EPTOn October 23 2012 12:09 FeUerFlieGe wrote:
On the fox website... Obama is winning in the poll. What does this mean?
On the fox website... Obama is winning in the poll. What does this mean?
the world may indeed end this year
President Obama Re-Elected - Page 985
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here. The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301 | ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
the world may indeed end this year | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Budmandude
United States123 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:07 noD wrote: As brazilian (tho not too prideful of it) I know pretty much we and the rest of Latin America are the reason the US is so close to completely lose to china in foreign commerce(which is now our biggest market, followed by other LA countries then EU, 10 years before US were the first). The fact that neither mentioned Brazil nor Mexico makes it pretty clear for me that whoever wins will have a good struggle against china  Mitt Romney made special mention of Latin America as being a huge potential trading partner that we are neglecting and need to work with more. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Swazi Spring
United States415 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:12 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: John Kerry is auditioning to be the next Secretary of State on MSNBC. Is he touting his swift boat record as foreign policy experience? | ||
|
synapse
China13814 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:09 FeUerFlieGe wrote: On the fox website... Obama is winning in the poll. What does this mean? Probably that reddit found it | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:12 Budmandude wrote: Mitt Romney made special mention of Latin America as being a huge potential trading partner that we are neglecting and need to work with more. Too bad we fucked that over during the entire 20th century. | ||
|
Swazi Spring
United States415 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:12 xDaunt wrote: Watching the Frank Luntz focus group on Fox, they are basically universally saying that they liked what Obama had to say on foreign policy more than Romney. However, they also said that they preferred what Romney had to say on the economy, which they believed to be the more important issue. The group is supposedly composed of undecided voters, most of whom voted for Obama in 2008. People who voted for Obama in 2008 are the ones who won't vote for him again. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. | ||
|
TotalBalanceSC2
Canada475 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:11 Sermokala wrote: America won the 2 world wars. We get to speak for the world now. I think Stephen Hawking should talk for the world when the advanced synthetic lifeforms show up since he will likely be the only one capable of understanding their advanced technology. /sarcasm | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:12 xDaunt wrote: Watching the Frank Luntz focus group on Fox, they are basically universally saying that they liked what Obama had to say on foreign policy more than Romney. However, they also said that they preferred what Romney had to say on the economy, which they believed to be the more important issue. The group is supposedly composed of undecided voters, most of whom voted for Obama in 2008. I saw that focus group. I can point out at least two that apparently define "undecided" as "want to be on TV" because their minds were obviously already made up. | ||
|
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:14 Swazi Spring wrote: People who voted for Obama in 2008 are the ones who won't vote for him again. Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. no, no: fool me once, shame on me. fool me twice... won't fool me twice. | ||
|
Deathmanbob
United States2356 Posts
| ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:12 xDaunt wrote: Watching the Frank Luntz focus group on Fox, they are basically universally saying that they liked what Obama had to say on foreign policy more than Romney. However, they also said that they preferred what Romney had to say on the economy, which they believed to be the more important issue. The group is supposedly composed of undecided voters, most of whom voted for Obama in 2008. I would probably respect it more if it were made by someone who wasnt probalby one of the top 3 most famous republican strategists of this generation. | ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:15 Deathmanbob wrote: 48% to 40% really? cnn polls break my heart At least that one is better for Romney than the CBS poll of uncommitted voters. | ||
|
Bayyne
United States1967 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14220 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:14 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Too bad we fucked that over during the entire 20th century. What do you mean? You can't say that america wasn't a HUGE factor into south Americas victory in the drug war against the cartels that wrecked the nations with corruption drugs and violence. | ||
|
Swazi Spring
United States415 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:17 Sermokala wrote: What do you mean? You can't say that america wasn't a HUGE factor into south Americas victory in the drug war against the cartels that wrecked the nations with corruption drugs and violence. He is probably referring to how we supported popular democratic revolutions in Chile and Argentina. | ||
|
armada[sb]
United States432 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:17 Sermokala wrote: What do you mean? You can't say that america wasn't a HUGE factor into south Americas victory in the drug war against the cartels that wrecked the nations with corruption drugs and violence. What victory? | ||
|
Swazi Spring
United States415 Posts
Colombia has more or less stabilized, no? | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:15 Deathmanbob wrote: 48% to 40% really? cnn polls break my heart I was only off by 2%, not bad, back to econometrics homework, night everybody. | ||
| ||
