|
AdamBanks
Canada996 Posts
On September 26 2012 08:27 Vorgrim wrote: Balls are worth a lot more than 15 years. tell me that when ur on your death bed and I might believe some of you guys. | ||
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
For making a decision to not have kids, yep. If only you could tack on those 15 years between 18 and 30, so as to turn 30 after having spent 45 years of relative youth. | ||
|
AdamBanks
Canada996 Posts
On September 26 2012 08:22 AngryMag wrote: Dude, you won't have much ink left in your pen without balls, you wouldn't need to worry about orgasms. What did you do in biology classes all these years for fucks sake... actually most of the fluid in jack comes from the prostate not your balls. Bio ftl. | ||
|
Lokian
United States699 Posts
anyways, this is korean research, which are derived from superstition and folklore. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On September 26 2012 08:30 AdamBanks wrote: tell me that when ur on your death bed and I might believe some of you guys. If I'm surrounded by my children and grandchildren I'd gladly say it. | ||
|
AngryMag
Germany1040 Posts
On September 26 2012 08:33 AdamBanks wrote: actually most of the fluid in jack comes from the prostate not your balls. Bio ftl. you won't have sexual drive without balls..... you don't get horny in the first place... | ||
|
AdamBanks
Canada996 Posts
On September 26 2012 08:35 AngryMag wrote: you won't have sexual drive without balls..... you don't get horny in the first place... testosterone therapy. | ||
|
Vorgrim
Korea (North)1601 Posts
On September 26 2012 08:30 AdamBanks wrote: tell me that when ur on your death bed and I might believe some of you guys. Your balls must not be as magnificent as mine. My condolences, Adam. | ||
|
Forikorder
Canada8840 Posts
On September 26 2012 07:55 Blazinghand wrote: I don't think I'd have the balls to make a decision like that. whoever could really answer that is simply nuts | ||
|
Lokian
United States699 Posts
what is the point of increasing ur hormones when the reason ur balls are cut off is to lower them. | ||
|
AngryMag
Germany1040 Posts
nah, why would you change a winning team? | ||
|
dannystarcraft
United States179 Posts
On September 26 2012 08:12 wozzot wrote: This is quite a ballsy extrapolation to make about 3 billion people based on studying 81 eunuchs from a specific culture at a specific time period. If some source of biological causation that could be found that testified to a link between testosterone production and a massive loss of lifespan, this could be a seminal paper that could promote great academic fecundity in the medical field. It wouldn't erect a penetrative new foundation, but it would nevertheless be significantly large. However, without it, this research will most likely turn limp and end up going nowhere. The castrati study already appears to neuter the claims that these Korean scientists are making, and it's uncertain whether this research will stay hard or snap in half under further scrutiny. Yes! I agree completely. As to the thread, I will die young if this be the case. | ||
|
Orek
1665 Posts
| ||
|
s_Evil
Netherlands18 Posts
On September 26 2012 08:22 AngryMag wrote: Dude, you won't have much ink left in your pen without balls, you wouldn't need to worry about orgasms. What did you do in biology classes all these years for fucks sake... Actually you are the one who did not pay attention in biology class... Even castrated men can get orgasms since testosterone /balls are not required to get one. Your ejaculate would be of minimal volume (not zero, since part of it is created by your prostate) and not contain any sperm but the feeling would be the same. | ||
| ||
