|
Imagine you have a million of lightbulbs, in numerical numbers, from 1,2,3,4.... to 1 000 000.
All the lightbulbs are OFF....
When i press the switch of the first lightbulb then ALL THE LIGHTBULBS WILL TURN ON.
When i press the switch of the second lightbulb then ALL THE MULTIPLES OF 2 WILL CHANGE, (ie. if they are on then they go off, if they are off, they turn on.)
When i press the switch of the third lightbulb then ALL THE MULTIPLES OF 3 WILL CHANGE (ie. if they are on then they go off, if they are off, they turn on)
And so on........
UNTIL you get to the 1,000,000th swtich...
At the end.. which lightbulbs are On?
|
w/o even really thinking about it
the first one?
|
Umm, I think it's that brain but that would be one hell of an easy riddle :/
|
United Kingdom10597 Posts
|
|
It's not too hard. Think about it. All numbers with an even number of factors will be off, those with an odd number will be on. All primes will be off. 1 will be on.
As a result, only square numbers will be on. 1,4,9,16,25, etc. etc.
|
|
|
Here's a better one:
Three woman go to their favorite restaurant and each order some food that costs £30 overall. So they each give £10 to the waiter who then gives it to the manager. The manager however decides to give £5 back to the women as a good will gesture since the women have been such loyal customers over the years. Now the waiter thinks he can make some money out of this so he secretely takes £2 for himself and only gives £1 back to each women.
This means each woman has payed £9 each, having originally payed £10 and gotten £1 back. The waiter has £2 thus the overall money payed is 3x9 + 2 = £29. So where'd the extra pound go?
|
With the way the riddle's said, you'd think that it would be that when the 1 000 000th switch is turned on, all the multiples of 1 000 000 would change, and that would mean only the last one.
|
On June 17 2005 13:20 Pistachio wrote: Here's a better one:
Three woman go to their favorite restaurant and each order some food that costs £30 overall. So they each give £10 to the waiter who then gives it to the manager. The manager however decides to give £5 back to the women as a good will gesture since the women have been such loyal customers over the years. Now the waiter thinks he can make some money out of this so he secretely takes £2 for himself and only gives £1 back to each women.
This means each woman has payed £9 each, having originally payed £10 and gotten £1 back. The waiter has £2 thus the overall money payed is 3x9 + 2 = £29. So where'd the extra pound go?
Old One. Order of Operations.
|
What is the next number in this sequence....
1,2,4,8,16,31
|
On June 17 2005 13:15 LTT wrote: It's not too hard. Think about it. All numbers with an even number of factors will be off, those with an odd number will be on. All primes will be off. 1 will be on.
As a result, only square numbers will be on. 1,4,9,16,25, etc. etc.
That is....CORRECT!. Im thinking in other difficult ones, ill post them later.
|
On June 17 2005 13:23 BigBalls wrote: What is the next number in this sequence....
1,2,4,8,16,31
There are a few that could be. You are most likely thinking about the maximum number of regions formed in a circle by connecting straight lines between n points on the circle. In which case it would be, 57,99,163
It could just as well be 32,62,124,248,496,992 which are the divisors of 992. Although that one is finite... (Similarly divisors of 496)
60,116,224,432 for the expansion of 1/(1-2x+x^5).
|
BigBalls, are you serious? I don't want to spend hours on a joke
|
On June 17 2005 13:29 LTT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:23 BigBalls wrote: What is the next number in this sequence....
1,2,4,8,16,31 There are a few that could be. You are most likely thinking about the maximum number of regions formed in a circle by connecting straight lines between n points on the circle. In which case it would be, 57,99,163
you bitch lol
|
you beat me to the squares answer, then you answer that one grrrrrrr
ok, here's one that ltt is prohibited from answering
1 11 21 1211 111221 312211
what is the next element in the sequence
|
lol i just noticed it was renamed capslock topic omfg ahahaha
someone make it math riddles or something
|
|
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
On June 17 2005 13:33 BigBalls wrote: lol i just noticed it was renamed capslock topic omfg ahahaha
someone make it math riddles or something
:O
|
On June 17 2005 13:34 Jathin wrote: LTT is probably one of those dudes that knows 1,000,000,000 useless things no one cares about =p
and he will proabably be making more money than all of us soon
|
Nah, I remember a few things, like the sequence BB posted because it was drilled into me in a discrete math programming class. I found the other sequences from a handy website I have in my favorites: http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/
|
Belgium6772 Posts
|
On June 17 2005 13:34 Jathin wrote: LTT is probably one of those dudes that knows 1,000,000,000 useless things no one cares about =p
Seems like one of those dudes that is an expert in math
|
|
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
OK HERE IS ANOTHER ONE, I NEED HELP ON THIS, BECAUSE IT WAS FOR HOMEWORK A FEW DAYS AGO AND I NEED ALOT OF HELP , PLEASE...
Why does the equation X^n + Y^n = Z^n it doesnt have integer solutions if n > = 3 .
Find me a solution please. Or if it cant be done then explain why you cant?.
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
|
I've got one for you. Let's see if I can get this one right.
5 pirates find 100 pieces of gold and decide to split the loot. Being that they are bloodthirsty, greedy, yet rediculously rational, they come up with the following plan. (It might help if you imagine them in a line). The first pirate makes a proposal for how the loot will be split among them. If the proposal gets at least 50% of the votes, it is passed and is executed. If it fails to get 50% of the vote, the proposer is executed and the next pirate in line makes his proposal. What proposal should the first pirate make to recieve the maximum benefit possible?
|
On June 17 2005 13:39 loloko2 wrote: PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
OK HERE IS ANOTHER ONE, I NEED HELP ON THIS, BECAUSE IT WAS FOR HOMEWORK A FEW DAYS AGO AND I NEED ALOT OF HELP , PLEASE...
Why does the equation X^n + Y^n = Z^n it doesnt have integer solutions if n > = 3 .
Find me a solution please. Or if it cant be done then explain why you cant?.
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
Give Fermat a ring and ask him about his last theorem. Perhaps he will let you see the margin of his book? ... >.>
|
Bigballs it's actually 312211
|
On June 17 2005 13:37 Xeofreestyler wrote: Bigballs, its 13112221
one 1, one 3, two 1, three 2, one 1
1113213211
|
I think loloko2 is serious
|
On June 17 2005 13:41 LTT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:39 loloko2 wrote: PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
OK HERE IS ANOTHER ONE, I NEED HELP ON THIS, BECAUSE IT WAS FOR HOMEWORK A FEW DAYS AGO AND I NEED ALOT OF HELP , PLEASE...
Why does the equation X^n + Y^n = Z^n it doesnt have integer solutions if n > = 3 .
Find me a solution please. Or if it cant be done then explain why you cant?.
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP Give Fermat a ring and ask him about his last theorem. Perhaps he will let you see the margin of his book? ... >.>
Why do you have to ruin my joke to the teamliquidians T__T i hate you ^_^
|
On June 17 2005 13:40 LTT wrote: I've got one for you. Let's see if I can get this one right.
5 pirates find 100 pieces of gold and decide to split the loot. Being that they are bloodthirsty, greedy, yet rediculously rational, they come up with the following plan. (It might help if you imagine them in a line). The first pirate makes a proposal for how the loot will be split among them. If the proposal gets at least 50% of the votes, it is passed and is executed. If it fails to get 50% of the vote, the proposer is executed and the next pirate in line makes his proposal. What proposal should the first pirate make to recieve the maximum benefit possible?
Errr, he proposes that the first three pirates "in line" get 1/3 of the loot? Maybe he gets the extra coin or they spend it on strippers or something?
|
LTT, you don't buy Andrew Wiles' proof?
|
On June 17 2005 13:44 -_- wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:40 LTT wrote: I've got one for you. Let's see if I can get this one right.
5 pirates find 100 pieces of gold and decide to split the loot. Being that they are bloodthirsty, greedy, yet rediculously rational, they come up with the following plan. (It might help if you imagine them in a line). The first pirate makes a proposal for how the loot will be split among them. If the proposal gets at least 50% of the votes, it is passed and is executed. If it fails to get 50% of the vote, the proposer is executed and the next pirate in line makes his proposal. What proposal should the first pirate make to recieve the maximum benefit possible? Errr, he proposes that the first three pirates "in line" get 1/3 of the loot? Maybe he gets the extra coin or they spend it on strippers or something?
No, he can do much better than that. Try thinking about it another way.
|
one 1 two 1's one 2 and one 1 one 1 one 2 and two 1's three 1's two 2's and one 1.
they're wrong and I'm the pirate who gets the extra coin!!!
edit: Or at least mine's sexier bitches!
|
Belgium6772 Posts
On June 17 2005 13:43 7op wrote:one 1, one 3, two 1, three 2, one 1 1113213211
That would be the element after the following element, yes
|
On June 17 2005 13:45 MPXMX wrote: LTT, you don't buy Andrew Wiles' proof?
I've never looked at it. I'm sure it is fine, I wasn't discrediting it, I was just trying to point out that lolokos problem didn't deserve to be here -.-
|
Belgium6772 Posts
On June 17 2005 13:46 -_- wrote: one 1 two 1's one 2 and one 1 one 1 one 2 and two 1's three 1's two 2's and one 1.
they're wrong and I'm the pirate who gets the extra coin!!!
edit: Or at least mine's sexier bitches!
Err, wtf no? 312211 -> one 3 one 1 two 2 two 1 -> 13112221 then that one would be one 1 one 3 two 1 three 2 one 1 -> 1113213211
Kthxbai.
|
On June 17 2005 13:46 LTT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:44 -_- wrote:On June 17 2005 13:40 LTT wrote: I've got one for you. Let's see if I can get this one right.
5 pirates find 100 pieces of gold and decide to split the loot. Being that they are bloodthirsty, greedy, yet rediculously rational, they come up with the following plan. (It might help if you imagine them in a line). The first pirate makes a proposal for how the loot will be split among them. If the proposal gets at least 50% of the votes, it is passed and is executed. If it fails to get 50% of the vote, the proposer is executed and the next pirate in line makes his proposal. What proposal should the first pirate make to recieve the maximum benefit possible? Errr, he proposes that the first three pirates "in line" get 1/3 of the loot? Maybe he gets the extra coin or they spend it on strippers or something? No, he can do much better than that. Try thinking about it another way.
He waits till all the other pirates are atrophied (they're greedy bitches like him) and then he kills them.
I googled it, Jesus christ couldn't get it.
|
On June 17 2005 13:37 Xeofreestyler wrote: Bigballs, its 13112221
booyah
hmm, lets see if i can come up with more...
|
On June 17 2005 13:43 loloko2 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:41 LTT wrote:On June 17 2005 13:39 loloko2 wrote: PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
OK HERE IS ANOTHER ONE, I NEED HELP ON THIS, BECAUSE IT WAS FOR HOMEWORK A FEW DAYS AGO AND I NEED ALOT OF HELP , PLEASE...
Why does the equation X^n + Y^n = Z^n it doesnt have integer solutions if n > = 3 .
Find me a solution please. Or if it cant be done then explain why you cant?.
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP Give Fermat a ring and ask him about his last theorem. Perhaps he will let you see the margin of his book? ... >.> Why do you have to ruin my joke to the teamliquidians T__T i hate you ^_^ I'm sure it was x^n+y^n=z^n doesn't have any integer solutions if n > = 2
And it was solved in 1993 by Andrew Wiles. Edit: oops someone already mentioned it t.,t
|
On June 17 2005 13:49 Xeofreestyler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:46 -_- wrote: one 1 two 1's one 2 and one 1 one 1 one 2 and two 1's three 1's two 2's and one 1.
they're wrong and I'm the pirate who gets the extra coin!!!
edit: Or at least mine's sexier bitches! Err, wtf no? 312211 -> one 3 one 1 two 2 two 1 -> 13112221 then that one would be one 1 one 3 two 1 three 2 one 1 -> 1113213211 Kthxbai.
