EPTShooting of Trayvon Martin - Page 156
| Forum Index > General Forum |
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP. If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:45 Sufficiency wrote: Now I think about it, she knows she is messing up.... which is why she appears to be so nervous. The State must have preped her pretty hard. To me she appears annoyed actually. From the beginning. Edit: more or less only at the defense though. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:46 m4inbrain wrote: To me she appears annoyed actually. From the beginning. Edit: more or less only at the defense though. I am annoyed just watching her speak. | ||
|
AnachronisticAnarchy
United States2957 Posts
| ||
|
jeremycafe
United States354 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:44 m4inbrain wrote: You see, sometimes an objection might get overruled because it's worth overruling it. But feel free to put your tinfoil hat back on, sorry to have bothered you, let's stop. Tinfoil hat? rofl. You are a dick. Bro. You are telling me it is ok for an attorney to tell a story and just let the witness say yes yes yes yes yes? No, they have to ask questions. Which he wasn't doing, he was telling a story and letting her go along with it. It would be different if it was stating facts, but he wasn't. He was telling a story of what MIGHT have happened. But you are right, lets stop. That is twice now you decided to go the internet fuckbag route of talking shit. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:41 jeremycafe wrote: There was one huge ruling, which was throwing out the voice experts. Which is a damn good thing because that faulty tech would have destroyed this case. The state does the same crap the defense does and gets away with it when the defense objects. She talks to the defense like they are children. Maybe they rubbed her the wrong way with that horrendous knock-knock joke? All it takes is one major fuck up and the judge becomes an antagonist the rest of trial. | ||
|
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:47 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote: What's happening now on stream? All I'm getting is a state of California seal. 15 Minute break. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:47 AnachronisticAnarchy wrote: What's happening now on stream? All I'm getting is a state of California seal. As far as I know, there was an objection by the prosecution and they are speaking off mic about something the defense asked/was going to ask. | ||
|
Fildun
Netherlands4124 Posts
| ||
|
jeremycafe
United States354 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:48 Sufficiency wrote: As far as I know, there was an objection by the prosecution and they are speaking off mic about something the defense asked/was going to ask. They were about to read the interview quotes to prove she changed her story, the state objected and won. So they approached the bench to argue about it. Went on break after. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:49 jeremycafe wrote: They were about to read the interview quotes to prove she changed her story, the state objected and won. So they approached the bench to argue about it. Went on break after. thank you | ||
|
jeremycafe
United States354 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:49 SKC wrote: She did feel to be annoyed with the defense, but I don't have the knowledge to say if her actions were also biased, I haven't even watched most of the trial. It could just be because the defense does feel a bit amateurish at some points. I will agree with that. All of her conversations with the defense she changes her tone compared to talking with the state. It's like they are just a thorn in her side when they speak. Which __in my opinion__ will impact her rulings on objections they make. And __in my opinion__ it has. | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:52 Kaitlin wrote: What was the significance of the "Crump interview" ? Was it under oath ? Why was it so important that she now has said she didn't take it seriously ? She doesn't have to be under oath. The credibility of someone that tells fake facts about a murder case in national television is seriously lacking. | ||
|
jeremycafe
United States354 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:52 Kaitlin wrote: What was the significance of the "Crump interview" ? Was it under oath ? Why was it so important that she now has said she didn't take it seriously ? Because she told a different story then. And she originally stated she only wanted to help because of race. It shows she is willing to lie for the simple purpose of helping martins win. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:52 Kaitlin wrote: What was the significance of the "Crump interview" ? Was it under oath ? Why was it so important that she now has said she didn't take it seriously ? Yea the point was that she isn't credible. And frankly the defense has established this already (with her age issues and "not taking it seriously"). | ||
|
Tewks44
United States2032 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:52 Kaitlin wrote: What was the significance of the "Crump interview" ? Was it under oath ? Why was it so important that she now has said she didn't take it seriously ? for the same reason the defense can bring up the fact she lied about her age even though she wasn't under oath. To have definitive proof of a prosecution witness who has changed stories multiple times is pretty damning | ||
|
czylu
477 Posts
On June 27 2013 05:51 jeremycafe wrote: I will agree with that. All of her conversations with the defense she changes her tone compared to talking with the state. It's like they are just a thorn in her side when they speak. Which __in my opinion__ will impact her rulings on objections they make. And __in my opinion__ it has. i don't think any judge wants to be in this situation. This whole murder case has gotten racial and political. If he gets off scott free the prosecutor will need to find a new job, while the judge will never ever get a promotion. Look at that flashy necklace she's wearing. Probably bought by some politician ;D. | ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
| ||
| ||
