EPTYour data suggest a strong automatic preference for Protoss compared to Terran/Zerg.
????
(sorry for obligatory starcraft joke)
Implicit Association Test - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
NonYold
United States2814 Posts
Your data suggest a strong automatic preference for Protoss compared to Terran/Zerg. ???? (sorry for obligatory starcraft joke) | ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On August 11 2005 04:29 camooT wrote: The whole point behind the switching is to compare your reaction times when different ideas are associated. i.e., if you're slower when black is associated with good, it means the connections you made unconsciously in that direction are less strong. Wouldn't the fact that you switch them around mean that you'll most likely be slower on the second go because you just got used to it being the other way around ;;;;; Surprisingly I was faster the second round but that doesn't make sense so I guess it was purely speed/me being cautious the first round ;D | ||
|
Chobohobo
United States945 Posts
| ||
|
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
|
JazZ[AutO]
United States558 Posts
| ||
|
1INK
United States630 Posts
Your data suggest a strong association of Male with Science and Female with Liberal Arts compared to Female with Science and Male with Liberal Arts. ^ wth? | ||
RaGe
Belgium9947 Posts
| ||
|
oPtioNaLk
Korea (South)564 Posts
On August 11 2005 07:43 Chibi[OWNS] wrote: they should have just told you that you have 5 seconds to answer each one, and that it's not a race -.- The point of the timing is to make sure that you don't think about the implications are... | ||
|
Krzych
Poland693 Posts
| ||
|
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
|
camooT
United States1354 Posts
On August 11 2005 07:40 Chobohobo wrote: Yeah pretty much this test is weak in some sense. It is essentially like a game and some people will only get better at later rounds. even if you get better, there is a difference in response times between the two categories. it also adjusts for order. these folks are from harvard and have been doing this for a while, give them some credit. sounds like most of you just don't want to accept your results. | ||
|
Krzych
Poland693 Posts
On August 11 2005 07:37 FrozenArbiter wrote: Wouldn't the fact that you switch them around mean that you'll most likely be slower on the second go because you just got used to it being the other way around ;;;;; That's exactly what I think, Frozen. | ||
|
1INK
United States630 Posts
On August 11 2005 11:59 oPtioNaLk wrote: The point of the timing is to make sure that you don't think about the implications are... i think the implications of mine were pretty obvious, when they say "this test is designed to show a link between males vs females and sciences vs liberal arts" when we all basically know the intended connection they are trying to make | ||
|
camooT
United States1354 Posts
your score is (for the fiftieth time this thread) weighted depending on the order you took each part of the test. i think there is more information on how this is done after you have taken it, on your score page. ink: not everybody has those same associations, and they may not be as strong. there are plenty of people who have neutral associations as far as gender, science and liberal arts go or they may be exactly opposite. still, i'm not sure i understand what you're saying. clarify please :\. maleorder: do elaborate. | ||
|
maleorderbride
United States2916 Posts
As in really fucking stupid and inconclusive. Whoever was the moron that designed it really needs to rethink their career. | ||
|
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
I guess it's more that I have a problem to focus, it could have slipped the other way too. EIDIT:Made the religon test too and: "Your data suggest a moderate automatic preference for Judaism compared to Other Religions." I stongly call bs. I hate all religions equally. Oh well I hate the christians a thad more but not much. Oh well the I cant call bull.. well I still think that it could slip both ways. I find it hard to belive these tests have any real use and correct results. | ||
|
Krzych
Poland693 Posts
On August 11 2005 17:59 camooT wrote: your score is (for the fiftieth time this thread) weighted depending on the order you took each part of the test. i think there is more information on how this is done after you have taken it, on your score page. ink: not everybody has those same associations, and they may not be as strong. there are plenty of people who have neutral associations as far as gender, science and liberal arts go or they may be exactly opposite. still, i'm not sure i understand what you're saying. clarify please :\. maleorder: do elaborate. What I meant is that first you are trained to associate one thing with other, and then you are said to do something like opposite of this. It is easier to learn to do something you have never done before, than to learn to do the same thing in a different way. And this makes the test biased in my opinion. I can give you a starcraft related example: You got used to using some hotkeys to produce units, and I guess it wasn't very hard to do. But when you already know which keys to press and then someone changes the settings of the game, and now "o" makes tanks and "p" makes vultures you will screw constantly because you are used to different setting. And if you were to learn the hotkeys without knowing any beforehand, the keys wouldn't matter and again, you would have no problems. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On August 11 2005 02:25 NubainMuscle wrote: What is your problem? Users like me, Stat.quo, etc. have done nothing to provoke the implicit (in this case overt) prejudice I read in this general forum on a regular basis. Granted this is a private site, but the fact that you openly use offensive terms in a public atmosphere demonstrates your lack of character. I have seen your picture and am confident that you would not be so bold outside of the comfort of an internet forum. Quite pathetic really. are you for real? rofl | ||
|
Hippopotamus
1914 Posts
Your data suggest a moderate automatic preference for George W. Bush compared to John F. Kennedy. I know that isn't true. Bush's face is stupid and it pisses me off, and I dislike him through and through. There is no implicit association here, it's just that the categories were switched around and that fucked up my sorting because I was used to them being the other way around. | ||
| ||
