|
On September 18 2012 03:27 NeMeSiS3 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 03:26 ayaz2810 wrote:On September 18 2012 03:10 Gene wrote:On September 18 2012 03:08 ayaz2810 wrote:
People realize that we're genetically predisposed to like teenage girls right? There's nothing disgusting about it. It's fucking biology. I wouldn't fault a 25 year old dude from saying a 15 year old girl is hot. Acting on those urges on the other hand......
So stupid to be upset about. You can't argue biology. Chill out.
CP though..... burn in hell for that. Oh is that how it is? How young would you go then before you would argue against it? I feel more enlightened already Probably before sexual maturity? You know.... when they're still children? That's kind of how it works smartass. Actual sexual maturity is around 12-14 isn't it? I don't think going that low is correct unless we mean different things when we think of sexual maturity. Maybe I'm wrong though.
Sounds about right.
EDIT: You think cavemen didn't have sex with 12-14 year old girls to create more cave people? I mean this as a general question. Not to anyone specifically. Just to the people who think that finding a 15 year old girl attractive is reprehensible.
|
Google's purpose is not to create a repository of jerk off material made up entirely of underage girls.
Can people stop being this moronic?
|
On September 18 2012 03:30 Positronic wrote:Google's purpose is not to create a repository of jerk off material made up entirely of underage girls. Can people stop being this moronic?
I don't understand the difference, can you explain? I feel that if google is allowing said childporn (with easier access I might add) shouldn't that be comparable to Reddit allowing the same?
|
On September 18 2012 03:33 NeMeSiS3 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 03:30 Positronic wrote:Google's purpose is not to create a repository of jerk off material made up entirely of underage girls. Can people stop being this moronic? I don't understand the difference, can you explain? I feel that if google is allowing said childporn (with easier access I might add) shouldn't that be comparable to Reddit allowing the same?
Google was not specifically created to host jailbait images, as many of these Reddit subforums were. There is not much more to understand other than it's stated purpose as a search engine. It's not listing the material in such a way as to be accessed by those who have the intent to pleasure themselves to it. The Reddit forums in question do so brazenly and without regret, and reveling in the fact that the subjects of the photos do not know they're being used for what they are.
Edit: Google lists pictures of underage girls in an incidental way, because of their products function, not because they state a desire to post jailbait.
|
Russian Federation266 Posts
Am I the only one who thinks that using the terms "pedophilic" while speaking about content with postpubertal children or "child porn" to content where there is no pornography is beyond retarded?
|
On September 18 2012 03:10 Gene wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 03:08 ayaz2810 wrote:
People realize that we're genetically predisposed to like teenage girls right? There's nothing disgusting about it. It's fucking biology. I wouldn't fault a 25 year old dude from saying a 15 year old girl is hot. Acting on those urges on the other hand......
So stupid to be upset about. You can't argue biology. Chill out.
CP though..... burn in hell for that. Oh is that how it is? How young would you go then before you would argue against it? I feel more enlightened already
And the line you draw is so much better than the line he draws? Age of consent varies from country to country. It can be as low as 13.
|
On September 18 2012 03:33 NeMeSiS3 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 03:30 Positronic wrote:Google's purpose is not to create a repository of jerk off material made up entirely of underage girls. Can people stop being this moronic? I don't understand the difference, can you explain? I feel that if google is allowing said childporn (with easier access I might add) shouldn't that be comparable to Reddit allowing the same?
Google does sensor extreme pornographic material though - shouldn't Reddit have the same obligation? It's a little bit different because of the mass of content; you could almost say that Google is the largest library on the planet and Reddit is a small bookstore. You find all but the most reprehensible things a library, but if the institution is smaller then they need to be careful about what kinds of material they can be associated with.
However, both Reddit and Google currently sensor materials. Reddit has banned "jailbait" and google has banned website that shows 6 year olds being raped.
|
On September 18 2012 03:37 Evilmystic wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks that using the terms "pedophilic" while speaking about content with postpubertal children or "child porn" to content where there is no pornography is beyond retarded?
So I decided out of frustration not knowing whether they were 12 year olds or 17 or so on the site opened a few of the links... I found Faye Raegan, Lexi Belle and some other notable porn stars in the majority of the images. The rest looked like college students or older...
Is this really what we're labling as child pornography now? Hell, maybe I'm a pedophile to then for watching some porn here and there.