-_-, do you see the three before the 1? 3 ones. do you see the 2 before the 2? Two 2's. Do you see the 1 before the 1? One one
KTHXBAIBITCH
|
if it was all split equally, each pirate would get 20% if the first pirate were gone, then it were split equally, each would get 25%
50-1, 25+1, 25, 0,0
|
On June 17 2005 13:49 Xeofreestyler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:46 -_- wrote: one 1 two 1's one 2 and one 1 one 1 one 2 and two 1's three 1's two 2's and one 1.
they're wrong and I'm the pirate who gets the extra coin!!!
edit: Or at least mine's sexier bitches! Err, wtf no? 312211 -> one 3 one 1 two 2 two 1 -> 13112221 then that one would be one 1 one 3 two 1 three 2 one 1 -> 1113213211 Kthxbai.
I haven't been following the puzzle, so the numbers might prove me wrong, but there are two general forms for this one. In one, all the digits are looked at and then written, in another it goes by differences. Let me give an example
312211 in the former case would be 132231 (one 3 two 2s three 1s) in the latter it would be 13112221 (one 3 one 1 two 2s two 1s)
|
On June 17 2005 13:53 BigBalls wrote: if it was all split equally, each pirate would get 20% if the first pirate were gone, then it were split equally, each would get 25%
50-1, 25+1, 25, 0,0
Closer, but still thinking about it the wrong way. Start with the 2 pirate case and work your way to 5
|
Must the first pirate propose specific proportions of splitting the loot or can he say things like "2nd pirate can take as much as he wants as long as 2/3 of the rest of you agree with it" ?
|
On June 17 2005 13:56 MPXMX wrote: Must the first pirate propose specific proportions of splitting the loot or can he say things like "2nd pirate can take as much as he wants as long as 2/3 of the rest of you agree with it" ?
I'm sure he can, but his optimal solution involves a specific number of coins going to certain pirates.
|
2 pirates fourth pirate 100, last pirate 0 - passes
3 pirates third pirate 99, fourth pirate 0, last pirate 1 - improvement
4 pirates second pirate 99, third pirate 0, fourth pirate 0, last pirate 1
5 pirates first pirate 98, second pirate 0, third pirate 1, fourth pirate 0, last pirate 1
|
On June 17 2005 13:58 BigBalls wrote: 2 pirates fourth pirate 100, last pirate 0 - passes
3 pirates third pirate 99, fourth pirate 0, last pirate 1 - improvement
4 pirates second pirate 99, third pirate 0, fourth pirate 0, last pirate 1
5 pirates first pirate 98, second pirate 0, third pirate 1, fourth pirate 0, last pirate 1
Yeah, that's the right way to do it, but the 4 pirates case, the 4th pirate gets 1 and the last gets 0.
Edit: Remember that they are bloodthirsty as well. fourth and last pirate have no improvement over the 3 pirate setup so all else being equal, they'd like the proposer to die. since the third pirate is really losing out, it'd end up 3-1 against the proposal.
|
|
On June 17 2005 13:20 Pistachio wrote: Here's a better one:
Three woman go to their favorite restaurant and each order some food that costs £30 overall. So they each give £10 to the waiter who then gives it to the manager. The manager however decides to give £5 back to the women as a good will gesture since the women have been such loyal customers over the years. Now the waiter thinks he can make some money out of this so he secretely takes £2 for himself and only gives £1 back to each women.
This means each woman has payed £9 each, having originally payed £10 and gotten £1 back. The waiter has £2 thus the overall money payed is 3x9 + 2 = £29. So where'd the extra pound go?
the overall money payed is 3x9=27. the 2 bucks are just split from that, so the manager gets 25 and the waiter 2.
|
2 pirates fourth pirate 100, last pirate 0 - 1/2 passes
3 pirates third pirate 99, fourth pirate 0, last pirate 1 - improvement for last pirate, 2/3 passes
4 pirates second pirate 99, third pirate 0, fourth pirate 1, last pirate 0 - fourth pirate will improve and will vote for the second pirate 2/4 passes
5 pirates first pirate 98, second pirate 0, third pirate 1, fourth pirate 0, last pirate 1 3/5 passes
|
On June 17 2005 13:20 Pistachio wrote: Here's a better one:
Three woman go to their favorite restaurant and each order some food that costs £30 overall. So they each give £10 to the waiter who then gives it to the manager. The manager however decides to give £5 back to the women as a good will gesture since the women have been such loyal customers over the years. Now the waiter thinks he can make some money out of this so he secretely takes £2 for himself and only gives £1 back to each women.
This means each woman has payed £9 each, having originally payed £10 and gotten £1 back. The waiter has £2 thus the overall money payed is 3x9 + 2 = £29. So where'd the extra pound go?
they paid 9 each to the manager, who essentially received 27 but has 25 now cuz the waiter took 2. why would u add 2 to 27?
|
Yeah, there you go. I love that one
|
I don't see why a pirate will agree to receive 1 coin, when another receives 99. Would he not say fuck it, execute him, let's have a better deal? Because if he does that, he can suggest a 25% 4 way split for example and others should agree ?
|
Belgium6772 Posts
On June 17 2005 13:52 -_- wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:49 Xeofreestyler wrote:On June 17 2005 13:46 -_- wrote: one 1 two 1's one 2 and one 1 one 1 one 2 and two 1's three 1's two 2's and one 1.
they're wrong and I'm the pirate who gets the extra coin!!!
edit: Or at least mine's sexier bitches! Err, wtf no? 312211 -> one 3 one 1 two 2 two 1 -> 13112221 then that one would be one 1 one 3 two 1 three 2 one 1 -> 1113213211 Kthxbai. -_-, do you see the three before the 1? 3 ones. do you see the 2 before the 2? Two 2's. Do you see the 1 before the 1? One one KTHXBAIBITCH
Your way of solving it would be wrong since then the first 5 elements of the row would be wrong. Kthxstfubainub
Now lets stop this silly riddle and I'll here's a fresh one:
On a small planet not far away lived a strange race. A long time ago all the members of that species had one of three eye colors: blue, green or brown. In some point in history a famous war took place, initiated by the blue and brown eye faction. They genocided all green eyes, thus eliminating the green eye color from their race, and reducing the population of the planet to a few hundred. Soon after that war the factions were disbanded, and eye color was from that point on considered an inappropriate topic. Some rules were later established for the benefit of the whole society, so that something like this could never, ever happen again. The rules were as follows:
1. Nobody is allowed to talk about eyecolors. 2. If anyone gets to know his own eyecolor he must commit suicide at midnight in the town square.
Now I must explain the way this species was thinking, so you understand their reactions later on. You must understand that they all were really strict about those rules. In the beginning some people happened to accidently see their eyecolor in some reflective surface or puddle of water, and every last one of them faithfully comitted suicide the night after. After a few incidences all mirroring surfaces were removed from the cities, to minimize the risk. Also, this species was a very logical thinking. Although they still lacked knowledge in some areas, they thought clearly and logically, and trusted in the results they got, even if it led to their own death. Last, the way it worked after the rules were established was that everyone knew the eyecolor of everyone else on the planet, but not his own. Of course, on a small planet like this, they all saw everyone everyday, so a suicide was immediately noted. Well, the people on this little planet were living for a few hundred years in peace and harmony, when something bad happened:
A little spacecraft crashed down in the desert near one of the large cities, leaving a big crater. Immediately the friendly people tried to rescue the astronauts, but it was too late. The only thing they recovered from the craft was a book about mathematics. In the same night a big meeting was called on, and everyone came together in a large hall. The book was read to the whole population, because it offered new concepts that were so impressive and striking that everyone had to know about them. But, knowledge isn't always a good thing. The knowledge in that book made the people aware of facts they didnt know about before, and made them realize a few things. In the following nights everyone was really nervous.
Then, in the 250th night after the dreaded meeting, all brown eyes committed suicide, thus eliminating the whole species, and leaving the planet an empty brick in the wide universe.
Blue eyes present during the meeting: Are there more blue or brown eyes in the meeting? Number of nights in which suicides happened: Which mathematical concept made them kill themselves?
|
Because if he doesn't agree, he is going to end up with nothing, and 1 coin is better than nothing.
|
Xeo: Am I allowed to answer? I've done it before 
You might want to change it from blue to brown on your first question.
|
Belgium6772 Posts
Hold on a sec and give the others a chance
|
ive done that one before too, i wont answer
|
Belgium6772 Posts
If you guys want another one;
1 2 10 140 5740 -Next element= ?
|
pretty easy problem, prove answer is correct
Basketball player S's team statistician keeps track of the number, S(n) of successfull free throws S has made in his first n attempts of the season. Early in the season, S(n) was less than 80% of n but by the end of the season, S(n) was more than 80%. Is it necessarily true that at one point in the season S(n) was exactly 80% of n?
|
i have one:
There are sixteen prisoners on death row, who are about to be executed the next day. The warden tells the prisoners that on the day of their execution, either a white hat or a black hat will be placed on their heads. They will stand in a single file line so that the person at the front can't see any hats, the person second in line can see the first person's hat, the person third in line can see the first two people's hats, etc, and the last person in line can see everyone's hat but his own. (Nobody can see their own hat.) The warden will then, starting from the back of the line, ask each prisoner what color the hat they're wearing is. The prisoners are given the night to come up with a plan. Find the plan that guarantees the freedom of the maximum number of prisoners.
|
On June 17 2005 14:03 LTT wrote: Because if he doesn't agree, he is going to end up with nothing, and 1 coin is better than nothing.
Why? They kill the pirte but the gold is still there to split, it is easy when there is rule that gold disapire when they don't agree but you didn't mention that.
|
Wasn't that a Putnam problem? I remember seeing/doing it before.
Pacifist: Parity. (N-1) + 1/2 saved on average
|
On June 17 2005 14:08 Xeofreestyler wrote: If you guys want another one;
1 2 10 140 5740 -Next element= ?
x2,x5,x14,x41,x122
5740*122 is our answer
|
On June 17 2005 14:10 LTT wrote: Wasn't that a Putnam problem? I remember seeing/doing it before.
Pacifist: Parity. (N-1) + 1/2 saved on average
yeah it was, one of the easier ones so i figured people would get it
|
You got 12 ball's, one of the weight less OR more then the others. You have balance and you can use it 3 times.
Find the diferent ball.
|
I have one for u guys 
WRONG + /plus/ WRONG ------------- /equals/ RIGHT
|
Belgium6772 Posts
Nicely done bigballs, are you on hackquest?
Is anyone able to decipher this?
34 - ? 24 - 10 16 - 7 8 - 5 4 - ?
|
On June 17 2005 14:18 Polis wrote: You got 12 ball's, one of the weight less OR more then the others. You have balance and you can use it 3 times.
Find the diferent ball.
Easy, you put half and half, 6 remaining, half and half 3 remaining, then you put only 2, if they weight the same is the other one.
|
On June 17 2005 14:22 Xeofreestyler wrote: Nicely done bigballs, are you on hackquest?
Is anyone able to decipher this?
34 - ? 24 - 10 16 - 7 8 - 5 4 - ?
what's hackquest?
and the new one looks harder :/
|
And one old, not very difficult, but as far as I remember Newton gave a wrong answer first. Here it is: There is a lake, a boat in it, and a stone in the boat. What will happen if the the stone is taken from the boat and put in the lake? a) the level of the lake increases; b) the level of the lake decreases; c) the level of the lake stays the same;
Best regards )
/ME Now going to search old topics like that )
|
On June 17 2005 14:18 Polis wrote: You got 12 ball's, one of the weight less OR more then the others. You have balance and you can use it 3 times.
Find the diferent ball.
oh god, too many cases. ive done this problem so many times, its a good exercise
|
the eyes riddle seems pretty difficult.. i'll give it a shot, i doubt it's correct, but i need a hint if im thinking in the right direction
Blue eyes present during the meeting: 125 Are there more blue or brown eyes in the meeting? same amount Number of nights in which suicides happened: 250 Which mathematical concept made them kill themselves? statistical equal distribution
basic idea is, that you know br=num_of_browneyes, bl=num_of_blueeyes, and you assume that br=bl. your own eyecolor is x=unknown, so if it's like br=bl-1 situation, you "know" that you are bl, and kill yourself. the next night for the next person to think about it, it's bl=br, but you know what the eyecolor of the person who killed himself was. so you know that you must belong to the other group and kill yourself. da capo
|
On June 17 2005 14:22 baal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 14:18 Polis wrote: You got 12 ball's, one of the weight less OR more then the others. You have balance and you can use it 3 times.
