EPTHerman Cain - Page 7
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Offhand
United States1869 Posts
| ||
|
BioNova
United States598 Posts
Sarah Palin is a rare bird(being nice, had my coffee!!), but may actually be thinking rational for a change. See Rick Perry's support before he had to get on TV and debate, now look at it. Palin waiting to enter, and lessening her exposure to questions may be the genius move of this election, unless she chooses Christine O'Donnell as her running mate. Then again, if announced on halloween in some sexy witch outfits, we would be back in the genius pile again. Confusing | ||
|
Flamingo777
United States1190 Posts
On October 03 2011 13:53 Signet wrote: Gallup is a pretty well-respected polling organization. Also when I click the link I see Cain having the highest positive intensity, followed by Perry, Giuliani, Romney, and then Palin 5th. It's so early to really say how Cain's numbers will hold up - just weeks ago Republicans appeared ready to nominate Perry, now his stock is falling. Who knows what will happen with Cain. One thing's for sure, Romney is holding steady. He may simply outlast all of the other candidates. Might have interpreted the graph wrong. T__T Assumed the graph would show numbers moving upward in an ascending fashion. | ||
|
Signet
United States1718 Posts
On October 04 2011 00:03 Flamingo777 wrote: Might have interpreted the graph wrong. T__T Assumed the graph would show numbers moving upward in an ascending fashion. Ah ha. Yeah they had it so up-down was name recognition (Palin is highest there), left-right was "positive intensity." | ||
|
Kaitlin
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
LXR
357 Posts
| ||
|
MERLIN.
Canada546 Posts
Anyone else read this??? Are you implying he doesn't support abortion/homosexuals and you (republicans since you generalized your position) are all supporting that? Its 2011 grow the fuck up, seems like all these nominations we're born ass backwards and forgot to live in the time, and that time is equality... Or atleast humanitys best attempt thus far. Obama might not be doing the best job, but with what he was thrown into atleast it isn't complelty gone, all of these runners need to be replaced with an iq above their combined total (that's above 100 I'd guess) | ||
|
ZeaLL
Canada53 Posts
On October 04 2011 04:17 MERLIN. wrote: "Cain sux b/c he duzznt sepport teh abortionz our teh homoshecks." You are right, and we like it that way. Anyone else read this??? Are you implying he doesn't support abortion/homosexuals and you (republicans since you generalized your position) are all supporting that? Its 2011 grow the fuck up, seems like all these nominations we're born ass backwards and forgot to live in the time, and that time is equality... Or atleast humanitys best attempt thus far. Obama might not be doing the best job, but with what he was thrown into atleast it isn't complelty gone, all of these runners need to be replaced with an iq above their combined total (that's above 100 I'd guess) If you weren't an uneducated dolt you'd realize he didn't imply that at all. He said that Cain doesn't give a rat's ass RIGHTFULLY it is not the job of the president elect to dabble in these matters as they are to be handled on a State level. When the entire global economy is on the verge of collapse and we are still debating inane things like abortion and gay marriage on a federal level I weep for the future. That's the OPs point and clearly you missed it due to your bipartisan, emotional and uneducated opinions. User was warned for this post | ||
|
MERLIN.