I think the image of CP should really be changed because when I went in looking I had my eyes squinted expecting to see someone the age of my little sister and then shut my laptop in horror... But not only did I NOT find any actual pornography (other then the actual porn stars) but none of them seemed underage...
Anywho, if you're brave enough start looking but I only went into 3 of them and I mean after looking at the 3 and not seeing anything I feel comfortable to assume the rest probably are around the same.
Anybody find anything else, my opinion would definitely change if they harbored actual child pornography.
|
How can I host images and videos on reddit?
|
Isn't this old news? I think r/jailbait and similar offending subreddits have been shut down.
|
On September 18 2012 03:42 NeMeSiS3 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 03:37 Evilmystic wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks that using the terms "pedophilic" while speaking about content with postpubertal children or "child porn" to content where there is no pornography is beyond retarded? So I decided out of frustration not knowing whether they were 12 year olds or 17 or so on the site opened a few of the links... I found Faye Raegan, Lexi Belle and some other notable porn stars in the majority of the images. The rest looked like college students or older... Is this really what we're labling as child pornography now? Hell, maybe I'm a pedophile to then for watching some porn here and there. I think the image of CP should really be changed because when I went in looking I had my eyes squinted expecting to see someone the age of my little sister and then shut my laptop in horror... But not only did I NOT find any actual pornography (other then the actual porn stars) but none of them seemed underage... Anywho, if you're brave enough start looking but I only went into 3 of them and I mean after looking at the 3 and not seeing anything I feel comfortable to assume the rest probably are around the same. Anybody find anything else, my opinion would definitely change if they harbored actual child pornography.
This line of reasoning is terrible.
"I've looked at a minority of places where this has been reported and thanks to that small experience I've decided that I'm comfortable dismissing all the evidence to the contrary".
Edit: Also you have no idea what is going on if you don't assume that the places hosting 12 year old girls vs 17 year olds aren't going to be private sub reddits now.
|
I am enraged, I will immidiately email their sponsors
|
On September 18 2012 03:30 Positronic wrote:Google's purpose is not to create a repository of jerk off material made up entirely of underage girls. Can people stop being this moronic?
Is it Reddit's?
People are making shitty subreddits. Reddit is just a medium, a broad one at that and of course it will have bad apples here and there. No point in attacking the whole website ;_;
|
On September 18 2012 03:46 Positronic wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 03:42 NeMeSiS3 wrote:On September 18 2012 03:37 Evilmystic wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks that using the terms "pedophilic" while speaking about content with postpubertal children or "child porn" to content where there is no pornography is beyond retarded? So I decided out of frustration not knowing whether they were 12 year olds or 17 or so on the site opened a few of the links... I found Faye Raegan, Lexi Belle and some other notable porn stars in the majority of the images. The rest looked like college students or older... Is this really what we're labling as child pornography now? Hell, maybe I'm a pedophile to then for watching some porn here and there. I think the image of CP should really be changed because when I went in looking I had my eyes squinted expecting to see someone the age of my little sister and then shut my laptop in horror... But not only did I NOT find any actual pornography (other then the actual porn stars) but none of them seemed underage... Anywho, if you're brave enough start looking but I only went into 3 of them and I mean after looking at the 3 and not seeing anything I feel comfortable to assume the rest probably are around the same. Anybody find anything else, my opinion would definitely change if they harbored actual child pornography. This line of reasoning is terrible. "I've looked at a minority of places where this has been reported and thanks to that small experience I've decided that I'm comfortable dismissing all the evidence to the contrary". Edit: Also you have no idea what is going on if you don't assume that the places hosting 12 year old girls vs 17 year olds aren't going to be private sub reddits now.
I have yet to actually see any evidence of the contrary, and I said if anyone finds something else I'd have no issue changing my stance... I feel like everyone is blowing smoke but zero proof is ever shown with actual children for me to be outraged... I looked around, still haven't found anything.
I may not have digged far enough but I have yet to see anyone pull up some disturbing shit. A better question is how do you know they're in the private sub forums (sure they might be, but I'm making assumptions based off of a little bit of looking around, you're basing assumptions off... Nothing? opinion?)