Find the diferent ball. Easy, you put half and half, 6 remaining, half and half 3 remaining, then you put only 2, if they weight the same is the other one.
No the ball weight MORE OR LESS then others. You put 6-6 and they weight diferent then? Actually that give you no info.
|
There are 4 people who are trying to cross a bridge. One person walks across at 1 second, one at 2, one at 5, one at 10.
The bridge has holes in it, so each trip a flashlight must go across. Also, only two people may cross at once. Finally, a trip takes as long as it takes the slowest person to travel across.
Find a way to get everyone across in less than 18 seconds.
|
Baltimore, USA22254 Posts
On June 17 2005 14:10 Pacifist wrote: i have one:
There are sixteen prisoners on death row, who are about to be executed the next day. The warden tells the prisoners that on the day of their execution, either a white hat or a black hat will be placed on their heads. They will stand in a single file line so that the person at the front can't see any hats, the person second in line can see the first person's hat, the person third in line can see the first two people's hats, etc, and the last person in line can see everyone's hat but his own. (Nobody can see their own hat.) The warden will then, starting from the back of the line, ask each prisoner what color the hat they're wearing is. The prisoners are given the night to come up with a plan. Find the plan that guarantees the freedom of the maximum number of prisoners.
Well, you could do something like, first guy says the color of the hat in front of him, so the next guy knows what to say.... and then depending upon how the guy says the color of his hat (ie, says it softly or loudly, quickly vs quiet, etc.), the in front of him would know if his hat is the same color as the previous. This would guarantee everyone but the first prisoner would live. He has 50/50 shot. ^_^
|
Belgium6772 Posts
One page memory: I believe it increases, since the surface of the boat decreases the force the stone does on the lake, so if its put in with its entire weight it will increase the level of the water
It could be the other way around too though, not entirely sure x.x I once had it at a school quiz, and we werent sure so we used a fancy synonym of "stays the same" (in our language) and the dumb teacher probably didnt understand the word so gave us +1 for the answer XD
|
On June 17 2005 14:22 baal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 14:18 Polis wrote: You got 12 ball's, one of the weight less OR more then the others. You have balance and you can use it 3 times.
Find the diferent ball. Easy, you put half and half, 6 remaining, half and half 3 remaining, then you put only 2, if they weight the same is the other one.
Nah, cause you don't know if it's lighter or heavier, therefore you can't tell which of the groups of six to split for the second measurement, etc. Someone posted this a while back and a bunch of us banged on it for a while
|
Ok ill do the ball one again. Label them 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12
first you weigh 1,2,3,4v5,6,7,8
If unequal, we know the unequal ball is among the last 4. Now weigh 1,2,9v5,10,11
If equal, we know 12 is unequal, one weighing determines lighter or heavier. If unequal, odd ball is among 9,10,11. Suppose WLOG 1,2,9 was heavier. So 9 is potentially heavy, 10,11 potentially light. 3rd weighing: 8,10 v 11,12 If stays the same, 9 is heavy. If 10 side up, it is light, if 11 side up, 11 is light.
That covers when the 4x4 to start out is equal. I dont feel like doing the rest, maybe someone who has never done it can jump off from here and do the other case
|
Belgium6772 Posts
On June 17 2005 14:27 wasted wrote: the eyes riddle seems pretty difficult.. i'll give it a shot, i doubt it's correct, but i need a hint if im thinking in the right direction
Blue eyes present during the meeting: 125 Are there more blue or brown eyes in the meeting? same amount Number of nights in which suicides happened: 250 Which mathematical concept made them kill themselves? statistical equal distribution
basic idea is, that you know br=num_of_browneyes, bl=num_of_blueeyes, and you assume that br=bl. your own eyecolor is x=unknown, so if it's like br=bl-1 situation, you "know" that you are bl, and kill yourself. the next night for the next person to think about it, it's bl=br, but you know what the eyecolor of the person who killed himself was. so you know that you must belong to the other group and kill yourself. da capo
No, this isnt the right way =) But I'll give you a hint: The mathematical concept is called induction. With other words: Proving something by proving the opposide is wrong. If you cant find it after this I'll post the answer, its quite hard
|
On June 17 2005 14:03 LTT wrote: Because if he doesn't agree, he is going to end up with nothing, and 1 coin is better than nothing.
if he doesn't agree, the first pirate gets executed and they can work for a better solution whoever gets a very small share will be unhappy with the first guy getting more and vote against... as long as the first guy gets more than others, they logically shouldn't vote for it I don't really see what perspective you are considering
|
On June 17 2005 14:34 Xeofreestyler wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 14:27 wasted wrote: the eyes riddle seems pretty difficult.. i'll give it a shot, i doubt it's correct, but i need a hint if im thinking in the right direction
Blue eyes present during the meeting: 125 Are there more blue or brown eyes in the meeting? same amount Number of nights in which suicides happened: 250 Which mathematical concept made them kill themselves? statistical equal distribution
basic idea is, that you know br=num_of_browneyes, bl=num_of_blueeyes, and you assume that br=bl. your own eyecolor is x=unknown, so if it's like br=bl-1 situation, you "know" that you are bl, and kill yourself. the next night for the next person to think about it, it's bl=br, but you know what the eyecolor of the person who killed himself was. so you know that you must belong to the other group and kill yourself. da capo No, this isnt the right way =) But I'll give you a hint: The mathematical concept is called induction. With other words: Proving something by proving the opposide is wrong. If you cant find it after this I'll post the answer, its quite hard 
that's contradiction
induction is when you build up for all numbers by showing a connection between n and n+1
|
On June 17 2005 14:35 MPXMX wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 14:03 LTT wrote: Because if he doesn't agree, he is going to end up with nothing, and 1 coin is better than nothing. if he doesn't agree, the first pirate gets executed and they can work for a better solution whoever gets a very small share will be unhappy with the first guy getting more and vote against... as long as the first guy gets more than others, they logically shouldn't vote for it I don't really see what perspective you are considering
msg me on aim, beanbags99, ill explain it
|
would be cool, but I don't use AIM
|
Belgium9947 Posts
On June 17 2005 14:36 BigBalls wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 14:34 Xeofreestyler wrote:On June 17 2005 14:27 wasted wrote: the eyes riddle seems pretty difficult.. i'll give it a shot, i doubt it's correct, but i need a hint if im thinking in the right direction
Blue eyes present during the meeting: 125 Are there more blue or brown eyes in the meeting? same amount Number of nights in which suicides happened: 250 Which mathematical concept made them kill themselves? statistical equal distribution
basic idea is, that you know br=num_of_browneyes, bl=num_of_blueeyes, and you assume that br=bl. your own eyecolor is x=unknown, so if it's like br=bl-1 situation, you "know" that you are bl, and kill yourself. the next night for the next person to think about it, it's bl=br, but you know what the eyecolor of the person who killed himself was. so you know that you must belong to the other group and kill yourself. da capo No, this isnt the right way =) But I'll give you a hint: The mathematical concept is called induction. With other words: Proving something by proving the opposide is wrong. If you cant find it after this I'll post the answer, its quite hard  that's contradiction induction is when you build up for all numbers by showing a connection between n and n+1
he made a mathematical term clear to you in english, thats already quite a prestation
I'd want to see you do that in another language
|
Maybe im not being an asshole like someone else and im trying to help his english cause he already said once he has trouble in it?
|
|
On June 17 2005 14:34 Xeofreestyler wrote:No, this isnt the right way =) But I'll give you a hint: The mathematical concept is called induction. With other words: Proving something by proving the opposide is wrong. If you cant find it after this I'll post the answer, its quite hard 
hmm, well so everyone makes the assumption "i have XYZ_colored eyes" and contradicts that assumption thus proving (s)he has the other color? dont think i will get that anytime soon, so if i'm the only person thinking about this, i give up and you can reveal the answer
|
On June 17 2005 14:09 BigBalls wrote: pretty easy problem, prove answer is correct
Basketball player S's team statistician keeps track of the number, S(n) of successfull free throws S has made in his first n attempts of the season. Early in the season, S(n) was less than 80% of n but by the end of the season, S(n) was more than 80%. Is it necessarily true that at one point in the season S(n) was exactly 80% of n?
This is one I haven't heard... I guess for 80% it is necessarily true... because 80% means you have exactly 4 makes for each miss. It's impossible to improve to >= 80% with a miss, only a make. Assume you have X misses and Y makes. So at the point where you go to or above 80%, you are going from (X,Y) to (X,Y+1) and from Y < 4X to either Y > 4X or Y=4X. But that's not possible without going through Y = 4X, because X and Y both increment by ones and are both integers.
Really convoluted wording I just made... but I convinced myself...
It's a cool problem. I guess the same thing holds for every percentage which can be expressed as N/(N+1) with N a positive integer?
|
Belgium6772 Posts
Bigballs,rage, chill. Thats just the definition I heard for induction and it seemed to be the correct answer for the riddle too... Anyway;
They know they are mixed, with blue-eyed people and brown-eyed people, so there must be at least one of each. When the spaceship crashed, from the math book they learned about mathematical induction. Therefore, they knew that if there was only one brown-eyed person, the brown-eyed person would find out cos* eye color from the fact that everybody else had blue eyes, and kill cosself. If there were two brown-eyed people, each would expect the other to kill themself, and, upon finding the other alive the next morning, realize that the other person saw someone with brown eyes, which must be them, and both would die the second night. If there were three brown-eyed people, each would assume the situation in the previous sentence was taking place, until they saw that the other two were alive on the third day, at which time they would realize that there was another brown-eyed person, who must be themself, so all three would kill themselves on the third night. And so on. Since it took until the 250th night, 250 brown-eyed people killed themselves. Upon awakening the next morning and finding all of the brown-eyed people dead, the blue-eyed people would know that they had blue eyes and kill themselves the next night, leaving the planet unpopulated in just two nights of suicides.
Number of blue eyes? -249 Number of nights in which suicides happened after the meeting: -2 Are there more blue or brown eyes in the meeting? -brown Which mathematical concept made them kill themselves? -Mathematical induction
|
On June 17 2005 14:25 One Page Memory wrote: And one old, not very difficult, but as far as I remember Newton gave a wrong answer first. Here it is: There is a lake, a boat in it, and a stone in the boat. What will happen if the the stone is taken from the boat and put in the lake? a) the level of the lake increases; b) the level of the lake decreases; c) the level of the lake stays the same;
Id say the the weight/volume (i forget what's the english for this, density?) of the stone is bigger than that of water. So the stone is able to push up more water when in the boat than when it replaces it's own volume with stone in the water. So the water level will decrease...
|
On June 17 2005 14:27 BigBalls wrote: There are 4 people who are trying to cross a bridge. One person walks across at 1 second, one at 2, one at 5, one at 10.
The bridge has holes in it, so each trip a flashlight must go across. Also, only two people may cross at once. Finally, a trip takes as long as it takes the slowest person to travel across.
Find a way to get everyone across in less than 18 seconds.
i assume this means:
there can only go 2 over at the same time, since the flashlight has to be returned, thus the following sequence must happen
side A <-> side B 4 <-> 0 // 2 from A to B = pass 1 2 <-> 2 // 1 from B to A = pass 2 3 <-> 1 // 2 from A to B = pass 3 1 <-> 3 // 1 from B to A = pass 4 2 <-> 2 // 2 from A to B = pass 5 0 <-> 4 // done
so, 5 passes and only 18 secs
5 and 10 can't go together, since one of them had to go back, which would kill the deadline. if they have to go seperate, their trips will last fifteen secs since you have to go back at least two times, you use at least another two secs, if you use 1 as the one who goes back. that leaves pass5, which will at least cost two seconds
that sums up to 19.
i'm curious how to do it quicker.
|
huh aseq smarter then Newton )) RIGHT
|
|
On June 17 2005 15:07 wasted wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 14:27 BigBalls wrote: There are 4 people who are trying to cross a bridge. One person walks across at 1 second, one at 2, one at 5, one at 10.
