http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=274834
Higgs Particle Announcement Incoming!!! - Page 11
Forum Index > General Forum |
Notfragile
Greece713 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=274834 | ||
Rannasha
Netherlands2398 Posts
On July 04 2012 16:19 Sandtrout wrote: I think judging from the introduction (how it was held) it is rather likely they can confirm the Higgs boson. But let's see. They have found it. The news was already announced at particle physics research institutes a few days ago. | ||
DooMeR
United States1519 Posts
LOL JOLLY GOOD | ||
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
On July 04 2012 16:19 Uncultured wrote: Man, you really aren't helping at all. I understand the speaker more than you, which makes me wonder if you know what you're talking about at all. I'm trying to type while making notes as fast as I can. If you understand the talk, then don't read what I'm writing. If you disagree with what I'm writing, then you should post. | ||
Mowr
Sweden791 Posts
On July 04 2012 16:20 IronManSC wrote: I don't understand any of this stuff T_T They are just explaining the experimental setup. | ||
ZlyKiss
Poland697 Posts
| ||
crawlingchaos
Canada2025 Posts
On July 04 2012 16:22 ZlyKiss wrote: i think is this scientist is just aware of the significance of this event and he is stressed because of that And he has 175 slides to go through without going over time, heh | ||
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
| ||
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
| ||
felisconcolori
United States6168 Posts
| ||
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
I think he said that they have 5 exit channels so they have to be able to identify which channel they actually see. They do that by fitting to simulation. | ||
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
| ||
J.E.G.
United States389 Posts
| ||
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
![]() I guess the slides are not public yet. ![]() Who is giving the seminar? | ||
Uncultured
United States1340 Posts
On July 04 2012 16:24 Al Bundy wrote: So far I can say one thing for certain, that CMS seems to perform very very well This is basically what he's describing. How they've managed to fine tune their measurements using other variables in the standard model to a very fine degree. Then with this as a sort of barometer they are able to search for the Higgs particle with high accuracy. | ||
kingjames01
Canada1603 Posts
You basically tell the computer everything that can happen at each step and what the odds are for each process. Then you let the computer do its thing many, many, many times. | ||
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
| ||
crawlingchaos
Canada2025 Posts
nm; reading is good | ||
Velocirapture
United States983 Posts
On July 04 2012 16:24 Al Bundy wrote: So far I can say one thing for certain, that CMS seems to perform very very well If they did not go through every calibration then naysayers would be all over them. Due diligence is a huge part of good science since data without context is useless. After all, we remember the 'neutrinos faster than light' frenzy. | ||
felisconcolori
United States6168 Posts
On July 04 2012 16:26 kingjames01 wrote: hehe, yeah, Monte Carlo is the term used to describe simulations that rely on probability. You basically tell the computer everything that can happen at each step and what the odds are for each process. Then you let the computer do its thing many, many, many times. Oh, I understand what he's talking about with regard to the Monte Carlo. But I can't stop myself from thinking about cards. | ||
| ||