EPTShooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 157
| Forum Index > General Forum |
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP. If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:55 Sufficiency wrote: Yea the point was that she isn't credible. And frankly the defense has established this already (with her age issues and "not taking it seriously"). Well, you can never crush a witness hard enough, specially not the main witness, unless you in some way makes the jury sympathize with her because of your ownage. | ||
|
Tula
Austria1544 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:44 xDaunt wrote: As I mentioned earlier, they have to put her on because she has their best evidence. She's probably the only one that can rebut Zimmerman's claim of self defense, despite her liabilities. There's no getting around it. So yes, if they are going to try the case, then they have to put her on. The real issue is whether they should have tried this case to begin with as opposed to dropping the charges. In all seriousness do you honestly think they CAN drop the case without setting loose a huge shitstorm? Obviously I'm European, so I might be mistaken, but so far it seems to me, that no matter how weak their case might be they need this to at least appear in front of judge and jury to make up for the horrendous way the case was handled by the police a year ago. If the police had investigated properly immediately they might have been able to drop it back then, but the way they refused to investigate anything until the media went berserk if they simply dropped it now (or some months ago, when it was clear this case was/is weak) many people would have screamed about coverups and other stupid stuff. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:57 SKC wrote: Well, you can never crush a witness hard enough, specially not the main witness, unless you in some way makes the jury sympathize with her because of your ownage. Yeah, this is exactly right. The Defense still needs to show that she has been changing her story about what happened when she was talking with Trayvon on the phone. | ||
|
Namunelbo
501 Posts
There are live streams of trials in the US? This feels like watching Gyakuten Saiban (Phoenix Wright) in real life, without the fancy quirks of course. Are there dedicated websites / streams for these things or is this an exception? + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On June 27 2013 06:00 Tula wrote: In all seriousness do you honestly think they CAN drop the case without setting loose a huge shitstorm? Obviously I'm European, so I might be mistaken, but so far it seems to me, that no matter how weak their case might be they need this to at least appear in front of judge and jury to make up for the horrendous way the case was handled by the police a year ago. If the police had investigated properly immediately they might have been able to drop it back then, but the way they refused to investigate anything until the media went berserk if they simply dropped it now (or some months ago, when it was clear this case was/is weak) many people would have screamed about coverups and other stupid stuff. I have no doubt that political considerations are at play here. | ||
|
Fildun
Netherlands4123 Posts
And if it doesn't, does anyone know another way to watch it from it? | ||
|
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
On June 27 2013 06:02 Fildun wrote: Does the link also work on my smartphone? (Samsung) And if it doesn't, does anyone know another way to watch it from it? Depends on the samsung, if you can play flash on it, sure. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
Fildun
Netherlands4123 Posts
On June 27 2013 06:03 m4inbrain wrote: Depends on the samsung, if you can play flash on it, sure. I'm a smartphone n00b, how do I see whether it has flash on it? I believe it's a galaxy ace, the newest. | ||
|
AnachronisticAnarchy
United States2957 Posts
| ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
On June 27 2013 06:04 Fildun wrote: I'm a smartphone n00b, how do I see whether it has flash on it? I believe it's a galaxy ace, the newest. I don't think an ace can play flash without rooting etc. This impeachment isn't as easy to do as it looks. When you have a witness who is actually stupid it is difficult to move logically from point a to b even if it is obvious to everyone else. He has to get this on the record somehow. Yeah. It's hard to distinguish between stupidity and lies. | ||
|
JoeCool
Germany2520 Posts
| ||
|
Tewks44
United States2032 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
So basically, she admitted that the Crumps interview wasn't done "seriously", then she said under oath that what she said during the interview was the facts. GGWP. | ||
|
Kojak21
Canada1104 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On June 27 2013 06:08 Kojak21 wrote: damnit i gotta take a dump but i dont wanna miss something! Notebooks man, notebooks are the future. I seriously doubt I could talk to such a witness with a straight face. | ||
| ||