The bridge has holes in it, so each trip a flashlight must go across. Also, only two people may cross at once. Finally, a trip takes as long as it takes the slowest person to travel across.
Find a way to get everyone across in less than 18 seconds. i assume this means: there can only go 2 over at the same time, since the flashlight has to be returned, thus the following sequence must happen side A <-> side B 4 <-> 0 // 2 from A to B = pass 1 2 <-> 2 // 1 from B to A = pass 2 3 <-> 1 // 2 from A to B = pass 3 1 <-> 3 // 1 from B to A = pass 4 2 <-> 2 // 2 from A to B = pass 5 0 <-> 4 // done so, 5 passes and only 18 secs 5 and 10 can't go together, since one of them had to go back, which would kill the deadline. if they have to go seperate, their trips will last fifteen secs since you have to go back at least two times, you use at least another two secs, if you use 1 as the one who goes back. that leaves pass5, which will at least cost two seconds that sums up to 19. i'm curious how to do it quicker.
be clever
|
On June 17 2005 14:53 Xeofreestyler wrote: Bigballs,rage, chill. Thats just the definition I heard for induction and it seemed to be the correct answer for the riddle too... Anyway;
They know they are mixed, with blue-eyed people and brown-eyed people, so there must be at least one of each. When the spaceship crashed, from the math book they learned about mathematical induction. Therefore, they knew that if there was only one brown-eyed person, the brown-eyed person would find out cos* eye color from the fact that everybody else had blue eyes, and kill cosself. If there were two brown-eyed people, each would expect the other to kill themself, and, upon finding the other alive the next morning, realize that the other person saw someone with brown eyes, which must be them, and both would die the second night. If there were three brown-eyed people, each would assume the situation in the previous sentence was taking place, until they saw that the other two were alive on the third day, at which time they would realize that there was another brown-eyed person, who must be themself, so all three would kill themselves on the third night. And so on. Since it took until the 250th night, 250 brown-eyed people killed themselves. Upon awakening the next morning and finding all of the brown-eyed people dead, the blue-eyed people would know that they had blue eyes and kill themselves the next night, leaving the planet unpopulated in just two nights of suicides.
Number of blue eyes? -249 Number of nights in which suicides happened after the meeting: -2 Are there more blue or brown eyes in the meeting? -brown Which mathematical concept made them kill themselves? -Mathematical induction
guess i would have been the only survivor on that island since i couldn't think that deep
|
On June 17 2005 13:21 LTT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:20 Pistachio wrote: Here's a better one:
Three woman go to their favorite restaurant and each order some food that costs £30 overall. So they each give £10 to the waiter who then gives it to the manager. The manager however decides to give £5 back to the women as a good will gesture since the women have been such loyal customers over the years. Now the waiter thinks he can make some money out of this so he secretely takes £2 for himself and only gives £1 back to each women.
This means each woman has payed £9 each, having originally payed £10 and gotten £1 back. The waiter has £2 thus the overall money payed is 3x9 + 2 = £29. So where'd the extra pound go? Old One. Order of Operations.
errr NO -.-
its simply that 3x9 + 2 makes no sense at all, its like saying something like this:
4 + 4 = 8 8 - 2 = 6 then: 8 - 4 = 6 <--- wooooot
its just confusing ppl so they dont think that what the waiter took has nothing to do with anything in 3x9.
|
This one shouldn't be to hard for any of you but might as well post it.
A Robot Gazelle start at a city in Uganda and travels at a speed of 10 miles per hour toward Kenya. After reaching Kenya the Gazelle returns, traveling over exactly the same distance, at only 2 miles per hour. What is the gazelles average speed over the entire Journy? (assume that the Gazelle turned around instantly once it reached Kenya.)
|
On June 17 2005 16:27 Lord)Lw( wrote: This one shouldn't be to hard for any of you but might as well post it.
A Robot Gazelle start at a city in Uganda and travels at a speed of 10 miles per hour toward Kenya. After reaching Kenya the Gazelle returns, traveling over exactly the same distance, at only 2 miles per hour. What is the gazelles average speed over the entire Journy? (assume that the Gazelle turned around instantly once it reached Kenya.)
Hmm average speed = total distance/total time taken so I'm guessing if we assume the distance between uganda and kenya is 10 miles, it would've taken him 1 hour to get to kenya, and 5 hours to get back to uganda, and the distance is 20 miles altogether, so thats 20/(5+1) = 3.3 recurring mile per hour??
skyglow1
|
Like i said, not a hard one....
|
|
does anyone else feel like a dumbass after reading most of these? I swear each one that comes up I spend like 10 min trying to figure out get close, and someone posts something that I feel I could not have missed. BAH!
|
On June 17 2005 13:39 loloko2 wrote: PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
OK HERE IS ANOTHER ONE, I NEED HELP ON THIS, BECAUSE IT WAS FOR HOMEWORK A FEW DAYS AGO AND I NEED ALOT OF HELP , PLEASE...
Why does the equation X^n + Y^n = Z^n it doesnt have integer solutions if n > = 3 .
Find me a solution please. Or if it cant be done then explain why you cant?.
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
Well, it took more than 200 years, until Andrew Wiles (a Mathematician from Princetown) through 1987-1994 came up to solve that problem.
The answer loloko2, X^n + Y^n = Z^n doesn't have integer solutions if n > = 3, is because that all eliptical cuvers are modular, a mathematical conjecture enounces by Tagimura Siyama during the late 1940s.
Oh and by the way, that problem is aka "Fermat's Last Theorem"
|
@BigBalls
please resolve the bridge riddle. or at least tell me via pm
|
On June 17 2005 18:20 lightman wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:39 loloko2 wrote: PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
OK HERE IS ANOTHER ONE, I NEED HELP ON THIS, BECAUSE IT WAS FOR HOMEWORK A FEW DAYS AGO AND I NEED ALOT OF HELP , PLEASE...
Why does the equation X^n + Y^n = Z^n it doesnt have integer solutions if n > = 3 .
Find me a solution please. Or if it cant be done then explain why you cant?.
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP Well, it took more than 200 years, until Andrew Wiles (a Mathematician from Princetown) through 1987-1994 came up to solve that problem. The answer loloko2, X^n + Y^n = Z^n doesn't have integer solutions if n > = 3, is because that all eliptical cuvers are modular, a mathematical conjecture enounces by Tagimura Siyama during the late 1940s. Oh and by the way, that problem is aka "Fermat's Last Theorem"
My teacher said that if you solved it you would win a fields medal or something like that, which would be the equivalent to nobel, but i guess everyone knows the answer now --v?
|
u shared these with ur teacher at school?
|
My teacher won national math olympics these would be piece of cake for her
|
So far it looks like BigBalls is good at this I congratulate him for both being smart and intereseted, and for being passionate and hunger to this. But also I may say so far I sense his talent hasn't been challenged yet, so I'll start to warm him up (or anyone else that accepts the challenge). It's easy, requires some reasoning and math and that's it:
Given an equilateral triangle with a side that lenghts L. Each one of the three sides is divided into n+1 equal parts, and for each point that divides a side, you draw n parallel lines to each one of the three sides.
Calculate the total number of triangles obtained, this is, the total number of equilateral triangles that will have by side-lenght L/n , 2L/n , .....L.
|
SPOILER TO BRIDGE RIDDLE:
1 and 2 guy cross (2 sec) 1 guy comes back (1 sec) 5 and 10 guy cross (10 sec) 2 guy comes back(2 sec) 1 and 2 guy cross(2 sec)
TOTAL: 17 sec
|
On June 17 2005 15:16 BigBalls wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 15:07 wasted wrote:On June 17 2005 14:27 BigBalls wrote: There are 4 people who are trying to cross a bridge. One person walks across at 1 second, one at 2, one at 5, one at 10.
The bridge has holes in it, so each trip a flashlight must go across. Also, only two people may cross at once. Finally, a trip takes as long as it takes the slowest person to travel across.
Find a way to get everyone across in less than 18 seconds. i assume this means: there can only go 2 over at the same time, since the flashlight has to be returned, thus the following sequence must happen side A <-> side B 4 <-> 0 // 2 from A to B = pass 1 2 <-> 2 // 1 from B to A = pass 2 3 <-> 1 // 2 from A to B = pass 3 1 <-> 3 // 1 from B to A = pass 4 2 <-> 2 // 2 from A to B = pass 5 0 <-> 4 // done so, 5 passes and only 18 secs 5 and 10 can't go together, since one of them had to go back, which would kill the deadline. if they have to go seperate, their trips will last fifteen secs since you have to go back at least two times, you use at least another two secs, if you use 1 as the one who goes back. that leaves pass5, which will at least cost two seconds that sums up to 19. i'm curious how to do it quicker. be clever 
1 and 2 go --> 2 seconds 1 goes back --> 1 second 5 and 10 go --> 10 seconds 2 goes back --> 2 seconds 2 and 1 go --> 2 seconds
17 seconds
|
doh....
now i feel stupid
5 and 10 can't go together, since one of them had to go back, which would kill the deadline.
nice one by me...
|
On June 17 2005 14:29 EvilTeletubby wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 14:10 Pacifist wrote: i have one:
There are sixteen prisoners on death row, who are about to be executed the next day. The warden tells the prisoners that on the day of their execution, either a white hat or a black hat will be placed on their heads. They will stand in a single file line so that the person at the front can't see any hats, the person second in line can see the first person's hat, the person third in line can see the first two people's hats, etc, and the last person in line can see everyone's hat but his own. (Nobody can see their own hat.) The warden will then, starting from the back of the line, ask each prisoner what color the hat they're wearing is. The prisoners are given the night to come up with a plan. Find the plan that guarantees the freedom of the maximum number of prisoners. Well, you could do something like, first guy says the color of the hat in front of him, so the next guy knows what to say.... and then depending upon how the guy says the color of his hat (ie, says it softly or loudly, quickly vs quiet, etc.), the in front of him would know if his hat is the same color as the previous. This would guarantee everyone but the first prisoner would live. He has 50/50 shot. ^_^
u cant change quality of voice or something like that assume that each prisoner speaks in a monotonous voice, the only distinguishable aspects of his voice is "black" or "white"
|
On June 17 2005 19:01 BCloud wrote: My teacher won national math olympics these would be piece of cake for her
Dude, these problems are a piece of cake for anyone with basic (but solid) calculus knowledge.
It just happens that you are not going to find much of that people in a BW forum.
|
On June 17 2005 18:56 BCloud wrote: My teacher said that if you solved it you would win a fields medal or something like that, which would be the equivalent to nobel, but i guess everyone knows the answer now --v?
Oh and Andrew won nothing, and he has said he doesn't really want anything. What he sure won was a place in history as one of the greatest by solving one of the most (the most for some people) intriguing math problems of all time.
Oh and by the way, do you suck your teacher's cock or something?
|
i bet lightman is a pimp with the bitches.
|
On June 17 2005 19:06 lightman wrote: So far it looks like BigBalls is good at this I congratulate him for both being smart and intereseted, and for being passionate and hunger to this. But also I may say so far I sense his talent hasn't been challenged yet, so I'll start to warm him up (or anyone else that accepts the challenge). It's easy, requires some reasoning and math and that's it:
Given an equilateral triangle with a side that lenghts L. Each one of the three sides is divided into n+1 equal parts, and for each point that divides a side, you draw n parallel lines to each one of the three sides.
Calculate the total number of triangles obtained, this is, the total number of equilateral triangles that will have by side-lenght L/n , 2L/n , .....L.
haha, im a little drunk, just got back from a wedding reception, ill take a look at this tomorrow, looks pretty cool, ill try doing some sort of induction on it, im pretty sure thats the best way to approach it, ill give it a look tomorrow
oh yeah, and that other problem with the 34 - ? 24 - etc, can the writer give me a clue or something lol, i dont know where to start on it
|
oh gee a tech support thread.
so which one of you paste bandits is gonna come fix my computer
|
On June 17 2005 19:15 lightman wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 18:56 BCloud wrote: My teacher said that if you solved it you would win a fields medal or something like that, which would be the equivalent to nobel, but i guess everyone knows the answer now --v? Oh and Andrew won nothing, and he has said he doesn't really want anything. What he sure won was a place in history as one of the greatest by solving one of the most (the most for some people) intriguing math problems of all time. Oh and by the way, do you suck your teacher's cock or something? my teacher is a she idiot, next time read it carefully
|
You have three spinners with 4 slots on each one. Assign the number 1-12 on them so that spinner A beats spinner B on average, spinner B beats spinner C on average and spinner C beats spinner A on average.