Why are you so passive aggressive also, calm down.
|
Sadly I don't think the purpose of this is to somehow crack down on what is/isn't allowed on reddit but as an ammo in upcoming election. The connection will be that Obama visited reddit, reddit is "allowing CP" and therefore Obama likes CP. You could say that in this case, CP is the one being abused...
|
On September 18 2012 03:48 Andr3 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 03:30 Positronic wrote:Google's purpose is not to create a repository of jerk off material made up entirely of underage girls. Can people stop being this moronic? Is it Reddit's? People are making shitty subreddits. Reddit is just a medium, a broad one at that and of course it will have bad apples here and there. No point in attacking the whole website ;_;
No it's not Reddit as a whole's purpose, it's the intent of the creator of the subforum in which this material was posted, that's pretty obvious man.
And yes, you could consider it just a medium, but you have to hold the administrators responsible for allowing exploitative material on the site when they have every tool to remove it, they just choose not to.
|
|
|
Why would you be so stupid that you'd post jailbait material on such a popular website like reddit?
There's plenty of places to find jailbait material on the internet anonymously.
I don't understand what these people were thinking.
|
Russian Federation266 Posts
On September 18 2012 03:42 NeMeSiS3 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 03:37 Evilmystic wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks that using the terms "pedophilic" while speaking about content with postpubertal children or "child porn" to content where there is no pornography is beyond retarded? So I decided out of frustration not knowing whether they were 12 year olds or 17 or so on the site opened a few of the links... I found Faye Raegan, Lexi Belle and some other notable porn stars in the majority of the images. The rest looked like college students or older... Is this really what we're labling as child pornography now? Hell, maybe I'm a pedophile to then for watching some porn here and there. I think the image of CP should really be changed because when I went in looking I had my eyes squinted expecting to see someone the age of my little sister and then shut my laptop in horror... But not only did I NOT find any actual pornography (other then the actual porn stars) but none of them seemed underage... Anywho, if you're brave enough start looking but I only went into 3 of them and I mean after looking at the 3 and not seeing anything I feel comfortable to assume the rest probably are around the same. Anybody find anything else, my opinion would definitely change if they harbored actual child pornography.
There is almost no real child pornography in the "normal" Internet, it only exists in cryptographic pseudonymous networks. The reason is pretty obvious - in almost every country in the world sharing such content is illegal and only really stupid people would risk doing it without proper "disguise", and stupid people rarely possess any sort of such content.
Closest thing available outside of darknets/i2p/TOR/etc are pictures and videos of non-nude underage people (most of them posted by themselves on the social networks) and webcam porn with 16/17 y.o. girls (because it's often impossible to distinguish them from 18+ ones without actually checking their IDs).
|
On September 18 2012 03:55 Evilmystic wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2012 03:42 NeMeSiS3 wrote:On September 18 2012 03:37 Evilmystic wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks that using the terms "pedophilic" while speaking about content with postpubertal children or "child porn" to content where there is no pornography is beyond retarded? So I decided out of frustration not knowing whether they were 12 year olds or 17 or so on the site opened a few of the links... I found Faye Raegan, Lexi Belle and some other notable porn stars in the majority of the images. The rest looked like college students or older... Is this really what we're labling as child pornography now? Hell, maybe I'm a pedophile to then for watching some porn here and there. I think the image of CP should really be changed because when I went in looking I had my eyes squinted expecting to see someone the age of my little sister and then shut my laptop in horror... But not only did I NOT find any actual pornography (other then the actual porn stars) but none of them seemed underage... Anywho, if you're brave enough start looking but I only went into 3 of them and I mean after looking at the 3 and not seeing anything I feel comfortable to assume the rest probably are around the same. Anybody find anything else, my opinion would definitely change if they harbored actual child pornography. There is almost no real child pornography in the "normal" Internet, it only exists in cryptographic pseudonymous networks. The reason is pretty obvious - in almost every country in the world sharing such content is illegal and only really stupid people would risk doing it without proper "disguise", and stupid people rarely possess any sort of such content. Closest thing available outside of darknets/i2p/TOR/etc are pictures and videos of non-nude underage people (most of them posted by themselves on the social networks) and webcam porn with 16/17 y.o. girls (because it's often impossible to distinguish them from 18+ ones without actually checking their IDs).
Ahh ok that makes more sense, then why is reddit involved? I mean if it's not on the "normal" internet, where reddit resides then how could this be there and no one see it? Maybe I just don't understand subreddits well enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
