EPTGoogle Announces Campaign to Legalize Gay Marriage - Page 23
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Rewera
Poland354 Posts
| ||
|
Rhine
187 Posts
On July 09 2012 02:48 IrOnKaL wrote: Whelp! Time to go back to Firefox! Except for Firefox is in large part funded by Google. You can switch to IE. Oh wait, Microsoft is also for Gay marriage. I guess you can try finding an old copy of Netscape somewhere. It's almost fitting for a backwards view like that. | ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On July 09 2012 03:31 darthfoley wrote: my highschool class is around 2.5% gay i would say. of course it's not concrete but i'm quite aware of my surroundings. They probably aren't open. There have been many anonymous surveys done, with all of them pointing to around 7-10% of males being homosexual, and 4-5% of females. | ||
|
Smat
United States301 Posts
On July 09 2012 04:49 xsnac wrote: maybe in US . in europe everyone knows if your class mate is gay or not . and i only met 1 gay swapping 4 high schools in 2 diferent countrys . gays arent afraid of bully in eu . Its not about bullying... And your anecdote basically makes my point, do you realize how little chance there is that 4 different high schools have only one gay person between them all? It would be a pretty amazing coincidence. | ||
|
Smat
United States301 Posts
On July 09 2012 05:01 FabledIntegral wrote: They probably aren't open. There have been many anonymous surveys done, with all of them pointing to around 7-10% of males being homosexual, and 4-5% of females. Those figures make sense considering it is becoming a fairly accepted fact that there are more full on gay men than there are full on gay women, of course that could be do to society's different treatment or inherent differences between female and male sexualities. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18857 Posts
On July 09 2012 05:04 Smat wrote: Those figures make sense considering it is becoming a fairly accepted fact that there are more full on gay men than there are full on gay women, of course that could be do to society's different treatment or inherent differences between female and male sexualities. What about full on rapists? | ||
|
jax1492
United States1632 Posts
| ||
|
BillClinton
232 Posts
On July 08 2012 20:42 Kahuna. wrote: Slavery isn't a pathology though. So your point is irrelevant. I'm sorry to say that but you are really disgusting. | ||
|
SnipedSoul
Canada2158 Posts
On July 09 2012 04:32 fairymonger wrote: Its getting pretty retarded when major companies are supporting things that are highly controversial. It's a good way to get the LGBT community to use your product. Google will also be all over the news for a while so free advertising just for supporting what's right! | ||
|
Nyarly
France1030 Posts
On July 09 2012 05:00 Rhine wrote: Except for Firefox is in large part funded by Google. You can switch to IE. Oh wait, Microsoft is also for Gay marriage. I guess you can try finding an old copy of Netscape somewhere. It's almost fitting for a backwards view like that. So no more homophobes on the internet ? Woot \o | ||
|
jax1492
United States1632 Posts
On July 09 2012 05:06 SnipedSoul wrote: It's a good way to get the LGBT community to use your product. Google will also be all over the news for a while so free advertising just for supporting what's right! if google wants some free press they should be fixing schools or help people who need help, i dont see how throwing money at lgbt causes is helping really ... like i said earlier companies should be neutral on issues like this. | ||
|
Smat
United States301 Posts
I don't know, I imagine that almost all rapists are men so.. | ||
|
DoubleReed
United States4130 Posts
On July 09 2012 04:32 fairymonger wrote: Its getting pretty retarded when major companies are supporting things that are highly controversial. This is actually not that uncommon. This happens throughout history. There were companies that favored desegregation back in those days. In fact, desegregated movie theaters (back in the 30s) earned some huge profits when it was very controversial. | ||
|
Trowa127
United Kingdom1230 Posts
On July 09 2012 05:15 jax1492 wrote: if google wants some free press they should be fixing schools or help people who need help, i dont see how throwing money at lgbt causes is helping really ... like i said earlier companies should be neutral on issues like this. Could I ask why its an issue for companies to take a stance on something equality based? | ||
|
MajorityofOne
Canada2506 Posts
| ||
|
Gluon
Netherlands421 Posts
 Great job posters! | ||
|
SnipedSoul
Canada2158 Posts
On July 09 2012 05:15 jax1492 wrote: if google wants some free press they should be fixing schools or help people who need help, i dont see how throwing money at lgbt causes is helping really ... like i said earlier companies should be neutral on issues like this. Why? Do LGBT people not need help? They are discriminated against all over the world. Google wants to change that for the better. | ||
|
BillClinton
232 Posts
On July 09 2012 00:15 Legate wrote: But its something diffrent to get discriminated for having certain genes, than for example wearing funny cloth or what ever. You basically say its the same because its both discrimination. I think its a dagerous relativization. Nobody can choose if he/she is white or black, just as little someone can choose if he/she is homo or hetero. Why dont you read a little bit in knowledgable and reliable sources about a topic before you come to such biased world views? | ||
|
DoubleReed
United States4130 Posts
On July 09 2012 05:15 jax1492 wrote: if google wants some free press they should be fixing schools or help people who need help, i dont see how throwing money at lgbt causes is helping really ... like i said earlier companies should be neutral on issues like this. Social issues affect companies. People want to work in a state where they can get married. Many companies care about the well-being and happiness of their employees, which means getting involved is inevitable in this sort of thing. | ||
|
Celestia
Mexico376 Posts
| ||
| ||