(by beat I mean has a higher average)
Show a proof as well, dont simply list numbers. The proof will not be an equation, but it will be a logical set.
|
You mean that when you spin the spinners (lets say its A and B), the # that comes up on spinner A is greater than the # on spinner B more than half the time?
|
Calgary25986 Posts
Well I had it done but I don't have "proof". I don't really know what you expect from that... >_<
|
yes. exactly right. I mean, "on average" spinner A beats B, B beats C, and C beats A.
Basically, the majority of the time A >B>C>A. All you need to show is a scenario where this happens more than 50% of the time for each one.
PM me the number sets chill.
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
On June 17 2005 19:06 lightman wrote: So far it looks like BigBalls is good at this I congratulate him for both being smart and intereseted, and for being passionate and hunger to this. But also I may say so far I sense his talent hasn't been challenged yet, so I'll start to warm him up (or anyone else that accepts the challenge). It's easy, requires some reasoning and math and that's it:
Given an equilateral triangle with a side that lenghts L. Each one of the three sides is divided into n+1 equal parts, and for each point that divides a side, you draw n parallel lines to each one of the three sides.
Calculate the total number of triangles obtained, this is, the total number of equilateral triangles that will have by side-lenght L/n , 2L/n , .....L.
Just got back home, 7am, I'm dead tired so I hope this will make sense 
This problem looks cool (had already seen all the other problems of the thread). I'm pretty sure you mean L/(n+1), 2L/(n+1), etc. for the lengths, anyway I'll use n as your n+1 as defined initially or your n as defined by the side-lenghts.
Let k(p,m) be the number of triangles of side-lengths p*L/m when n=m.
n=1, k(1,1) = 1 (number of triangles of length L at n=1) n=2, k(2,2) = 1, k(1,2) = 3+1 n=3, k(3,3) = 1, k(2,3) = 3, k(3,3) = 5+3+1 and we could go on... More generally, when we go one step further at n, we could see it as enlarging the triangle at (n-1) by one line, so we just have to count how many triangles of the good length we are adding. First we are adding new triangles which base belongs to the new bigger base (new triangles facing er... upside up ?) and we'll have how many... we'll have n-(p-1) for k(p,n). We shouldn't forget the new triangles which don't have their base but just one point on the new enlarged triangle base (new triangles facing upside down) and we have something like (n-p)-(p-1) for k(p,n) that is n+1-2p, or more exactly the max of either that or 0 if we don't have any such triangle, which can happen.
Soooooo, we should have something like k(p,n) = k(p,n-1) + n+1-p + max(n+1-2p,0) and with that we can find all of them. Maybe we could find an elegant formulat, but that will be left as dessert for whoever wants to.
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
What's a spinner ?
edit : here's another sequence (haven't found xeo's yet -_-), though I'm pretty sure I must have posted it already : 10, 11, 20, 31, 52, 121, 200
|
On June 17 2005 22:51 Catyoul wrote: What's a spinner ?
edit : here's another sequence (haven't found xeo's yet -_-), though I'm pretty sure I must have posted it already : 10, 11, 20, 31, 52, 121, 200
314,512(hah! easy one),851,1228
|
You have ten stacks of coins, and each one has 10 coins in it. However, one of the stacks consists entirely of counterfeits, which each weigh one gram more than a standard coin. You know the weight of a standard coin. You have a scale that will tell you the exact weight of whatever you put on it, but for the sake of having an interesting puzzle you may only use this scale once.
How do you determine which stack is counterfeit?
|
On June 17 2005 13:39 loloko2 wrote: PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
OK HERE IS ANOTHER ONE, I NEED HELP ON THIS, BECAUSE IT WAS FOR HOMEWORK A FEW DAYS AGO AND I NEED ALOT OF HELP , PLEASE...
Why does the equation X^n + Y^n = Z^n it doesnt have integer solutions if n > = 3 .
Find me a solution please. Or if it cant be done then explain why you cant?.
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
X = 0, Y = Z ;
X = Z, Y = 0;
X = -Y, Z = 0, n is odd;
It seems that there's plenty of integer solutions.
|
On June 17 2005 23:26 LordOfDabu wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 13:39 loloko2 wrote: PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP
OK HERE IS ANOTHER ONE, I NEED HELP ON THIS, BECAUSE IT WAS FOR HOMEWORK A FEW DAYS AGO AND I NEED ALOT OF HELP , PLEASE...
Why does the equation X^n + Y^n = Z^n it doesnt have integer solutions if n > = 3 .
Find me a solution please. Or if it cant be done then explain why you cant?.
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP X = 0, Y = Z ; X = Z, Y = 0; X = -Y, Z = 0, n is odd; It seems that there's plenty of integer solutions. 
Umm no...
|
Um, yes. Checking them yourself should be pretty simple.
With that said, the correct statement of the theorem is supposed to be that it has no non-zero integer solutions.
|
Good to see Catyoul and BigBalls back tearing shit up with these math puzzles again. Couple new faces as well. Fun times with that boy/girl percentage problem where I made an ass of myself for at least a good 10 pages. I've been helping out with some of the contest work at my local high school, this was the last question off of the Euclid (grade 12 contest). Haven't taken the time to work out part c) yet, the first two are easy.
Consider a list of the first n positive integers (the problem was stated with opening/closing lockers but that's not needed). Proceed in this fashion, beginning with 1, remove every second number from the list (i.e. 2, 4, 6, ...) until you reach the end. Then of those numbers that remain starting with n and going backwards, again remove every second number. Again repeat this procedure going back up and down the list until there is only one number left. Let f(n) be this number.
Ex. n = 15 We remove 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 13 9 5 1 7 15 3 This gives us f(15) = 11
a) f(50) = ? (Grunt work if you want) b) Show there is no n such that f(n) = 2005 (Easy) c) Show there are infinitely many n such that f(n) = f(2005)
|
On June 17 2005 23:22 LordOfDabu wrote: You have ten stacks of coins, and each one has 10 coins in it. However, one of the stacks consists entirely of counterfeits, which each weigh one gram more than a standard coin. You know the weight of a standard coin. You have a scale that will tell you the exact weight of whatever you put on it, but for the sake of having an interesting puzzle you may only use this scale once.
How do you determine which stack is counterfeit?
Take 1 coin from stack 1, 2 coins from stack 2, etc. Weigh the 55 coins. If the weight of a genuine coin is y, the correct weight should be 55y. Then deduce which stack is the counterfeit based on how much you are off by.
|
On June 17 2005 23:11 LTT wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 22:51 Catyoul wrote: What's a spinner ?
edit : here's another sequence (haven't found xeo's yet -_-), though I'm pretty sure I must have posted it already : 10, 11, 20, 31, 52, 121, 200 314,512(hah! easy one),851,1228
is that 2^1 base 2, 2^2 base 3, 2^3 base 4, etc?
|
On June 18 2005 00:41 gg2w wrote: Good to see Catyoul and BigBalls back tearing shit up with these math puzzles again. Couple new faces as well. Fun times with that boy/girl percentage problem where I made an ass of myself for at least a good 10 pages. I've been helping out with some of the contest work at my local high school, this was the last question off of the Euclid (grade 12 contest). Haven't taken the time to work out part c) yet, the first two are easy.
Consider a list of the first n positive integers (the problem was stated with opening/closing lockers but that's not needed). Proceed in this fashion, beginning with 1, remove every second number from the list (i.e. 2, 4, 6, ...) until you reach the end. Then of those numbers that remain starting with n and going backwards, again remove every second number. Again repeat this procedure going back up and down the list until there is only one number left. Let f(n) be this number.
Ex. n = 15 We remove 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 13 9 5 1 7 15 3 This gives us f(15) = 11
a) f(50) = ? (Grunt work if you want) b) Show there is no n such that f(n) = 2005 (Easy) c) Show there are infinitely many n such that f(n) = f(2005)
a. 13579 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 49 45 41 37 33 29 25 21 17 13 9 5 1 1 9 17 25 33 41 49 49 33 17 1 1 33 33
f(50)=33
b. Basically, look at the pattern. First time through, all even numbers are removed. Second time through, if n = 3mod4 or 0mod4, then all 1mod4 are removed, if n=2mod4 or 1mod4, all 3mod4 are removed. 2005 is 1 mod4, so we want n to be 2mod4 or 1mod4. So, all we have left are numbers 1mod4. 1 5 9 etc
Third time through, all 5mod8 are eliminated. 2005 is 5mod8, thus f(n) cannot be 2005
c. ill get back to this, gonna shower
|
i have a thought on c!
n=1, f(n)=1 n=2, f(n) = 1 n=3, f(n) = 3 n=4, f(n) = 3 n=5, f(n) = 1 n=6, f(n) = 1 n=7, f(n) = 3 n=8, f(n) = 3 n=9, f(n) = 9 n=10, f(n)=9 n=11, f(n) = 11 n=12, f(n)=11 n=13, f(n)=9 n=15, f(n) = 11 n=17, f(n)= 1 n=19, f(n)= 3
1,5,17 are the same 3,7,19 are the same
Looks like n+2^2, n+2^4, etc are the same
so just glancing, im guessing f(n) = f(n+2^(2y)) for all y>=1
|
a proof i dont see for it, hmmmmmmmm
maybe catyoul or Ltt will clean up my mess
|
On June 18 2005 00:24 LordOfDabu wrote: Um, yes. Checking them yourself should be pretty simple.
With that said, the correct statement of the theorem is supposed to be that it has no non-zero integer solutions. Zero isn't an integer.
|
lordofdabu is right
zero is an integer, youre thinking of natural numbers malmis
|
|
The triangle problem is still unanswered
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
On June 18 2005 07:01 lightman wrote: The triangle problem is still unanswered I think I've pretty much answered it. Now coming back to it with a good night (or should i say day) sleep, it's pretty straightforward to find a direct formula for each element.
k(p,n) = k(p,n-1) + (n+1-p) + max(n+1-2p,0) = k(p,n-2) + (n-p) + max(n-2p,0) + (n+1-p) + max(n+1-2p,0) = k(p,p-1) + (p+1-p) + ... + (2p-1+1-p) + (2p+1-p) + (2p+1-2p) + .. + (n+1-p) +(n+1-2p) To get from 2nd to 3rd line, I've just went back step by step, k(p,p-1) is of course 0 so everything is known in that line. The separation at n=2p-1 comes from the fact that it's the point where n+1-2p gets >= 0 so we have to include the second recurrence term. Actually we have 2 cases I should have separated earlier.
Either n+1-2p >= 0 or not. If n >= 2p-1, we have the sum written above. If n <= 2p-1, the max(n+1-2p,0) is always 0, so it actually simplifies to : k(p,n) = (p+1-p) + ... + (n+1-p)
So, we have 2 cases. 1. n <= 2p-1 : k(p,n) = sum(k+1-p) for k=p -> n = (n+1-p)(n+2-p)/2
2. n >= 2p-1 : k(p,n) = sum(k+1-p) for k=p -> 2p-1 + sum(2k+2-3) for k=2p -> n = p(p+1)/2 + (n+1-2p)(n+2-p)
Tadaaaaaaa.
