|
|
On October 23 2012 11:27 Nyxisto wrote: how is devaluing your currency "currency manipulation"? its in every countries right to decide at what price they want to sell their currency at , and devaluing your currency is a legitimate tool to increase your exports.
I try to imagine what Romney would want to do? Force China to stop it because it's mean?
Manipulating your currency to hurt other countries and better your own isn't good. Its not a legitimate tool is basic market forces to discourage countries building up their entire economy based on nothing but exports. Obama is trying to stop china from doing it and hes gotten them to go half way on it. But they're still cheating in economics to keep their econ growth artificially high.
|
|
On October 23 2012 11:26 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2012 11:24 Lmui wrote:On October 23 2012 11:22 xDaunt wrote: Obama on China: I have no plan, but Romney exports jobs to China! He is mentioning his history though and giving hard facts about that though. Under Obama's administration, 2x exports to china, closest currency valuation in the last 20 years. Those are meaningless relative values. 2x almost nothing is still almost nothing.
Watch out, you're about to walk right into a Sorites paradox.
|
I LOVE TEACHERS MORE THAN ANYONE HERE
AND COPS TOO, CANT FORGET ABOUT COPS
|
On October 23 2012 11:27 Nyxisto wrote: how is devaluing your currency "currency manipulation"? its in every countries right to decide at what price they want to sell their currency at , and devaluing your currency is a legitimate tool to increase your exports.
I try to imagine what Romney would want to do? Force China to stop it because it's mean?
sounds to me like Romney is going to stop the Fed from printing money to be ideologically consistent, that'll hit Gary's numbers hard
|
audio fucked up for anyone else?
|
Apparently Romney likes to cut back on stuff he loves... He must hate money.
|
On October 23 2012 11:29 sc2superfan101 wrote: does anyone else hate the:
"a woman in Phili, a man in Ohio, a boy in Colombus and a girl in California. a dog in Zimbabwe. a cat in Nantucket. a snake in my pants."
shit that politicians do?
Yep, it's the way that they try to make it look like they understand.
That both of them used Pennsylvania in examples solidifies my idea that their internals show it, if not fully in play, closing.
|
On October 23 2012 11:28 Adreme wrote:I never liked how politifact rates but I always do love there explanations. The rating system is probably just to get page views but the explanations after that are what is important.
No one reads the explanations, they just take the ratings at face value. Pretty sad.
|
Tbh I think Obamallama looks better, and Romney looks like the one who's under-the-weather. Wouldn't be surprised to see him releasing a statement saying he was sick or something.
|
we all love teachers lol
gotta say, really liking bob here, he has a strong hand, a good hand on the pulse of important issues, but also allows them to rebut each other
|
On October 23 2012 11:29 sc2superfan101 wrote: does anyone else hate the:
"a woman in Phili, a man in Ohio, a boy in Colombus and a girl in California. a dog in Zimbabwe. a cat in Nantucket. a snake in my pants."
shit that politicians do?
It all the same, they both do it. "I talked to a *group who's vote I want* in *swing state* who said my opponent kicks puppies."
|
|
I'm saying tie.
No one clearly defeated the other or differed from the other in any discernible way. Saying different is just bias. This was basically two candidates parroting each other.
|
On October 23 2012 11:31 Risen wrote: Tbh I think Obamallama looks better, and Romney looks like the one who's under-the-weather. Wouldn't be surprised to see him releasing a statement saying he was sick or something.
He'll have to as this was a repeat of Nixon - Kennedy debate.
|
On October 23 2012 11:31 maliceee wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2012 11:28 Adreme wrote:On October 23 2012 11:24 durza wrote:On October 23 2012 11:10 TheTenthDoc wrote:On October 23 2012 11:09 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 23 2012 10:56 durza wrote: That apology tour claim has been dismissed so many times. Dismissed by who? Liberals? It's a fact. And, as shown by Romney's weak response, a relatively meaningless one. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/oct/17/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-says-barack-obama-began/Politifact gives it a pants on fire rating and has done so multiple times, I'm going to assume that you're going to tell me politifact is run by liberals. I never liked how politifact rates but I always do love there explanations. The rating system is probably just to get page views but the explanations after that are what is important. No one reads the explanations, they just take the ratings at face value. Pretty sad.
They clearly do the meter just so they can have a gimmick to get hits but it basically devalues what is otherwise a very effective site.
|
Just arrived at china did Obama won before that too ?
|
Neither one of you mentioning foreign policy as less than a soundbite in your closing, shame on both of you.
|
I think this debate was a tie. Both sides have some stuff that they point to in support of the proposition that they "won," but there definitely was no decisive win for either side. Yet, that this was a draw was clearly a victory for Romney.
|
On October 23 2012 11:30 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2012 11:27 Nyxisto wrote: how is devaluing your currency "currency manipulation"? its in every countries right to decide at what price they want to sell their currency at , and devaluing your currency is a legitimate tool to increase your exports.
I try to imagine what Romney would want to do? Force China to stop it because it's mean? Manipulating your currency to hurt other countries and better your own isn't good. Its not a legitimate tool is basic market forces to discourage countries building up their entire economy based on nothing but exports. Obama is trying to stop china from doing it and hes gotten them to go half way on it. But they're still cheating in economics to keep their econ growth artificially high.
KK, all countries that try to do things that are good for them, plz stop world econ is norush20~
|
|
|
|