Canada546 Posts
On October 04 2011 05:34 ZeaLL wrote: If you weren't an uneducated dolt you'd realize he didn't imply that at all. He said that Cain doesn't give a rat's ass RIGHTFULLY it is not the job of the president elect to dabble in these matters as they are to be handled on a State level. When the entire global economy is on the verge of collapse and we are still debating inane things like abortion and gay marriage on a federal level I weep for the future. That's the OPs point and clearly you missed it due to your bipartisan, emotional and uneducated opinions. IF**** That is what he was implying, then I have nothing negative to say, how I took it was simply "cain doesnt support gays, ppl who complain are right in assuming that, and we don't give a fuck about you" How did I take it that way? First he insulted anyone who would complain about someone not supporting gays, secondly he said "you are right, we don't give a fuck" and as i described above it could be seen that way. Sorry, through his attempts to "troll" people who are pro-rights by implying we all sound like imbeciles I took slight offence to that. BUT if that wasn't what he was trying to imply, then I admit I'm wrong : P. " bipartisan, emotional and uneducated opinions" It is possible, that one may take things completely differently, and with almost all of the republican cand. thus far stating slurs/things against gay people (Ms. B comes to mind) it's hard to be able to take a stance that isn't of great offence, but no reason to state my opinions are uneducated merely on an emotional response to a subject. And also, since you already made one wrong claim, I'm also not Bipartisan at all... I might swing right on 1 or 2 VERY small occasions, but I don't leave the left corner to often. So please, don't bash my post when obviously it wasn't just some random troll, you could see how that could be seen differently. | ||
|
Alay
United States660 Posts
On October 04 2011 05:34 ZeaLL wrote: If you weren't an uneducated dolt you'd realize he didn't imply that at all. He said that Cain doesn't give a rat's ass RIGHTFULLY it is not the job of the president elect to dabble in these matters as they are to be handled on a State level. When the entire global economy is on the verge of collapse and we are still debating inane things like abortion and gay marriage on a federal level I weep for the future. That's the OPs point and clearly you missed it due to your bipartisan, emotional and uneducated opinions. Actually, those are federal issues and need to be dealt with on a country-wide level. The economy is a problem, but freedoms don't take a backseat just because of financial issues. Both their economic strategy and their rights values are very important matters in my vote. | ||
|
Samoan Wing
15 Posts
| ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On October 04 2011 05:34 ZeaLL wrote: If you weren't an uneducated dolt you'd realize he didn't imply that at all. He said that Cain doesn't give a rat's ass RIGHTFULLY it is not the job of the president elect to dabble in these matters as they are to be handled on a State level. When the entire global economy is on the verge of collapse and we are still debating inane things like abortion and gay marriage on a federal level I weep for the future. That's the OPs point and clearly you missed it due to your bipartisan, emotional and uneducated opinions. User was warned for this post you think the economy is more important than human rights? really? also you're last sentence is so ironic it hurts ;/ | ||
|
Uranium
United States1077 Posts
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Herman_Cain&oldid=453307928#Controversial_remarks | ||
|
Valashu
Netherlands561 Posts
| ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On October 14 2011 08:29 Uranium wrote: I'd just like to point out that *someone* edited out the "Controversial Remarks" section of his wikipedia page. If you want to read them, here's the old version: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Herman_Cain&oldid=453307928#Controversial_remarks Rick Santorum has a section like that on Wikipedia, why on earth doesn't Cain have one? | ||
|
hoganftw
United States32 Posts
He's already been caught in a web of lies, much like Obama was caught flip-flopping long before he ever was president. Of course, the public at that point have already been sold on the idea that he already won the election. He's against Muslims, he's afraid to audit the Fed, his 9-9-9 tax plan is ludicrous, doesn't want to end the wars we are currently in, and he wants to pick a fight with Iran. If he becomes the Republican Nominee/President, I'm moving to Sweden or Switzerland or somethin' | ||
|
sunprince
United States2258 Posts
On October 14 2011 08:05 turdburgler wrote: you think the economy is more important than human rights? You do need an economy to pay for things like protecting human rights. While in general, human rights > economy, there's a minimum threshold for both. | ||
|
scaban84
United States1080 Posts
I don't think his "controversial remarks" are of any significance, he just stated the obvious about the Muslim religion. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On October 14 2011 09:11 sunprince wrote: You do need an economy to pay for things like protecting human rights. While in general, human rights > economy, there's a minimum threshold for both. if you value you the human rights, no one needs protecting | ||
|
QuXn
Germany71 Posts
if u really want to compare h.cain, mr.666, to ron paul watch the video! btw. the most conservative voters there are just gave dr. ron paul 37% of their votes... | ||
| ||