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
Nice problem gg2w. BigBalls : I think your conjecture is false, doesn't work for 7 and 11 for example. Nice intuition however, there definitely seems to be something with powers of 2 and even powers of 2. Looks like some fractal-like structure going like this :
1 -> 2^(2p+1) : block A 2^(2p+1)+1 -> 2^(2p+2) : block B 2^(2p+2)+1 -> 2^(2p+3) : A, B
thus giving something like :
1-2-4-----8--------16----------------32-------------------------------------------------------64 A B AB CDCD ABABCDCD E F EF EFEF GHGH EFEFEFEFGHGH 64---- ...-- 128 ABABCDCDABABCDCDEFEFEFEFGHGHEFEFEFEFGHGH
Gotta go now, but I'll be back to formalize and try to prove it
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
Actually, BigBalls, your conjecture is true with an additional hypothesis : f(n) = f(n+2^(2k)) for k such as 2^2k > n
The structure described in my previous post is a direct consequence of this.
|
haha, bigballs just proved this is load of bullshit :p GL HF.
|
sorrow eyes, its not that hard even.
all lights that are hit twice are on, hit 4 times, hit 6 times.
so powers of 2, 4, 6, etc
however, powers of 4,6 are subsets of powers of 2. thus, all powers of 2 are on
|
On June 18 2005 00:45 gg2w wrote:Show nested quote +On June 17 2005 23:22 LordOfDabu wrote: You have ten stacks of coins, and each one has 10 coins in it. However, one of the stacks consists entirely of counterfeits, which each weigh one gram more than a standard coin. You know the weight of a standard coin. You have a scale that will tell you the exact weight of whatever you put on it, but for the sake of having an interesting puzzle you may only use this scale once.
How do you determine which stack is counterfeit? Take 1 coin from stack 1, 2 coins from stack 2, etc. Weigh the 55 coins. If the weight of a genuine coin is y, the correct weight should be 55y. Then deduce which stack is the counterfeit based on how much you are off by.
nicely done
|
On June 18 2005 19:36 BigBalls wrote: sorrow eyes, its not that hard even.
all lights that are hit twice are on, hit 4 times, hit 6 times.
so powers of 2, 4, 6, etc
however, powers of 4,6 are subsets of powers of 2. thus, all powers of 2 are on
hmm, im sure that number 1 bulb got hit once, and its on. 2 got hit twice, and its off T_T enlight me...[
|
i mean after the initial hit when theyre all on.
so 1 is hit 0 times after that
the ones that are on after that are ones that are hit an even number of times. this means they are even powers,
so they are x^(2y) = (x^y)^2, so all square numbers stay on
|
On June 18 2005 19:45 BigBalls wrote: i mean after the initial hit when theyre all on.
so 1 is hit 0 times after that
the ones that are on after that are ones that are hit an even number of times. this means they are even powers,
so they are x^(2y) = (x^y)^2, so all square numbers stay on
Hi again 
and all the other numbers stays off? for example, 24 is not a square number but it still stays on switch on/off 1...............on 2...............off 3...............on 4...............off 6...............on 12.............off 24.............on
|
|
hahaah pwnt :D thx for prompt replies
|
think of it this way
a number after 1 will be hit by itself.
thus, to stay on, it needs either 1, 3, 5, etc factors.
factors come in pairs unless they are squares
thus the only way for a number to have an odd number of factors is if its a square
|
Yeah, I forgot about factors come in pairs part, already edited post. Thanks a bunch Math major pwns doesnt it 
K I got a question:
Background: A king has a tiger, he hid the tiger behind one of the five doors. A knight wants to marry the king's daughter, he must open one door and kills the tiger.
The King says: Young worrier, the tiger will ALWAYS caught you by suprise when you open the door which contains it.
The knight thoughs: Because the tiger will always caught me by suprise, it must not be in the last door because when I fond the first four doors are empty, it must be in the last one, and that's not a suprise at all. So then it must not be in the second last door for the same reason... and the third to the last door, and goes on... It is no tiger behind anydoors!
The knight proceed happily to open each door, convinced that there isnt any tiger... and once he opens the second door, a tiger jumps out, and that completely suprised the knight.
Which part of the knight's thought is flawed?
|
haha, yeah its fun
right now im doing research on difference sets
Basically, start with a Group G of order v. A subset D of G is a (v,k,lambda) difference set if Delta D = lambda * (G-0). Delta D = (d-d', d,d' are in D, d!=d'). So basically, the set Delta D has each non identity element of G exactly lambda times. Let me give you an example.
D={1,2,4} is a (7,3,1) difference set in Z7. Delta D = {1-2,1-4,2-1,2-4,4-1,4-2} = {6,4,1,5,3,2} (addition in Z7) = {1,2,3,4,5,6}, which is 1 copy of each non identity element in Z7. It's interesting stuff, my professor is basically the leading guy in the field.
|
|
On June 18 2005 08:40 Catyoul wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2005 07:01 lightman wrote: The triangle problem is still unanswered I think I've pretty much answered it. Now coming back to it with a good night (or should i say day) sleep, it's pretty straightforward to find a direct formula for each element. k(p,n) = k(p,n-1) + (n+1-p) + max(n+1-2p,0) = k(p,n-2) + (n-p) + max(n-2p,0) + (n+1-p) + max(n+1-2p,0) = k(p,p-1) + (p+1-p) + ... + (2p-1+1-p) + (2p+1-p) + (2p+1-2p) + .. + (n+1-p) +(n+1-2p) To get from 2nd to 3rd line, I've just went back step by step, k(p,p-1) is of course 0 so everything is known in that line. The separation at n=2p-1 comes from the fact that it's the point where n+1-2p gets >= 0 so we have to include the second recurrence term. Actually we have 2 cases I should have separated earlier. Either n+1-2p >= 0 or not. If n >= 2p-1, we have the sum written above. If n <= 2p-1, the max(n+1-2p,0) is always 0, so it actually simplifies to : k(p,n) = (p+1-p) + ... + (n+1-p) So, we have 2 cases. 1. n <= 2p-1 : k(p,n) = sum(k+1-p) for k=p -> n = (n+1-p)(n+2-p)/2 2. n >= 2p-1 : k(p,n) = sum(k+1-p) for k=p -> 2p-1 + sum(2k+2-3) for k=2p -> n = p(p+1)/2 + (n+1-2p)(n+2-p) Tadaaaaaaa.
First of all I can't really understand your solution but from what I read, you don't make any difference between the triangle positions and that is your mistake.
The problem is as follows:
So now you have to distinguish between the standing triangles and the upside down triangles.
The standing triangles satisfy this relation
Parallel lines 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total 0 1 1 1 3 1 4 2 6 3 1 10 3 10 6 3 1 20 4 15 10 6 3 1 35 5 21 15 10 6 3 1 56 6 28 21 15 10 6 3 1 84 7 36 28 21 15 10 6 3 1 120
while the upside down triangles follow this table:
Parallel lines 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 6 1 7 4 10 3 13 5 15 6 1 22 6 21 10 3 34 7 28 15 6 1 50
so in the end we get something like this:
Parallel lines : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Number of triangles 1 5 13 27 48 78 118 170 236
It is easy to observe that in table #1, the number is very similar to the result you posted, (n+1)(n+2)/2.
Therefore, the total number of triangles is the SUM from 0 to n, this agrees with your reasoning.
S(i=0,i=n) (i+1)(i+2)/2 = (n3 + 6n2 + 11n + 6)/6
now what you miss was to take the upside down triangles:
to achieve this we calculate the succesive differences of each term of the new B serie
Difference: 1 3 7 13 22 34 50 70 95 1ª 2 4 6 9 12 16 20 25 2ª 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 3ª 0 1 0 1 0 1
generalizing:
3rd difference = (1+(-1)n)/2
2nd difference = 2 + S(i=0,i=n-1) 3rd difference = (2n+5-(-1)n)/4
1st difference = 2 + S(i=0,i=n-1) 2nd difference = (2n2 + 8n+ 7 + (-1)n)/8
thus
Total Number of upside down triangles is
1 + S(i=0,i=n-1) 1st difference = [(4n3 + 18n2 + 20n +3)/48] - [(-1)n/16]
and finally we add the standing up triangles with the upside down triangles to achieve the number of all triangles:
[4n3 + 22n2 +36n + 17 - (-1)n]/16
which is the correct answer
Please let me know if you have any questions
|
Found these math problems on google: enjoy 1. One day, a person went to horse racing area, Instead of counting the number of human and horses, he instead counted 74 heads and 196 legs. Yet he knew the number of humans and horses there. How did he do it, and how many humans and horses are there?
2. y = log x If y = 10, then what is x?
3. 10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 10! Can this be true?! Why or why not?
4. If 1/2x +1/2(1/2x + 1/2(1/2x +1/2(1/2x + ... = y, then x = ?
5. What place in this world can have their temperatures Fahrenheit and Celsius equal?
|
haha these topics are awesome!
|
Here's another one:
the numbers are the lenght of the hexagon's sides. Find the radius of the circle
|
On June 18 2005 21:05 decafchicken wrote: Found these math problems on google: enjoy 1. One day, a person went to horse racing area, Instead of counting the number of human and horses, he instead counted 74 heads and 196 legs. Yet he knew the number of humans and horses there. How did he do it, and how many humans and horses are there?
2. y = log x If y = 10, then what is x?
3. 10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 10! Can this be true?! Why or why not?
4. If 1/2x +1/2(1/2x + 1/2(1/2x +1/2(1/2x + ... = y, then x = ?
5. What place in this world can have their temperatures Fahrenheit and Celsius equal?
1 is easy let x be men, y be horse number x+y=74 2x+4y=196 solve
2. um... Y=LogX, 10^X=Y, 10^X=10, x is 1.
3. Corse it's true, by definition 10!=10*9*8*...*1
4. Well I see a lot of printhesis, but what is in the final printhesis? the printhesis never closed, it could be .5X+X^100 in the most inner one, need to clearify plz.
5. If im correctly guessing that C=5/9F - 32 and C=F so F=5/9F-32, F=-72 So both F and C are equal temperature at -72o
edit, formula wrong... F=9/5C + 32, solution is -40. mybad
|
On June 18 2005 21:05 decafchicken wrote: Found these math problems on google: enjoy 1. One day, a person went to horse racing area, Instead of counting the number of human and horses, he instead counted 74 heads and 196 legs. Yet he knew the number of humans and horses there. How did he do it, and how many humans and horses are there?
2. y = log x If y = 10, then what is x?
3. 10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 10! Can this be true?! Why or why not?
4. If 1/2x +1/2(1/2x + 1/2(1/2x +1/2(1/2x + ... = y, then x = ?
5. What place in this world can have their temperatures Fahrenheit and Celsius equal?
1. 74 heads 196 legs
let A = Humans , B = Horses
A + B = 74 2A + 4B = 196
2B = 48 -> B = 24 -> A = 50
50 Humans, 24 Horses
2. 1
3. yes
4. I don't understand the problem
5. The poles. -40ºC = -40ºF
|
Let's assume that HM = Human and HR = Horse 1) HM + HR = 74 2HM + 4HR = 196 (2HM + 4HR) - (2 HM + 2HR) = 196 - 148 2HR = 48 HR = 24 HM + (24) = 74 HM = 74 - 24 HM = 50
So, the solution is 24 horses and 50 humans. 2) y = log x 10 = log x 10 = 10^x x = 1 3) Yes!!! The expression "x!" means x(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)...1 So 10! means 10(10-1)(10-2)(10-3)(10-4)(10-5)(10-6)(10-7)(10-8)(10-9)= 10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1=10!, which means it is correct. 4) 1/2x +1/2(1/2x + 1/2(1/2x +1/2(1/2x + ... = y If x = 1, then the equation likes this: 1/2 +1/2(1/2 + 1/2(1/2 +1/2(1/2 + ... = y 1/2 +1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32 + ... = y y = 1 = x y = x 5) F = 1.8C + 32 x = 1.8x + 32 x - 1.8x = 1.8x + 32 - 1.8x -0.8x = 32 -8x = 320 -x = 40 x = -40 The only place that might be -40 degrees cold must be Anartica.
Those are the answers.
|
On June 18 2005 21:24 lightman wrote:Here's another one: the numbers are the lenght of the hexagon's sides. Find the radius of the circle
11, 2, 7, are all chord of a sector. C=chord, R=Radius, A=angle of a sector A=2sin-1(C/2R) plug in A1=2sin-1(11/2R) A2=2sin-1(7/2R) A3=2sin-1(2/2R) 2A1+2A2+2A3=2pie Solve all that junk, R=7 edit: copied the formula wrong. there we go... edit2: here's the picture which I worked on
|
|
|
On June 18 2005 21:38 Sorrow_eyes wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2005 21:05 decafchicken wrote: Found these math problems on google: enjoy 1. One day, a person went to horse racing area, Instead of counting the number of human and horses, he instead counted 74 heads and 196 legs. Yet he knew the number of humans and horses there. How did he do it, and how many humans and horses are there?
