What grinds your gears? - Page 65

On August 17 2012 09:21 DigiGnar wrote:
I'm an Athiest. I find it funny that I know more about a couple religions than most people do about their own. What grinds my gears is that people bash atheists.

I don't know everything, even though I may be arrogant. Christians like to think they know everything. Like, when life legally starts. Or that dinosaurs never existed. That pisses me off to no limits. Or when they cherry pick the bible for shit like, "Thou shalt not lie with another man like a women" without realizing that the town Sodom was brought down not for sodomy but because ANOTHER town thought that their shit didn't stink. If you want to know something funny, Lot, the guy who was trying to sacrifice his daughters so that the angels didn't get raped had sex with the daughters in a cave after the town was destroyed. NOTHING BAD EVER HAPPENED TO HIM, AND IN FACT, YOU CAN FIND GOD GIVING CHILDREN TO DAUGHTERS WHO DIDN'T GET FUCKED BY THEIR DAD. So, if you want to pick that line and defend it, you're defending incest.

It's like Christianity trying to say it's better than Islam. They are both equally bad and their shit stinks just like the other guy.

But I can't just not believe in something and leave it at that. As an atheist, I find religion to be extremely detrimental (is this the right word) to the advancement of humankind. I must make it my mission to persuade others to believe in what I believe in. (Sounds JUST LIKE SOME RELIGIONS THAT ARE BIG IN THIS WORLD.)

I don't actually care what religion peopla are, but I will intellectually rape them if they open their mouth.

I am so Le Rage because of driving. I'm writing this to calm my nerves down.

On August 17 2012 10:42 autoexec wrote:


You do know that his daughters got him drunk and then slept with him. He was not aware of it. Says it plain and simple in Genesis 19: 30-35

Not trying to start a religion debate, but if you are gonna bash on religion, please get it right. When you don't, that is what grinds my gears.

On August 17 2012 10:52 jusTjoshin wrote:


This entire thread is a religion debate :/

On August 17 2012 10:42 autoexec wrote:


You do know that his daughters got him drunk and then slept with him. He was not aware of it. Says it plain and simple in Genesis 19: 30-35

Not trying to start a religion debate, but if you are gonna bash on religion, please get it right. When you don't, that is what grinds my gears.

On August 17 2012 10:55 DigiGnar wrote:



So says the King James version. Anyway, I understand it's possible to rape a woman that's passed out drunk, but how do you rape a guy that's passed out drunk? How does he get hard and nut when he's passed out drunk?

On August 17 2012 11:00 autoexec wrote:


Not necessarily passed out. But I'm no drunk expert. Never drank enough to get drunk. But I'm sure there's a point in being drunk where you have no idea what you are doing and never remember it. But I don't want to get into a religion debate so I'm gonna stop haha

On August 17 2012 11:07 DigiGnar wrote:


I'm really just trying to get a sense of how hard it must've been to get pregnant from a drunk guy. I mean, think about that. If you really think about it, it doesn't make sense. Drunk dudes just don't nut.

On August 17 2012 10:31 SnipedSoul wrote:
Religion never caused any wars ROFL. Check out all the genocide and ethnic cleansing in the middle east and Africa because some people are the wrong kind of muslim.

On August 17 2012 11:25 Elegy wrote:


Shall we really debate this?

Please, provide a list of wars caused directly by religion. every empirical study done on this will show a massive preponderance towards wars for non religious purposes.

Again, I am not saying religion doesn't cause wars....just not nearly as often as other motives.

read what I write instead of what you think I said.

On August 17 2012 11:28 Heh_ wrote:

Middle Eastern conflict, past and present. There's a fuckton of fighting around that area, I don't need to explain why.

Seriously I don't know what's inside that skull of yours if you're denying this.

On August 17 2012 11:33 Elegy wrote:


dude.


okay.

a handful of conflicts RELATIVE to the entire scope of human history. this is a relative argument.

On August 17 2012 10:52 jusTjoshin wrote:
This entire thread is a religion debate :/

On August 17 2012 11:37 Heh_ wrote:

Are you fucking serious? The crusades was the largest string of wars in the medieval ages.. All those petty wars by neighboring factions are minor in comparison. Tell me with a straight face that current Middle Eastern conflict isn't caused religion.

Unless you consider squabbles between tribes in the stone age as "the entire scope of human history", you're obviously refusing to acknowledge facts.

On August 17 2012 11:37 Heh_ wrote:

Are you fucking serious? The crusades was the largest string of wars in the medieval ages.. All those petty wars by neighboring factions are minor in comparison. Tell me with a straight face that current Middle Eastern conflict isn't caused religion.

Unless you consider squabbles between tribes in the stone age as "the entire scope of human history", you're obviously refusing to acknowledge facts.

On August 17 2012 11:46 Hacksaw11 wrote:
Discriminations...

I am deaf and it fucking grinds my teeth when ppl are surprised that i can drive.. WTF deaf ppl have excellent visual and are not distracted by radio/music whatever theyre playing whereas i am 100% focused on the road, apparently deaf are the better drivers.

Fucking idiots.

On August 17 2012 11:51 DigiGnar wrote:



If you are deaf, you shouldn't drive. You are very dangerous every time you drive. Really, don't drive anymore. You need to be able to hear. If you can't hear a train coming, if you can't hear a firetruck whining down the street, if you can't hear someone honking at you, you shouldn't drive.

It's the same reason why you shouldn't listen to music when driving. Because you might not hear something.