2. y = log x If y = 10, then what is x?
3. 10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 10! Can this be true?! Why or why not?
4. If 1/2x +1/2(1/2x + 1/2(1/2x +1/2(1/2x + ... = y, then x = ?
5. What place in this world can have their temperatures Fahrenheit and Celsius equal? 1 is easy let x be men, y be horse number x+y=74 2x+4y=196 solve 2. um... Y=LogX, 10^X=Y, 10^X=10, x is 1.
Maybe you're mistaken or im dumb if y = log x, then x = 10^y, not the other way around, rite? so x = 10^10?
|
for number 3, the right side is infinite, so we can say If 1/2x +1/2(1/2x + 1/2(1/2x +1/2(1/2x + ... = y => (y - 1/2x) * 2 = 1/2x +1/2(1/2x + 1/2(1/2x +1/2(1/2x + ... = y again => (y - 1/2x)* 2 = y => y = x
|
I dont know if this has been posted but my ex asked me this.
A= sinx B = n C = 6
Prove:
A/B = C
For n can be any real or imaginary number...
|
On June 18 2005 23:21 bangchucaibang wrote: Maybe you're mistaken or im dumb if y = log x, then x = 10^y, not the other way around, rite? so x = 10^10? Yeah, I don't know what's with the x=1. if x=1, logx=lnx/ln10=ln1/ln10=0 0=/=10 as far as I know...
|
A/B = sinx/n if x=0, sinx=0, A/B=0 0=/=6 as far as I know... Where am I wrong? (that is: is there any relation between sinx and n you forgot to mention?)
edit: Ok, that was lame...
|
Here's mine, it's more of a logical problem (and I hope it's understandable):
In this political party, clubs/groups were formed. -None of them involve the entire party. -If we take randomly two members, there is always one club to which the both of them belong. -A member belongs at most to two clubs.
How many clubs is there at most? At least? edit: I think I just solved it, and it's not really interesting in the end. if you haven't got too much time on your hands, don't bother.
|
On June 18 2005 23:21 bangchucaibang wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2005 21:38 Sorrow_eyes wrote:On June 18 2005 21:05 decafchicken wrote: Found these math problems on google: enjoy 1. One day, a person went to horse racing area, Instead of counting the number of human and horses, he instead counted 74 heads and 196 legs. Yet he knew the number of humans and horses there. How did he do it, and how many humans and horses are there?
2. y = log x If y = 10, then what is x?
3. 10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1 = 10! Can this be true?! Why or why not?
4. If 1/2x +1/2(1/2x + 1/2(1/2x +1/2(1/2x + ... = y, then x = ?
5. What place in this world can have their temperatures Fahrenheit and Celsius equal? 1 is easy let x be men, y be horse number x+y=74 2x+4y=196 solve 2. um... Y=LogX, 10^X=Y, 10^X=10, x is 1. Maybe you're mistaken or im dumb if y = log x, then x = 10^y, not the other way around, rite? so x = 10^10?
hehe i was a moron
|
On June 19 2005 05:20 fearus wrote: I dont know if this has been posted but my ex asked me this.
A= sinx B = n C = 6
Prove:
A/B = C
For n can be any real or imaginary number...
So long as n is not zero,
(s*i*n*x) / n = (s*i*x)*n/ n = six.
Cute. (The trick is that sinx is four variables, not the sine function).
|
Belgium6772 Posts
Anybody care to try this?
34 - ? 24 - 10 16 - 7 8 - 5 4 - ?
A hint is that you have to think logical, not mathematical  Oh and english is the language you should use for this ...
|
|
yeah, what the fuck is that
|
Maybe some kind of relation ?? WTF
Great topic btw
|
Twenty-four has 10 letters.
Sixteen has 7 letters.
Eight has 5 letters.
"English is the language you should use for this" gave it away.
|
If I took the right angle:
34 - 10 24 - 10 16 - 7 8 - 5 4 - 4
|
Here's another problem that I like:
Four bugs (let's call them A, B, C, and D) occupy the corners of a square 10 inches on each side (A has the upper left, B has the upper right, C has the lower right, and D has the lower left). Simultaneously A crawls towards B, B towards C, C towards D, and D towards A. Assuming that all four crawl at the same constant rate, how far will each travel before they meet?
|
Another gem:
Consider the cuadratric equation ax2 -bx + c, with a,b,c natural numbers. Its roots are two real numberts between 0 and 1.
Proove that a is greater or equal than 5 and b is equal or greater then 5.
|
Must the two roots be distinct? If not, a = 4, b = 4, c = 1 will yield an equation with a double root of x = 0.5, for 4x^2 - 4x + 1 = (2x - 1)(2x - 1)
|
Belgium9947 Posts
On June 18 2005 05:12 BigBalls wrote: lordofdabu is right
zero is an integer, youre thinking of natural numbers malmis
zero is a natural number
|
Belgium6772 Posts
Gj lordofdabu
Guess that hint was a bit too much eh? =) Some people get it right away others dont
Took me very long --;;
|
Belgium6772 Posts
Here's another one btw;
1 3 11 67
|
On June 19 2005 13:57 RaGe-xG- wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2005 05:12 BigBalls wrote: lordofdabu is right
zero is an integer, youre thinking of natural numbers malmis zero is a natural number
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NaturalNumber.html
america doesnt include it (or at least every teacher and professor ive ever had doesnt), belgium might
|
On June 19 2005 13:57 LordOfDabu wrote: Must the two roots be distinct? If not, a = 4, b = 4, c = 1 will yield an equation with a double root of x = 0.5, for 4x^2 - 4x + 1 = (2x - 1)(2x - 1)
further, are the roots between 0 and 1 inclusive? cause if so, 1,2,1 yields 1,1 as roots
|
On June 19 2005 14:02 BigBalls wrote:Show nested quote +On June 19 2005 13:57 RaGe-xG- wrote:On June 18 2005 05:12 BigBalls wrote: lordofdabu is right
zero is an integer, youre thinking of natural numbers malmis zero is a natural number http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NaturalNumber.htmlamerica doesnt include it (or at least every teacher and professor ive ever had doesnt), belgium might
America is not a country
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
On June 18 2005 20:57 lightman wrote: (....) Please let me know if you have any questions Hmmmm I think we're not answering the same question, now coming back to your initial post, I guess I misunderstood you. The solution I gave is the total number of triangles of side p*L/n when you divide with (n-1) parallel lines, while you were only asking the total number of triangles. You can check pretty easily that my solution is correct and I think the problem I solved was harder than what you asked
|
Bill307
Canada9103 Posts
Here's a fairly easy one that doesn't involve any heavy calculations, just some good thinking and knowledge of the pythagorean theorem at the least. It introduces an idea that some people might find interesting . I'll try to explain it in pre-post-secondary education terms so that more people can understand it.
On the planet Thassux, the natives have a peculiar way of expressing coordinates in two dimensions. Here on Earth, we frequently refer to points using cartesian coordinates, e.g. on a 2D graph, the point (5, 9) is 5 units to the right and 9 units up from the origin. On the planet Thassux, the point {5, 9} -- they like to use curly braces because they are harder to write -- is 5 units to the right and 9 units in an up+right direction at a 45 degree angle, again from the origin. Example: the point {1, 1} would translate to (1 + 1/sqrt(2), 1/sqrt(2)) in our coordinate system.
Question: On the planet Thassux, given two points {a, b} and {c, d}, what is the distance between them? Recall that on Earth, the distance between two points (a, b) and (c, d) is given by the square root of (a - b)^2 + (c - d)^2. You can leave your answer in terms of binomials like "(a - c)": it doesn't get any simpler if you expand them out.
Also, for people interested in more of a challenge, try going in the opposite direction: as you have seen, the formula on the planet Thassux is not particularly elegant. However, on the planet Mophux, the distance from a point {x, y} to the origin {0, 0} is given by the square root of x^2 + xy + y^2. Assuming that, like Thassux and Earth, the first coordinate is how many units you must move "to the right", describe how the coordinate system may work on Mophux. If you want, you can also come up with other solutions that ignore this assumption, which would be cool .
|
wow this thread rocks and that is correct America is not a country,IS A CONTINENT AND YES
I recon that zero is a natural number too
|
America isn't a continent unless you add an adjective.
For Bill's first question: sqrt( ( ( (sqrt2)b/2 + a) - ( (sqrt2)d/2 + c) ) )squared + ( (sqrt2)b/2 - (sqrt2)d/2) )squared)
I hope.
|
On June 19 2005 13:10 LordOfDabu wrote: Here's another problem that I like:
Four bugs (let's call them A, B, C, and D) occupy the corners of a square 10 inches on each side (A has the upper left, B has the upper right, C has the lower right, and D has the lower left). Simultaneously A crawls towards B, B towards C, C towards D, and D towards A. Assuming that all four crawl at the same constant rate, how far will each travel before they meet?
10 inchese ofcorse
and yeah, this one is classic, my dad told me this.
|
On June 19 2005 21:36 Sorrow_eyes wrote:Show nested quote +On June 19 2005 13:10 LordOfDabu wrote: Here's another problem that I like:
Four bugs (let's call them A, B, C, and D) occupy the corners of a square 10 inches on each side (A has the upper left, B has the upper right, C has the lower right, and D has the lower left). Simultaneously A crawls towards B, B towards C, C towards D, and D towards A. Assuming that all four crawl at the same constant rate, how far will each travel before they meet? 10 inchese ofcorse and yeah, this one is classic, my dad told me this.
Wouldn't they never meet? they are all moving the same distance in the same amount of time all moving in a Clockwise Position.
EDIT: Sorry i was just reading the question wrong.
|
They will spiral towards the center of the square.
|
Im sorry i just cant help it, america IS A CONTINENT, that name comes from the explorer Americo Vespucio, who named it when they discovered it wasnt actually the Indias, and forgive me but USA is USA, America is all this part of the globe from Canada to Argentina, including the Caribbean and such but nowdays most people refer to America = USA which is not true and is a mistake P.S im not flamming the US and no i dont hate the US and such so dont misunderstand my post
|
On June 19 2005 22:12 LordOfDabu wrote: They will spiral towards the center of the square.
pm me w/ ur Email addr for a UMS map on it :D
|
On June 19 2005 23:18 PaeZ wrote: Im sorry i just cant help it, america IS A CONTINENT, that name comes from the explorer Americo Vespucio, who named it when they discovered it wasnt actually the Indias, and forgive me but USA is USA, America is all this part of the globe from Canada to Argentina, including the Caribbean and such but nowdays most people refer to America = USA which is not true and is a mistake P.S im not flamming the US and no i dont hate the US and such so dont misunderstand my post
I totally agree with him, you cant argue that guys, imsorry, hes right... ^_^
|
On June 19 2005 14:02 BigBalls wrote:Show nested quote +On June 19 2005 13:57 RaGe-xG- wrote:On June 18 2005 05:12 BigBalls wrote: lordofdabu is right
zero is an integer, youre thinking of natural numbers malmis zero is a natural number http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NaturalNumber.htmlamerica doesnt include it (or at least every teacher and professor ive ever had doesnt), belgium might
Looked it up in a dictionary ( www.ne.se ). Apparently, 0 was not counted as a Natural number in the past. However nowadays counts as one.
|
big N with a doube vertical bar : Natural numbers 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9...
N* same without zero
Big Z relative numbers ... -6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 ...
Z* same without zero , Z+ =N , Z- = Z\{N*}
Anyway * means remove zero, + means keep only positive ones, - negatives ones.
Big Q those which can be written as a/b (a,b) in ZxZ* , they have a simplified form p/q where q is in N*, p in Z and GCD(p,q) = 1 , grand common divider
D decimal numers , one fuck of a useless thing, those who can be written as Sum(k=1..n, A(k)/10^k) n is finiteand 0<=A(k)<=9 and A(k) is in N
R Real numbers ... they verify that any part X of R that verify : there is M such as for any x in X we have |X| < M and so there is a "inf" (borne inférieure in french) Also we have the included segments axioma : For any sequence of segments In such as In+1 is in In the intersection of all In as n->infinity is definied and non-null
if the lenght of the segments tend to zero the limit is singleton
C complex numbers : using i the square root of -1 we generate the maginay part of C i think it very beautifull to see C as surface. z is in C only if it can be written as z=a+ib with a and b in R.
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
On June 19 2005 20:06 Bill307 wrote: Question: On the planet Thassux, given two points {a, b} and {c, d}, what is the distance between them? Recall that on Earth, the distance between two points (a, b) and (c, d) is given by the square root of (a - b)^2 + (c - d)^2. You can leave your answer in terms of binomials like "(a - c)": it doesn't get any simpler if you expand them out. d² = (a-c)² + (b-d)² + sqrt(2) (a-c) (b-d)
On June 19 2005 20:06 Bill307 wrote:Also, for people interested in more of a challenge, try going in the opposite direction: as you have seen, the formula on the planet Thassux is not particularly elegant. However, on the planet Mophux, the distance from a point {x, y} to the origin {0, 0} is given by the square root of x^2 + xy + y^2. Assuming that, like Thassux and Earth, the first coordinate is how many units you must move "to the right", describe how the coordinate system may work on Mophux. If you want, you can also come up with other solutions that ignore this assumption, which would be cool  . With the assumption, second coordinate is 1/2 unit to the right, sqrt(3)/2 up
Without it, it's funnier, the family of solutions can be described like this : Let a and b be 2 arbitrary numbers with the following relation : a - b = +/- pi/3 + 2 k pi (with k an integer) Let u1 = cos a, u2 = sin a, v1 = cos b, v2 = sin b. All coordinate systems on Mophux are of the form : u1 to the right and u2 to the top for the first coordinate, v1 to the right and v2 to the top for the second coordinate.
|
On June 19 2005 23:27 loloko2 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 19 2005 23:18 PaeZ wrote: Im sorry i just cant help it, america IS A CONTINENT, that name comes from the explorer Americo Vespucio, who named it when they discovered it wasnt actually the Indias, and forgive me but USA is USA, America is all this part of the globe from Canada to Argentina, including the Caribbean and such but nowdays most people refer to America = USA which is not true and is a mistake P.S im not flamming the US and no i dont hate the US and such so dont misunderstand my post
I totally agree with him, you cant argue that guys, imsorry, hes right... ^_^
K. First of all let's review all our history lessons.
The name of our country is United States of AMERICA. Right?
What the name of your country PaeZ and loloko2 ? It's Estados Unidos de Mexico or Estados Unidos Mexicanos, right ?
When us americans (US citizens) refer to our country as America it's because the word America is within the name of our country right ? That is the reason why Bigballs says "America...."
Same way, when you refer to your country, you do it as Mexico right ? That's why you say "Mexico ..."
Don't be stupid and come up with all that Vespucio stuff.
|
North America is a continent.
South America is a continent.
And on the natural numbers debate, I was taught that natural numbers are 0,1,2,3..... and counting numbers are 1,2,3,4....
|
On June 20 2005 10:22 lightman wrote:Show nested quote +On June 19 2005 23:27 loloko2 wrote:On June 19 2005 23:18 PaeZ wrote: Im sorry i just cant help it, america IS A CONTINENT, that name comes from the explorer Americo Vespucio, who named it when they discovered it wasnt actually the Indias, and forgive me but USA is USA, America is all this part of the globe from Canada to Argentina, including the Caribbean and such but nowdays most people refer to America = USA which is not true and is a mistake P.S im not flamming the US and no i dont hate the US and such so dont misunderstand my post
I totally agree with him, you cant argue that guys, imsorry, hes right... ^_^ Don't be stupid and come up with all that Vespucio stuff.
He didn't come up with the "Vespucio stuff", it's true.
|
Amerigo Vespucci
Vespucci was an explorer, a cartographer named the continent (at the time, it was not determined they were two continents) America after Vespucci's first name. Vespucci didn't name anything.
The correct way to refer to both North and South America together is "the Americas."
|
 math puzzle guys, not history
|
I know America is named because of Vespucio. The world has five continents which are Europe, Asia, Oceania, Africa and America (plus Artic and Antartic regions). But there is no such thing as the North American continent, South American continent, Middle East Continent, Eastern Europe, or South Africa continent. Those are regions.
My point is to the Argentinian and Mexican fellows that became pissed because BigBalls referred to the US they way we normally do. Comodity purpuses that's all. Want another example ?: "God Bless United States of America" turns into -> "God bless America". That is, us US Citizens call our country "America" because it's part of our name, United States of America, not because we think our country is the entire continent. You should agree with me, some people, we, even call it "the states". When we refer to USA as "America" or "the states", we are talking about our country, we're not referring to the whole world or anything like that. It's just a mere coincidence.
Just as I stated earlier, the official name for Mexico is United States of Mexico, and mexicans refer to their country as "Mexico". Also for your information, there is another case in our continent: Venezuela's Official name (a southamerican country) for more than one hundred years used to be United States of Venezuela, until the mid 1950s if I am not mistaking, and I am pretty sure that they referred to their country as Venezuela.
The correct way to refer to both North and South America together is "the Americas" or as plain and simple as "the continent America".
Oh and returning to the previous argument 0 is not a natural number. Anyway, I think it's not like we are going to change the world with any of these arguments.
|
Back to our interesting and nice thread. Here's a hard one:
Let n be a natural number. A cube with an arist of lenght n can be divided into 1996 cubes which arists are also natural numbers. Find the minor possible value of n.
|
Okay, no trick in this one it's just one hell of a funny calculus :
/ PI | | ln(a+b*cos(t)) dt / 0
a pure answer is usless, the method is interesting :p
Another one (easy)
let T be a regular tetrahedron (? four equilateral triangulars faces, right) and M inside T [interior to T] Proove that the sum of the distances from M to T's faces is a constant not depending of the position of the point M (all heavy(carthesians) methods are not welcomed
|
'snooker' table (measuring 8 metres by 4m) with 4 'pockets' (measuring 0.5m and placed at diagonal slants in all 4 corners) contains 10 balls (each with a diameter of 0.25m) placed at the following coords: 2m,1m...(white ball) ...and red balls... 1m,5m... 2m,5m... 3m,5m 1m,6m... 2m,6m... 3m,6m 1m,7m... 2m,7m... 3m,7m
The white ball is then shot at a random angle from 0 to 360 degrees. Just to make it clear, a ball is 'potted' if at least half of the ball is in area of the 'pocket'
Assuming the balls travel indefinitely (i.e. no loss of energy via friction, air resistance or collisions), answer the following:
a: What exact angle should you choose to ensure that all the balls are potted the quickest? b: What is the minimum amount of contacts the balls can make with each other before they are all knocked in? c: Same as b, except that each ball - just before it is knocked in - must not have hit the white ball on its previous contact (must be a red instead of course). d: What proportion of angles will leave the white ball the last on the table to be potted?
The diagram for the probelm can be found here:http://www.skytopia.com/project/imath/imath.html#13
|
Here is a good one:
In the diagram, two circles are tangent to each other at point B. A straight line is drawn through B cutting the two circles at A and C, as shown. Tangent lines are drawn to the circles at A and C. Prove that these two tangent lines are parallel.
|
On June 19 2005 23:24 Sorrow_eyes wrote:
pm me w/ ur Email addr for a UMS map on it :D
After sending my PM with my request, I was asked to save and host a replay of the map's demonstration.
Those interested can find the replay here: http://s40.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2GE3ENU8Q0USI2H3OX6WF12I0G
The demonstration is not perfect due to the rate at which Staredit goes through the triggers, but it is sufficient for grasping exactly what is going on.
|
|
Bill307
Canada9103 Posts
On June 20 2005 07:29 Catyoul wrote: d² = (a-c)² + (b-d)² + sqrt(2) (a-c) (b-d)
Wow, I need to spend more time in this topic. The first time I worked out the answer to my own question I got it wrong . So I guess the formula on the planet Thassux isn't so bad after all. And yes, that is the correct answer .
On June 20 2005 07:29 Catyoul wrote: With the assumption, second coordinate is 1/2 unit to the right, sqrt(3)/2 up
Without it, it's funnier, the family of solutions can be described like this : Let a and b be 2 arbitrary numbers with the following relation : a - b = +/- pi/3 + 2 k pi (with k an integer) Let u1 = cos a, u2 = sin a, v1 = cos b, v2 = sin b. All coordinate systems on Mophux are of the form : u1 to the right and u2 to the top for the first coordinate, v1 to the right and v2 to the top for the second coordinate.
With the assumption you are correct: the second coordinate is angled at 60 degrees (pi/3) up from the x-axis. My friend actually worked this out in the "forwards" direction a few months ago, which is what gave me the idea for this question.
(ok, I'm gonna move into some linear algebra terms now )
The last result is also interesting. I haven't actually tried to do it myself yet so I'll just take your word for it . I guess it means that so long as the angle between the two basis vectors is 60 degrees (pi/3), the formula will come out like that.
I wonder if the formula is always of the form a^2 + xab + b^2 ... ... ... and after working it out, I see that in general, the formula is:
a^2 + b^2 + 2 (cos theta) ab = a^2 + b^2 + 2 a.b [dot product] dot product makes sense because a and b are really just lengths of vectors, and the angle between them is the angle between the two basis vectors
And of course it doesn't matter what the actual directions of the basis vectors are, since the distance will be the same in any case . Therefore, this will come out to a^2 + b^2 + ab whenever the cosine of the angle between the vectors is 0.5 . Which is precisely at +/- pi/3 + 2 k pi, which is what you said. Therefore, your final answer is also correct .
Last of all, this distance stuff reminds me of something I did in my final year of high school involving vectors, dot product, and distances. Wish I could remember what it was that I learned .
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
On June 20 2005 15:05 Cambium wrote: Here is a good one:
In the diagram, two circles are tangent to each other at point B. A straight line is drawn through B cutting the two circles at A and C, as shown. Tangent lines are drawn to the circles at A and C. Prove that these two tangent lines are parallel. It's gonna become a habit of mine to answer puzzles after parties I guess :p Tangent lines run perpendicularly to the radius at the tangent point. Let's name the centers of the circles O and O'. The triangles OBA and O'BC are isosceles (and similar btw), the angles OBA and O'BC are the same and are also the same as OAB and O'CB because the triangles are isosceles. Thus the angles between the tangent lines and the AC line are the same, proving their parallelism.
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
On June 20 2005 13:03 lightman wrote: Back to our interesting and nice thread. Here's a hard one:
Let n be a natural number. A cube with an arist of lenght n can be divided into 1996 cubes which arists are also natural numbers. Find the minor possible value of n. Hmmmmmmmm The smaller cubes all have an arist of at least 1, which also means a minimum volume of 1 per cube, thus a minimum volume of 1996 for our big cube. The smallest cube that can contain 1996 is with n=13, making a 2197 volume cube. We're still 201 too big if filled only with arist 1 cubes, so we'll replace some with bigger ones. If we replace a cube of arist 1 with a cube of arist 2, we increase the volume by 8-1=7 If we replace a cube of arist 1 with a cube of arist 3, we increase the volume by 27-1=26 If we replace a cube of arist 1 with a cube of arist 3, we increase the volume by 64-1=63 If we replace a cube of arist 1 with a cube of arist 4, we increase the volume by 125-1=124 With one cube of arist 4, one of arist 3 and two of arist 2, we've got our count of 201 and we've proved that n=13 is possible. Since it's also the smallest possible, it's the one we were looking for.
|
On June 20 2005 15:05 Cambium wrote:Here is a good one: In the diagram, two circles are tangent to each other at point B. A straight line is drawn through B cutting the two circles at A and C, as shown. Tangent lines are drawn to the circles at A and C. Prove that these two tangent lines are parallel.
easyly : by drawing angles we get the answer :
|
|
|
|